|
Patter Song posted:Joementum trolls harder than anyone. It's true, but he trolls in a fashion I find aesthetically pleasing.
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 12:35 |
|
|
The plan for the Trump Wall
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
I don't think there are even that many "establishment" goons to toxx? Except Joe but we can't toxx Joe he's a national treasure.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:49
|
|
|
Dahn posted:The plan for the Trump Wall I'm glad we're finally sealing Alaska and Hawaii off from proper America.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Dahn posted:The plan for the Trump Wall The Librul Isles
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
Cantorsdust posted:I'm glad we're finally sealing Alaska and Hawaii off from proper America. Well Alaska is doing the raping
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Fargo Fukes posted:Joe he's a national treasure. I agree.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Dahbadu posted:Will do! (Didn't know that was an option. Sorry.) If it helps any, if by some miracle this RSF is still kickin' long enough for either of your toxxes to come true I will gladly ban you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Dahn posted:The plan for the Trump Wall If this will keep Californians from moving to Oregon I'm in favor of this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
Cruz is leading the charge in a 50-state attack on PP. https://www.texastribune.org/2015/08/23/cruz-lead-50-state-attack-planned-parenthood/ I think Cruz will be Trump's VP.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
The same milquetoast democratic cowards who cleaved to Hillary as a sure thing early on are the first to waver at the slightest hint of weakness. They're the ones secretly urging Biden to run, and their wheedling will further weaken Hillary and embolden a doomed Biden to split the establishment vote.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
Martin Random posted:The same milquetoast democratic cowards who cleaved to Hillary as a sure thing early on are the first to waver at the slightest hint of weakness. They're the ones secretly urging Biden to run, and their wheedling will further weaken Hillary and embolden a doomed Biden to split the establishment vote. This is what America has become, milquetoast. mealymouthed, little participation trophy squirmtards. We need to make America great again.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:25
|
|
|
Dahn posted:The plan for the Trump Wall As a Californian, I'm okay with this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:As a Californian, I'm okay with this. Same. But I still want your water. I think this makes me a bad person.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:31
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:As a Californian, I'm okay with this. Rename it Alta California, let it join with its Baja sister in Mexico.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
Dahn posted:This is what America has become, milquetoast. mealymouthed, little participation trophy squirmtards. actually participation trophies are cool and good Dahbadu posted:Same. But I still want your water. I think this makes me a bad person. I think that if the rest of the country and the world wants our almonds (they do) we should get their water, it's only fair
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:43
|
|
|
Love how Carson City and Yuma get fenced off too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:So...according to Nate Silver, the guy who is leading the GOP primary in national polls by double digits, has leads in early states and later states in polls, has infinite money to draw on, and is running against a field of drooling inbreds has a 2% chance at his nomination. His models are basically dartboards at this point . Dude makes a lot of really silly mistakes which isn't a surprise given his lack of advanced statistical education.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
Nate Silver doubting Trump means his entire reason for being is called into question quite frankly.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:48
|
|
|
Yes polls in August 2015 tell you everything you need to know about the entirety of the nomination process in 2016 and are an accurate reflection of what will happen in five months and do not deserve any kind of reservations or analysis.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:50
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Nate Silver doubting Trump means his entire reason for being is called into question quite frankly. My point was simply that claiming that it's more likely that Sanders is the Democratic nominee than Trump as GOP nominee is prima facie absurd.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
What if we made a clone combining the DNA of both Trump and Sanders, then used John Titor's car to send him 35 years back in time? After collecting the no doubt surly hobo from his box, would we have a candidate capable of inducing starry-eyed fascination in left and right together?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
Antti posted:Yes polls in August 2015 tell you everything you need to know about the entirety of the nomination process in 2016 and are an accurate reflection of what will happen in five months and do not deserve any kind of reservations or analysis. The responsible thing for a data scientist to do at this point would be to either shut up or analyze a far more proximate problem like next week's poll numbers as a response to a set of possible new revelations or rallies. I guess that doesn't really bring about the same traffic, though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 20:58
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:My point was simply that claiming that it's more likely that Sanders is the Democratic nominee than Trump as GOP nominee is prima facie absurd. Sanders isnt opposed by his party, there are just concerns about his electability in the general among the brass. Trump is despised by the GOP party brass and whether he would actually be given the nom even if he earned it is in doubt. Keep in mind the small percentages youre talking about and WHY.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:09
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:As a Californian, I'm okay with this.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:Sanders isnt opposed by his party, there are just concerns about his electability in the general among the brass. Trump is despised by the GOP party brass and whether he would actually be given the nom even if he earned it is in doubt. Keep in mind the small percentages youre talking about and WHY. And don't forget, the odds given are just for Trump successfully nabbing the Republican nomination, which a bunch of the GOP is willing to ratfuck him out of, not for him to get any nomination at all (i.e. the TrumpoWhig Party).
