|
neonnoodle posted:This is great; you are great. Thanks man! Here's another one from the same project. An accursed defiler.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2015 14:53 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:31 |
|
Have not been in a good mood for art the last two weeks and have been drawing mostly scrap. With that said, there are two great female digital artists with kickstarters right now for art books (and both are cheap buys, given shipping from Europe and small production runs): loish, http://loish.deviantart.com/ and http://loish.net/ https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1022149620/the-art-of-loish-a-look-behind-the-scenes Pernille, http://www.pernilleoe.dk/ https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pernilleoe/blush-the-art-of-pernille-rum I am not related in any way to either artist though I do enjoy their work. I've been trying to diversify my reference, inspirations and ideas shelf away from Japan, and both those books seem like a good fit to me.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2015 17:44 |
|
can I post stuff here that doesn't involve anything but keyboard and mouse in photoshop
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 10:27 |
|
Varicelli posted:can I post stuff here that doesn't involve anything but keyboard and mouse in photoshop I vote yes and I'm incredibly curious to see it now. Show us your soul.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 10:47 |
|
Delta Echo posted:I vote yes and I'm incredibly curious to see it now.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 14:32 |
|
yeah, sorry. I just wasn't too sure if this was only like actual drawings or stuff but I usually modify photos and composite upon them until they look really different. Here is te thingy I recently set up. https://www.behance.net/velly I mostly just want to know if any of this is actually good because I'm spending a lot of time on it around these days and if its not worthwhile I could be doing other stuff haha this sounds a little self serving but I really just don't have anyone reliable to tell me
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 17:08 |
|
also bit rushed on and low res -- too low res to do nice stitching Varicelli fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Sep 11, 2015 |
# ? Sep 11, 2015 17:27 |
|
Confessions wall and Infrared are very successful. Confessions wall in particular, because I can't spot the filters. As appreciable as legitimate artwork.
Anagram of GINGER fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Sep 11, 2015 |
# ? Sep 11, 2015 17:35 |
|
I have links for the two big ones in full size too http://casumon.com/ss4824_2.jpg http://casumon.com/4-6-15_final.jpg
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 17:49 |
|
Agreed with Delta Echo. One thing to note if you use your own photos, Sigma makes a line of cameras that store Blue / White, Red, and Green in seperate layers in the raw. It's an exotic, CCD only used by Sigma, requires special software to process images (free, from Sigma), is not cheap, and only produces best results with prime lenses designed explicitly for each camera due to customizations. If you need another lens, you need a new camera. With that said, it could be a huge initial leg up on work like yours. The dp0 ultra wide seems particularly suited. http://www.sigma-global.com/en/cameras/dp-series/ Note that these cameras are for art, not weddings. A lot of reviews miss the point. (Disclaimer: I do not own one of these but have admired some of the work I have seen done with them.)
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 17:55 |
|
I've just discovered the method which works best for me. I start a tiny tiny canvas, and draw thumbnails of stuff, and eventually start expanding the canvas, blowing things up in resolution and just finish from there. I had no idea this could work. Been doing the complete opposite of this for years.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 09:23 |
|
Make sure you establish a horizon line and periodically re-check the perspective while zoomed out. I sometimes make the mistake of putting down the structure of a thing in improper perspective, simply due to being zoomed-in and missing the overall perspective.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 10:38 |
|
Back when I made these I was really proud of them. Now, I'm not sure it's all that good. They're probably quite terrible!
