|
LSD CURES JUNKIES posted:I mostly wanted to know if they could refile the charge. Where do you live that private citizens get warrants?
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2015 11:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 22:43 |
|
|
I'm such a tool.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2015 13:35
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:Where do you live that private citizens get warrants? In Virginia private citizens can swear out warrants in front of the magistrate. When I was a cop we used to occasionally refer bullshit calls and mutual combat to the magistrate.
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:Where do you live that private citizens get warrants? I'm coming at you bro. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2015 19:42
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:... given your description of the first set of charges. I seriously doubt that description. sever
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
If driver A runs driver B off the road and driver B runs over granny smith's mailbox, would granny go after A for damages because he caused it, or B because he did it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
The real answer is whatever party has the most money and is therefore most likely to make granny whole.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
SkunkDuster posted:If driver A runs driver B off the road and driver B runs over granny smith's mailbox, would granny go after A for damages because he caused it, or B because he did it? Assuming A stopped and admitted fault, A. In the real world, B. Unless, as HDD91 pointed out, A is loaded.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
SkunkDuster posted:If driver A runs driver B off the road and driver B runs over granny smith's mailbox, would granny go after A for damages because he caused it, or B because he did it? Granny parachute account spotted!
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
In a criminal case, would a lawyer be allowed to introduce a defendant's refusal or acceptance of a polygraph test as part of his case? I don't mean the test results, but the actual fact of refusal or acceptance. "Joe Defendant repeatedly refused to submit to a polygraph test," or, "Joe offered numerous times to take a polygraph test."
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 06:50
|
|
|
welpmy mother (and roommate) has lost it. How do I protect myself and my stuff from eviction and am I entitled to the back child support she is getting? posted:I am 21 and I live with my mother. I go to college, which I took a loan out for, and work a job so I am rarely home but it is still my home. I've lived there well past the amount of time to establish residency in my state (OH). I pay rent in the amount of $100 a month for my room, to pitch in for other things. She makes me pay by the 5th of every month so my understanding is that this makes me a paying tenant. https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/3a1bhu/my_mother_and_roommate_has_lost_it_how_do_i/
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
Depends on the value of the poopsock collection the cleaning crew threw out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
Ah yes, child support, which of course is to go directly into the pocket of the child.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 16:35
|
|
|
Centripetal Horse posted:In a criminal case, would a lawyer be allowed to introduce a defendant's refusal or acceptance of a polygraph test as part of his case? I don't mean the test results, but the actual fact of refusal or acceptance. "Joe Defendant repeatedly refused to submit to a polygraph test," or, "Joe offered numerous times to take a polygraph test." I think "no" as to both, but I'm going to ask around. I do know that there are some states where the test results are never admissible, and other states where the results are admissible if both parties stipulate to their admission; there may be a state by state difference in the answer to your question.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 16:56
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Ah yes, child support, which of course is to go directly into the pocket of the child. well duh it's CHILD support as an aside r/legaladvice new is now my homepage
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
FordPRefectLL posted:well duh it's CHILD support Basically my friend's girlfriend of five years had sex with this other dude (they're in an open relationship but he was friends with this particular guy) and now he wants to hold said guy down and pry out some of his front teeth. Let's say this ended up happening, how much jail time would he be looking at? Edit: This is Indiana
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
What does he want to use to pry the teeth out with?
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
That's a good question, pliers seem far too gauche.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Basically my friend's girlfriend of five years had sex with this other dude (they're in an open relationship but he was friends with this particular guy) and now he wants to hold said guy down and pry out some of his front teeth. Let's say this ended up happening, how much jail time would he be looking at? So you can gently caress other people, just don't actually gently caress other people. Got it! What a great thing to be a part of, can I sign up?
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
polyamory: the relationship decision for broken people to break things more
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
This one's just sad:quote:[MI] Patrol Cops take cans of Soda regularly from my Brother's Grocery shop without paying. When asking for payment they just laugh it off. Help me fight off those bullies. What to do? Mostly for the advice. People are saying "Call it in as an armed robbery because they have guns." No one is offering the truth of "You can report it to someone higher but let's be honest here, they're the police and will not give a poo poo and you are hosed."
