|
self sniping cars
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
The Management posted:self sniping cars  boom headshot
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
nice graphics on that videogame
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 17:10
|
|
|
the google cars have an accident per mile rate approximately 10 times that of the national average.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 17:27
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the google cars have an accident per mile rate approximately 10 times that of the national average. mad max: fully-automated road 
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 17:32
|
|
|
lol, the logo urine incident as well as excalating spam has forced google to close their map maker tool to the public.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
I'd rather be hit by a car owned by a third of a trillion dollar company than by some uninsured jackass
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
I've wrecked a few cars
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:lol, the logo urine incident as well as excalating spam has forced google to close their map maker tool to the public. good
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
Smythe posted:I've wrecked a few cars maybe if you got a nexus 6, you could see the gps directions without having to squint at it. because it's huge, you see
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:15
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the google cars have an accident per mile rate approximately 10 times that of the national average. do they still not actually have active detection and rely on essentially a really detailed google map to navigate
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
I see them driving around mountain view all the time. they drive poorly. yesterday I saw one trying to make a left turn out of a straight-only lane
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
computer parts posted:do they still not actually have active detection and rely on essentially a really detailed google map to navigate it's google, what do you think
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
The Management posted:I see them driving around mountain view all the time. they drive poorly. yesterday I saw one trying to make a left turn out of a straight-only lane lol
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
also they're equipped with sharp sensor pods to gore pedestrians
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
The Management posted:also they're equipped with sharp sensor pods to gore pedestrians shaggar's kind of car!
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
they might also shoot off into the spokes of nearby bicycles
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
The Management posted:I see them driving around mountain view all the time. they drive poorly. yesterday I saw one trying to make a left turn out of a straight-only lane look out here comes my glitch lol
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2015 22:30
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:lol, the logo urine incident as well as excalating spam has forced google to close their map maker tool to the public. the what now?
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
Virion posted:look out here comes my glitch lol
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
knowing Google if their car crashes j to you it will keep running you over and backing up and then afterwards when you try to sue Google they will delete your gmail account
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:the what now? 
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 00:50
|
|
|
lmbo
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
The Management posted:I see them driving around mountain view all the time. they drive poorly. yesterday I saw one trying to make a left turn out of a straight-only lane same tho y'all should know that they drive like grandmas b/c that's what a computer thinks is the safest way to drive shockingly humans like to go fast regardless of relative danger
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:16
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:same
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:same is it true? I mean speed deltas are bad but otherwise
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
The Management posted:I see them driving around mountain view all the time. they drive poorly. yesterday I saw one trying to make a left turn out of a straight-only lane i bet it had a turn signal on which already puts it ahead of a sizeable percentage of human drivers
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:is it true? I mean speed deltas are bad but otherwise yea and that kinda holds up since most of your travel time is spent waiting at signals (unless you're traveling like 45 miles or more) tho it turns out that i know the project director or w/e so i've got lotsa questions for him when we're both not out drinkin around our respective ladies he offered me a ride and a tour and stuff so i'm sure that i'll get to ask him lotsa uncomfortable questions then like how they brute-forced mapping and how they hope to deal w/ construction sites and whatnot he was mostly p happy that i was enthused about the whole thing and that i even knew what the original DARPA challenge was for it
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:yea and that kinda holds up since most of your travel time is spent waiting at signals (unless you're traveling like 45 miles or more) What kind of intersections become possible if you remove human drivers entirely? Is it within the realm of possibility that stop lights would go away and robotic cars could just open intervals between themselves large enough for opposing streams of traffic to weave between one another?
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
Stringent posted:What kind of intersections become possible if you remove human drivers entirely? Is it within the realm of possibility that stop lights would go away and robotic cars could just open intervals between themselves large enough for opposing streams of traffic to weave between one another? what we currently know about automated driving cars and how they improve upon human drivers (other than crash fatalities) is that you can have far far greater traffic density on a roadway they can basically all tailgate eachother even thru turns and stuff and require narrower lanes you even start seeing an improvement at around 33% driverless iirc which is part of why having 18-wheelers all automated is a p big deal intersections would probably operate p similarly if all of the vehicles were automated, just more efficiently since you wouldn't need an all-red phase or probably even a yellow phase and can ignore things like decision-reaction times
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:45
|
|
|
but we're never going to see all automated because people love their cars too much what can we do with 25% automated. actually useful hov lanes?
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:but we're never going to see all automated because people love their cars too much kill all the people, problem solved
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
btw decision-reaction time aka response time is how long your average human takes to see something (like brakelights) and then think of a response (apply brakes) and then act upon that response (begin depressing brake pedal) this is typically assumed to be 3.2 seconds which is an empirical average - younger people are closer to a second and olds (or drunks or people using a cellphone) are more like 4 or even 5 seconds that number is used to determine things like how long it should take a driver to stop their car traveling at the posted speed limit if they see the light change - which therefore influences the minimum length of time the light should remain yellow in any phase robot cars could improve upon this, tho you wouldn't want to since you'll prolly still have human drivers whizzing around out there too
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:but we're never going to see all automated because people love their cars too much better interstates mostly, depends on how much of that 25% is tractor trailers
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:btw decision-reaction time aka response time is how long your average human takes to see something (like brakelights) and then think of a response (apply brakes) and then act upon that response (begin depressing brake pedal) why would you use the average instead of the worst case?
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Stringent posted:why would you use the average instead of the worst case? it's a weighted average as far as i know so it grabs the largest realistic segment of drivers that we see on the roads worst case is way too inefficient for peak traffic conditions
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:worst case is way too inefficient for peak traffic conditions lol, and you call programmers terrible
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
Stringent posted:why would you use the average instead of the worst case? there is no worst case, just cases worse than all the ones previously
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:but we're never going to see all automated because people love their cars too much
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
what happens when i cut a driverless car off and slam on the brakes so it hits me? who writes me the check
|
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 05:26
|
|
