|
The MSJ posted:
$162.90 for that?
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:49 |
|
|
Wet Fifty posted:$162.90 for that? That's not in US dollars.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:14
|
|
|
Kugyou no Tenshi posted:It's obviously from the alt-timeline Avengers: The Old Age of Ultron. The Age of Oldtron
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:39
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:The Golden Age of comics really always surprises me for the fact that there's obviously zero quality control in place. I love those comics with the super omnipotent dude, I think it's starman or something, who inflicts horrific and ironic punishments on his enemies. Like he turned one guy into a giant head or something. Those comics are messed up and intended for children.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
nexus6 posted:I love those comics with the super omnipotent dude, I think it's starman or something, who inflicts horrific and ironic punishments on his enemies. Like he turned one guy into a giant head or something. Those comics are messed up and intended for children. Stardust. The Super Wizard.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 17:03
|
|
|
QUACKTASTIC posted:When 900 years old, you reach… handle your weed well, you will not Doob or doob not, there is no try The MSJ posted:That's not in US dollars. Plus, y'know...it's TRU, they're notorious for being stupid expensive compared to anywhere else BOOTY-ADE has a new favorite as of 17:31 on May 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 17:28
|
|
|
EDIT: Ah poo poo, where did that new page come from?
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
BrianBoitano posted:Naw, that's a classic Flehmen Response. He's trying to get a good whiff of some female Ultron urine he's come across. This is an amazing post.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
BjornOfBorg posted:
That's some good poo poo.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 03:41
|
|
|
I would legit drive the hell out of one of these.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
Are you in fact Franken Berry
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:24
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:25
|
|
|
Oh Common Core, you so funny It reads like a stupid riddle out of context, I guess.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
You just break every equation down to ones. You have eight ones and five ones so you add five of the eight ones to the five other ones and now you have ten ones and three ones. Don't worry about the three ones though, they get to live on a nice farm with grandma and your old dog.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:35
|
|
|
That seems like the exact opposite of basic logic skills and is the sort of thinking that creates 80's point and click adventure games.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 04:48
|
|
|
It's written exactly like a lovely puzzle. And it's terrible maths. If it was "If you had 8 of an item here and 5 of an item there, how would you make a group of 10 items?" I'd be fine with it. That's nice, simple kindergarten level maths. Sesame Street poo poo, yo. But just saying "(8+2=10) Then add 3" makes me want to hunt down whoever thought common core was a good idea and run them over with my car.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:That seems like the exact opposite of basic logic skills and is the sort of thinking that creates 80's point and click adventure games. Not really, it's the way most people do math mentally they just don't write it down and realize it. If I asked to you add 1127 to 94 you drat sure wouldn't be doing it in your head the way you'd do it on paper. You'd probably just round those numbers to something easy and say, it's about 1220 and call it a day. This is just that method of math, but exact. It really doesn't make much sense with single digit numbers but where the hell else are you going to start if you have to teach little kids.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
every new method of teaching me math fails more miserably than the last
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:25
|
|
|
Modern Day Hercules posted:Not really, it's the way most people do math mentally they just don't write it down and realize it. If I asked to you add 1127 to 94 you drat sure wouldn't be doing it in your head the way you'd do it on paper. You'd probably just round those numbers to something easy and say, it's about 1220 and call it a day. This is just that method of math, but exact. It really doesn't make much sense with single digit numbers but where the hell else are you going to start if you have to teach little kids. This is dumb as hell.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:29
|
|
|
Aren't there also multiple correct answers in that question, like 7 from one and 3 from the other? Is that a feature or a bug
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:31
|
|
|
(8+2)+3=(10)+3 You quickly know what adds up to 10, then you figure out the rest.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:42
|
|
|
Unoriginal Name posted:(8+2)+3=(10)+3 1=1
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
I have an easier way to communicate that same principle: "what do 2+8, 5+5, and 1+9 all have in common?"
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:46
|
|
|
Jaramin posted:I have an easier way to communicate that same principle: "what do 2+8, 5+5, and 1+9 all have in common?" They're all numbers
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:51
|
|
|
1=0.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999...?
