MC Fruit Stripe posted:Email sent to bosses. What, you've never had a big spicy meal (usually mexican) and then thought about twenty minutes later "Oh god that was a mistake, there goes tomorrow"?
|
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:09 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 19:03 |
|
I am continually surprised with just how many Texas goons there are, especially in this thread
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:14 |
|
I'm also in the DFW area - Plano to be exact. It's fuckin hot and I want to move.
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:22 |
|
mewse posted:Kid was clever enough to change that setting but not to change it back? Alereon fucked around with this message at 23:41 on Aug 13, 2015 |
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:35 |
|
Moey posted:No one ever download VMTurbo's free monitoring software. They will call you everyday, forever. VMTurbo: "We automatically adjust your resource allotment in vCenter so you don't have to spend hours doing it! COST SAVINGS!" Me: "My team doesn't spend hours doing it. We deploy conservatively and use DRS to load balance. I don't remember the last time we had to worry about-" VMTurbo: "... but you'll save HOURS everyday!" Me: "If I was spending hours manually load balancing I'd be very concerned about the state of my environment..." VMTurbo: "EXACTLY now you won't HAVE to!" Me: "But I DON'T." VMTurbo: "So... follow-up meeting?" Me: "No."
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:36 |
|
Lord Dudeguy posted:VMTurbo: "We automatically adjust your resource allotment in vCenter so you don't have to spend hours doing it! COST SAVINGS!" Ha, good to know. I have not actually deployed the software, was bored one day and was thinking about it.
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:38 |
|
Moey posted:Ha, good to know. I have not actually deployed the software, was bored one day and was thinking about it. We have vKernel vFoglight to do our monitoring/deployment recommendations. VMTurbo apparently takes it one step further and executes against its own recommendations (haha no).
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:42 |
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:I'm also in the DFW area - Plano to be exact. It's fuckin hot and I want to move. Sup Dallas nerdgoons Give it tll late January and it'll be fuckin cold and you'll want to move. We might have to go meet for bbq one day. In other news from my new pod, I just got reimbursed for buying sodas and snacks for the office, as well as charges for parking downtown. I also heard word that the idiot VP from $JOB-1 (lets get our vendors to pay for our expanding hardware costs by giving them free advertising in return!) is basically getting fired. Still glad I left. One of the guys in India flattened an entire VMAX by typing someting into it he found on google and everyones pulling major overtime (Except for support) to get environments back up again.
|
# ? Aug 13, 2015 23:58 |
|
nitrogen posted:Sup Dallas nerdgoons cd \ | sudo rm -rf *
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 00:23 |
|
nitrogen posted:One of the guys in India flattened an entire VMAX by typing someting into it he found on google and everyones pulling major overtime (Except for support) to get environments back up again. I've had offshore folks do the very same thing on at least 2 occasions in the past 4 years. Someday there will be a tipping point in the balance between missed SLA payouts and the cost of employing competent administrators. I hope that day is sooner than later
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 00:46 |
|
J posted:Meetings are hard. Apparently so, but this isn't even for a meeting room. This is a web meeting. A meeting that they can go in, check who's available at what time, and schedule. What's so hard about that?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 00:53 |
|
bull3964 posted:This is a universal truth for any free piece of software that requires contact info to download. Why would you sign up for anything online with any info except one of your spam email addresses and a fake phone number? They can send emails straight to my Gmail aggregate junk mail account's spam folder all day for all I care.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 01:10 |
|
bull3964 posted:This is a universal truth for any free piece of software that requires contact info to download. This is why you put in fake contact information.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 01:56 |
|
How is it that when I ask for a specific email address that's being blocked so that I can find out why it's being blocked, all I can can get is the following.quote:government emails and embassies with .org OKAY.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 02:43 |
|
QuiteEasilyDone posted:How is it that when I ask for a specific email address that's being blocked so that I can find out why it's being blocked, all I can can get is the following. Your mail server is being black listed by mxlogic. Good luck.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 02:48 |
|
The Fool posted:Your mail server is being black listed by mxlogic. Good luck. For incoming mail? all the servers on our side are clean according to mxtoolbox, I'm just resolving this as "Client refused to provide sufficient information"
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 02:56 |
|
poo poo pissing me off: three separate people trying to talk to me about type poo poo. One guy with 9/11 stuff, two people trying to tell me that Windows 10 is a "data collection hyper scam". Me: you can turn all that stuff off you know Both guys in separate occasions: No it stays on, collecting every thirty minutes! Me: Where'd you hear that? Both: I was just reading an article earlier today... Hmmm yes, one article that says you're right vs all these other ones that say you're wrong. Whoever made that 4chan image that people are quoting as hard truth needs to be shot
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 03:03 |
|
Luna Was Here posted:poo poo pissing me off: three separate people trying to talk to me about type poo poo. One guy with 9/11 stuff, two people trying to tell me that Windows 10 is a "data collection hyper scam".
