|
Dalael posted:Most of the evidence presented by Jim Allen is circumstantial. This is, at best, a charitable interpretation.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 10:49 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 05:13 |
|
Let’s not be ridiculous. Everyone knows Atlantis is Greenland.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 11:16 |
|
I need to hear about that knee myth. How on earth do you interpret that?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 11:19 |
|
LingcodKilla posted:So... Has anyone tried using olive oil as lube? I couldnt help but notice while making dinner tonight that it is really hard to get off your hands. I wonder if the ancients had a term for catching you while being guilty of rubbing one off like "I caught you greasy handed". You mean "oiling the slaves". Why would you use the handcrank when you have slaves. You could fieldtest how it does? For science.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 12:57 |
|
Your entire argument is strawmanning opponents who you think are laughing at you because you dare to bring up Atlantis, appeals to authority and appeals to ignorance, coupled with zero awareness of how broken your (and Jim Allen's) arguments are. People are not laughing because you dare to bring up Atlantis, they are laughing because you present the case so badly and so earnestly. Please stop bringing this up. You've been forced to fall back on appeals to ignorance twice already this time. Most people just give up on the argument at that point.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 14:15 |
|
Quift posted:I need to hear about that knee myth. How on earth do you interpret that? Well you heard of knee-grows right? Gotta go! Taking the first flight to hell!
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 14:17 |
|
Dalael posted:
This right here is the entire problem with his entire "theory". He went looking for a spot that matched Plato's description, then decided that must be it. I could invent out of thin air a list of 10 geographical references that would describe a particular place. If you went searching around the entire world, you would certainly find some place that matched it, even though I had not been thinking of that place, had never been to that place, and indeed had never even heard of it. Based on this guy's reasoning, he would declare that that was indeed the exact place I had intended to describe, which would be completely false. It's just pattern-matching, something our brains do very well. We will do it even when no such pattern actually exists. So "an uncanny collection of matches" by itself means nothing whatever. In fact, it's almost always a sign of a false positive, since when people have made actual connections between descriptions of features of some place and the corresponding real areas, there are always some errors of memory or language. Being too perfect usually means it's wrong. Deteriorata fucked around with this message at 16:00 on Sep 12, 2015 |
# ? Sep 12, 2015 15:57 |
|
Quift posted:Speaking of myths. Let us all talk about them. Favourite myth and favourite interpretation. Is there a consensus on whether Cinncinatus was a real person or just a parable? And not to hard on Judeo-Christians, but the Genesis myth really is hilarious when you think about it. As explained by David Cross: God makes this huge, massive planet; then he decides 'I'm gonna put one dude in there'.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 16:11 |
|
PittTheElder posted:Is there a consensus on whether Cinncinatus was a real person or just a parable? I'm personally convinced that the version of creation in Gen1 is a deliberate parody of the Enuma Elish, with the point being to emphasize to the captive Hebrews why it's better to be Hebrew than Babylonian, to avoid being assimilated into the greater Babylonian culture. Their world was not a huge, massive planet, but a fairly small disc of land maybe 1000 miles across, forming the bottom of an air bubble in a massive primordial ocean. Gen2 is a completely different story, a version of which had been told around campfires by epic singers for probably 1000 years before being written down.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 16:18 |
|
The myth about how humans were created in the Popol Vuh is nuts. First the gods create men out of mud, but they cannot stand up and are brainless, and they melt and die in agony. Then they try wood, but they turn out to be senseless atheists, so the gods turn them into monkeys. Corn worked, though.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 16:35 |
|
The virgin spirit of the air is impregnated by the air, then a duck lays an egg on her knee, then she moves and the egg drops and shatters into the earth, the sky, the stars, and the sun. After a few centuries she gives birth to the eternal bard. At some points other humans show up?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 16:52 |
