Important to the magical mind of the gun nut is the belief that because a gun uses a round designed for target shooting, or for killing game birds, it is therefore restrained from being used in violence against humans. Even if some liberal SJW sickopath managed to overcome the spells binding the 20-gauge loaded with birdshot, the percentage chance is lower that they will kill someone with it, so there's no problem.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 13:46 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 00:36 |
|
Effectronica posted:Important to the magical mind of the gun nut is the belief that because a gun uses a round designed for target shooting, or for killing game birds, it is therefore restrained from being used in violence against humans. So you agree with me that some cartridges (and logically the guns built to take those cartridges) were designed to have purposes other than killing people (target shooting, hunting). Thanks. Never said guns were harmless, just that not all guns are built with the sole purpose of killing people.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 13:52 |
|
tumblr.txt posted:So you agree with me that some cartridges (and logically the guns built to take those cartridges) were designed to have purposes other than killing people (target shooting, hunting). Thanks. Oh, gently caress off.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 13:58 |
tumblr.txt posted:So you agree with me that some cartridges (and logically the guns built to take those cartridges) were designed to have purposes other than killing people (target shooting, hunting). Thanks. No, I refuse to agree with liars. Please admit your dishonest statements about what other people have said, such as altering "killing" to "killing people" and refusing to distinguish between guns and bullets. Or, you know, go the way of all gun freaks.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:01 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:Kellermann’s studies on guns frequently get criticized by people who do not seem to have read them. The latest to do so is Michael Krauss, who writes
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:02 |
|
Someone post the John Galt speech next.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:15 |
|
Doccers posted:I've still not seen any causal link to gun control lowering suicide or homicide rates. Even the Australian ban has studies indicating strongly it did absolutely nothing. ( http://www.sascv.org/ijcjs/pdfs/bakersamaraijcjs2015vol10issue1.pdf ) The implicit fallacy here which gun advocates literally never seem to consider is that Australia already had strong gun laws, they didn't go from nothing to a full ban. You can use this data to argue that full bans are not significantly better than merely heavy regulation, but you cannot honestly use it to claim what they always do, which is that Gun Laws Do Nothing. This is without even going too far into their mythology that upon a gun ban crime will skyrocket and the government will viciously oppress (choose one according to your politics: taxpayers/the proletariat/the pure white man)
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:27 |
|
tumblr.txt posted:So you agree with me that some cartridges (and logically the guns built to take those cartridges) were designed to have purposes other than killing people (target shooting, hunting). Thanks. Target shooting is practice killing. Hunting is killing. I never said 'for the sole purpose of killing people exclusively.' Their sole purpose is destructive. If you are caught up on target shooting as a hobby, then choose another projectile medium that isn't harmful to society at large, or conducive to efficient mass injury/death. Like a slingshot or a bow and arrow.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:42 |
|
The vast vast majority of guns aren't used to kill anyone. I think we're going to be okay, Lee. We're going to be okay.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:51 |
|
I think guns are fine, we just need to ban the use of a chemical propellant and make it so you have to pump your firearm like a BB gun. No using gas cartridges to cheat either, you have to pressurize it by hand the good old fashion way. This way you can still hunt and target shoot or hold it in your hand while standing naked in front of a mirror with your microdick tucked between your legs so you can finally feel like a real man if only for a moment or whatever, but it's way harder to kill 12 people.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:57 |
|
various cheeses posted:The vast vast majority of guns aren't used to kill anyone. so you agree that guns are useless
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 14:58 |
|
I think we can all agree that at the very least crossbows are objectively better than guns at everything except shooting multiple things quickly or one thing multiple times. I propose we have a government program to exchange any gun for a crossbow.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 15:08 |
|
Ha! Yeah right! Then you'll want to come after my crossbows next! Which is ridiculous because Type-C Weimerheinen crossbows are NOT ASSAULT CROSSBOWS and were only designed for beautiful displays of marksmanship and the explosive bolts are only for style and furthermore *posts ten thousand lines about crossbow trigger mechanisms and how WRONG AND BACKWARDS these SJW DIPSHITS are about EVEN THE MOST SIMPLE CROSSBOW EQUIPMENT, GOD*
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 15:13 |
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:so you agree that guns are useless all things that do not kill are useless, death is the only goal worth striving for
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 15:25 |
|
Effectronica posted:Or, you know, go the way of all gun freaks. Achieve policy success?
