- killhamster
- Apr 15, 2004
-
SCAMMER
Hero Member
|
rip
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 02:55
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2024 17:10
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
at least he'll be able to post again when star citizen comes out
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 02:56
|
|
- Heresiarch
- Oct 6, 2005
-
Literature is not exhaustible, for the sufficient and simple reason that no single book is. A book is not an isolated being: it is a relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships.
|
at least he'll be able to post again when star citizen comes out
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 02:57
|
|
- Dr. Honked
- Jan 9, 2011
-
eat it you slaaaaaaag
|
nobody
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:01
|
|
- Robawesome
- Jul 22, 2005
-
|
at least he'll be able to post again when star citizen comes out
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:04
|
|
- Dr. Honked
- Jan 9, 2011
-
eat it you slaaaaaaag
|
nobody liked this guy
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:05
|
|
- Cyberbird
- Jul 18, 2015
-
|
bet you a bitcoin he tries to evade probation
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:05
|
|
- trucutru
- Jul 9, 2003
-
by Fluffdaddy
|
cannot wait for his new account
seraph85 should be able to fly low for a while without being detected
anyways
quote:
Discussion: Scams are actually GOOD for Bitcoin (self.bitcoin_uncensored)
submitted 7 hours ago by JokeReference
Just think about it for a moment. Scams are a proof that there is a real desire in the free market for Bitcoin. Whenever you hear about an exit scam or bitlocker viruses or an exchange mysteriously disappearing, you're hearing about the uncensored, true need in the world for this currency.
Yes, the scammers are horrible people and should never take advantage of intelligent Bitcoin users, but the fact that they exist should be treated like the canary in the coal mine. No matter what nebulous forces might try to keep down the news of Bitcoin's success, the existence of scams shows that in the real world Bitcoin is alive and well.
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:21
|
|
- trucutru
- Jul 9, 2003
-
by Fluffdaddy
|
BTCS Reports $4.5 Million Loss For This Year’s First Half
https://www.bitcoin.com/news/btcs-reports-4-5-million-loss-years-first-half/
quote:
BCTS reported the total revenues for the Q2 2015 stood at $144,375, significantly up from $4,912 accounted in the Q2 2014, while for the first half of 2015 it stood at 182,043, up from $130,180 the figure registered in the same period in 2014.
According to the company’s CEO Charles Allen:
“Our refined focus on securing the blockchain minimizes risk and positions us to capitalize on the massive market potential of the blockchain across all industries. We believe we selected an ideal timing for market entry that allowed us to pass over the high-risk period of extreme volatility that knocked many smaller players out of the space. With this latest increase in capacity, we believe we are well positioned to become a dominant player for the long-term.”
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 03:25
|
|
- Dren
- Jan 5, 2001
-
-
Pillbug
|
i wish people would stop buying him "funny" custom titles, the one he chose himself is embarrassing enough
the only one I ever see is the probation kitten
at least he'll be able to post again when star citizen comes out
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:06
|
|
- Dren
- Jan 5, 2001
-
-
Pillbug
|
hello seraph84
to my fellow buttcoiners, i have a slow day at work and want to yell at the void and i'm sorry.
i am writing you this message in the hopes that you will read it. i'm sure you will because how could you resist? this reflection upon your words is impossible to look away from for such an embodiment of narcissus himself. sadly i will not succeed in getting through to you in any way because you're distracted by yourself and have already made up your mind about all of this since you perceive yourself to be infallibly intelligent and that the way you see the world is surely the best and most correct for how smart you are. yes indeed.
your youtube link suggests you feel like a victim, attacked. and that you can "fight back" as it were. this is a naive interpretation of your persistence here at best, an insult to what you pretend to stand for at worst. this is not a good start to your childish psuedo intellectual diatribe and no one outside of your like minded cryptophillic sycophants will respond well to something like this.
"actually, this is good for bitcoin" is a good meme we utter with frequency because it embodies your shuttered mindset so well. so desperate are the invested believers that any context can be contrived to be "Good for bitcoin". surely even you have seen this pattern and surely you can realize that you are not immune to it.
you're wrong. your arguments are founded on nothing but your flawed imagination and propped up by the madness you indulge yourself in.
you had three days to edit and do copy on your shallow antagony and yet there are simple spelling and grammatical errors. were you anyone else i wouldnt even mention it but you are eager to present yourself as a beautiful marble statue so i'd like to point out some flaws in your own inability to convey yourself.
also this paragraph is devoid of any actionable meaning and you're not as good a writer as you think you are.
there's a lot of conclusions you're jumping to here. bitcoin is neither anonymous nor outside of the realm of law. vpn or not. it had a brief period of outpacing comprehension of the legal system, but that period is quickly coming to a close and transactions are just as legally binding and identifiable as ever. risks about your personal information are still just as present and bitcoin has very little to do with enabling or disabling elements of either side of the privacy coin.
