|
fidel sarcastro posted:i'd pay in blood for a language with sql literals. you mean like Embedded SQL? behold the horror that made me keep away from databases for a long time code:
|
# ? May 28, 2015 03:27 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:21 |
|
proc is really hard to search for
|
# ? May 28, 2015 03:33 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:i don't know how to explain this right. uhhhh so i have a list of points calculated from iterating over ((forward vector - gravity vector) * iteration step). the Y axis of the chart is the Y value of the coordinate, the X axis of the chart is one iteration step. iteration runs until the height is below 0. yes, i know this is a bar chart. Everyone else posted good answers for your question, but when doing this sort of simulation be careful how you do the eq of motion integration, not all the ways conserve energy etc. I'm on my phone but google leapfrog verlet for one of the standard algos
|
# ? May 28, 2015 07:23 |
|
Bloody posted:barf your poo poo into excel and ask it to fit it for you and enjoy your r^2=1.000 post your fits
|
# ? May 28, 2015 09:38 |
|
MeruFM posted:no but they have very little in common huh. the "data scientists" i know of do plenty of ml, but i guess it's not a well defined position
|
# ? May 28, 2015 10:15 |
|
suffix posted:huh. the "data scientists" i know of do plenty of ml, but i guess it's not a well defined position typical ML dev works in Python, Matlab, Lua, C++. possibly C#/F# in finance, possibly Java in industry. possibly R, but my impression is that it's losing popularity in the face of Python. most of a ML dev's time is focused on the algorithms rather than data. there are a lot fewer ML devs around than there are data scientists. you're right though, they're not well-defined positions and there's a lot of overlap. coffeetable fucked around with this message at 13:09 on May 28, 2015 |
# ? May 28, 2015 10:39 |
|
FamDav posted:proc is really hard to search for try sproc
|
# ? May 28, 2015 11:49 |
|
trying out sublime text 3 and wtf it doesnt realize if you move a file from under it even textwrangler does that what is this poo poo
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:02 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:trying out sublime text 3 and wtf it doesnt realize if you move a file from under it It does realize, and it turns the currently open document into a new unsaved document triple sulk posted:Big Machine Learning Evangelist Digital Media Prophet here
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:23 |
|
~Coxy posted:try sproc idk anyone who calls stored procs sprocs except for people who don't use them or understand them.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 14:35 |
|
eschaton posted:you mean like Embedded SQL?
|
# ? May 28, 2015 15:06 |
|
Valeyard posted:It does realize, and it turns the currently open document into a new unsaved document i have never wanted or needed that. it should keep the file open and just update where it saves to. might even be a dealbreaker for me
|
# ? May 28, 2015 15:38 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:i have never wanted or needed that. it should keep the file open and just update where it saves to. this is NOT the time to laugh at sublimes settings, but it looks like there is one for this e; hmm apparently this setting doesnt do that, Valeyard fucked around with this message at 16:12 on May 28, 2015 |
# ? May 28, 2015 16:03 |
|
is there any reason to use sublime over anything else at this point? gently caress it, notepad++ still works for me.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:04 |
|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:is there any reason to use sublime over anything else at this point? gently caress it, notepad++ still works for me. if youre an autist
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:09 |
|
Valeyard posted:this is NOT the time to laugh at sublimes settings, but it looks like there is one for this that seems to remember what files were open when you close & reopen the whole app
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:09 |
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:that seems to remember what files were open when you close & reopen the whole app yeah oops, sorry
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:13 |
|
<>
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:18 |
|
Valeyard posted:this is NOT the time to laugh at sublimes settings wrong
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:28 |
|
I use sublime because I managed to install the plugins I want and I'll be damned if I'm gonna repeat that with some other editor. I am not paying to use that poo poo though.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 16:49 |
|
you can easily setup all your sublime plugins using dropbox, so when installing on a new machine its really easy to get started
|
# ? May 28, 2015 17:08 |
|
Shaggar posted:idk anyone who calls stored procs sprocs except for people who don't use them or understand them. two companies ago, everybody called them "sprocs"; it drove me up the wall i'm trying to write a servlet that will work with different versions of selenium grid -- one that uses org.json.json and one that uses com.google.gson. the two libraries have similar but not identical interfaces. i would like to write a class that gives me a kind of front-end common interface for the libraries. i know there has to be a pattern for this, but it's not "facade", and i can't think of any other candidates
|
# ? May 28, 2015 17:29 |
|
rrrrrrrrrrrt posted:is there any reason to use sublime over anything else at this point? gently caress it, notepad++ still works for me. nope. vim and emacs are better editors and idea is a better ide. Valeyard posted:you can easily setup all your sublime plugins using dropbox, so when installing on a new machine its really easy to get started you can do that with any editor and a git repo.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 17:32 |
|
prefect posted:two companies ago, everybody called them "sprocs"; it drove me up the wall adapter is the name from gang of four. I think most people would call it a wrapper.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 18:25 |
|
yeah but why do you have separate json libs and why are you not just using jackson + jax-rs like everyone else.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 18:27 |
|
Shaggar posted:yeah but why do you have separate json libs and why are you not just using jackson + jax-rs like everyone else. i didn't pick these libraries -- they're the ones that selenium is using, and i don't seem to be able to package up other dependencies in this jar. i'm sure that means i'm doing something wrong.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 18:37 |
|
Awia posted:if youre an autist if you think you're autistic but you don't use vi or emacs then maybe you should get your diagnosis checked
|
# ? May 28, 2015 18:38 |
|
I have to do differential equations to make a scorched earth clone? holy poo poo gently caress that I'll go work on something else
Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 18:57 on May 28, 2015 |
# ? May 28, 2015 18:53 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:I have to do differential equations to make a scorched earth clone? holy poo poo gently caress that I'll go work on something else if you can do basic integration of polynomials, you can handle this. suppose the shell starts at position x0 and is launched with velocity v0 in a world with gravity g the acceleration is a = -(0, 1)g which when integrated wrt time gives the velocity eqn v = v0 - (0,1)g*t and when you integrate that you get the position eqn x = x0 + v0*t - (0,1)g*t^2
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:01 |
|
coffeetable posted:if you can do basic integration of polynomials you are proceeding from a flawed premise Luigi Thirty posted:the last math class i took was college algebra. I know how to add/subtract/multiply/divide polynomials and how to cheat on math tests using a TI-83.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:12 |
|
http://math2.org/math/integrals/tableof.htm
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:23 |
|
coffeetable posted:x = x0 + v0*t - (0,0.5)g*t^2
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:33 |
|
You don't even need to integrate and can just cheat Assuming y is the only axis affected by gravity code:
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:35 |
|
fuk
|
# ? May 28, 2015 19:44 |
|
if you were as a child forced to do 1000 calc exercises everyday, you would not have made such a simple error
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:02 |
|
Just khan academy for integrating babby polynomials, it's easy as gently caress. For any function f(x) where the polynomial terms are xn the integral is a new function, F(x) = xn+1/(n+1) + C If the syntax is confusing just Khan Academy that poo poo. Also if you want a "proof" of it write a Riemann sub algo and increase the number of rectangles used to fit the curve, it'll start making sense.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:08 |
|
do americans not learn calculus in high school?
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:10 |
|
Remember when calc was 'hard' and things were simple?
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:10 |
|
wolfram alpha does it and will show the steps that it took (although maybe only if you subscribe??)
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:10 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:21 |
|
Awia posted:do americans not learn calculus in high school? The brainiacs who are college prep bougies do in 12th grade or some poo poo, maybe. We hardly learn basics of statistics and how loving interest works, it's really hosed up.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 20:11 |