|
Sir Tonk posted:https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2015/06/21/the-ridiculous-propaganda-photos-of-sheep-dipped-dylann-storm-roof/ Yeah Poe's law is strongly in effect here. Pretty much all the lighting "inconsistencies" pointed out are completely consistent with there being a flash mounted slightly to the top right of the lens, and actually sort of debunk themselves when considered in that context. WHY IS THE PHOTOGRAPHER NOT CASTING A SHADOW
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 03:48 |
|
|
SedanChair posted:Crafty hoax architects, leaving meticulously photoshopped pictures on a website for HenryKrinkle to find. A less crafty architect would have just distributed the pictures to the media, but that's scrub-tier. Radical left internet forums are part of the conspiracy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 15:57
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Radical left internet forums are part of the conspiracy. How deep does it go? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
What's your clearance?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2015 18:50
|
|
An Angry Bug posted:What's your clearance? 11 foot 8
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
An Angry Bug posted:What's your clearance? Infrared.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 10:54
|
|
|
An Angry Bug posted:What's your clearance? Still got some thetans left, unfortunately.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 11:59
|
|
|
I give people from countries where the US has done some crazy conspiracy poo poo a pass on mild 9/11 truther stuff. They generally don't know much about the specifics of 9/11 but they are familiar with the specifics of some of the crazy stuff that the US has done in their country. If they just want to maintain a surface understanding (which is how we approach most things), it is pretty easy to shrug and say, "Yeah, that sounds plausible," and then move on with their lives. Full-on Truthers who make it part of their identity are a separate case, but that doesn't sound like what is going on here.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
snorch posted:Yeah Poe's law is strongly in effect here. Pretty much all the lighting "inconsistencies" pointed out are completely consistent with there being a flash mounted slightly to the top right of the lens, and actually sort of debunk themselves when considered in that context. WHY IS THE PHOTOGRAPHER NOT CASTING A SHADOW Why would it matter where the photo is taken, anyway? The background isn't important, it's the rear end in a top hat burning a flag in the foreground that matters.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
Alien Arcana posted:Why would it matter where the photo is taken, anyway? The background isn't important, it's the rear end in a top hat burning a flag in the foreground that matters. Why would the inconsistencies matter, it's the guy with the flag and the moon lander that's important. See how you can spin this to say that the faking of the moon landing isn't important?
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 18:42
|
|
|
site posted:Why would the inconsistencies matter, it's the guy with the flag and the moon lander that's important. But that doesn't follow. In the moon landing photo, the environment is very important to the picture, because it's the moon. In the "guy burning a flag" photo, the environment is extraneous; it's still a guy burning an american flag no matter where the picture was taken.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:But that doesn't follow. In the moon landing photo, the environment is very important to the picture, because it's the moon. In the "guy burning a flag" photo, the environment is extraneous; it's still a guy burning an american flag no matter where the picture was taken. But if it was taken in a studio then it was clearly an innocent part of a stock-photo shoot wherein he was playing the fake character role of a kid burning a flag without truly meaning the sentiment in his heart, further proving that he's really an innocent and misunderstood person and this wasn't about race
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
Why would they go to the effort of faking a forest background when they could have just shot it in a forest?
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Carsius posted:Why would they go to the effort of faking a forest background when they could have just shot it in a forest? Because THEY work in mysterious ways.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 09:01
|
|
I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!
|
Carsius posted:Why would they go to the effort of faking a forest background when they could have just shot it in a forest? Because the lizard people live in an underground bunker that they can't leave so they have to use fake environments. See, they're allergic to trees and...
