PYF Funny Pictures: The person circled in red is Hitler

The Something Awful Forums > Main > Post Your Favorite: Carefully Curated > PYF Funny Pictures: The person circled in red is Hitler

«‹›806 »

Data Graham: Dec 28, 2009; 📈📊🍪😋

SatansBestBuddy posted:

My question is why the gently caress are there two webcomics about girls as torso's with invisible arms?

Three?

# ? Aug 9, 2015 04:37

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 25, 2024 15:49

Red_October_7000: Jun 22, 2009

SatansBestBuddy posted:

My question is why the gently caress are there two webcomics about girls as torso's with invisible arms?

Your regdate suggests that you did not, in fact, stumble directly out from under a rock to a public terminal, but, um, the answer is more than likely related to the fact that some folks find it hot for whatever reason.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf
The armless/big tits combo goes back a ways, too.

Anywho, back to funny images (please?)

# ? Aug 9, 2015 05:07

Jamesman: Nov 19, 2004; "First off, let me start by saying curly light blond hair does not suit Hyomin at all. Furthermore,"; Fun Shoe

flosofl posted:

That movie is getting poo poo on by *everyone*. Rotten Tomatoes has it at 9% positive.

EDIT: Hahahaha

content:

That reviewer must not remember Fraggle Rock very well because that poo poo got raw at times. Don't compare this Fantastic Four movie to Fraggle Rock. Fraggle Rock is loving amazing.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 05:30

Chiparus: May 7, 2012

Red_October_7000 posted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf
The armless/big tits combo goes back a ways, too.

Probably not armless-- those may be her arms are resting over her boobs.

I love ugly medieval art babies and their weird expressions.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 07:08

Nighthand: Nov 4, 2009; what horror the gas

Vanderdeath posted:

IIRC, that guy took his websites down since he's trying to have an actual career in graphic design and art but people saved literally all of his poo poo so it's likely gonna pop up whenever you Google him now.

A lot of it is still on his tumblr so he did a piss-poor job if he was trying to scour it from his past.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 07:27

Philippe: Aug 9, 2013; (she/her)

Chiparus posted:

Probably not armless-- those may be her arms are resting over her boobs.

I love ugly medieval art babies and their weird expressions.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 08:15

BooLoo: Oct 18, 2010; SLAM TIME

Chiparus posted:

Oh hey, I did a thing to this one awhile back

BooLoo has a new favorite as of 14:51 on Aug 9, 2015

# ? Aug 9, 2015 09:43

Koala Cola: Dec 21, 2005; I am the stone that the builder refused...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQmaEtUUPyE

An oldie but a goody, probably only enjoyable if you enjoy :420:

# ? Aug 9, 2015 10:25

RolandTower: Nov 19, 2003; Guns n' Roses n' Deus Ex Machina; Bleak Gremlin

Red_October_7000 posted:

Your regdate suggests that you did not, in fact, stumble directly out from under a rock to a public terminal, but, um, the answer is more than likely related to the fact that some folks find it hot for whatever reason.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_of_Willendorf
The armless/big tits combo goes back a ways, too.

The Venus of Villendorf has arms, you Vierdo.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 10:54

The Blue Pyramid: Mar 1, 2009; Kiepski to nie
kaktus;
Pić musi!

Chiparus posted:

Probably not armless-- those may be her arms are resting over her boobs.

I love ugly medieval art babies and their weird expressions.

In case anyone is curious, the reasoning I was always taught for medieval Jesuses being so ugly is that they were painted not to look like babies, but rather given manly features since Jesus was no normal baby.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 15:02

Blue On Blue: Nov 14, 2012

Chiparus posted:

Baby getting fresh

Also has a pretty nice set of abs on him

I'm going to call him Guido, judging from the chain around his neck

# ? Aug 9, 2015 15:08

tribbledirigible: Jul 27, 2004; I finally beat the internet. The end boss was hard.

Sappo569 posted:

Baby getting fresh

Also has a pretty nice set of abs on him

I'm going to call him Guido, judging from the chain around his neck

How can you tell from a chain that he's a wild romantic rover?

# ? Aug 9, 2015 15:32

Stoatbringer: Sep 15, 2004; naw, you love it you little ho-bot

Sappo569 posted:

Baby getting fresh

Also has a pretty nice set of abs on him

Those aren't abs!

# ? Aug 9, 2015 16:16

White Light: Dec 19, 2012

Our Lord and savior's packin' heat

# ? Aug 9, 2015 16:52

EmptyVessel: Oct 30, 2012

RolandTower posted:

The Venus of Villendorf has arms, you Vierdo.

And hands if you look carefully.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 17:06

Philippe: Aug 9, 2013; (she/her)

RolandTower posted:

The Venus of Villendorf has arms, you Vierdo.

