|
reply is NOT google search 
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
Valeyard posted:why use lisp in 2015 the same reasons as in 2005 and 1995 you can read that two ways. both are valid
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
dammit thread i wanted to post about webdev on page 404 
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:why use lisp in 2015 because theyre idiots
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
the only acceptable options in this thread are hilariously useless functional languages or full retard on the microsoft stack
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
jython is good, it combines all the best parts of both java and python
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:19
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:why use lisp in 2015 uniform syntax and macros. or stockholm syndrome.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
why not groovy
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
dont worry pram, the microsoft stack is headed to unix and it will be better than anything currently available on unix
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
microsoft porting the .net stack to unix is lol do they want to become borland?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
pram posted:why not groovy unironically better than jython
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
they have no choice. windows is a type of famous sinking ship, chairs and all
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
pram posted:the only acceptable options in this thread are hilariously useless functional languages or full retard on the microsoft stack nah there's at least one nutjob in the thread that thinks you should use go for everything
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:nah there's at least one nutjob in the thread that thinks you should use go for anything
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:37
|
|
|
is this TBC's new gimmick? java, python and c++ are langs that are not utterly terrible and there's discussion about them in this thread that isn't just "oh it's poo poo." mostly it's go and js that get that for some weird reason
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:nah there's at least one nutjob in the thread that thinks you should use go for everything I do most of my programming in Java you dunce
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
its mostly a bunch of retards who don't know anything about go having a hernia about it and it bringing me great pleasure
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
I don't know anything about Go other than It's Bad
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:43
|
|
|
it isnt bad
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
it's pretty bad.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
it sounds like it's not that bad, but not that good.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
I want to use that Hugo thing but dont really have any reason to atm
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:48
|
|
|
fleshweasel posted:it sounds like it's not that bad, but not that good. its actually extremely good for the stuff i described which is why it has seen adoption in places like cdns, services like sendgrid, etc. just admit you dont know anything about it and stfu
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
i knew asking about web poo poo would make people very angry
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
look, this awia guy asks 'what should i do web poo poo in' and the shambling morons itt unironically advocate loving lisp which just barely has a working http server and a handful of unmaintained micro frameworks
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
I predict in five years time no one will give a drat about Go. Common Lisp is immortal tho.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
so's fortran but that doesn't mean new software should be written in it
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
symbolics is making a comeback
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
Bloody posted:so's fortran but that doesn't mean new software should be written in it i'm fluent in fortran but that fact is absolutely not going anywhere near my cv...
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:i'm fluent in fortran but that fact is absolutely not going anywhere near my cv... man, that haskell fortran parser exercise you helped me with was MADE for you
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:08
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:unironically better than jython very likely true, i guess the main thing i'm looking for in a plang on the jvm is "can i use this to mash together our existing java stuff and our existing python stuff into one huge pile of poo poo that more or less works when the stars are right" and it's hard to beat jython in that niche
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:i'm fluent in fortran but that fact is absolutely not going anywhere near my cv... why on earth are you fluent in fortran
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
Bloody posted:so's fortran but that doesn't mean new software should be written in it Someone should tell this to astrophysicists.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2015 23:25
|
|
|
pram posted:the only acceptable options in this thread are hilariously useless functional languages or full retard on the microsoft stack *softly whispering in your ear* play fsharp my lord
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:*softly whispering in your ear* play fsharp my lord 
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:you're like 25 was a uni maths module, wrote some numerical integration tools in python and fortran.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
pram posted:look, this awia guy asks 'what should i do web poo poo in' and the shambling morons itt unironically advocate loving lisp which just barely has a working http server and a handful of unmaintained micro frameworks so its on par w/ go then.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
i was joking everybody's moved on to fstar already
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:so its on par w/ go then. shagger !!! :iamafag: but no not really. for example this is a bigger framework that has an orm and the whole nine yards (go is actually really popular in china) http://beego.me/
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 00:15
|
|