|
Shaggar posted:maybe if we were looking at routers with very similar performance, but in this case the difference in speeds is so incredible that the small variances caused by the network aren't significant. mishaq posted:ok shagger actually shaggar is extremely correct here. real world testing is the only number that matters sniping page 0x100
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 11:26 |
|
|
every packet is inspected and ads are injected if possible.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:every
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
and also ads are injected
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
if ad injection is not possible the packet is sent to goog for examination so they can determine how to inject ads
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
"everyone elses content, our ads" - goog
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:it's amazing to me that nobody at google foresaw that everybody would assume their router was mining everything for ad data hmmmmmmm i wonder why
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 18:24
|
|
|
I like how there is only one LAN port. on a $200 router. i wonder if they cut it because they somehow managed to gently caress up gig-e switching.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:I like how there is only one LAN port. on a $200 router. i wonder if they cut it because they somehow managed to gently caress up gig-e switching. theres just not enough surface area on this gigantic cylinder of a router to put a few more ethernet ports on it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:I like how there is only one LAN port. on a $200 router. i wonder if they cut it because they somehow managed to gently caress up gig-e switching. more gig-e ports means more packets to sniff per second which makes the router even slower.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
i predicted this. the router is so slow because it's constantly compiling gentoo updates
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
google antitrust problems spread to india http://recode.net/2015/08/31/in-india-google-could-face-another-antitrust-case/ must be india trying to punish american tech companies - google apologist
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:it's amazing to me that nobody at google foresaw that everybody would assume their router was mining everything for ad data not only that but there doesn't seem to be a clear message about what this is or why it's good.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
some of google's internal practices (particularly with regards to how they work with contractors) make those of microsoft look like glittering mind-diamonds
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:not only that but there doesn't seem to be a clear message about what this is or why it's good. I mean, does this surprise you in any way?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
google heard the rumors of a new apple tv thats combined with an Airport Extreme and Time Capsule and they had to get something out the door.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Ludwig van Halen posted:google heard the rumors of a new apple tv thats combined with an Airport Extreme and Time Capsule and they had to get something out the door. i'm pretty sure that rumour was my professional speculation in another thread?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:what the hell, how can it be so bad with a fast enough SoC and wifi chips? is their software really that bad or the extra processing power went to something else Shifty Pony posted:I like how there is only one LAN port. on a $200 router. i wonder if they cut it because they somehow managed to gently caress up gig-e switching. Shaggar posted:tp-link is fine, its the goog that's poo poo your garden variety consumer "router" is only usable because it does all the routing and switching in hardware, not on the control plane. under normal circumstances, data never passes through the cpu. those 1 GHz ARM chips can't actually move very much data. fast cpus with piss I/O and piss memory bandwidth some moron at goog said "well we have a bunch of megahertz" and decided to try and do poo poo like it's an x86 linux box lol 100% cpu usage and 20 mbps throughput
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:24
|
|
|
especially given that they use gentoo what do you want to bet they did 100% of the software development on x86 boxes and then just figured "oh hey this marvell SoC is 1.5 GHz, it'll be fine"
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
i had a $50 802.11n buffalo router and wi-fi always seemed kinda slow but i never really measured it, and then i upgraded from a 4mbps to a 100mbps internet connection and the speeds didnt seem to improve at all. turns out that piece of crap buffalo router was capping actual wi-fi transfer speeds at 2mbps no matter which settings i used. maybe google hired the project team from that router to make onhub
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
fart simpson posted:i had a $50 802.11n buffalo router and wi-fi always seemed kinda slow but i never really measured it, and then i upgraded from a 4mbps to a 100mbps internet connection and the speeds didnt seem to improve at all. turns out that piece of crap buffalo router was capping actual wi-fi transfer speeds at 2mbps no matter which settings i used. maybe google hired the project team from that router to make onhub My old Comcast router's chipset capped wireless speeds at about 40 megabit to the outside world but could handle 150 megabit within the Lan. Since the original speed was ~33 megabit download this was invisible, but it got real annoying when the service got boosted to 120 down
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
my guess is the brillo team made this as their like test device and they're like welp that was a lot of R&D, better ship something, hmm how about this dumb prototype?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
then when they try convince HTC to use brillo they can point to this and be like, see? a thing. :-)
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:My old Comcast router's chipset capped wireless speeds at about 40 megabit to the outside world but could handle 150 megabit within the Lan. Since the original speed was ~33 megabit download this was invisible, but it got real annoying when the service got boosted to 120 down my verizon router capped the ethernet ports at 25mb despite me paying for 50. the wireless was only G too so i couldn't complain there, but putting it into passthru mode and putting a cheapo linksys as the router 'doubled' my speed i guess what im saying here is gently caress verizon fios and gently caress this horrible earth that they're still leagues better than my only other option (kabletown).
