Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ignite Memories
Feb 27, 2005

Look at it this way: It's not happening right away, but there has been a definite shift in that direction. If it continues, and Texas eventually goes blue, it's going to be a hell of a lot more difficult for republican presidencies to happen. Like, ever again.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jerry Manderbilt
May 31, 2012

No matter how much paperwork I process, it never goes away. It only increases.

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Wow the Central Valley is not as republican as it seems apparently.

Yeah from that map, the San Joaquin Valley's GOP strongholds were suburban Fresno/Clovis and Tulare/Kern Counties. Obama won San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Merced counties (and I think Fresno County too). It's a far cry from when Bush swept the valley in 2004 and nearly won Sacramento County.

Slate Action
Feb 13, 2012

by exmarx

Cubey posted:

In addition to the unskewed polls guy, I seem to remember other, more nationally recognized polls like Gallup that had the race as being too close to call, if not slightly in Romney's favor.

At one point in October 2012, Gallup had Romney up by seven points.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Slate Action posted:

At one point in October 2012, Gallup had Romney up by seven points.

If that was right after the first debate that's right about what D&D had too.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

computer parts posted:

If that was right after the first debate that's right about what D&D had too.

Yeah there was a brief period there where R-money probably was legit ahead.

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Yeah there was a brief period there where R-money probably was legit ahead.

Eh, on the same day the SCOTUS upheld the ACA the EU took actions to stabilize Greece, and at that point with the two major factors off the table (the ACA and the economy crashing) Silver had Obama ahead and never looked back

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007


Chick Fil A goers sing God Bless America

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF00qCIGe04

Mo_Steel
Mar 7, 2008

Let's Clock Into The Sunset Together

Fun Shoe

I didn't know they catered. Wonder if they'd provide food for a special wedding reception... :unsmigghh:

Arguably smart of them though; good publicity right there.

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

What kind of monster gives people cold Chick-Fil-A? That's not thanks at all.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

Gyges posted:

What kind of monster gives people cold Chick-Fil-A? That's not thanks at all.

Some people like it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYIUuyoSVAs

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005


Terrible food for terrible people - fitting, really.

Grey Fox
Jan 5, 2004

ThirdPartyView posted:

Terrible food for terrible people - fitting, really.
You're half-right!

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Grey Fox posted:

You're half-right!

Tea Partiers are not terrible people? :stare:

Good Citizen
Aug 12, 2008

trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump

ThirdPartyView posted:

Tea Partiers are not terrible people? :stare:

They just love freedom and the constitution and tricorner hats. What's wrong with that?

lamentable dustman
Apr 13, 2007

ðŸÂ†ðŸÂ†ðŸÂ†


Disappointing that they would server some Georgia food at a SC event. I mean, they could of got Maurice's BBQ to cater if they wanted a freedom loving organization to do it.

Wasn't there an article a few months ago about how Republican staffers in DC were loving sick of eating CFL every meal?

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

lamentable dustman posted:

Disappointing that they would server some Georgia food at a SC event. I mean, they could of got Maurice's BBQ to cater if they wanted a freedom loving organization to do it.

Wasn't there an article a few months ago about how Republican staffers in DC were loving sick of eating CFL every meal?

Not just staffers. The chairmaaaaaaaaaaan is tired of it too.

AndNowMax
Sep 25, 2009

Fighting the fight for *mumble* *mumble*
Governor Carcetti recently hired a national political director. Does this count as a "campaign activity," where he now has to file his 2016 paperwork in the next 15 days?

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005


quote:

Burke used to run a second franchise in Alexandria, Virginia, the one that caters Graham's birthday parties. "Lindsey," as he calls him, would send Burke a photo with a note as a thank-you, and Burke would respond with a gift of his own—a mug or other Chick-fil-A trinket as a birthday gift for the senator. Sadly, Burke says, the two have never met, but based on their correspondence, he believes they are "kindred spirits." "I don't know if we ever met that we'd be best friends, or anything like that," Burke says. "But if he needed a good chicken sandwich, I know where he can get one."