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:The virgin spirit of the air is impregnated by the air, then a duck lays an egg on her knee, then she moves and the egg drops and shatters into the earth, the sky, the stars, and the sun. This is actually largely Lönnrot's invention. There's three different Finnish creation myths: - the diver myth (a primordial god, generally Väinämöinen, falls into the sea and creates the land from the sand at the bottom of it) - the egg myth (as in Kalevala, except with Väinämöinen instead of Ilmatar) - the forging myth (Seppo Ilmarinen creates the sky, and possibly what supports it, i.e. the sampo. Kalevala's version is a reinterpretation of it) The diver myth is the most widespread among the Uralic peoples and considered the earliest. The egg myth is common throughout the world and considered an import. The forging myth is an iron age creation obviously, probably as a radical reinterpretation of an earlier sky god's role. Väinämöinen is an almost omnipotent god in most traditions too, but in Lönnrot's second Kalevala he's merely a culture hero.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 17:18 |
|
Invention sounds a bit more original than combining multiple myths together (isn't the Kalevala version basically the forging myth with imported eggs worked in?), but yea, much of Kalevala diverges a lot from the source material. If you know more about the topic, I'd be very interested.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 18:13 |
|
Waci posted:Invention sounds a bit more original than combining multiple myths together (isn't the Kalevala version basically the forging myth with imported eggs worked in?), but yea, much of Kalevala diverges a lot from the source material. If you know more about the topic, I'd be very interested. Well I mean obviously Lönnrot's "problem" was that the stories could never provide a coherent whole, because 1) they were preserved in a large area, from Northern Sweden to the White Sea, and had diverged considerably, and 2) because they consisted of multiple historical layers, where hunter-gatherer mythology was mixed with later agricultural traditions, and they could be superficially contradictory. So Lönnrot couldn't just compile an epic, he had to write one. It's not a criticism obviously, but it should always be kept in mind that the Kalevala flat out is not "authentic" Finnish mythology. Obviously there's an ongoing creative process when stories are passed down, but I think most people would agree that the creative process of the reciters is more "real" than that of an urban author like Lönnrot.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 18:40 |
|
I wrote this for the existance of god debate thread.Quift posted:I dont care if you are trolling or not. The story is so brilliant I will walk you through it anyway.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 20:33 |
|
Is there a good book on the history of the Roman empire for somebody who doesn't really know the history and is looking for a starting point?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2015 21:30 |
|
Last page but this tidbit of conspiracy theory stuff:Tomn posted:... and that Chinese treasure fleets kickstarted the European Renaissance. caught my attention, as I haven't ever heard it before. I guess this is the zheng he fleet and they went all over the place getting goodies and what not, but I hadn't ever heard anyone say they got any farther than what, the eastern african coast? Nothing is jumping out at wikipedia, whats the gist there with the renaissance stuff?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 00:46 |
|
There is a possibly insane possibly cynical person who purports to believe that Zheng He took a fleet to Italy. That's it.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 00:48 |
|
Aw that is too bad, I was hoping there was some elaborate conspiracy theory I hadn't run into yet and could get a crazy book about for my brothers birthday.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 00:58 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Is there a good book on the history of the Roman empire for somebody who doesn't really know the history and is looking for a starting point? that's actually kind of a tough question, its hard to find a good comprehensive source since there is so much out there about the romans. personally I dont think I've even really read one I'd recommend, I've always kinda hopped around between authors focused on particular topics/time periods in the roman republic/empire. I'm sure someone here can offer a good suggestion though. are you looking for just the history of the empire in particular or roman history in general? I find that reading about the Punic wars is a good start, books about Caesar, and then the civil wars/the end of the republic, Augustus, and the establishment of the empire. Adrian Goldsworthy is a decent jumping off point here. Jamwad Hilder fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Sep 13, 2015 |
