Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

euphronius posted:

Who is she losing to in this scenario. Biden? Unlawful Obama?

Maybe the guy who's in first place now and ain't looking back?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ATribeCalledKvetch
Nov 5, 2010

I do hate myself, but it has nothing to do with being Jewish.

Pontius Pilate posted:

Rick Perry: the next Eugene Debs.

It would be a Herculean task for Rick Perry to get a million votes in any national election.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



euphronius posted:

Who is she losing to in this scenario. Biden? Unlawful Obama?

Bernie Sanders actually, who is in fact leading in both of those states.

Rexicon1
Oct 9, 2007

A Shameful Path Led You Here

Vox Nihili posted:

Honestly, acting on actual geopolitical interests would be a huge step up from the last 15 years.

Oh Iraq and Afghanistan were definitely influenced by our geopolitical interests, having a U.S. Colony in the middle of Mesopotamia just south of Russia and bordering Iran and Saudi Arabia is a fantastic power play. Too bad we just don't have any loving idea how to actually solidify our interests and we just ruined several countries from the ripples of our stupid loving imperialism.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

what does this even mean. of course an air strike in a foreign country is "interventionism"

The US has launched airstrikes against it's own people before. That's not technically interventionism!

Also obviously a hypothetical war where we were attacked first would allow non-interventionist airstrikes.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
ISIS is pretty much the end result of flip flopping between "destroy everything" and "do nothing". Basically American foreign policy can be summed up by a picture of someone making GBS threads on a street and someone else being forced to clean it up.

America is so permanently tied to the rest of the world vis a vis military treaties, agreements, and whatnot that it would be impossible to avoid ALL intervention and it would be negligent to attempt to minimize it. Unfortunately the middle east is our mess to clean up and if we don't do it we will be in the wrong both morally and logically. This doesn't mean we need to put boots on the ground, but helping out the right people with aid and air strikes is a very good way to go about fostering pro-America sentiment in the region while minimizing our own casualties.

This isn't even getting into the can of worms that is saying ignoring the plight of workers/the oppressed overseas is the most "left" position to take but w/e.

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

Xenophon posted:

Because I was only counting tweets from @BernieSanders, not @SenSanders, because that's what's on C-SPAN's presidential twitter list. Maybe Bernie should stop hiding behind multiple identities on twitter??

What kind of Clintonesque poo poo is he trying to pull here?

Abner Cadaver II
Apr 21, 2009

TONIGHT!
if only there was some international body that could take the sole responsibility of policing the planet off our nation's shoulders

if only *bombs iran*

Vox Nihili
May 28, 2008

Venom Snake posted:

ISIS is pretty much the end result of flip flopping between "destroy everything" and "do nothing". Basically American foreign policy can be summed up by a picture of someone making GBS threads on a street and someone else being forced to clean it up.

America is so permanently tied to the rest of the world vis a vis military treaties, agreements, and whatnot that it would be impossible to avoid ALL intervention and it would be negligent to attempt to minimize it. Unfortunately the middle east is our mess to clean up and if we don't do it we will be in the wrong both morally and logically. This doesn't mean we need to put boots on the ground, but helping out the right people with aid and air strikes is a very good way to go about fostering pro-America sentiment in the region while minimizing our own casualties.

This isn't even getting into the can of worms that is saying ignoring the plight of workers/the oppressed overseas is the most "left" position to take but w/e.

Air strikes do not foster pro-American sentiment, HTH.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Vox Nihili posted:

Air strikes do not foster pro-American sentiment, HTH.

imagine i just posted that gif of us bombing a hill owned by ISIS and kurds chanting "Go USA" over it a billlion times.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
I guess your technically correct that air strikes make ISIS not like us very much :shrug:

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx

Vox Nihili posted:

Right, though sending material support is certainly much less interventionst than bombing. By the metric of sending weapons, intervention is almost ubiquitous.

"Isolation" < complete non-intervention < sanctions < sending weapons << airstrikes/drone strikes < ground forces < occupation
This is part of what I was getting at, pretty much every goddamn country on earth does some form of "intervention", it's a matter of degree/level. The US is not the sole interventionist on the planet, and the US hypothetically going full non-intervention woudln't mean intervention magically disappears, it just means other countries would step up to fill the void. France already intervened in Mali (and a few other Francophone countries) with basically zero help from us. Iran is backing Assad and Iraqi Shia militias with zero help from us. Russia is currently backing Assad as well, because Syria is a foreign intervention clusterfuck.

fade5 fucked around with this message at 00:49 on Sep 12, 2015

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

fade5 posted:

This is part of what I was getting at, pretty much every goddamn country on earth does some form of "intervention", it's a matter of degree/level. The US is not the sole interventionist on the planet, and the US hypothetically going full non-intervention just means other countries will step up to fill the void. France already intervened in Mali (and a few other Francophone countries) with basically zero help from us. Iran is backing Assad and Iraqi Shia militias with zero help from us.