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 09:05
|
|
|
It's not a true exercise of power unless you're also using it to drive people who know the TRUTHtm further out of the mainstream by making them sound like crazy people when they talk about lighting inconsistencies.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 13:11
|
|
|
LIke the crisis actor stuff, they just have to deny reality at all points. None of it has to make sense and they sure as hell aren't considering *why* the nebulous enemy would need to do it, but goshdarnit they sure are convinced. I'm curious how many of the big conspiracy voice are mentally unstable and how many are just fleecing the gently caress out of people. There might be a handful of otherwise normal people that actually believe it, but all these site are too quick to believe any bullshit story that breaks from the mainstream. Makes me want to start throwing out crazy ideas like that page for the Charleston killings, but I'd be worried that they wouldn't see the obvious flaws and any effort to reveal the ruse would just be seen as a trick by the NWO or whatever to deceive them. It's like arguing with fundamentalists, you can't possibly win.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
There's nothing you can do. I think people have tried to create fake conspiracy theory videos in the past then reveal later how fake they were to try to trap people, and the conspiracy theorists didn't actually care. They just said the person was lying about the video being a fake.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 14:54
|
|
|
Snape killed Dumbledore? Does that really seem likely to you? We all know that the Fed has been wanting to nab the Alchemist Stone so that they could start printing off gold bars in order to shore up the failing economy, they obviously had the most to gain from Dumbledore's death. An avada kedavra curse at such close range would be easily deflected by a master wizard like Dumbledore. It just doesn't add up. I think it's clear that the CIA killed Dumbledore and set up Snape as the fall guy, and Harry Potter is in cahoots.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Carsius posted:Why would they go to the effort of faking a forest background when they could have just shot it in a forest? Is it even a forest? That looks a lot more like backyard shrubbery to me. And we all know that back yards are out of reach to the mysterious all powerful conspirators.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Snape killed Dumbledore? Does that really seem likely to you? We all know that the Fed has been wanting to nab the Alchemist Stone so that they could start printing off gold bars in order to shore up the failing economy, they obviously had the most to gain from Dumbledore's death. An avada kedavra curse at such close range would be easily deflected by a master wizard like Dumbledore. It just doesn't add up. I think it's clear that the CIA killed Dumbledore and set up Snape as the fall guy, and Harry Potter is in cahoots. The wizarding bank is clearly a front. Gringotts. GRINGO. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
And now for a completely different conspiracy theory:
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
What the gently caress is with the internet's obsession with cuckolding the past year or so? It's everywhere and I'd never even heard of it this time a year or two ago.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
#nickCUCK I'm dying
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
Modern America needs more complicated fetishes drawn from Renaissance-era insults.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:And now for a completely different conspiracy theory: This is simultaneously hilarious and also pretty plausible, it's not like Nickelodeon shows haven't ever had sexual innuendo that kids wouldn't understand. It's not a good reason to try and get a show cancelled though
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:This is simultaneously hilarious and also pretty plausible, it's not like Nickelodeon shows haven't ever had sexual innuendo that kids wouldn't understand. Hey, Dude! clearly was actually about anonymous gay sex. And this, CTs are nutty enough that this might be sincere. http://i.imgur.com/Qc3EWKU.jpg
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
To be fair, PSY isn't a fan of American foreign policy and referencing the destruction of the Twin Towers isn't incongruous in a song about the hollowness of (Western) materialism rum amok. I'm not saying that is what it was, but if it were true it wouldn't be evidence of some larger plot.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:This is simultaneously hilarious and also pretty plausible, it's not like Nickelodeon shows haven't ever had sexual innuendo that kids wouldn't understand. There's a difference between occasional innuendo, which kid's shows have, and the belief that the show is trying to indoctrinate kids into cuckold fetish.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:There's a difference between occasional innuendo, which kid's shows have, and the belief that the show is trying to indoctrinate kids into cuckold fetish. I'm not following, perhaps you'd like to read this pamphlet I printed out at work.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:What the gently caress is with the internet's obsession with cuckolding the past year or so? It's everywhere and I'd never even heard of it this time a year or two ago. 4chan users started latching on to the word earlier in the year. Still can't figure out why.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Dehry posted:4chan users started latching on to the word earlier in the year. Still can't figure out why. You could probably ask a GBSer, they've latched on just as hard.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:22
|
|
|
Dehry posted:4chan users started latching on to the word earlier in the year. Still can't figure out why. People were spamming interracial porn on /pol/ and the white supremacists got really loving mad that their precious white aryan babes were being sullied by the negro, and then a bunch of it ended up being from some well-known cuckold pay site I think? It was loving stupid.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
Well yeah, there's always been a thing in the white supremacist crowd about watching a black dude gently caress your wife. Body Count did a nice song about it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:There's a difference between occasional innuendo, which kid's shows have, and the belief that the show is trying to indoctrinate kids into cuckold fetish. Well yeah, but basically this is no worse than accusing Rocko's Modern Life of trying to indoctrinate kids into becoming phone sex operators. The plausible part isn't the indoctrination. The plausible part is the innuendo existing in the show at all. Claiming that a show is "indoctrinating children" is stupid in nearly all circumstances
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 05:51
|
|
|
Johnathan C. Butler sounds like a pimp.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
Dehry posted:4chan users started latching on to the word earlier in the year. Still can't figure out why. It's a funny sounding word
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2015 23:26
|
|
|
point of return posted:You could probably ask a GBSer, they've latched on just as hard. You sound really salty about people latching onto and over-using terms on the internet.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:And now for a completely different conspiracy theory: I guess i missed it when you first posted this but lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2015 21:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 03:48 |
|
|
TPP Passes: Obama Now A Dictator Foundation of global government cemented with passage of secretive bill[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCGsUTQBx-c
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2015 22:25
|
|