Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
DivineCoffeeBinge
Mar 3, 2011

Spider-Man's Amazing Construction Company

Joementum posted:

Quote of the night, "You want to get rid of money in politics? Join my campaign - we have no money!" ~ Lindsey Graham

Mister Macys posted:

Why is he still running? Serious question.

As I understand it, Lindsey Graham hates what some of the candidates *coughcoughTrumpcough* are doing to the Republican Party, and he's running so that he will be on record as standing in opposition. He'll run for as long as he can, no matter how few votes he gets.

It's a campaign based, at this point, on spite. Which, personally, I kinda love.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RBC
Nov 23, 2007

IM STILL SPENDING MONEY FROM 1888

HalPhilipWalker posted:

Hillary is a dead candidate walking.

While the email thing was something completely cooked up by Congressional Republicans in that every other Sec State has done it, everyone understands how fragile Internet security is. The whole debacle makes her look incompetent and untrustworthy. While Democrats would stand behind her if it was something only Republicans care about, it has destroyed her credibility with people who aren't reliable Democrats.

This has caused her to enter a death spiral. The main reason to vote for Hillary has always been electability. As she sheds supporters, Democratic primary voters stop seeing her as electable, causing her to shed more supporters, causing more people to see her as unelectable.

Nominations are great predictors of elections because they go to candidates that are likely to win. No one actually votes based on endorsements. Hillary received a bunch of endorsements when it looked like she would win. Those mean jack poo poo now.

That doesn't mean Bernie is going to win. Biden is waiting until Hillary is a stinking corpse, at which time he'll enter. He will become the new establishment candidate, pulling in support from Hillary and Bernie.

If you want a parallel to Hillary, go back to 2000. At the very start of the race, Elizabeth Dole was considered a front runner. But it became obvious that the main reason she was considered that was because of name recognition and her husband, Bob Dole, was the previous Republican nominee. Hillary is much the same. Support for her has less to do herself and more to do with the huge support for Bill. If she wasn't married to him, she would never be considered a viable candidate.

wrap it up clintonailures

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

Brannock posted:

10 years from now we're going to look back on this era and wonder how the hell we didn't predict the first Twitter President.

To be fair, there's a thread over here that's been predicting the first social media president for several months now:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3717961

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 213 days!

Did you literally just start paying attention to politics this year? :allears:

TheScott2K
Oct 26, 2003

I'm just saying, there's a nonzero chance Trump has a really toad penis.

HalPhilipWalker posted:

Hillary is a dead candidate walking.

While the email thing was something completely cooked up by Congressional Republicans in that every other Sec State has done it, everyone understands how fragile Internet security is. The whole debacle makes her look incompetent and untrustworthy. While Democrats would stand behind her if it was something only Republicans care about, it has destroyed her credibility with people who aren't reliable Democrats.

This has caused her to enter a death spiral. The main reason to vote for Hillary has always been electability. As she sheds supporters, Democratic primary voters stop seeing her as electable, causing her to shed more supporters, causing more people to see her as unelectable.

Nominations are great predictors of elections because they go to candidates that are likely to win. No one actually votes based on endorsements. Hillary received a bunch of endorsements when it looked like she would win. Those mean jack poo poo now.

That doesn't mean Bernie is going to win. Biden is waiting until Hillary is a stinking corpse, at which time he'll enter. He will become the new establishment candidate, pulling in support from Hillary and Bernie.

If you want a parallel to Hillary, go back to 2000. At the very start of the race, Elizabeth Dole was considered a front runner. But it became obvious that the main reason she was considered that was because of name recognition and her husband, Bob Dole, was the previous Republican nominee. Hillary is much the same. Support for her has less to do herself and more to do with the huge support for Bill. If she wasn't married to him, she would never be considered a viable candidate.

Politics isn't the World Cup you dumb motherfucker, you don't just suddenly start paying attention every four years.

midnightclimax
Dec 3, 2011

by XyloJW

NotWearingPants posted:

To be fair, there's a thread over here that's been predicting the first social media president for several months now:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3717961

tbh I was expecting Eripsa thread :smith:

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 213 days!
The whole "email scandal will destroy Clinton" thing is obvious chum in the water, but I'd like to point out that Hillary has been a big deal politically since before she married Bill.

quote:

“I was disappointed when they married,” admits Betsey Wright, who had met the dating couple when they came to her home state of Texas to work for the McGovern campaign in 1972. “She has been absolutely critical to Bill’s success but, then, I had images in my mind that she could be the first woman president.”

One of her first big plays on the political stage:

quote:

But the dynamic duo made a lasting impression on one of the judges, John Doar, a hero of the civil-rights movement. Six months after they graduated, Doar was shopping for crack young lawyers to staff the House Judiciary Committee inquiry that would prepare the impeachment case against President Richard Nixon. Bill excused himself; he was already geared up for his 1974 congressional race. But what about Hillary? “If he hadn’t suggested her, I would have called her anyway,” says Doar.