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
When I was a kid we played something in school called the 24 game. Basically the teacher held up a flash card with 4 numbers on it and you had to figure out how you could add, subtract, multiply or divide those numbers to get 24. You had to use each number and could only use each once. It might be something easy like 6|2 8|4 where you can do something like 8/4=2, 2x2=4, 6x4=24 or it could be way more complicated, involving larger double-digit numbers. Oddly enough that helped me do a ton of math in my head and it really helped me remember arithmetic shortcuts.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
Baron von Eevl posted:When I was a kid we played something in school called the 24 game. Basically the teacher held up a flash card with 4 numbers on it and you had to figure out how you could add, subtract, multiply or divide those numbers to get 24. You had to use each number and could only use each once. It might be something easy like That's a good and useful exercise, though, whereas "how can 8 + 5 = 10" is some dumb stupid poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:24
|
|
|
Baron von Eevl posted:When I was a kid we played something in school called the 24 game. Basically the teacher held up a flash card with 4 numbers on it and you had to figure out how you could add, subtract, multiply or divide those numbers to get 24. You had to use each number and could only use each once. It might be something easy like or 6*2 = 12, +8 +4 = 24. EDUFANTASTIC!
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:26
|
|
|
Modern Day Hercules posted:Not really, it's the way most people do math mentally they just don't write it down and realize it. If I asked to you add 1127 to 94 you drat sure wouldn't be doing it in your head the way you'd do it on paper. You'd probably just round those numbers to something easy and say, it's about 1220 and call it a day. This is just that method of math, but exact. It really doesn't make much sense with single digit numbers but where the hell else are you going to start if you have to teach little kids. I know I'm only contributing to the derail and pulling an "I'm oooold  moment, but I was taught the old fashioned way how to do math, and in my head that's exactly how I added those numbers. I saw you asking to add 1127 to 94 and my brain immediately pictured:1127 + 94 -------- And I sat and figured it out in at most 5 seconds, and I'm not the fastest math guy in the world by far. something cockamamie like (94 + 6) + (1127-6) or whatever adds more steps to the process and slows you down further, and is not in the least bit how my brain processes math.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:41
|
|
|
edit: sorry folks, uncalled for
THE PENETRATOR has a new favorite as of 07:52 on May 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:48
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:I know I'm only contributing to the derail and pulling an "I'm oooold https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIWaJ0sy03g Deteriorata has a new favorite as of 06:53 on May 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:50
|
|
|
Choco1980 posted:I know I'm only contributing to the derail and pulling an "I'm oooold You're not adding any steps in the alternate method, the steps you're doing are just different. You had to do poo poo like add each place one by one and carry the ones and poo poo, whereas the other method doesn't require any of that. If you're actually picturing graphical representations of math problems you're wasting time, and if you're trying to be fast about it you're probably loving up more often and worse when you do it than if you were just rounding to the nearest ten and then rectifying from there. Nerds don't like to think about it, but the methods that we notate and process math problems by are 100% arbitrary. It worked fine when people just picked random rear end letters to represent numbers, it worked fine before they realized 0 was a thing, and it works fine with the common core method, they just aren't what we learned in school so a lot of goony fucks are scared by the change as they always are.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 06:56
|
|
|
Who the gently caress cares how you do math. The picture is supposed to be funny because the problem is poorly worded, and the explanation is just as confusing.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 07:04
|
|
|
dpbjinc posted:Who the gently caress cares how you do math. The picture is supposed to be funny because the problem is poorly worded, and the explanation is just as confusing. I found it funny because a child young enough to misspell "with" understood the question and gave a correct answer, then was given the note by a (presumably) adult teacher that they were wrong with some frankly bizarre reasoning and WHY THE gently caress DO I HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT THE gently caress FUNNY MEANS loving gently caress  I had another image set of cats but gently caress ya'll
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 07:34
|
|
|
cats in holes are funny to me because i imagine a man pouring cement over the cat and it becoming a dead cat statue in a pot or something, and i lauygh..
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 07:39
|
|
|
 it looks like a funny face 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 07:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:49 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 07:54
|
|