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 18:33
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:This one's just sad: Put in a camera, give it to local news station, enjoy media frenzy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
Kalman posted:Put in a camera, give it to local news station, enjoy media frenzy. That'll probably stop the theft, but it won't make the cops very friendly, and then golly it always seems to take them just a few extra minutes if they ever need to respond there, etc.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Basically my friend's girlfriend of five years had sex with this other dude (they're in an open relationship but he was friends with this particular guy) and now he wants to hold said guy down and pry out some of his front teeth. Let's say this ended up happening, how much jail time would he be looking at? What an amateur. He needs to step up his game: quote:BG remembers that on July 4, 2003, he voluntarily ingested several of what Skinner described as “the Eucharist,” believing that the Catholic communion wafers that Skinner provided would be laced with LSD, as on previous occasions when Skinner had given them to G. G expected that the wafers would cause him to “trip,” but instead he was rendered completely unconscious. G testified that his next memory was of waking up naked on the hotel bathroom floor, with his hands, legs, and mouth duct-taped, and with Skinner standing over him, kicking him in the groin area as hard as he could and saying, “You should never have touched my fiancée; you should never have touched my fiancée.” G remembers that he eventually passed out during this assault and that when he woke up, Skinner was kneeling over him with a hypodermic needle, injecting something into his penis. G’s comprehension then got “extremely blurry,” and he has very few clear memories of the incredible torture that he was subjected to over the next four days at the Tulsa Doubletree and then at a Houston area motel after that. Downside: Life +90 years
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
joat mon posted:Assuming A stopped and admitted fault, A. In the real world, B. Unless, as HDD91 pointed out, A is loaded. Yes. More typically, B gets sued and B can bring A into the suit. B probably screwed up and made an excuse. A probably doesn't exist. If A does exist, then the story is more interesting because people rarely run one another off the road for no reason at all. Succinctly, B is either lying or only telling a little bit of the story.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
Jfc, joat mon, jfc
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
Bad Munki posted:That'll probably stop the theft, but it won't make the cops very friendly, and then golly it always seems to take them just a few extra minutes if they ever need to respond there, etc. Up to him if that's worth stopping petty theft.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
patentmagus posted:Yes. More typically, B gets sued and B can bring A into the suit. B probably screwed up and made an excuse. A probably doesn't exist. If A does exist, then the story is more interesting because people rarely run one another off the road for no reason at all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
Kalman posted:Put in a camera, give it to local news station, enjoy media frenzy. As someone who used to be a supervisor on a police force: Film it. Get you asking the cops to pay for it and them laughing at you and walking out. Then get an appointment with their precinct lieutenant (shouldn't be that far from you) and detail all of this + video/audio. Also, keep a log of the dates and times of the thefts with the officers names. I would be willing to bet that this officer, or officers, are the station dirt bags and the lieutenant will kiss you on the lips for giving him what he needs to fire them. However, if the lieutenant is a dirtbag too, give it to the local media*. *Every reasonably sized city has a certain news team that the cops do not like because they report on them. Find and use that news team.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2015 19:36
|
|
blarzgh posted:I think "no" as to both, but I'm going to ask around. I do know that there are some states where the test results are never admissible, and other states where the results are admissible if both parties stipulate to their admission; there may be a state by state difference in the answer to your question. My gut reaction was also, "no," but I am not remotely a lawyer. I'd be curious about the answers in different states, though.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2015 21:36
|
|
|
joat mon posted:Aggravated Battery, 3-16 years. Holy gently caress. I just followed that link and read the opinion. Reads like a real life version of the movie Blue Velvet; the Skinner dude sounds just like the Dennis Hopper character Frank Booth. Again... holy gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