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
someone should compare the OnHubris to the google fibre router to see if it's somehow gotten worse
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:10
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:your garden variety consumer "router" is only usable because it does all the routing and switching in hardware, not on the control plane. under normal circumstances, data never passes through the cpu. those 1 GHz ARM chips can't actually move very much data. fast cpus with piss I/O and piss memory bandwidth I found this out with Asus rt-ac66u. QOS disabled hardware routing and dropped throughout to 110mbit which was frustrating because I have gigabit fiber. turning it off and reenabling hardware routing sent speeds back up to... 240mbit down 900mbit up because I happen to have one of the lucky unknown number of rt-ac66u routers with a hardware routing glitch to which Asus says "lol gently caress you it is past the warranty period". still better than using at&t's router because I can use opendns instead of having at&tdns sending me to woefully overloaded cdns for YouTube and the like. also lol it was faster in non hardware accelerated mode than the Google router.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:26
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:I found this out with Asus rt-ac66u. QOS disabled hardware routing and dropped throughout to 110mbit which was frustrating because I have gigabit fiber. turning it off and reenabling hardware routing sent speeds back up to... 240mbit down 900mbit up because I happen to have one of the lucky unknown number of rt-ac66u routers with a hardware routing glitch to which Asus says "lol gently caress you it is past the warranty period". i have a question is it more correct to use a custom dns or something...
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:30
|
|
|
Smythe posted:i have a question is it more correct to use a custom dns or something... Honestly you should use that dnsbench thing to see what servers work good for your network, then select the top like 2 that won't redirect if a site don't exist
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:OnHubris A for participation but C- for being kinda dumb and stupid
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:Honestly you should use that dnsbench thing to see what servers work good for your network, then select the top like 2 that won't redirect if a site don't exist that's exactly what I did. works great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 04:48
|
|
|
uuh ethernet switching gets done in hardware sure but like hardware NAT? and i mean these shits usually run some form of linux? idk i'm just a dumb retard but that doesn't sound right
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
lol if you don't use the finest latvian engineering for your home router
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 06:53
|
|
|
every single modemrouter combination is loving garbage.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:every single modemrouter combination is loving garbage.  if your wifi ap and router are not separate devices you done hosed up
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 06:56
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:someone put a new set of double a's in cremnob i want him fully charged on tuesday 
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
just attach a USB hub to your main macbook and plug USB hdds and Ethernet adapters into it and passthrough them into virtualbox where you run a router file server Linux
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 10:36
|
|
|
ya same
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 13:38
|
|
|
what happens today?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
I hope Smythe probes cremnob for the whole week
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 14:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 11:26 |
|
|
its here. the all new nest generation 3 The display is 40 percent larger than the previous Nest, with 25 percent more pixels. (Nest says the display is now up to 229 PPI.) With the new display, Nest is adding a "Farsight" feature to the thermostat, which turns the display on whenever it detects motion in a room and displays useful information. The Nest will display an analog clock, digital clock, or the current temperature; Nest says it can be read from "across the room." Previously, the Nest display would only turn on when someone was standing in front of it, but "Farsight" is an extension of this that covers the whole room.
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2015 14:31
|
|