# ? Sep 13, 2015 01:36 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Is there a good book on the history of the Roman empire for somebody who doesn't really know the history and is looking for a starting point? I would recommend Roman Empire by Nigel Rodgers. It is a fairly simple book, easy to read which glances over many aspect of the Romans. I believe it to be a really good starting point for someone who knows very little about them and is not looking for something too in-depth.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 01:42 |
|
Quift posted:I wrote this for the existance of god debate thread. This is nonsense. Even putting aside the problem of trying to interpret myths as mangled symbols for real events, the timeframes don't come close to adding up, the symbolism is absurdly convoluted, and you cut through an insane amount of corners. And I don't really understand what point you were trying to make? Did you just want to show off your pet theory?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 02:02 |
|
Ras Het posted:This is nonsense. Even putting aside the problem of trying to interpret myths as mangled symbols for real events, the timeframes don't come close to adding up, the symbolism is absurdly convoluted, and you cut through an insane amount of corners. And I don't really understand what point you were trying to make? Did you just want to show off your pet theory? Ugh, rude. Finns.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 02:23 |
|
No I mean I appreciate his thought in emphasising how myths have a real purpose, but come on, you're not doing anyone a favour by coming up with stories like that.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 02:26 |
|
Quift posted:I wrote this for the existance of god debate thread. Citation needed.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 02:51 |
|
LingcodKilla posted:So... Has anyone tried using olive oil as lube? I couldnt help but notice while making dinner tonight that it is really hard to get off your hands. I wonder if the ancients had a term for catching you while being guilty of rubbing one off like "I caught you greasy handed". Is it weird that the first problem I thought of is that olive oil is too expensive?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 02:54 |
|
Synnr posted:Last page but this tidbit of conspiracy theory stuff: I'm talking about this guy. He made a big splash with a book that claimed that Zheng He's treasure fleet got to America before Colombus did, even managing to make it to the Caribbean, but his evidence was basically roundly derided as nonsense, despite the book being pretty popular. He followed this up with another book suggesting that same treasure fleets made their way to Italy and the magnificence of it all was what started the Renaissance. And looking at Wikipedia, apparently he capped things off by throwing his hat into the Atlantis ring, too, which is nicely circular. He's not so much a conspiracy theorist as he is a pseudo-scholar, mind you - less about cover-ups and more about "SHOCKING new revelations!"
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 03:06 |
|
uninverted posted:Is it weird that the first problem I thought of is that olive oil is too expensive? What was the poor mans substitute? Rapeseed? Vegetable? What was their preferred method of cooking food? gently caress it,someone post roman food recipes im curious about this now. Agean90 fucked around with this message at 03:23 on Sep 13, 2015 |
# ? Sep 13, 2015 03:20 |
|
Tomn posted:I'm talking about this guy. He made a big splash with a book that claimed that Zheng He's treasure fleet got to America before Colombus did, even managing to make it to the Caribbean, but his evidence was basically roundly derided as nonsense, despite the book being pretty popular. He followed this up with another book suggesting that same treasure fleets made their way to Italy and the magnificence of it all was what started the Renaissance. And looking at Wikipedia, apparently he capped things off by throwing his hat into the Atlantis ring, too, which is nicely circular. I am certain that this thread went through a round of "Did Zheng He reach Cape Breton Island" questioning.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 03:26 |
|
Like us, they imported cheap olive oil from Spain.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 03:30 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Is there a good book on the history of the Roman empire for somebody who doesn't really know the history and is looking for a starting point? http://www.amazon.com/Chronicle-Roman-Emperors-Reign-Reign/dp/0500289891 Lots of pictures and diagrams and stuff. It is a very wonderful introduction.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 03:38 |
|
Basically the Ming treasure fleets had a few purposes. The previous Hongwu emperor had closed ports to international trade (such policies and edicts are quite common in China, and they were basically futile attempts in domestic stability). The treasure fleets would therefore re-establish trade with all the smaller kingdoms to the south and west, and signal that China was once again open for business. While the treasure fleets were the big ones, lots of smaller trading vessels would follow in their footsteps. These ships were expensive, they sure as hell were not going to be used on risky ventures to the east. Them running off to the east exploring nothing of importance would have been a scandal that the Confucian court officials (who by and large opposed these ventures) would have pounced upon. The treasure fleets also had an unstated purpose: hunt down signs of another claimant to the throne, whose body had never been recovered. The Yongle emperor wasn't the first in line for the throne, and he wanted to nip any counterclaims in the bud. Phobophilia fucked around with this message at 08:23 on Sep 15, 2015 |