Saudi Arabia doesn't seem to be doing a whole hell of a lot.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

NotWearingPants posted:

Saudi Arabia doesn't seem to be doing a whole hell of a lot.

this statement is so breathtakingly wrong I would need a flow chart to accurately show how wrong it is.

MrBims
Sep 25, 2007

by Ralp

NotWearingPants posted:

Saudi Arabia doesn't seem to be doing a whole hell of a lot.

Saudi Arabia did an intervention 14 years ago today.

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
NotWearingPants did you work for the Bush administration?

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Full Battle Rattle posted:

Can you run a presidential campaign from a jail cell?

Eugene Debs managed it.

quote:

Debs ran for president in the 1920 election while in prison in Atlanta, Georgia, at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary. He received 919,799[42] write-in votes (3.4%),[43] slightly less than he had won in 1912, when he received 6%, the highest number of votes for a Socialist Party presidential candidate in the U.S

In unrelated news, this recently appeared in Kirby, VT, and I can't seem to stop bringing it up.

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx

NotWearingPants posted:

Saudi Arabia doesn't seem to be doing a whole hell of a lot.
They're backing rebel FSA groups as well as Islamist groups like Ahrar al Sham in the Syrian Civil War, and have been for years:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/07/turkey-saudi-arabia-syria-rebels-pact_n_7232750.html

quote:

The Turkish-Saudi agreement has led to a new joint command center in the northeastern Syrian province of Idlib. There, a coalition of groups — including Nusra and other Islamist brigades such as Ahrar al-Sham that Washington views as extremist — are progressively eroding Assad's front. The rebel coalition also includes more moderate elements of the Free Syrian Army that have received U.S. support in the past.

At the end of March, the alliance — calling itself "Conquest Army" — took the city of Idlib, followed by the strategic town of Jisr al-Shughour and then a government military base.

"They have really learned to fight together," the Turkish official said.

Turkish officials say that Turkey provides logistical and intelligence support to some members of the coalition, but has no interaction with Nusra — which it considers a terrorist group. But the difference with IS, the officials say, is that Turkey does not view Nusra as a security threat and therefore does not impede it.

The Turkish official who touted the Conquest Army's ability to fight cohesively said, however, that Turkey and Saudi Arabia have moved to bolster Ahrar al-Sham at Nusra's expense. This strays from the U.S. line that al-Sham is an extremist group, but Turkish officials say they distinguish between international jihadist groups and others with more localized aims. They place al-Sham in the latter category.

Moreover, they hope to use al-Sham's rise to put pressure on Nusra to renounce its ties to al-Qaida and open itself to outside help.

Saudi Arabia also INVADED loving YEMEN do you watch the news at all?

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

invading yemen was a real bad idea

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

TEAYCHES posted:

invading yemen was a real bad idea

It is, but perhaps all this discussion of foreign interventions isn't best suited to the 2016 primary thread, save where it actually intersects with, you know, the 2016 primaries.

Shark Sandwich
Sep 6, 2010

by R. Guyovich
saudi arabia loves to export its disaffected sexually frustrated males to every sectarian war it can so its pretty funny to see them fail at an actual military adventure in yemen

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx

TEAYCHES posted:

invading yemen was a real bad idea
Well yeah, but the US didn't tell Saudi Arabia to do it. They were loving morons just like the US was invading Iraq, and Yemen will go about as well for Saudi Arabia long-term as Vietnam or Iraq did for the US.

Venom Snake posted:

imagine i just posted that gif of us bombing a hill owned by ISIS and kurds chanting "Go USA" over it a billlion times.
http://news.yahoo.com/grateful-us-strikes-syrian-kurds-name-baby-obama-053145189.html

quote:

Sultan Muslim, a Syrian Kurd, had no doubt what to name her seventh child when he was born, safely in Turkey, after a harrowing month-long flight from her home in Kobane: Obama.

Desperate to flee the flashpoint Syrian border town, the heavily pregnant mother, her husband and six other children made it across the frontier just in time for the boy's arrival.

Islamic State (IS) jihadists, accused of widespread atrocities, seized control of the strategic locality and US-led bombing raids launched in the last few weeks have tried to stop their advance.

"I gave my son this name from my heart. I will never change this name," the shy 35-year-old said in a refugee camp in Suruc, just inside Turkey.

"He dispatched planes, aid for us. Because of his help maybe we will get rid of this cruelty and get back to our homes," she said, cradling her three-day-old son.
Kobani is bombed to hell, but a lot of the Kurds living there before ISIL attacked have moved back.:toot:

The point of all of this is that there is no "one-size-fits-all" for intervention, and that it should be thought about and the pros and cons weighed before it's done.