Grey Fox
Jan 5, 2004

ThirdPartyView posted:

Tea Partiers are not terrible people? :stare:
Seriouspost: Chic-Fil-A is the best chicken fast food around here by a mile. The locations are spotless, the staff are super friendly and don't seem to have had their souls crushed by management, and the food quality is consistently good.

edit: but yes I'd be sick of it too if I had it at every catered event

Grey Fox fucked around with this message at 18:52 on May 9, 2015

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

It's breaded chicken with a pickle on a bun.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
Donald Trump is proposing a 35% import tariff on all goods. Somehow he's managed to come up with policy proposals even more unlikely than his candidacy.

Then, "I wrote a book called The Art of the Deal, which I'm sure everybody in this room has read, except the people negotiating with Iran. But they're babies. They're babies!"

"Tell Tom Brady, who has twelve feet of snow in front of his house, about global warming. He can't get out!"

"I believe in clean air. I've got a ton of environmental awards."

"I love the guys of Duck Dynasty. They stay at my luxury hotels. But this did not look like the Duck Dynasty guys."

"We got illegals. We got free cars. We got no jobs."

"The lobbyists will come and see me, but I don't give a poo poo about lobbyists."

It's kind of impossible to take Trump out of context because that would assume his speech had context.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
Sanders campaign event about to kick off at Syracuse.

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


lamentable dustman posted:

Disappointing that they would server some Georgia food at a SC event. I mean, they could of got Maurice's BBQ to cater if they wanted a freedom loving organization to do it.

Wasn't there an article a few months ago about how Republican staffers in DC were loving sick of eating CFL every meal?

Nah Maurice's hasn't been at the same spot on the "Real American" list since the old racist bastard died and his heirs quickly scrubbed every ounce of confederate poo poo from the brand and all restaurants.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Joementum posted:

Donald Trump is proposing a 35% import tariff on all goods. Somehow he's managed to come up with policy proposals even more unlikely than his candidacy.

Autarky American style would be a thing to see.

Glenn Zimmerman
Apr 9, 2009

Concerned Citizen posted:

10% of Elizabeth Warren's fundraising, per Open Secrets, was from Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate. That's a fairly broad sector, and it includes much more than "the casino that destroyed the economy." And even a janitor at Goldman Sachs who sends in $5 might find himself counted as a Goldman contribution. Industry sources of donations are interesting, but I wouldn't read that much into it. PAC contributions are a more useful source to track than individual contributions as well.

1.) Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (or FIRE) was instrumental in the housing bubble that destroyed the economy. Why did you put casino in air quotes? This is fairly well established.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405

quote:

Goldman used two methods to hide the mess they were selling. First, they bundled hundreds of different mortgages into instruments called Collateralized Debt Obligations. Then they sold investors on the idea that, because a bunch of those mortgages would turn out to be OK, there was no reason to worry so much about the lovely ones: The CDO, as a whole, was sound. Thus, junk-rated mortgages were turned into AAA-rated investments. Second, to hedge its own bets, Goldman got companies like AIG to provide insurance — known as credit default swaps — on the CDOs. The swaps were essentially a racetrack bet between AIG and Goldman: Goldman is betting the ex-cons will default, AIG is betting they won't.

Insurance (specifically housing insurance) benefits from any policy that creates a housing bubble. Also future providers, yadda yadda.

2.) You only list your employment if you >$200 to a campaign. Please remember to do research before posting!

I also sincerely doubt janitors are dropping double benjamins to Hillary's campaign in significant numbers to affect the $21 million dollar total.

Also Warren's total donation was ~8%, not 10%, but hey.

3.) Did you look at the PAC contributions? You will notice a whose who of bail out receivers on it. For the record, #1 is a pro-choice group (good!) and lawyer lobby (meh).

I suppose you are technically correct in that you only said Finance but they're basically inseperable from the rest of the FIRE group when it comes to the financial crisis. I would recommend reading the whole Taibi piece if you have time.
-

Kalman posted:

"Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate" also includes bank tellers, insurance salespeople, and real estate brokers. It doesn't actually tel you that much about the viewpoint being espoused.

