|
Solemn Sloth posted:Is there a quick way of checking for random baronies outside of your control or do you have to go through every county individually? There will be a second coat of arms floating above the county.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:20 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 02:21 |
|
TheMcD posted:Use the little province looking button that pops up at the top of the menu when you select a province to check regions, which apparently is what the decision checks now. Alternatively, you might be missing a barony somewhere, which is a common stumbling block for "control all of X" requirements. According to that, everything in India is under my control. Swedish Horror posted:There will be a second coat of arms floating above the county. I hovered over all the counties and didn't see any with multiples, and all the ones with a coat of arms over them that I did check were 100% mine.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:28 |
|
Swedish Horror posted:There will be a second coat of arms floating above the county. This is like when I learned in thread about box selecting boats
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:31 |
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:I have never seen the reincarnation event occur so I had it happen to one of my sons just today, too bad I am a republic and I won't be selecting that little uggo as my heir.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:33 |
|
Once they balance and shake out the bugs I think this might be the best expansion. It's really cool that Paradox made conquest actually matter. Once catholic rulers have stability and consolidation they really have no reason to expand other than prestige, and expansion is really risky. Makes for really boring inertia after a while. As a nomad you literally can't survive without wide-ranging conquest. Pagans and tribal had some of that, but most of them had decent land, or good places to raid. If you stay on the steppes you will die to a rival, and that's exciting. Edit: also my nation of choice in Mount and Blade was always Khergit so there is that. Famethrowa fucked around with this message at 03:51 on Jul 21, 2015 |
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:45 |
|
Horse Lords has honestly sold me on the idea of adding China to CKII. At this point we're so far from being able to claim that the scope is only "the crusader kings" that it's like, gently caress it, just do it.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:57 |
|
It's definitely in my top 2 dlc with Old Gods, and may be my number 1 but too early to tell
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 03:59 |
|
Confused about playing in tribal Ireland 769 start. Says I need max tribal organization to reform, but there are no tribal laws under my laws. I also took the 'Become King of Ireland' ambition, but I don't have the subjugation CB against anyone, just 'make tributary'. Are catholic tribals screwed up?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 04:01 |
|
Subjugation CB is pagan only, dunno about the laws thing though.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 04:05 |
|
Fintilgin posted:Confused about playing in tribal Ireland 769 start. Says I need max tribal organization to reform, but there are no tribal laws under my laws. I also took the 'Become King of Ireland' ambition, but I don't have the subjugation CB against anyone, just 'make tributary'. Are catholic tribals screwed up? Subjugation is a Pagan thing. You must have a Ducal level title to change crown laws; as a Count you also can't change centralisation, etc. Ireland got screwed, royally. Tutorial isle is now really bad. It was always really slow and needed x5, but now it's just atrocious.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 04:10 |
|
Tutorial island has always been 1066 Ireland, anything else is brutal for a first timer.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 04:31 |
|
Charlemagne Ireland, also known as "Pictland's house extension."
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 04:35 |
|
Eh, I'm doing a 769 Ireland as Dublin and it's not exceedingly hard. It's only 800 and I could reform to feudalism if I chose to, which I won't (yet) because then all of the tribals in Ireland will hate my guts and also because I still have plenty of raiding to do. Seriously, I have more money than I can spend just by cracking open all of the churches around me like clockwork every few years. Who knows what it'll be like when I get enough ships to take on Rome. The Moral Authority hit made everything even better, two counts got taken over by heretics and I gobbled them up basically for free. Getting a second county is extremely useful, because you need to give it to any claimants you find. Getting CBs is super hard to do in Catholic Tribal Ireland.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 06:35 |
|
There really should be a penalty for raiding churches as a catholic lol. "Don't mind me holy father, I am just doing more damage to Catholicism than the Muslims."