# ? Sep 13, 2015 04:06 |
|
Speaking of mythology, I read this passage the other night and it gave me chills for some reason. It's from Herodotus, Book 2: "Thus far went the record given by the Egyptians and their priests; and they showed me that the time from the first king to that priest of Hephaestus, who was the last, covered three hundred and forty-one generations, and that in this time this also had been the number of their kings, and of their high priests. Now three hundred generations are ten thousand years, three generations being equal to a hundred. And over and above the three hundred, the remaining forty-one cover thirteen hundred and forty years. Thus the whole period is eleven thousand three hundred and forty years; in all of which time (they said) they had had no king who was a god in human form, nor had there been any such either before or after those years among the rest of the kings of Egypt. Four times in this period (so they told me) the sun rose contrary to experience; twice he came up where he now goes down, and twice went down where he now comes up; yet Egypt at these times underwent no change, either in the produce of the river and the land, or in the matter of sickness and death." In my head, I always assumed at some point back in the dawns of time, people actually had a basis for thinking the gods walked among men and inspired all those stories. Not, of course, that there were actual gods wandering around, but I just thought there'd have been some powerful dude who through trickery or deliberate illusion convinced people of his divinity, and that passed down through the generations led to the gods of myth. But here's someone saying that in 11,000 years, there's never been a god in human form. Of course, I'm pretty sure the sun never went backwards either, and maybe it's just my ignorance of the origin of myths, but it seems like the time when gods walked as men would have to be before 11,000 years before Herodotus was writing, which makes the myths and the gods way older than I thought they were. What's our earliest collection of Greek myths, for instance? 500 BC? We don't have anything from thousands of years before that, right?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 04:37 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Is there a good book on the history of the Roman empire for somebody who doesn't really know the history and is looking for a starting point? The short answer is "not really". Rome lasted a long time and different points in time had widely varying internal politics, foreign policies, languages, economic systems, military strategies, and so forth. Researchers and historians tend to get interested in a period or two and write about those quite well, but there isn't really a standout book that covers the whole picture, in my opinion. The clusterfuck at the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Empire is likely to be the period where you'd find the most material, since that's also the period that we have a lot of primary sources from. I'm not super versed in textbooks, but I've heard good things about The Romans: From Village to Empire. If you want something a little more popularized, I'd recommend History of Rome or The Mask of Jove. They're both from the 60s/70s and so from the old school (and perhaps a bit dated) -- but they're readable and not as old school as, say, Gibbon or Montesquieu.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 05:00 |
|
A Strange Aeon posted:Speaking of mythology, I read this passage the other night and it gave me chills for some reason. It's from Herodotus, Book 2: The earliest possible date for Homer as a (at least semi-mythical) person is estimated at 1102 BC, with around 850 BC being the latest estimated date. Hesiod, the other famous Greek religious poet, is estimated at 750 BC as the earliest date he could have lived. It's supposed that the epics were codified and written down around 700-600 BC, but we have no way of knowing when people started telling stories about these figures or formulating religious ritual around them. I would speculate people weren't telling stories about Achilles in 11,000 BC, though.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 05:12 |
|