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/1992/05/hillary-clinton-first-lady-presidency

e: Then again, it was a different world:

quote:

In 1978 the Clintons swept into the governor’s office with the promise of youth and purity. “Arrogant” was the outcry of the Establishment, and the governor’s spouse became the lightning rod for people’s resentment.

Okay only the first half changed, but still.

Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 16:35 on Sep 13, 2015

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

Bernie Sanders will be speaking at Jerry Falwell's Liberty University tomrorow.

Cruz, Perry, Walker and Trump have spoken there. As far as I know, a non-republican politician has never spoken at the University or a convocation.

Carson is going to speak there on November 11

Patter Song
Mar 26, 2010

Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.
Fun Shoe
Are you ready for your Sunday morning poll dump?

First up, from the LA Times, what might be the first California poll we've seen all cycle.

GOP side:

Trump 24
Carson 18
Bush 6
Cruz 6
Rubio 5
Fiorina 5
Walker, Kasich, Paul, Huckabee 2
Christie, Perry, Santorum 1

Dem side:

Clinton 39
Sanders 23
Biden 11

You'd assume CA to be a pretty Clinton-friendly state, so this is pretty striking. Also obligatory laughter at Bush and Walker.

Anyway, now time for the main feature: CBS/Yougov Battleground Tracker polls of IA, NH, and SC. Now, these aren't great polls (6% margin of error is a warning sign right from the get go), but they send a pretty interesting message. These are all likely voters polls.

Iowa Dems:

Sanders 43
Clinton 33
Biden 10
O'Malley 5
Chafee and Webb 1

(Holy poo poo Iowa I am skeptical as gently caress of these results but wow)

Iowa GOP:

Trump 29
Carson 25
Cruz 10
Rubio 6
Walker 5
Fiorina and Huckabee 4
Jeb! and Santorum 3
Kasich Paul and Jindal 2
Gilmore (!) and Christie 1
Perry (RIP), Graham, and Pataki 0

There are some days when it isn't worth getting out of bed if your name is Jeb! Bush. This is one of them.

NH Dems:

Sanders 52
Clinton 30
Biden 9
O'Malley 1
Webb and Chafee 0

NH GOP:

Trump 40(!)
Carson 12
Kasich 9
Fiorina 8
Paul and Jeb! 6
Cruz 5
Walker 3
Christie and Rubio 2
Huckabee and Perry 1
Jindal, Graham, Santorum, Gilmore, and Pataki 0

This one is pretty impressive for both Sanders and Trump.

SC Dems:

Clinton 46
Sanders 23
Biden 22
Webb 1
O'Malley and Chafee 0

SC GOP:

Trump 36
Carson 21
Cruz 6
Jeb! and Sitting South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham 5
Kasich 4
Fiorina, Rubio, Huckabee, and Walker 3
Christie 2
Santorum, Jindal, and Paul 1
Gilmore, Perry, and Pataki 0


Enjoy.

TROIKA CURES GREEK
Jun 30, 2015

by R. Guyovich

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

Bernie Sanders will be speaking at Jerry Falwell's Liberty University tomrorow.

Cruz, Perry, Walker and Trump have spoken there. As far as I know, a non-republican politician has never spoken at the University or a convocation.

Carson is going to speak there on November 11

it's_a_trap.jpg

e: Ted Kennedy spoke there in the 80s I believe

TROIKA CURES GREEK fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Sep 13, 2015

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

for them!

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Patter Song posted:

Are you ready for your Sunday morning poll dump?

First up, from the LA Times, what might be the first California poll we've seen all cycle.

GOP side:

Trump 24
Carson 18
Bush 6
Cruz 6
Rubio 5
Fiorina 5
Walker, Kasich, Paul, Huckabee 2
Christie, Perry, Santorum 1

Dem side:

Clinton 39
Sanders 23
Biden 11

You'd assume CA to be a pretty Clinton-friendly state, so this is pretty striking. Also obligatory laughter at Bush and Walker.

Anyway, now time for the main feature: CBS/Yougov Battleground Tracker polls of IA, NH, and SC. Now, these aren't great polls (6% margin of error is a warning sign right from the get go), but they send a pretty interesting message. These are all likely voters polls.

Iowa Dems:

Sanders 43
Clinton 33
Biden 10
O'Malley 5
Chafee and Webb 1

(Holy poo poo Iowa I am skeptical as gently caress of these results but wow)

Iowa GOP:

Trump 29
Carson 25
Cruz 10
Rubio 6
Walker 5
Fiorina and Huckabee 4
Jeb! and Santorum 3
Kasich Paul and Jindal 2
Gilmore (!) and Christie 1
Perry (RIP), Graham, and Pataki 0

There are some days when it isn't worth getting out of bed if your name is Jeb! Bush. This is one of them.