Wrong Venus.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 17:21

Gene Hackman Fan: Dec 27, 2002; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Birb Katter posted:

this was from a couple of pages back but get this:

dongbirds

# ? Aug 9, 2015 17:23

RatHat: Dec 31, 2007; A tiny behatted rat👒🐀!

Tasteful Dickpic posted:

Wrong Venus.

That had arms originally, they were just broken before it was found.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 18:24

Philippe: Aug 9, 2013; (she/her)

I did not know this.

Thanks, thread. Thead.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 18:26

Amorphous Blob: Jun 26, 2009; by Lowtax
(and can't post for 2 years!)

Chiparus posted:

Probably not armless-- those may be her arms are resting over her boobs.

I love ugly medieval art babies and their weird expressions.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:17

Johnny Aztec: Jan 30, 2005; by Hand Knit

RatHat posted:

That had arms originally, they were just broken before it was found.

You know, it's just really a shame we don't have any more sculptors doing Flesh-in-Stone.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:37

Proteus Jones: Feb 28, 2013

Johnny Aztec posted:

You know, it's just really a shame we don't have any more sculptors doing Flesh-in-Stone.

How about Flesh-in-Flesh-in-Stone?

# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:48

Johnny Aztec: Jan 30, 2005; by Hand Knit

flosofl posted:

How about Flesh-in-Flesh-in-Stone?

That's neat. Is that real and hand carved?

# ? Aug 9, 2015 19:58

Proteus Jones: Feb 28, 2013

Johnny Aztec posted:

That's neat. Is that real and hand carved?

I think so? I remember seeing this a while ago when tumblr lost their loving poo poo about it.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:01

Solice Kirsk: Jun 1, 2004; .

I like that and they should put it in front of every gym.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:27

wayfinder: Jul 7, 2003

Solice Kirsk posted:

I like that and they should put it in front of every gym.

Huh, why?

# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:38

Zzulu: May 15, 2009; (â°ËvËâ°)

cuz he likes it

# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:58

cowboythreespeech: Dec 28, 2008

Gene Hackman Fan posted:

this was from a couple of pages back but get this:

dongbirds

noice

# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:02

ToxicSlurpee: Nov 5, 2003; -=SEND HELP=-; Pillbug

The Blue Pyramid posted:

In case anyone is curious, the reasoning I was always taught for medieval Jesuses being so ugly is that they were painted not to look like babies, but rather given manly features since Jesus was no normal baby.

If memory serves a lot of church art was ultimately commissioned by wealthy people as a way to get into heaven. This was especially true of those people kneeling outside of paintings. Those were painted to be the people who commissioned the art to buy their way into God's good graces. In the case of paintings of baby Jesus with his mom sometimes the paintings would have the face of whoever paid for it put on baby Jesus. Which is unbelievable hubris.

Which is part of why old church art can look very weird in general. It was often painted to deliberately glorify the people that were paying for it. Which was ironic because they were often rich oligarchs or shithead nobles who were kind of going against what Jesus actually taught.

Oh hey the peasants living on the land are hungry and their lives kind of suck. Nah gently caress it, better pay for a painting.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:06

Red_October_7000: Jun 22, 2009

ToxicSlurpee posted:

If memory serves a lot of church art was ultimately commissioned by wealthy people as a way to get into heaven. This was especially true of those people kneeling outside of paintings. Those were painted to be the people who commissioned the art to buy their way into God's good graces. In the case of paintings of baby Jesus with his mom sometimes the paintings would have the face of whoever paid for it put on baby Jesus. Which is unbelievable hubris.

Which is part of why old church art can look very weird in general. It was often painted to deliberately glorify the people that were paying for it. Which was ironic because they were often rich oligarchs or shithead nobles who were kind of going against what Jesus actually taught.

Oh hey the peasants living on the land are hungry and their lives kind of suck. Nah gently caress it, better pay for a painting.

I guess that explains these guys, then. Found 'em with text on.

My usual thought was "have these people even seen a baby before?"

# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:27

RFC2324: Jun 7, 2012; http 418

ToxicSlurpee posted:

If memory serves a lot of church art was ultimately commissioned by wealthy people as a way to get into heaven. This was especially true of those people kneeling outside of paintings. Those were painted to be the people who commissioned the art to buy their way into God's good graces. In the case of paintings of baby Jesus with his mom sometimes the paintings would have the face of whoever paid for it put on baby Jesus. Which is unbelievable hubris.

Which is part of why old church art can look very weird in general. It was often painted to deliberately glorify the people that were paying for it. Which was ironic because they were often rich oligarchs or shithead nobles who were kind of going against what Jesus actually taught.

Oh hey the peasants living on the land are hungry and their lives kind of suck. Nah gently caress it, better pay for a painting.

So nothing has changed much.

# ? Aug 9, 2015 21:30