|
Bloody posted:a yak too far
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 17:00 |
|
|
triple sulk posted:for people who have interviewed with amazon, is their interview process as terrible as some make it out to be (sadly) a lot of it depends on who you're talking to, what team(s) you're being recruited into, and what you're expected to be doing. Feel free to PM me about it.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
triple sulk posted:i'm really looking forward to when it's all working 100% on os x. you can get asp.net running right now but it's definitely still buggy at times. yeah, it's good for a preview but some parts are still lacking polish. my biggest problem at this point is that the documentation i've found is (understandably) very visual studio focused, and i'm using vs code on osx.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
so i havent really been following the .net stuff. am i able to use c# to write stuff in unix without using mono??
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
visual studio code uses mono for debugging so it's probably still about mono but i was under the impression that the process of open-sourcing .net meant the mono people could start stealing all the correct implementations of poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
mono should just be loving gutted and replaced outright. one of the big asp.net bugs right now is specifically due to mono being a piece of poo poo and breaking the kqueue or whatever the gently caress.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
in theory you should be able to gut mono and just copy paste the correct implementation of everything yes
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:so i havent really been following the .net stuff. am i able to use c# to write stuff in unix without using mono?? it's still using mono for at least some things (nuget and aspnet are definitely using it, according to their github docs). not sure what their long-term goal is.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
Try watching the pilot of The Flash Wtf, wrong thread Valeyard fucked around with this message at 02:42 on May 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
as someone who uses xamarin tech right now let me just say it blows and i wish microsoft would just loving buy them out already and make the stuff more tolerable to use. xamarin studio is giant piece of shitgarbage that stops building correctly at random times for no explicable reason and requires you to restart the entire app and clean your project to get it running again. they will occasionally push code to stable that completely breaks certain things, too. the documentation is horrendous in some places and the forums are loving useless half of the time, and tons of reasonable requests for quality of life things to be added get ignored. one time in a minor point release they just instantly deprecated one of the font size things in the api that completely broke applications which were using it, and the solution people came up with to fix it was throwing an awkward generic method into the app.cs file. there was really no rhyme or reason to this afaik but it was annoying as poo poo. forms is stupid and it would literally be faster and easier to learn both objc/swift and java in order to write your ios/android apps respectively, because at least then you could actually use the ui building tools they give you instead of literally coding your god drat interface out. oh also because of that you have to rebuild your app and go to the specific page you're designing because they half-assed the realtime "sketches" and you can literally only sketch things on a loving iphone 5 now, which is apparently a recent change because before you could only do it on a 4. other devices? nope. okay i'm done now
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
meanwhile, they refactored some junk at work and sent out an email saying "if your build fails restart eclipse until it works"
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:meanwhile, they refactored some junk at work and sent out an email saying "if your build fails restart eclipse until it works" look at this idiot not using maven
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
Janitor Prime posted:look at this idiot not using maven let me tell you about 400mb of .jar files in a git repository
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 08:32
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:let me tell you about 400mb of .jar files in a git repository didnt you just upgrade from like, a retail job to programming a few months ago?? and now you're all posting like a wizened programmer??? great job dude
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 09:37
|
|
|
dumbass kroger in effect
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 11:57
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:let me tell you about 400mb of .jar files in a git repository lol owned
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 12:21
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:so i havent really been following the .net stuff. am i able to use c# to write stuff in unix without using mono?? current status:
so yes you could in theory work with .net on unix without mono, but in reality you would probably be better off with mono until the porting stuff stabilizes
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
also visual studio code is kinda garbage it's sublime text written in javascript
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:also visual studio code is kinda garbage its based on atom lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 15:37
|
|
|
i tried to use atom once and it seemed really bad.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 17:48
|
|
|
will regular visual studio be able to target .net cross-platform? cuz i could see that becoming my new favorite thing
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
DaTroof posted:will regular visual studio be able to target .net cross-platform? cuz i could see that becoming my new favorite thing it already does/is. c# has had all the necessary abstractions for portability for a long time, e.g. Path.PathSeparator. an assembly compiled by vs.net is the same as an assembly compiled by anything else it's just a matter of having the runtime and libs on your target
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:it already does/is. ah, makes sense. guess i just never bothered to look/try
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
i wish they would hurry up with vs2015. also fun bug(/feature?) of wpf: if you do mvvm "properly" using datatemplates and poo poo and use a ui library but only in xaml vs will be happy with it and not flag anything up, but the library dll will never be copied. the fix is to put at least one attribute such as Name which causes a codebehind to be generated, or add a do nothing method which uses the library dll.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
lol student code:code:
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:08
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code: rofl that owns
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:09
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code: bless lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code: 5
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code: lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
i think you should give them an a because even though they're missing something important there are good coding practices in there
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i think you should give them an a because even though they're missing something important there are good coding practices in there the mark scheme is very specific, doesn't account for general coding style and their code performed correctly so they didn't lose any marks for it lol see i get understand stuff like the intro to programming guy being baffled as to why the computer was printing the contents of the print statements that he wrote or why it did the same thing again when he ran it a second time this though was a 2nd year
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
despite betraying themselves as being ignorant of the purpose of a #define, they have shown a good faith effort of trying to things the right way. do they use that symbol anywhere else in place of a literal value?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
Barnyard Protein posted:despite betraying themselves as being ignorant of the purpose of a #define, they have shown a good faith effort of trying to things the right way. do they use that symbol anywhere else in place of a literal value? yeah they do, it looks just like a last-minute-just-done-all-nighter brain fart i didn't hold it against them, just found it funny the person that submitted screenshots of their excel graphs in lieu of exporting the graph in any way however...
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
ugh wtf the newest ragel mirror i can find is https://github.com/kaostao/ragel the ragel-6.9.tar.gz that can be downloaded at colm.net is super different, dozens of files are only in one of them or have different names
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:the person that submitted screenshots of their excel graphs in lieu of exporting the graph in any way however... ive said this before but just last year, in our 3rd year group projects, we had people who either couldnt understand git or more likely didnt want to learn the basics and just emailed round zipped projects to everyone or they would learn how to use git and then use it to commit just zipped version of the project exported from eclipse
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
or this person whose indentation seems to be done at random, their code is impossible to read jfc i can only assuming that they were copy/pasting from 3 different people all with different indentation settings why isn't white-space sensitivity mandatory again??
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code: lmao
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:lol student code:  Don't worry, Billy! You'll be an ace programmer yet!
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:15
|
|
|
qntm posted:
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 17:00 |
|
|
i don't know that person's gender and i'm not going to look it up. however given that they're an compsci undergrad, i reckon it's pretty safe to guess based on probability...
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2015 21:24
|
|