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 03:09 |
|
Well, there was a little bit of an attempt at analysis. At least they looked up the DNS records being hit, what caused it, what it was sending back, and whether it sent a unique machine id. It looks pretty bad
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 03:34 |
|
Can you explain further? I read the article but didn't see anything alarming. I guess it uses some bandwidth.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 04:06 |
|
anthonypants posted:Hate to break it to you, but there was an article on arse technica yesterday. It's a bad article, because there's literally no attempt at analysis of the information that's getting sent to Microsoft, but it's sending something regardless of the settings. Was there really? Neither of the guys who talked to me could say where they got the article from so I brushed it off since I don't follow them. I was running off of a few different articles from pcgamer and pcworld plus a few others that I could dig up when I'm at home that went over all the congruent things you had to disable but if there really is poo poo being collected regardless then point against me for the day
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 04:07 |
|
nitrogen posted:Sup Dallas nerdgoons Yeah, for me, until it breaches like 102-103, the heat doesn't bug me; I did marching band in high school so I'm used to this heat plus a bulky/heavy band uniform and poo poo. The cold is where I start to be a big baby.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 04:46 |
|
beejay posted:Can you explain further? I read the article but didn't see anything alarming. I guess it uses some bandwidth. The basic question is: what are they doing? And it this is what they see after a week in isolated (but common) use cases, what's being done in uncommon cases? How do we know there's no malintent? It sends machine IDs to MS (well, Bing) every time you type n the start menu. This is probably so it can correlate common searches and give you "better" results, but why can't you opt out? Even Google gives you that option. Hitting one of their own servers to guess your network config is innocuous. Pulling new data from MSN is a bandwidth waste. And Microsoft is better than they used to be, but font rendering happened in kernel space recently. Downloading data to update tiles from a known URP begs for a mitm. I don't know if the live tiles (or even explorer) run privileged these days, but I'd worry anyway, and you'll probably be able to exploit a buffer overflow and mitm unpatched Windows 10 installs which don't verify the data sent with any encryption key or something. To be fair, Apple also does this. And Canonical. And KDE can. But at least all of those are disabled when you're not using the feature. This isn't. Sending telemetry to Microsoft even when it's disabled is bad. Ignoring GP is really, really bad. The CDN bits, who knows? Probably checking for updates or something. Ars should maybe have mirrored the ports or sniffed it instead of tossing their hands up because it bypassed a proxy. But this is a lot of monitoring out of the box, some can't be disabled without group policy, some can't be disabled with it, and MS pointing at the user agreement is stupid and goes back on the more open Microsoft we've seen lately.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 05:00 |
|
QuiteEasilyDone posted:For incoming mail? all the servers on our side are clean according to mxtoolbox, I'm just resolving this as "Client refused to provide sufficient information" Sorry, I thought it was outgoing from your client to those government agencies. I've had mxlogic block clients without them being on any other blacklist.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 05:30 |
|
ChubbyThePhat posted:Please tell me that did not actually happen. It may or may not have. >_> If it did, it might be in my post history.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 06:29 |
|
nielsm posted:a boot disk usually needs something more than just FORMAT A: /S on it, to be useful. That made me all warm and fuzzy inside.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 06:50 |
|
evol262 posted:The basic question is: what are they doing? No word on whether the destination hosts form a small enough set that can be blocked by pointing them to 127.0.0.1 in HOSTS?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 07:26 |
|
Weatherman posted:No word on whether the destination hosts form a small enough set that can be blocked by pointing them to 127.0.0.1 in HOSTS? I don't know if this list is all-inclusive, but I got it from reddit back on launch day: http://paste2.org/A1sv86VF
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 11:18 |
|
Pikachu posted:I don't know if this list is all-inclusive, but I got it from reddit back on launch day: http://paste2.org/A1sv86VF
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 11:38 |
|
"This lovely OS phones home even when you tell it not to, *inserts hosts entries*" - The guys responsible for Jurassic Park security
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 12:50 |
|
Another DFW goon here, Arlington to be specific. Need more A/C. Nothing pissing me off today, cause I called out sick. No printers for me until next week.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 13:47 |
|
Things pissing me off: Got an escalation in the support group because someone in sales sold something without fully confirming hardware compatibility. And it's it the magnitude of $10K. Fortunately everything's alright on my end, but man. And this isn't a random sales person: the customer has a dedicated rep. So another "Sales" thing here. Edit: OKC goon here
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 14:37 |
|
anthonypants posted:Why does one of those have port 443 on it Yeah, what does the second one add that's not covered implicitly by the first one? 0.0.0.0 telemetry.appex.bing.net 0.0.0.0 telemetry.appex.bing.net:443 I'm guessing this may have been created using multiple sources and it slipped through. I'm curious. Are there any legit services this may kill?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 14:44 |
|
flosofl posted:Yeah, what does the second one add that's not covered implicitly by the first one? why is it redirecting to 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1? and why is it trying to redirect ports using the hosts file? It seems like reddit is spreading a stupid and useless file around
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 14:56 |
|
to quote a conversation I had with a friend recently: "Microsoft can always spin up more servers and force the updates on you - or just hardcode it and ignore /etc/hosts for those hosts.. Do you really want to spend the rest of your life playing Whack-a-Host?"
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:07 |
|
RFC2324 posted:why is it redirecting to 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1? Reddit is stupid and useless? WHY I NEVER
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:12 |
|
People don't know how TCP/IP and DNS works, news at 11.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:29 |
|
Ars is less idiotic than Reddit and claims that at least some of the stuff explicitly bypassed their proxies, and ignores the hosts file. Blackholing it from a real DNS server should be fine anyway, but that's still whack-a-mole and doesn't address the root cause.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:38 |
|
Or just firewall it. My home firewall is set to allow all outbound but I might have to change that if I start using Win10.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:41 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 19:03 |
|
The rightfax server we stopped paying licensing for 3 years ago froze up in the middle of last night and we stopped receiving faxes. I woke up and caught it at 6am before anyone in the office makes it in. I made the mistake of saying it had an issue in the middle of the night now the customer service person is furious because she might have missed a fax. I just reviewed the rightfax log and we haven't had a fax in the middle of the night since 2012. Of course the executive that loves to get angry at clouds is wanting to have a meeting about this. I hope not to let facts get in the way of a good fake outrage.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2015 15:44 |