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 15:52 |
|
SedanChair posted:Achieve policy success? For now! You must be ever
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:14 |
SedanChair posted:Achieve policy success? I was thinking "develop a full-blown sexual paraphilia", but that'$ a workable analog¥.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:19 |
People take concerted action and maintain constant vigilance in defense of their issue. Political activism as it should be or paranoia?
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:20 |
Who What Now posted:So what I'm getting here is that you believe whites and non-whites cannot coexist without violence. Interesting. Considering black people are more likely to be shot by other black people I don't know how you came up with this. According to those who want to ban guns it's racist to allow black people access to firearms since they will just end up shooting each other. So what I am getting from that is low numbers of black people + strict gun control = lower homicide rates from firearms.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:27 |
|
Effectronica posted:I was thinking "develop a full-blown sexual paraphilia", but that'$ a workable analog¥. Sex is actually a death paraphilia. Turns out loving is just a repressed urge to stab people with a spear.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:37 |
|
Armyman25 posted:Considering black people are more likely to be shot by other black people I don't know how you came up with this. According to those who want to ban guns it's racist to allow black people access to firearms since they will just end up shooting each other. white people are more likely to shoot other white people, and most likely to shoot themselves. i support every white american's second amendment right to defend themselves from themselves
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:54 |
|
crossbows should be allowed because theyre badass and i wouldnt even mind being shot with a crossbow, id just be like, "dude", not in a bad way, just kinda impressed
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:55 |
|
DolphinCop posted:crossbows should be allowed because theyre badass and i wouldnt even mind being shot with a crossbow, id just be like, "dude", not in a bad way, just kinda impressed http://pse-archery.com/shop/shop-crossbows/tac-ordnance/ These guys make a crossbow upper for an AR-15 lower receiver and fire control group. I don't even know what the gently caress.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 16:59 |
|
Doccers posted:http://pse-archery.com/shop/shop-crossbows/tac-ordnance/ American ingenuity
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:02 |
|
Doccers posted:http://pse-archery.com/shop/shop-crossbows/tac-ordnance/ I wonder what somebody who doesn't know about guns would think about it. "it's a crossbow...PLUS an assault rifle. Game of Thrones times a thousand."
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:02 |
|
DolphinCop posted:crossbows should be allowed because theyre badass and i wouldnt even mind being shot with a crossbow, id just be like, "dude", not in a bad way, just kinda impressed Plus when you inevitably shoot your child as they sneak in after breaking curfew you're much less likely to kill them and you can both have a laugh about it on the way to the hospital.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:03 |
|
TAC ARROWS
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:03 |
|
Doccers posted:http://pse-archery.com/shop/shop-crossbows/tac-ordnance/ I want this. I want to walk around in public with a crossbow on an AR-15. Also lol it was used in Red.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:05 |
|
before guns wars were basically fought with Nerf weapons that's why WWI's violence shocked everyone so much
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:05 |
|
Worried your new crossbow won't fill that niche of shooting a bunch of tiny projectiles all at once like your shotgun does? Don't worry we got you covered with our brand new Splinterstorm Bolt(patent pending)! This plastic sleeve is filled with hundreds and hundreds of toothpicks that is sure to please. Just send $35 in unmarked bills to our shipping center to receive your Splinterstorm bolt today. Order now and receive two boxes of refill toothpicks absolutely free!