If a candidate had a bunch of oil company employees donating to a republican, would you think they were donating because of their view of gun control?

Campaign donations are very effective predictor of legislative behavior. When looking through the literature I found like a billion papers but this one seemed the most complete/summarized. That first paragraph is empirical false if you spend more than 5s googling the topic, but is included for completeness.

https://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=4060

quote:

Although campaign contributions are widely viewed as a corrupting influence, for decades political scientists have failed to establish a direct connection between money and legislative outcomes.

Now a new approach provides strong evidence that donations directly influence the legislative process. Using a national analysis of state legislators, Lynda Powell, a professor of political science at the University of Rochester, documents the subtle and not-so-subtle ways in which money buys influence – from setting a party's agenda, to keeping bills off the floor, to adding earmarks and crafting key language in legislation.
...
In her new book, The Influence of Campaign Contributions in State Legislatures (University of Michigan Press, 2012), Powell argues instead that the real power of money is exerted long before the roll call. "The question is, what went into these laws," says Powell. "The wording of just a sentence or two or the addition of an earmark makes all the difference to a special interest group. For other contributors, the goal may be to preserve the status quo and prevent a bill from coming to a vote at all."
...
Through formal models and statistical analysis, Powell teases out the personal, institutional and political factors that make moneyed interests increasingly powerful in some states, but not others. For example, her data shows that political money carries more weight in states with more highly compensated legislators, larger chambers, and more professionalized leadership structures. Money is also more important in states whose majority party's advantage is tightly contested and whose legislators are more likely to hold hopes of running for higher office.
...

"I am not arguing that there is much quid-pro-quo influence," says Powell. "But even the best intentioned legislator receiving money from an interest group is likely to at least listen to what donors have to say. And if you are hearing much more from people who donate money to you, it is hard not to be swayed by the greater body of argument and evidence from donors."
Lynda Powell

None of these are quid pro quo agreements but have a demonstrated effect.

lamentable dustman
Apr 13, 2007

ðŸÂ†ðŸÂ†ðŸÂ†

Shifty Pony posted:

Nah Maurice's hasn't been at the same spot on the "Real American" list since the old racist bastard died and his heirs quickly scrubbed every ounce of confederate poo poo from the brand and all restaurants.

I figured they would when I heard he died, I know his son had been trying to get Maurice to dump all the confederate poo poo for year but haden't been by Piggy Park in a while. Speaking of Maurice though made me need to get some of his non racist brother Malvin's BBQ in Charleston.

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Glenn Zimmerman posted:

If a candidate had a bunch of oil company employees donating to a republican, would you think they were donating because of their view of gun control?

Could be coercion like the 'subtle' donation demands at Koch Industries. :shrug:

Kalman
Jan 17, 2010

Glenn Zimmerman posted:

Campaign donations are very effective predictor of legislative behavior. When looking through the literature I found like a billion papers but this one seemed the most complete/summarized. That first paragraph is empirical false if you spend more than 5s googling the topic, but is included for completeness.

https://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=4060


None of these are quid pro quo agreements but have a demonstrated effect.

So correlation is causation is what you're saying?

Or is it more likely that people choose to donate to candidates who they think are inclined toward their views?

Series DD Funding
Nov 25, 2014

by exmarx

ThirdPartyView posted:

Could be coercion like the 'subtle' donation demands at Koch Industries. :shrug:

You think a flier in the mail caused a bunch of their employees to donate to Romney?

Wheeee
Mar 11, 2001

When a tree grows, it is soft and pliable. But when it's dry and hard, it dies.

Hardness and strength are death's companions. Flexibility and softness are the embodiment of life.

That which has become hard shall not triumph.

Series DD Funding posted:

You think a flier in the mail caused a bunch of their employees to donate to Romney?

Maybe it did, maybe it didn't, but in either case it certainly set the tone of the company culture that people's lives are structured around, which is absolutely coercive.

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
edit: wrong thread

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

If this conversation didn't involve the word "yarrr" at some point then I don't want to live in this world anymore.