And it's relevant to 2016 because the Republicans would have us start a war with Iran, because Iraq wasn't bad enough. There is no pro to invading Iran, and the cons are so horrible it's terrifying to think about.

fade5 fucked around with this message at 01:05 on Sep 12, 2015

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Captain_Maclaine posted:

It is, but perhaps all this discussion of foreign interventions isn't best suited to the 2016 primary thread, save where it actually intersects with, you know, the 2016 primaries.

please dont backseat moderate, thanks

EmpyreanFlux
Mar 1, 2013

The AUDACITY! The IMPUDENCE! The unabated NERVE!

Venom Snake posted:

imagine i just posted that gif of us bombing a hill owned by ISIS and kurds chanting "Go USA" over it a billlion times.

The US is already quickly flushing it's goodwill with the Kurds down the drain.

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007

TEAYCHES posted:

please dont backseat moderate, thanks

Just when I thought you couldn't possibly get more insufferable.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

blue squares posted:

Just when I thought you couldn't possibly get more insufferable.

it was a joke, hes probably right. geez louise you d&d people sure are something awful

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

TEAYCHES posted:

it was a joke, hes probably right. geez louise you d&d people sure are something awful

Actually I'm being pretty relaxed about this place, really. Hardly banned anyone, yet.

But seriously, let's see if we can nudge the conversation back at least within seeing distance of the 2016 primaries, shall we?

blue squares
Sep 28, 2007

TEAYCHES posted:

it was a joke,
Ok, I'm sorry.

fade5
May 31, 2012

by exmarx
On a different topic and definitely relevant to 2016: Rick Perry dropped out and Jim Gilmore didn't even make it to the Kiddy Table debate, which means the culling of candidates has begun.

What's amazing is that Rick Perry was going to be center stage at the kiddy table debates, and he didn't even try to go for a last gasp before dropping out.

I had been wondering exactly what Rick Perry was expecting to be different about 2016 from his 2012 run (other than his new :crossarms:) and it turns out there honestly wasn't anything different. He blathered about the border a lot at the first debate, and that's all he really had/has.

fade5 fucked around with this message at 01:13 on Sep 12, 2015

Rexicon1
Oct 9, 2007

A Shameful Path Led You Here
Why does Carson talking immediately make me want to take a nap. He has these sleepy eyes and a really lilting little voice.

Pavlov
Oct 21, 2012

I've long been fascinated with how the alt-right develops elaborate and obscure dog whistles to try to communicate their meaning without having to say it out loud
Stepan Andreyevich Bandera being the most prominent example of that

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Actually I'm being pretty relaxed about this place, really. Hardly banned anyone, yet.

But seriously, let's see if we can nudge the conversation back at least within seeing distance of the 2016 primaries, shall we?

But I was really looking forward to hearing everyone's personal opinions on BBQ again.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Venom Snake posted:

I oppose US interventionism but if you seriously oppose air strikes then well, your retarded.

apparently opposing terrorizing third world towns with the sleep-depriving buzzing of numerous unmanned murder machines reminding them of their own insignificant mortality, is being retarded

drones are more effective than airstrikes, cheering on unethical military practices because they are cheaper and easier to abuse is awful

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Rexicon1 posted:

Why does Carson talking immediately make me want to take a nap. He has these sleepy eyes and a really lilting little voice.

There's an anesthesia joke in here somewhere but I can't make it work.

fade5 posted:

On a different topic and definitely relevant to 2016: Rick Perry dropped out and Jim Gilmore didn't even make it to the Kiddy Table debate, which means the culling of candidates has begun.

What's amazing is that Rick Perry was going to be center stage at the kiddy table debates, and he didn't even try to go for a last gasp before dropping out.

Remember back before Perry had his (first) big retard moment in 2012 and everyone was talking about how he was the new hotness for the GOP?

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo
The fact Drones are more effective is good because it means a lot less collateral damage so,

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Abner Cadaver II posted:

if only there was some international body that could take the sole responsibility of policing the planet off our nation's shoulders

if only *bombs iran*

It'd be unironically pretty awesome if such a thing existed that wasn't largely toothless and dysfunctional and beholden to various state's adversarial interests.

Pavlov
Oct 21, 2012

I've long been fascinated with how the alt-right develops elaborate and obscure dog whistles to try to communicate their meaning without having to say it out loud
Stepan Andreyevich Bandera being the most prominent example of that

Captain_Maclaine posted:

There's an anesthesia joke in here somewhere but I can't make it work.

"Neurosurgeon? Are you sure he wasn't an anesthesiologist because etc."

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

Trumps going to win isn't he

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014




Bernie is polling better nationally than Obama was at this same period of the 2008 election.

Pavlov
Oct 21, 2012

I've long been fascinated with how the alt-right develops elaborate and obscure dog whistles to try to communicate their meaning without having to say it out loud
Stepan Andreyevich Bandera being the most prominent example of that
How are they getting those popularity numbers? The '16 ones look way too regular.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


which has been done without a single debate, while there had been 10 democratic debates at this point in 2007

  • Locked thread