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:10 |
|
Split bolts like in the Witcher 3 or one of those demon hunter abilities in Diablo 3 will work nicely thanks.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:36 |
|
This is a thread for cool things like guns get your nerd poo poo out of here, nerd.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 17:40 |
|
How to spot an anti-gun retard: 1. Did they post about gun owner penis sizes? Anti-Gun retards think about the penis size of gun owners constantly. Guns threaten their masculinity and as such make them feel inadequate which they project onto the people that caused it, you guessed it gun owners. Notice how gun owners never talk about the penis size of non gun havers? It just isn't a thing. But any anti-gun thread or editorial will always have someone who is anti-gun calling firearms penis compensation devices. 2. Did they mention the militia part of the 2nd amendment and how we have to be in a militia to own guns? Anti-Gun retards don't understand what a militia really is. That it is made up of average citizens (eg not paid soldiers or law enforcement) and that typically militias supplied their own weaponry. How exactly does one provide their own weaponry to a militia if they aren't allowed to own them in the first place? Also Anti-gun retards love to say the National Guard is the militia even though it wasn't created until 1903, which also codified what the militia actually is. On top of all that the Heller decision in 2008 by the US Supreme Court said militia membership is not and has never been a requirement for gun ownership in the United States. Anti-gun retards love SCOTUS when it says Abortion or Gay marriage or Obamacare is legal in 5-4 decisions, but have a gun decision by 5-4 margin and it doesn't really count because retard logic. 3. Did they mention how no one needs something for hunting or that guns serve only one purpose? Anti-gun retards think owning firearms are only about hunting or killing people, because they are loving morons and must think computers are only about spreadsheets and playing solitaire. 4. Did they say anything about how the founding fathers couldn't have envisioned hi-cap magazines or machine guns? Anti-Gun retards don't understand concepts like technology and argue on computers or their smart phone using free speech protected by the 1st amendment about how the 4th amendment should protect them from search and seizure and that it also allows legal butt fuckery and abortions but say the 2nd amendment applies to an AR15 and holy poo poo Anti-gun retardation spills out everywhere thinking the 2nd only applies to muskets. Again the Anti-gun retard didn't read the Heller decision where this was plainly explained in basic English for everyone to read. 5. Did they mention how America should be like another country because that country in a cherry picked metric is better than the US? Anti-gun retards don't understand things like population size, density, geographic areas, economic policies, standards of living or even structures of government. Anything they suggest that the US does because another country does it you can immediately suggest female genital mutilation as a good idea because other countries do it. If they don't catch on or think you're serious they are an Anti-Gun Retard. 6. Did they say how they don't like how easy it is for guns to kill people? Anti-Gun retards can't control their emotions because they are retards. They think because they can't master basic poo poo like not pissing your pants or killing everyone when handed something dangerous no one else can do this. This is because they have a retard brain. They never scream about banning cars full of gasoline because they are so easy to kill lots of people with especially if you just gave a car to someone. Yet funny enough there aren't background checks etc to buy a car, or even licensing requirements to buy one either. No, Anti-Gun retards focus solely on how easy it is to kill people with guns because they can't problem solve their way out of a paper bag. Case in point after the Isla Vista murders where Elliot Roger stabbed people, hit them with his car and shot them; did the Anti-Gun retards care about stabbings or cars? No, they only screamed about guns because they are retarded. 7. Did they say how only cops or the military should have guns? Anti-Gun retards love LOVE LOVE the idea of societies with peasants and nobility. And really wish reality was like Game of Thrones or Anime or some other terrible situation where all of the poor people were subject to the whims and machinations of the armed nobility who could do what they pleased when they pleased without fear of reprisal. Anti-Gun retards at the same time will screech about how bad the 1% is and how the 99% should do something while not understanding just how retarded they are. 8. Did they say gun owners are racist? This is because Anti-Gun retards are usually racist as hell. They don't like the poor owning guns which, you guessed it also includes minorities. Funny the pro gun side wants gun rights for everyone, yes even blacks, gays,women and jews. Anti-Gun retards want to disarm minorities and women to make them easier victims for those that would wish to do them harm. To Anti-Gun retards, it would be preferable a woman be raped than be able to defend herself ever. That a minority be killed in the street like a dog than afford them the right to conceal carry a firearm to kill red neck assholes with. I hope you can now spot Anti-Gun retards and realize just how loving moronic they are.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:06 |
|
Didn't read but I am all of these points.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:12 |
|
Fat Ogre posted:retard retards retards retards retards retard retards loving morons retards retardation retard retards Retard retards retards a retard brain retards retards they are retarded. retards retards just how retarded they are. retards retards retards how loving moronic they are. Forums poster Fat ogre has a developmentally disabled child in real life.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:12 |
|
Look, projecting your small penis onto others won't change that you have a small penis.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:13 |
|
Tezzor posted:Fat ogre has a developmentally disabled child. Using burns originated by Kid Gloves I see. Even if I did have a retard for a kid what bearing does it have on this discussion? You think Shotguns and rifles are the same and that carrying a gun isn't using a gun.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:15 |
|
MariusLecter posted:Look, projecting your small penis onto others won't change that you have a small penis. Talking bout penises! Point number 1!
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:15 |
|
Fat Ogre posted:Talking bout penises! Point number 1! Open up a theater why don't you.
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 00:36 |
It's kind of disturbing how there are thousands of people who believe that the Supreme Court is infallible when issuing ex cathedra proclamations on matters of doctrine. To begin with, that's the pope who has that superpower.
|
|
# ? Aug 28, 2015 18:17 |