patentmagus posted:Yes. More typically, B gets sued and B can bring A into the suit. B probably screwed up and made an excuse. A probably doesn't exist. If A does exist, then the story is more interesting because people rarely run one another off the road for no reason at all. I have a 50 mile daily commute on country roads. Last week, an oncoming car started to pass a slow moving tractor and we would have hit head-on, but he saw me and tucked back in behind the tractor and everybody went on their merry way. It just got me thinking about what would have happened if I had to hit the ditch to avoid him and plowed into Farmer Bob's fence.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
A couple of weeks ago he painted his fence bright red. It doesn't go with the color of his house at all and it's been an eyesore. There's no homeowner's association to make rules about this kind of thing so anybody can basically make their house any color no matter what. A couple of days ago I just had a bad day at work and was still feeling pretty steamed. I really shouldn't have looked out the window and looked at that annoying red fence. for some reason i got really mad and decided to do something about it. so i got some white paint, poured some in a tray, stuck my bare rear end in the paint and then walked over to his house and pressed it up against his fence. a few hours later he gets home and knocks on my door. he asks me if i knew anything about it to which i said i didn't. he then told me he knew it was me since the mark on the fence looked like rear end cheeks that were too large to be from a mischievious teenager or child. THEN he told me to pull down my pants so he could see if there was paint there. i had showered earlier so there wasn't, but i obviously told him "No." then he said he was calling his attorney. i haven't heard back from him. should I call an attorney myself or is he just bluffing? EDIT: I live in tennessee
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
EAT THE EGGS RICOLA posted:A couple of weeks ago he painted his fence bright red. It doesn't go with the color of his house at all and it's been an eyesore. There's no homeowner's association to make rules about this kind of thing so anybody can basically make their house any color no matter what. A couple of days ago I just had a bad day at work and was still feeling pretty steamed. I really shouldn't have looked out the window and looked at that annoying red fence. for some reason i got really mad and decided to do something about it. so i got some white paint, poured some in a tray, stuck my bare rear end in the paint and then walked over to his house and pressed it up against his fence. a few hours later he gets home and knocks on my door. he asks me if i knew anything about it to which i said i didn't. he then told me he knew it was me since the mark on the fence looked like rear end cheeks that were too large to be from a mischievious teenager or child. THEN he told me to pull down my pants so he could see if there was paint there. i had showered earlier so there wasn't, but i obviously told him "No." then he said he was calling his attorney. i haven't heard back from him. should I call an attorney myself or is he just bluffing? EDIT: I live in tennessee Source your quotes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
I wasn't wearing my glasses and initially misread 'fence' as 'face'. It significantly improved the story, highly recommend.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
Before I hit up the Oregon Bar lawyer referral service, if anyone has a referral for a family law attorney in the Portland area I'd appreciate a PM.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 16:54
|
|
|
A second DUI in Connecticut is considered a felony with a minimum mandatory 4 months of jail. If a person was licensed and registered in a different state, hours away, and returned to that state prior to their trial, how severe would be consequences be? I had heard from a lawyer that the issuing state would have to send someone to get the person and only if they had been arrested and the warrant had shown up. But that the likelyhood of that happening was slim to none. I guess what I'm asking is if that is true and how bad of an idea would it be to flee
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
So person A was arrested in Connecticut and charged with a DUI. Person A then wants to return to state S and ignore the charges in Connecticut? That is a bad idea.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:That is a bad idea.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 22:43 |
|
|
quote:If you are throwing a little party somewhere outside, you have the sound speakers in your car for the music, then someone goes to look at your equipment in the car so you take out your gun and tell him to get away from the car but he starts acting touch and thinks you wont shoot him so he steps closer to you and wants to take your gun away from you so you have no other choice but to shoot him.. and theres lots of witnesses to what happened. I don't feel the killer is guilty in this case but I'm sure he would go to prison for this right? https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/3apvj6/what_happens_if_you_shoot_someone_who_didnt_think/ The guy's responses are great too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 04:52
|
|