NH Dems:

Sanders 52
Clinton 30
Biden 9
O'Malley 1
Webb and Chafee 0

NH GOP:

Trump 40(!)
Carson 12
Kasich 9
Fiorina 8
Paul and Jeb! 6
Cruz 5
Walker 3
Christie and Rubio 2
Huckabee and Perry 1
Jindal, Graham, Santorum, Gilmore, and Pataki 0

This one is pretty impressive for both Sanders and Trump.

SC Dems:

Clinton 46
Sanders 23
Biden 22
Webb 1
O'Malley and Chafee 0

SC GOP:

Trump 36
Carson 21
Cruz 6
Jeb! and Sitting South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham 5
Kasich 4
Fiorina, Rubio, Huckabee, and Walker 3
Christie 2
Santorum, Jindal, and Paul 1
Gilmore, Perry, and Pataki 0


Enjoy.

Coheed and Camembert
Feb 11, 2012

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

Bernie Sanders will be speaking at Jerry Falwell's Liberty University tomrorow.

Cruz, Perry, Walker and Trump have spoken there. As far as I know, a non-republican politician has never spoken at the University or a convocation.

This is a huge loving deal. Consider the history behind Liberty, Falwell, and the Moral Majority for a second. Cruz kicked off his candidacy there, Jindal gave the commencement last year, and of course, Saint Reagan. It's not the first time a Democrat has spoken there as the article says, VA Gov. McAuliffe, Ted Kennedy, and Jesse Jackson have been there.

It would make Jerry Falwell spin in his grave to know that an avowed socialist is speaking there. That warms my heart.

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

I don't really understand how Carson came to be #2. It doesn't seem like he's done anything much at all except be a bad speaker. Sure maybe he's getting the largest share of the "not Trump" vote right now, but why him as opposed to other fire breathing religious wingnuts like Santorum, Perry (RIP) or the Huck?

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

Zwabu posted:

I don't really understand how Carson came to be #2. It doesn't seem like he's done anything much at all except be a bad speaker. Sure maybe he's getting the largest share of the "not Trump" vote right now, but why him as opposed to other fire breathing religious wingnuts like Santorum, Perry (RIP) or the Huck?

He seems like a nice man.

Not all republican voters are horrible monsters.

Good Citizen
Aug 12, 2008

trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump

RBC posted:

wrap it up clintonailures

No, guys, listen, this GOP manufactured Clinton scandal is totally going to be the one that takes them down! This time she may have possibly technically done something illegal maybe! I can feel it!

Zwabu posted:

I don't really understand how Carson came to be #2. It doesn't seem like he's done anything much at all except be a bad speaker. Sure maybe he's getting the largest share of the "not Trump" vote right now, but why him as opposed to other fire breathing religious wingnuts like Santorum, Perry (RIP) or the Huck?

He comes across as the most sincere in his religious convictions and he's not a career politician in a cycle that's rejecting those figures.

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

Good Citizen posted:

No, guys, listen, this GOP manufactured Clinton scandal is totally going to be the one that takes them down! This time she may have possibly technically done something illegal maybe! I can feel it!

I think it's going to be next one.

Like another Patriots cheating scandal, we don't know what's it going to be yet, only that it's inevitable.

Teddybear
May 16, 2009

Look! A teddybear doll!
It's soooo cute!


NotWearingPants posted:

I think it's going to be next one.

Like another Patriots cheating scandal, we don't know what's it going to be yet, only that it's inevitable.

But, much like the patriots, she'll come through the other side largely unscathed and stomping much of the league.

Patter Song
Mar 26, 2010

Hereby it is manifest that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.
Fun Shoe

NotWearingPants posted:

He seems like a nice man.

Not all republican voters are horrible monsters.

Also worth considering that within right wing activist circles Ben Carson has been famous for a long time. Arguably since Gifted Hands (the Ben Carson biopic starring Cuba Gooding Jr. as Ben Carson) came out in 2009, but especially since he criticized Obama to his face at the 2013 Prayer Breakfast and suddenly became a regular commentator on all the right wing media. Ben Carson has been in their sights for quite some time.

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

Teddybear posted:

But, much like the patriots, she'll come through the other side largely unscathed and stomping much of the league.

touche'

e: that's French for "ouch," right?

Good Citizen
Aug 12, 2008

trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump trump
But seriously, the never-ending string of made up scandals are doing exactly what they're supposed to do. None of them are actually supposed to take her down, but constantly keeping something in the news is contributing to a public perception of shadiness.

Is it enough to stop her? lol no have you seen the other guys?

Doctor Candiru
Dec 23, 2004
Umbrella Monkey Sand

Gyges posted:

Probably all of them. Especially after McKinley.