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
Spaceman Future! posted:Sanders isnt opposed by his party, there are just concerns about his electability in the general among the brass. Trump is despised by the GOP party brass and whether he would actually be given the nom even if he earned it is in doubt. Keep in mind the small percentages youre talking about and WHY. Trump will get the nomination if he gets the votes. To the GOP higher-ups, it must be better to lose horrifically in 2016 than to possibly permanently splinter the party by encouraging Donald Trump as an independent and still horrifically lose in 2016 because the conservative vote is divided.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
Dahn posted:The plan for the Trump Wall i will volunteer to build this wall if we also get to deport the californians
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
Nessus posted:What if we made a clone combining the DNA of both Trump and Sanders, then used John Titor's car to send him 35 years back in time? After collecting the no doubt surly hobo from his box, would we have a candidate capable of inducing starry-eyed fascination in left and right together? trump and sanders mixed together, serve with a roux and bam you got yourself huey long
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:32
|
|
|
A Trump campaign video (with a simple replacement of Flash with Trump) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNIVpMXHqlk
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:37
|
|
|
Dahbadu posted:All you goons with strong "serious people" opinions really need to Nice meltdown. quote:I don't understand Nate Silver these days. "Nate Silver only knew what he was doing when he predicted things my way!" Bernieailures are on the precipice of some truly delightful poll unskewing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:40
|
|
yourselves for establishment candidates winning their respective primaries. After all, your opinions are so knowledgeable and educated, right? Put your money where your mouth is.
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:Nice meltdown. It's just math you do as a socialist
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:44
|
|
|
What's Nate Silver saying that is causing meltdowns? I can't keep up with this thread.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:What's Nate Silver saying that is causing meltdowns? I can't keep up with this thread. Trump es no bueno.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
So, where is the toxx yourself for the primary threads at?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Kobayashi posted:What's Nate Silver saying that is causing meltdowns? I can't keep up with this thread. That Trump and Bernie have a <5% chance of winning their respective nomination.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:trump and sanders mixed together, serve with a roux and bam you got yourself huey long I'd vote for Huey.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
its impossible to predict the future and nate silver is just using the information he has which really isn't enough to determine what's going to happen several months from now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Rename it Alta California, let it join with its Baja sister in Mexico. Secede, and then when the US Dollar crashes because congress defaults or whatever we will be in position to have everyone trade in Alto Pesos!
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 12:35 |
|
|
Patter Song posted:So...according to Nate Silver, the guy who is leading the GOP primary in national polls by double digits, has leads in early states and later states in polls, has infinite money to draw on, and is running against a field of drooling inbreds has a 2% chance at his nomination. So first of all, that "prediction" was acknowledged as a shoot-from-the-hip estimate without any real statistical basis, so it should be treated with a grain of salt. Secondly, consider the number of republican contenders with a legitimate shot versus the number of democratic candidates. Third, look at the republican party's own interests. Bernie may be an outsider, but at least he is actively in favor of what the democratic party wants. Trump has promised big tariffs, for example, which makes him #1 on the republican party's hit list. In short, the party will do whatever it takes to oppose him. Finally, consider the relative unimportance of nationwide pollling this early on. Most of the experts say that it has almost no predictive value at this point.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2015 21:57
|
|