"any financially solvent person who is serious about their ethical principles"
holy poo poo are you joking. that's a rhetorical question but are you seriously this misguided by randian abject reality
like, you're serious.
you really live so divorced from how the Real World works that you wrote these words unironically.
you feel very clever right now and that is a fault that will hold you back till you die if you can't come to your senses.
you present an internal dichotomy between 'fiat' and 'bitcoin' but even your own paragraph inextricably binds bitcoin to fiat by mere presence of dollar value.
you have no idea how money works but you're really sure you do.
the play on current and currency is so eye rolling you should be embarrassed. that you lack the self awareness to edit this kind of poo poo out means these diatribes will reach no one but those patient enough to yell at the void such as myself.
you talk about ethics and then tout the utility of evading taxes
do you know what ethics are? do you know how it differs from morals? probably not. probably. not.
a vivid imagination is playing out in your mind about how all of this should go down and how it will inevitably play out, but that part of your brain that checks and balances your assumptions with how reality plays out will never quite get the cycles it needs to realize that these exact promises have been just around the corner from so many people just as naive as you since bitcoin's inception and none of them have come true. you describe all these things happening but don't truly describe how and why every day actual real people actually want this or will be inspired to do this. (hint: they never will)
what possible grounds do you have to believe any of this? why do you think your imagination is so valid? surely you can meditatively socratic-method yourself into challenging your actual place in the world versus your grandiose visions and prophecies
no sane and reasonable person wants to trade systematized commodities as an every-day currency. that'd be like trading you shares of AAPL to buy groceries. it's not scalable and it's not feasible. and no sidechains and other augmentations dont count as they have the same problem and also don't and will never exist.
that quote is amazingly laden with bad assumptions and broad yet shallow finality that only an arrogant child such as yourself could fawn over. it's hollow and you're too dumb to see that.
invoking the kardashev scale in an attempt to appear omnisciently aware of some grand manifest destiny is enormously arrogant in the context you're trying to present it in. in a post-capitalist society we wouldn't need investment or an overwrought trust-less autism currency. we'd also all be dead.
the ledger aspect of bitcoin is not immune to tampering. it is fallacy to believe that information of any sort is immutable no matter how much redundancy you're expecting to pile onto it (and by extension waste energy over). all it takes is an organized human effort (and not necessarily a democratic one) to either extinguish ~the blockchain~ or force a favorable fork or version of the protocol.
this too shall pass.
please don't attach yourself to people who actually have good thoughts, as if you are on their level, or have anything meaningful to say about them as a reflection of your own experiences. it's insulting to Erich Fromm.
and then everyone stood up and clapped
the err of your violently misguided philosophies stems from a disbelief in others to build a society that you feel is fair to you, which you could only take the time to construct from the privilege said society has afforded you. the disbelief that other humans can construct social systems that can operate in a way that are somehow better than something as rigid, ugly, clunky, un-scaling as bitcoin is why bitcoin and bitcoiners will never be broadly appealing. to spit whenever you hear "social contracts" is to isolate yourself and your comrades even further from the everyday realities of the working everyday people you desperately want to attract and adopt this nightmare.
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:08
|
|
- Heresiarch
- Oct 6, 2005
-
Literature is not exhaustible, for the sufficient and simple reason that no single book is. A book is not an isolated being: it is a relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships.
|
the only one I ever see is the probation kitten
somebody bought him an anime avatar and a pedophile reference custom title, you can see it on his user profile which doesn't have the probation kitten
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:09
|
|
- PleasureKevin
- Jan 2, 2011
-
|
even the star citizen post that got him banned is plagiarized:
A citizen who has not been completely alienated, who has remained sensitive and able to feel, who has not lost that sense of dignity, who is not yet "for sale", who can still suffer over the suffering of other citizens, who has not acquired fully the having mode of existence - briefly, a citizen who has remained a person and not become a thing – a machine which cannot help feeling lonely, powerless, isolated in modern UEE society. Such a citizen cannot help doubting xermself and xer own convictions, if not xer sanity!
