|
Shifty Pony posted:iirc the artist that drew the graphic was not pleased by how the wsj annotated it. they drew it for rupert murdoch what did they expect
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:iirc the artist that drew the graphic was not pleased by how the wsj annotated it. lol I wanna find a link for this
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 14:57
|
|
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:lol I wanna find a link for this i like ur new avatar
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
most artists for the WSJ work freelance, I believe, they're just asked for an illustration, they're not informed about what the article is about
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 17:00
|
|
|
it finally happened: a self parking car hit a pedestrian. volvo explained that the car was not equipped with the $3,000 "pedestrian detection" option but that the driver was an idiot and it would have been disabled the way they were driving
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:it finally happened: a self parking car hit a pedestrian. volvo explained that the car was not equipped with the $3,000 "pedestrian detection" option but that the driver was an idiot and it would have been disabled the way they were driving here teh vid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8nnhUCtcO8
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:04
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:it finally happened: a self parking car hit a pedestrian. volvo explained that the car was not equipped with the $3,000 "pedestrian detection" option but that the driver was an idiot and it would have been disabled the way they were driving a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. farmer's market mode: ENGAGED
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. 
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. surprised you think so
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
it doesn't detect bicycles so
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:10
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:it finally happened: a self parking car hit a pedestrian. volvo explained that the car was not equipped with the $3,000 "pedestrian detection" option but that the driver was an idiot and it would have been disabled the way they were driving im the outrage at things costs more money by the author of the article.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
pr0zac posted:i like ur new avatar ty friend
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. lol
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
refleks posted:im the outrage at things costs more money by the author of the article. i'm the optional pedestrian detection system
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
refleks posted:im the outrage at things costs more money by the author of the article. lol rand paul has a parachute
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. i thought you approved of driving into pedestrians, am i getting yosposters mixed up again
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:it doesn't detect bicycles so neither do human drivers
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:a pedestrian detection feature that disables itself when you accelerate towards the pedestrian doesn't sound very useful. I'm sure it for the same reason that the safety system that prevents car windows from crushing arms, fingers, or childrens' heads is disabled if you hold down the "up" button:   what if I'm being carjacked!?!?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:lol rand paul has a parachute really? that article, and the video is dumb as gently caress. what kind of parking are they doing by backing up and accelerating into two people?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
refleks posted:really? mmm yeah, flawed test, thats exactly what I got out of this video. The car didn't even have a chance to prove itself.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:neither do human drivers lol
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:mmm yeah, flawed test, thats exactly what I got out of this video. The car didn't even have a chance to prove itself. "gently caress it guys, lets test a feature our car doesnt have. what could go wrong?"
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
refleks posted:"gently caress it guys, lets test a feature our car doesnt have. what could go wrong?" the company confirmed that even if the feature was installed it wouldn't have worked apparently pedestrian detection is overridden by pushing the accelerator
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:in a college town you could probably get money from both people my platform for automatically offering to complete dogwalking requests from dogwalking apps by listing those requests on dogsharing apps is seeking a lead investor for it's series A. get in touch
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
the talent deficit posted:my platform for automatically offering to complete dogwalking requests from dogwalking apps by listing those requests on dogsharing apps is seeking a lead investor for it's series A. get in touch good. easy money. gg
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:38
|
|
|
dog walk request apps have a standardized api that dog walkee requestor apps can utilize
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the company confirmed that even if the feature was installed it wouldn't have worked if it didn't people like me could just troll volvo drivers by tossing cardboard cutouts of Pittsburg Penguins goalkeeper Patrick Greiss into traffic, causing their brakes to lock and giving them whiplash/sending them through the windshield buy American next time fuckerrrrrr
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
Optimus_Rhyme posted:neither do human drivers bicycles aren't supposed to be on the road so idk why that's a problem.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
at the date posted:if it didn't people like me could just troll volvo drivers by tossing cardboard cutouts of Pittsburg Penguins goalkeeper Patrick Greiss into traffic, causing their brakes to lock and giving them whiplash/sending them through the windshield don't disparage chinese cars, they are teh future
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the company confirmed that even if the feature was installed it wouldn't have worked collision detection only works at low speeds
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:bicycles aren't supposed to be on the road so idk why that's a problem. I was going to make a shagger joke ...
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:where does yahoo get all that money it periodically uses to make people billionaires from? they bought it for stock. so basically they just gave him $5.7 billion worth of shares which doesn't cost the company anything really. he then dumped it on the open market and dupes gave him the cash.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2015 23:45
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:bicycles aren't supposed to be on the road so idk why that's a problem. don't quote your alt accounts
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
has anyone said tech buble yet
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
ultramiraculous posted:they did actually have contracts and revenue and whatnot...but that's just an insane number. was there any proprietary technology or was it just a directory of streams? what were they selling? I looked at their archive and couldn't figure it out.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the company confirmed that even if the feature was installed it wouldn't have worked hail satan
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:the company confirmed that even if the feature was installed it wouldn't have worked because otherwise it'd be trivially easy to carjack
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
Smythe posted:whats a neoliberal?  See also the "School Choice" movement in America. It has nothing to do with the American use of the word "liberalism" but instead comes from the "laissez faire" definition of liberalism. Assepoester fucked around with this message at 03:05 on May 27, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
Munkeymon posted:because otherwise it'd be trivially easy to carjack number of people killed in carjackings yearly: ~14 (9k injured, mostly poor minorities in cities) number of pedestrians killed yearly: 4700 (76000 injured) why yes we should hobble a lifesaving safety feature of the while suburban mom-mobile to address something which probably won't ever happen to it.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2015 03:14
|
|