|
Political Cartoons 2015: RRAAHHHHHH
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
So that's why Obama wanted to leave no survivors.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:08
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:Hint: It's the same people who have well-faded Tweety Bird tattoos. Since hipsters have already driven wolf shirts into the ground, is it time for ironic-sincere appreciation of Looney Tunes as the garment of the proletariat? I should ask YLLS.  
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:12
|
|
|
Looney Tunes freaking own
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
MinionOfCthulhu posted:Born: Edward Joseph Snowden Perfect.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:28
|
|
|
Reminder: the creator of this hideous abomination won a Pulitzer Prize.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
Two Pulitzers, actually 
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
I wonder how you top "bathing in the blood of fetuses" Is there gonna be a cartoon with Hillary wearing a fetus-skin coat?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:I wonder how you top "bathing in the blood of fetuses" Don't give them ideas 
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:I wonder how you top "bathing in the blood of fetuses" Would you elect me? I'd elect me
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:I wonder how you top "bathing in the blood of fetuses" It's odd how much they obsess over respecting life from zygote to babby but are totally willing to draw their dismembered bodies being used as everything from shampoo to fast food
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:14
|
|
|
 Ann Telnaes posted:Hillary Clinton's worst enemy is....Hillary Clinton  Ann Telnaes posted:Trump eats Jeb Bush for lunch  quote:According to Russia Today:
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:24
|
|
|
Hm, yes, Republicans and Teabaggers cast as the diverse coalition of disenfranchised minorities. Not to mention Biden's ultimate sacrifice being key to them winning against an old, incredibly white aristocrat, in order to usher in a new, more ethnically diverse body of government.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 05:24
|
|
|
Post 9-11 User posted:The, "Hillary Clinton is dropping in the polls!" cartoons irked me enough that I looked up her numbers, expecting to find that they are wrong about it. Her unfavorability (is that a word?) rating has steadily increased over recent years, her favorability rating has gone down in a nearly mirror image. I considered looking up whether or not this entirely fraudulent hatchet job against Planned Parenthood is tracking but I feel fear. Not gonna do it. Well, Hillary has actually gone out of her way to not do any interviews or make any statements despite running for President. While her favorability among her constituents has little to do with conspiracies about Vilerat or email servers, lots of people have huge problems with a super rich career politician whose "principles" appear to be whatever is popular with the median public at any moment (outside of when she was supporting the Iraq war).
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:02
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:07
|
|
|
Literally "[insert punch line here]". Oops, he forgot to tell a joke, but it's still a joke! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
Plague of Hats posted:Literally "[insert punch line here]". Yeah but Biden makes those horrible gaffes all the time. There exists no other politician who makes more gaffes than Biden, as everyone knows.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:28
|
|
|
lol at Gary "  " McCoy's newfound concern for children of Mexican immigrants
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
Haha, holy poo poo. It's like the Reese's of conservative cartoons. Two great tastes, together at last. I just imagine his thought process: "Republicans hate Obama. Republicans hate "anchor babies". Hmm... What if I imply... that Obama is the father of all the anchor babies?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 06:50
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:
The nonstop crocodile tears over that incident are amazing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 07:26
|
|
|
crabcakes66 posted:The nonstop crocodile tears over that incident are amazing. In Two Bulls's case I'm inclined to think it's genuine, as he's not a "gently caress the environment" type.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
I think I've figured out why Rall is such a bad artist. He's so sure that he can do no wrong that he draws in ink.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 08:01
|
|
|
Jedit posted:I think I've figured out why Rall is such a bad artist. He's so sure that he can do no wrong that he draws in ink. It's pretty clear he just starts at the final inking. Like, there are so many cases where he's clearly just squeezed something in a margin or cut someone's arm short to fit it in the frame.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 08:40
|
|
|
Someone please put this in the OP.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 08:56
|
|
|
Jedit posted:I think I've figured out why Rall is such a bad artist. He's so sure that he can do no wrong that he draws in ink. I am positive that there's an interview somewhere or a friend that said this is exactly what he does.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 09:12
|
|
|
Armani posted:Someone please put this in the OP. It's incredibly inaccurate though, the last panel should say "NEVER STOP FOR ANYTHING EVER"
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 11:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 12:21
|
|
|
loving hell that is beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 12:34
|
|
|
Vivian Darkbloom posted:Yeah but Biden makes those horrible gaffes all the time. There exists no other politician who makes more gaffes than Biden, as everyone knows. Trump may say absurdly racist and sexist things, make wild claims with no backing, and refuse to actually state any policy positions but look over here! Joe Biden says things like "Bosniak"! Please please please look over here at Biden and stop looking at the GOP frontrunner!
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 12:47
|
|
|
You know, we always fret over Ramirez's pulitzers, which is understandable. But we also never talk about Siers, Sacks or Wuerker's pulitzers, and those are the three winners since I started following this thread. If we don't care about the cartooning Pulitzer, who does? Maybe it's fine that Ramirez has them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 13:52
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:In Two Bulls's case I'm inclined to think it's genuine, as he's not a "gently caress the environment" type. No, but he also tends to err on the side of distrust for the government, even when (as in this case) it's not warranted-- last I checked, the EPA was very upfront about what had happened, and the studies hadn't come back yet with regard to potential health effects for those downstream of the release. It's understandable where that attitude comes from, but the EPA is up there with, like, the National Park Service and NOAA in terms of "morally good actors."
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 13:59
|
|
|
Stultus Maximus posted:Trump may say absurdly racist and sexist things, make wild claims with no backing, and refuse to actually state any policy positions but look over here! Joe Biden says things like "Bosniak"! Please please please look over here at Biden and stop looking at the GOP frontrunner! There was the time he let Clarence Thomas get away with sexually harassing Anita Hill
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 14:00
|
|
|
Eh, seems legit
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 14:10
|
|
|
colonel_korn posted:lol at Gary McCoy's newfound concern for children of Mexican immigrants I was about to say the same
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
This is a fairly shocking way to make a very milquetoast point.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
Mellow Seas posted:You know, we always fret over Ramirez's pulitzers, which is understandable. But we also never talk about Siers, Sacks or Wuerker's pulitzers, and those are the three winners since I started following this thread. If we don't care about the cartooning Pulitzer, who does? Maybe it's fine that Ramirez has them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 15:10
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
I just love how right wingers attach themselves to Star Wars. It's the most facile childish political perspective: us good guys, them bad guys. They're children.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 15:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 14:54 |
|
|
Quorum posted:No, but he also tends to err on the side of distrust for the government, even when (as in this case) it's not warranted-- last I checked, the EPA was very upfront about what had happened, and the studies hadn't come back yet with regard to potential health effects for those downstream of the release. It's understandable where that attitude comes from, but the EPA is up there with, like, the National Park Service and NOAA in terms of "morally good actors." Yeah, there's a whole bunch of anti-government types that are using this an excuse to hate on the EPA and are not disingenuous corporate sycophants. I mean, they still kind of serve corporations' needs by largely ignoring the culpability of the mining company that created the mess in the first place in favor of spinning conspiracies about the EPA, but they're slightly less hypocritical.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 15:25
|
|