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 20:43 |
|
Scribblehatch posted:
the action doesn't follow through in the torso cause its just facing forward, and it looks kinda awkward cause of how much movement is implied by the trails Crap fucked around with this message at 05:13 on Sep 13, 2015 |
# ? Sep 13, 2015 04:46 |
|
Is there any bit you liked?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 08:17 |
|
I liked the concept. There's a few things I'd do differently. I thought the arc of the paint showed a bit too much rotation. I shortened it to what I think looks believable, rather than "ow my hyperextended shoulder." I think the front-view face detracts from the sense of motion you want. The lower arm is a bit static and also not matching up with the shoulder. It could be made to look more dynamic, as if it is swinging along with the rest of the image. I pulled the leg in on the right side, because I think the base of his stance is too stable. He should look like he's about to finish his swing and then step forward with the back foot. Added a gradient to the paint swipe. I realize it's a single color paint, so to make it technically correct you'd need to use shadows to justify the darker swipe in the foreground. Added splashes along the plane of the swing.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 11:42 |
|
Sheeeeyit. That arm and head position is actually a lot better.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 15:00 |
|
Colon Semicolon posted:Back when I made these I was really proud of them. Now, I'm not sure it's all that good. They're probably quite terrible! I like this style, reminds me of that one 3D megaman game. I like the shading, but is that all baked in? I'd be interested seeing it motion.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 15:04 |
|
Megaspel posted:I like this style, reminds me of that one 3D megaman game. I like the shading, but is that all baked in? I'd be interested seeing it motion. The way it works is that the bottom of the tunnel is baked vertex colors that won't change with the mesh, so the textures along the tunnel are just panned along it's surface without actually moving it. the bars actually do just loop from their start position to the end, faking the actual movement quite well. I think the wheels on the elevator turn too, but it was almost never seen due to the camera angle. As for the robot? that particular one never got implemented in-game due to an oversight. However, all the other ones made looked fairly similiar, and they seemed to look fine in-game. The only difference is their lighting was a bit more uniform, whereas this one has a defined light source. I did nearly all the weapons that were used in our initial demo, but I haven't finished off all the presentation sheets.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 16:31 |
|
Anyone want to try a collaborative drawing by kicking a Photoshop file back and forth? PM me if interested.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 03:48 |
|
I didn't really like doing art digitally for a long time but finally got better hardware/software/brush sets so I did a lot more over the summer. Here's some dumb fanart dumb non fanart
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 05:38 |
|
Total noobshit here, I did have a question about this thread, awesome work all of you by the way! Would photo manipulation be appropriate to post in here? However if there is another thread wholly for photo manips I would love some linkage. c:
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 20:16 |
|
This is my depiction of the doof who stole my tv, book him officer
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 20:18 |
|
strangeconcoction posted:Total noobshit here, I did have a question about this thread, awesome work all of you by the way! Test your might
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 20:46 |
|
Delta Echo posted:Test your might Hope I don't get fatalitied up in this bitch.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 22:16 |
|
I vote yes it counts. What was your process? You call it photo manipulation but again, like the last example of keyboard and mouse work, I can't 'spot the filter.'
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 22:21 |
|
I do use some filtering, but even that has a technique in itself. Like many other photo manip peeps I used to slap one on at full blast setting because I thought it hid all of the ball busting worthy flaws. Careful adjustments of layers, layer opacities, and merging will give it a painterly and unique but sharpened allure. Basically if I'm gonna use a filter I'll make it so it doesn't look like it has a filter. c:
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 22:33 |
|
In review, so-called image/photo manipulations posted on this page. pretty frickin' sweet.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 22:42 |
|
Well consider me truly tickled, haha. The second one looks like a painting. Absolutely dreamlike.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2015 22:54 |
|
Nice Akira/Half-Life elevator.
|
# ? Sep 15, 2015 00:30 |
|
Nevermind wrong thread sorry guys.
Kierena fucked around with this message at 03:27 on Sep 15, 2015 |
# ? Sep 15, 2015 03:16 |
|
Have a bear riding Witch for your troubles Kierena fucked around with this message at 03:28 on Sep 15, 2015 |
# ? Sep 15, 2015 03:25 |
|
Delta Echo posted:In review, so-called image/photo manipulations posted on this page. In the mirrorless camera thread we are planning some Tokyo street photography trip next week and I am going to make sure to take fancy wide angle art photos and provide my camera raws itt for these guys. I already slap-dashed an Amazon S3 website for this purpose.
|
# ? Sep 15, 2015 07:58 |
|
Varicelli posted:Here is te thingy I recently set up. This is sick. Today was a fruitful day. President Kucinich fucked around with this message at 09:03 on Sep 16, 2015 |
# ? Sep 16, 2015 09:01 |
|
President Kucinich posted:This is sick. Every once in a while I see something I wish I had thought of.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2015 12:01 |
|
Box
|
# ? Sep 16, 2015 21:45 |
|
Digital drawing of some feline primate species things I made a ways back.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2015 19:41 |
|
Well that's loving radical.
|
# ? Sep 18, 2015 15:11 |
|
My innate disconnect with the human face always comes out real bad when I try to draw it. E: less is more idk it's not as hideous now. E2: okay NOW I'm happy with it. Diabetes Forecast fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Sep 21, 2015 |
# ? Sep 20, 2015 23:04 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:31 |
|
biomech tattoo sleeve stuff
|
# ? Sep 24, 2015 05:26 |