Xhe cannot help suffering, even though xhe can experience moments of joy and clarity that are absent in the life of xer "normal" contemporaries. Not rarely will xhe suffer from neurosis that naturally result from the situation of a sane citizen living in an insane society, rather than that of the more conventional neurosis of a typically sick sentient trying to adapt xermself to a sick intergalactic society. In the process of going further in xer analysis, i.e. of growing to greater independence and productivity, xer neurotic symptoms will cure themselves.
A person who has not been completely alienated, who has remained sensitive and able to feel, who has not lost the sense of dignity, who is not yet "for sale", who can still suffer over the suffering of others, who has not acquired fully the having mode of existence - briefly, a person who has remained a person and not become a thing - cannot help feeling lonely, powerless, isolated in present-day society. He cannot help doubting himself and his own convictions, if not his sanity.
[added paragraph break to match his]
He cannot help suffering, even though he can experience moments of joy and clarity that are absent in the life of his "normal" contemporaries. Not rarely will he suffer from neurosis that results from the situation of a sane man living in an insane society, rather than that of the more conventional neurosis of a sick man trying to adapt himself to a sick society. In the process of going further in his analysis, i.e. of growing to greater independence and productivity,his neurotic symptoms will cure themselves.
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:25
|
|
- Robawesome
- Jul 22, 2005
-
|
somebody bought him an anime avatar and a pedophile reference custom title, you can see it on his user profile which doesn't have the probation kitten
Occupation: Seer
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:33
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
was sanserif84 real? or was he an elaborate troll? how much money did lowtax get from this whole affair? did anyone say buttcoin? we may never know...
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:34
|
|
- Heresiarch
- Oct 6, 2005
-
Literature is not exhaustible, for the sufficient and simple reason that no single book is. A book is not an isolated being: it is a relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships.
|
he'll be back in a week to tell us all that it was a performance art piece and that we all played our roles fabulously
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:36
|
|
- Dren
- Jan 5, 2001
-
-
Pillbug
|
even the star citizen post that got him banned is plagiarized:
this is funny but why did you read the posts don't read the posts
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:37
|
|
- Mercury_Storm
- Jun 12, 2003
-
*chomp chomp chomp*
|
I thought that circumventing a probation is a ban-able offense, so he's as good as permabanned for about 11 years
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:39
|
|
- PleasureKevin
- Jan 2, 2011
-
|
this is funny but why did you read the posts don't read the posts
well turns out i didn't, i was reading fromm.
but seriously i just copy and pasted the first sentence into google haha
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 04:41
|
|
- Dixie Cretin Seaman
- Jan 22, 2008
-
all hat and one catte
-
Hot Rope Guy
|
does this mean they spent all that money on an unprofitable mining operation
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:14
|
|
- trucutru
- Jul 9, 2003
-
by Fluffdaddy
|
does this mean they spent all that money on an unprofitable mining operation
of course!
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:15
|
|
- Mercury_Storm
- Jun 12, 2003
-
*chomp chomp chomp*
|
Wow, so he threw about $42000 in the fireplace recently on bits then, good going
Yeah no wonder he was melting down extra hard
Mercury_Storm fucked around with this message at 05:21 on Aug 27, 2015
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:15
|
|
- PleasureKevin
- Jan 2, 2011
-
|
BCA means what?
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:19
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
bit-coin accumulation
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:22
|
|
- fermun
- Nov 4, 2009
-
|
buying cost average, i think. it's a thing where they say it's good to buy while it's crashing because it reduces the average cost you paid for your bitcoins and so when it goes up uP UP, you'll have made even more profit.
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:27
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
are there any bitcoin banks where you can deposit bitcoins and earn interest on the deposit?
the bank of be your own bank because bitcoin can only go up uP UP
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:28
|
|
- Sentient Data
- Aug 31, 2011
-
My molecule scrambler ray will disintegrate your armor with one blow!
|
You see, when you bought 10btc at 10 then another btc at the gox high off 1000, it was still a totally smart decision to buy at the 1000 because it only brought your average up to 100.
Anything at all to desperately hide past mistakes
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:29
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2024 17:10
|
|
- PleasureKevin
- Jan 2, 2011
-
|
buying cost average, i think. it's a thing where they say it's good to buy while it's crashing because it reduces the average cost you paid for your bitcoins and so when it goes up uP UP, you'll have made even more profit.
yeah, that's what i thought. so Mercury_Storm is probably wrong about the $42k number.
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2015 05:39
|
|