EXAKT Science
Aug 14, 2012

8 on the Kinsey scale

Chokes McGee posted:

If this conversation didn't involve the word "yarrr" at some point then I don't want to live in this world anymore.

He's not a pirate, he's a Minuteman you rube. Keep your powder dry, Ted Cruz 2016.

Mo_Steel
Mar 7, 2008

Let's Clock Into The Sunset Together

Fun Shoe

EXAKT Science posted:

He's not a pirate, he's a Minuteman you rube. Keep your powder dry, Ted Cruz 2016.

The two don't have to be mutually exclusive. :colbert:

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Glenn Zimmerman posted:

1.) Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (or FIRE) was instrumental in the housing bubble that destroyed the economy. Why did you put casino in air quotes? This is fairly well established.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405


Insurance (specifically housing insurance) benefits from any policy that creates a housing bubble. Also future providers, yadda yadda.


Again, this is a very broad sector. Not all finance was involved in subprime loans. In fact, most weren't.

quote:

2.) You only list your employment if you >$200 to a campaign. Please remember to do research before posting!

I also sincerely doubt janitors are dropping double benjamins to Hillary's campaign in significant numbers to affect the $21 million dollar total.

Also Warren's total donation was ~8%, not 10%, but hey.


Warren's was 9.9% per her 2012 campaign, when I checked it. v0v.

Anyway, you're wrong. Campaigns are only required to report your donation and employer if you donate more than $200. In 2008, Hillary chose to report everyone to the FEC. Don't believe me? Check the FEC's website. Here's one of her random disclosures:

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/001/28931446001/28931446001.pdf

quote:

3.) Did you look at the PAC contributions? You will notice a whose who of bail out receivers on it. For the record, #1 is a pro-choice group (good!) and lawyer lobby (meh).

I suppose you are technically correct in that you only said Finance but they're basically inseperable from the rest of the FIRE group when it comes to the financial crisis. I would recommend reading the whole Taibi piece if you have time.
-

Wong page. These are the PAC contributions in 2008. You'll notice that FIRE is in fourth. Behind "ideological" (mostly leadership PACs and groups like EMILY's List), lawyers, and labor.

quote:

If a candidate had a bunch of oil company employees donating to a republican, would you think they were donating because of their view of gun control?

Campaign donations are very effective predictor of legislative behavior. When looking through the literature I found like a billion papers but this one seemed the most complete/summarized. That first paragraph is empirical false if you spend more than 5s googling the topic, but is included for completeness.

https://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=4060


None of these are quid pro quo agreements but have a demonstrated effect.

I don't disagree that money in politics has a corrupting effect. Research has shown that donors get preferential treatment. This is very clear, and that's why I support restrictive campaign finance laws. But it's also easy to overstate what that money buys you. In our modern primary system, candidates collect as much money as humanly possible. Hillary was a NY-based politician, and she went where the money was: there's a lot of easy campaign cash for a NY politician in Wall Street. That doesn't mean thee was a quid pro quo, or that she is Wall Street's candidate: maybe it just means a lot of people on Wall Street support her? Not surprisingly, they're not all Republicans. There are actually a ton of wealthy center-left donors there.

Concerned Citizen fucked around with this message at 21:33 on May 9, 2015

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Glenn Zimmerman posted:

2.) You only list your employment if you >$200 to a campaign. Please remember to do research before posting!

I also sincerely doubt janitors are dropping double benjamins to Hillary's campaign in significant numbers to affect the $21 million dollar total.


I had to list my employment the last few times I've donated and I've never donated over $200.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Joementum posted:

Sanders campaign event about to kick off at Syracuse.



When is Bernie going to Austin or Liberal Beacon San Antonio?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kitten emergency
Jan 13, 2008

get meow this wack-ass crystal prison

Joementum posted:

Oh please, please, please let him create this shirt. :pray:



edit: I can confirm that weedlord.bonerhitler@randpaul.com voted for that shirt.

i would wear this after he loses the primary

  • Locked thread