For "history of Rome books" I'll make the unusual recommendation of starting with Colleen McCullough. In the course of telling the stories, she shows you the politics of the Roman republic rather than telling you about them. I didn't read all of them, so I can't vouch for the whole series, but the first couple will get you through Marius and Sulla. It's much easier to hang the contents of a nonfiction Roman history book or three onto an existing understanding, even if that base was achieved by historical fiction. I, Claudius (book or BBC series) also gives you something to start with, but it doesn't do as much for Republican politics as it does for the personalities. I just wish they hadn't decided to translate toga virilis as manly gown.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 05:55 |
|
Re: the origin of gods and myths, I don't think all gods got started the same way. Someone like Aphrodite might have started as a poetic metaphor and gradually became literalized into an actual being to appease and ask for help. Others may have been real people who gradually became seen as more than human; we know for sure that people like Julius Caesar were real people before they were proclaimed gods, so it's not so absurd to think that there are cases where it was forgotten that the person was human to begin with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euhemerism The third possible category, as I see it, is explanations for dramatic natural phenomena. Such gods might start as vague forces that people sought to appease, but gradually became seen more anthropomorphically, perhaps due to association with the other two types of gods. Edit: A fourth possible type: Gods invented as fictional characters and intended to be read as such, later misunderstood as real. Distinct from the first category because they don't start as a one-word concept; the personality and myths are there from the start. Something like this happens in the modern day in certain subcultures... Edit: A fifth category: Crazy but charismatic people convince others that the voices in their heads are real. Edit: Sixth category: Same as the fifth, but the originators of the cult are charlatans instead of madmen. The snake-god Glycon is an actual recorded example of this. Edit 2: Seventhly, gods could be created to explain rituals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_and_ritual#Myth_from_ritual_.28primacy_of_ritual.29 Of all the possibilities, this is the one I'm most skeptical of; I can't think of any obvious examples. (Smith's Adonis explanation seems strained.) Two gods with differing origins might be syncretized into one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyeus suggests that Zeus's king-of-the-gods traits (rule over the sky, etc.) come from a different previous god than his lightning-god traits. Of course, this is just unscholarly speculation on my part. It would be interesting to read an overview of current scholarship on the matter; the wiki article on Euhemerism, for example, is focused on views held by people in the 19th century and earlier. Silver2195 fucked around with this message at 08:02 on Sep 13, 2015 |
# ? Sep 13, 2015 06:56 |
|
Robin Lane Fox wrote a book, Traveling Heroes in the epic age of Homer, in which he tries to match the Greek myths about gods and heroes to actual physical places and people that the Greeks, specifically the Euboans, came into contact with during their travels in the 10th-8th century, and how this can transform myths. Its a cool book and the author is a distinguished scholar so unfortunately no theories about Atlantis or Bolivia being the source of the myths.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 09:02 |
|
Ras Het posted:This is nonsense. Even putting aside the problem of trying to interpret myths as mangled symbols for real events, the timeframes don't come close to adding up, the symbolism is absurdly convoluted, and you cut through an insane amount of corners. And I don't really understand what point you were trying to make? Did you just want to show off your pet theory? What I'm trying to show is an example of how a myth can be read. The symbols on the myth are not random but exist in a context which helps us understand the meaning of the symbols. While the symbolism might feel convoluted to you it might have been heavy handed in context. It is difficult to know. In this case a bit of mangled history. As stated the history is not meant to be read like we write history today. None of the persons in this myth are actual persons. Minos is all of the minoan kings rolled into one. His wife the people of crete etc. These are like glimpses the later Greeks kept about the minoan civilization which had been gone for hundreds of years. This is one possible reading. Another reading would look exactly like the matrix movie (fun stuff). Funnily enough the study of myths is really old. The ancient Greeks did this too and there are plenty of ancient speculation about the meaning is myth.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 09:18 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 05:13 |
|
Quift posted:What I'm trying to show is an example of how a myth can be read. The symbols on the myth are not random but exist in a context which helps us understand the meaning of the symbols. While the symbolism might feel convoluted to you it might have been heavy handed in context. It is difficult to know. Citation needed.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2015 09:29 |