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 06:37 |
|
Is there some secret to getting more men in my court as a merchant republic? While reading up on them I keep seeing people post about having hundreds of trade posts very quickly, buy I've been playing for 200 years and only have about 30. I've been arranging marriages mostly with lustful women with fertile education traits with a few quick or genius women to try to breed better rulers.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 07:24 |
|
Shaman Ooglaboogla posted:There really should be a penalty for raiding churches as a catholic lol. It does cause a MA penalty, although it's the same as the penalty for getting churches raided by anyone else.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 07:49 |
|
SelenicMartian posted:What if the Cadaver Synod event backfires and one of the defendants proves himself to be innocent? He's a damned corpse? How is he supposed to successfully defend himself?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 07:58 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:It does cause a MA penalty, although it's the same as the penalty for getting churches raided by anyone else. I think he means that priests/the Pope/whoever should get a negative opinion modifier of you for doing it or something. Some drawback to a Catholic raiding their own religion's churches beyond lowering MA.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:00 |
|
Groogy posted:He's a damned corpse? How is he supposed to successfully defend himself? He very successfully pleads the 5th.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:01 |
|
Groogy posted:He's a damned corpse? How is he supposed to successfully defend himself? Surprise witness.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:13 |
|
Autonomous Monster posted:And then after that we can get an expansion fleshing out all the religions that haven't been fleshed out yet. Flavor for Suomenusko or Slavic? Over my dead body Romuva is cool though
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:16 |
|
Groogy posted:Flavor for Suomenusko or Slavic? Over my dead body I've delved into the paradox forums, and I'm not sure that's something you should be offering
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:31 |
|
Romuva encourages me to make New Old Prussia. Therefore Romuva requires more flavor.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:45 |
|
I'm trying to mod decadence. Does anyone know what DEMESNE_FRACTION_MULT_POS and DEMESNE_FRACTION_MULT_NEG under NDecadence in defines.lua do?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:56 |
|
The pagans in the need of the most love are West Africans. Mali in general is just a worthless place with no flavor or reason to exist. Idjil is also the most useless province in the game. Seriously why is it there?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 08:59 |
|
Vassal games are kind of funny, because your ruler will do all kinds of poo poo to try and keep you happy. I picked the Duke of Holland under Karl, just intending to do my own thing, maybe try and become King of Frisia, and he wound up giving me two French vassals and, for a short while, designating me as his heir. I would have stabbed, but the temptation of weeding out the Karlings entirely was outweighed by my not actually wanting to be the blob.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 09:01 |
|
So I started a game as the High Chieftess of Kiev because tributaries make tribals really really fun to play now and I became both Lunatic and Possessed. All hail High Chieftess Dobrava, slayer of Cthulhu and lover of horses.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 09:16 |
|
So I'm playing a Feudal and got subjugated by a Nomadic Khaganate. It seems like it's going to be really, really hard to break away. Nomad armies are just ridiculous. Any suggestions?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 09:37 |
|
Odobenidae posted:Eh, I'm doing a 769 Ireland as Dublin and it's not exceedingly hard. It's only 800 and I could reform to feudalism if I chose to, which I won't (yet) because then all of the tribals in Ireland will hate my guts and also because I still have plenty of raiding to do. They changed the way it works and you can upgrade your other holdings for free once reforming. Your vassals can too. And if they don't, just revoke it for zero tyranny hit because they're disgusting tribals.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 09:38 |
|
Corbeau posted:So I'm playing a Feudal and got subjugated by a Nomadic Khaganate. It seems like it's going to be really, really hard to break away. Nomad armies are just ridiculous. Any suggestions? You really have to hope they get bled a bit and spend a lot of prestige/gold rebuilding. Clan revolts or other khaganates fighting them are your best bet. Khan on Khan wars can be loving brutal because you really need to smash the other guys army up due to not much territory to hold.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 10:29 |
|
Convert to EUIV, that is the proper time-frame for breaking the Tatar yoke.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 10:32 |
|
Groogy posted:Flavor for Suomenusko or Slavic? Over my dead body I was thinking Manichean and Yadziki, actually, but Slavic can come too. Also, what the gently caress is this about : Galle posted:It gets better! Government types aren't saved properly. They're recalculated when the game is loaded. Government being dynamically evaluated instead of statically defined and manipulated with "set_government_type =" commands is making it a modding nightmare.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 11:10 |
|
Also amusing from my vassal game: I'm a True Christian Knight that owns the Necronomicon.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 11:20 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:
Wait what?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 15:09 |
|
Green Wing posted:Wait what? Hold alt to select boats only
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 15:11 |
|
Turns out there was one barony in the middle of nowhere I missed that was independent, and I'm now the emperor of all India. It's a shame nicknames can't change - history will forever remember the first emperor of India as the "Ill-Ruler" because of huge revolt 30 years earlier.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 15:20 |
|
There should be a decision to remove/choose your nickname for a bunch of prestige. Like you'd think someone would be able to pull a better moniker than "Fat" after 50 years of brutal conquest.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 16:17 |
|
Trying to get SPQR and it's pretty obnoxious that after taking over Mauritania I have to spend another 40 years or so weeding out the Bektashi Order one barony at a time and each war takes at least 3 years because all their actual troops are God knows where deep in Persia or something. Is there any reason I can't press multiple county claims against the same enemy at once?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 16:29 |
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Trying to get SPQR and it's pretty obnoxious that after taking over Mauritania I have to spend another 40 years or so weeding out the Bektashi Order one barony at a time and each war takes at least 3 years because all their actual troops are God knows where deep in Persia or something. Is there any reason I can't press multiple county claims against the same enemy at once? There should just be an "Expel" casus belli against holy orders you don't control in your land, where you take all their holdings if they resist and lose against you.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 17:00 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 02:21 |
|
Tercio posted:Ok, so it does genuinely sound like something's wrong. I played as Khiva from 1066 because I wanted to have some time to learn/play with the Silk Road then see the Mongols pop up naturally. I was actually *hoping* to get conquered and the invasion went off like a wet fart. Very disappointing.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2015 17:10 |