Except maybe Bill. Slick Willy seemed to love him some glad handing. And McDonalds. Glad handing and McDonalds. And the ladies.
Bush II actually liked doing the whole rope line thing, and shook as many hands as he possibly could. But, he is absolutely still a germophobe; for example, around 12 seconds in to this famous clip of him and Clinton shaking hands in Haiti; also, Obama's recollection in the Audacity of Hope of meeting Bush in the Oval Office, and, after shaking hands, Bush immediately using hand sanitizer.

Not being at least OK with shaking hands at a rope line (like Trump) would be a pretty new thing in modern American politics. Rope lines are very good politics, too -- people fondly remember shaking a candidate's hand forever, let alone a president's hand, regardless of the candidate/president. This is a non-issue, though, either way, because Trump isn't actually trying to be president, and his supporters have already proven themselves to be accepting of pretty much anything he does or says.

On that note, that's where John Sides' Discovery/Scrutiny/Decline model is incomplete, since the scrutiny that drove down Cain and others has either had no effect or actually strengthened Trump's support. Is it just because Trump was already so well known, or because he's so legitimately different as a candidate? Or have we already figured this out?

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

Trump is winning or within the margin of error to Carson among likely voters? And Sanders is winning or within MoE to Clinton, too?!


Now I know how Trump feels. I wish we could hold the election now. Though either way, we'd get a president who can't pronounce "huge" correctly.

Teddybear
May 16, 2009

Look! A teddybear doll!
It's soooo cute!


NotWearingPants posted:

touche'

e: that's French for "ouch," right?

I dunno, I took one semester of French and got a pity B. I think it means touch?

Alfred P. Pseudonym
May 29, 2006

And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss goes 8-8

Patter Song posted:

Are you ready for your Sunday morning poll dump?

First up, from the LA Times, what might be the first California poll we've seen all cycle.

GOP side:

Trump 24
Carson 18
Bush 6
Cruz 6
Rubio 5
Fiorina 5
Walker, Kasich, Paul, Huckabee 2
Christie, Perry, Santorum 1

Dem side:

Clinton 39
Sanders 23
Biden 11

You'd assume CA to be a pretty Clinton-friendly state, so this is pretty striking. Also obligatory laughter at Bush and Walker.

Anyway, now time for the main feature: CBS/Yougov Battleground Tracker polls of IA, NH, and SC. Now, these aren't great polls (6% margin of error is a warning sign right from the get go), but they send a pretty interesting message. These are all likely voters polls.

Iowa Dems:

Sanders 43
Clinton 33
Biden 10
O'Malley 5
Chafee and Webb 1

(Holy poo poo Iowa I am skeptical as gently caress of these results but wow)

Iowa GOP:

Trump 29
Carson 25
Cruz 10
Rubio 6
Walker 5
Fiorina and Huckabee 4
Jeb! and Santorum 3
Kasich Paul and Jindal 2
Gilmore (!) and Christie 1
Perry (RIP), Graham, and Pataki 0

There are some days when it isn't worth getting out of bed if your name is Jeb! Bush. This is one of them.

NH Dems:

Sanders 52
Clinton 30
Biden 9
O'Malley 1
Webb and Chafee 0

NH GOP:

Trump 40(!)
Carson 12
Kasich 9
Fiorina 8
Paul and Jeb! 6
Cruz 5
Walker 3
Christie and Rubio 2
Huckabee and Perry 1
Jindal, Graham, Santorum, Gilmore, and Pataki 0

This one is pretty impressive for both Sanders and Trump.

SC Dems:

Clinton 46
Sanders 23
Biden 22
Webb 1
O'Malley and Chafee 0

SC GOP:

Trump 36
Carson 21
Cruz 6
Jeb! and Sitting South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham 5
Kasich 4
Fiorina, Rubio, Huckabee, and Walker 3
Christie 2
Santorum, Jindal, and Paul 1
Gilmore, Perry, and Pataki 0


Enjoy.

:bernget:

NotWearingPants
Jan 3, 2006

by Nyc_Tattoo
Nap Ghost

William Bear posted:

Trump is winning or within the margin of error to Carson among likely voters? And Sanders is winning or within MoE to Clinton, too?!


Now I know how Trump feels. I wish we could hold the election now. Though either way, we'd get a president who can't pronounce "huge" correctly.

Sanders/West v Trump/Carson

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



William Bear posted:

Trump is winning or within the margin of error to Carson among likely voters? And Sanders is winning or within MoE to Clinton, too?!


Now I know how Trump feels. I wish we could hold the election now. Though either way, we'd get a president who can't pronounce "huge" correctly.

Maybe it was everyone else all along that has been mispronouncing the word?

skaboomizzy
Nov 12, 2003

There is nothing I want to be. There is nothing I want to do.
I don't even have an image of what I want to be. I have nothing. All that exists is zero.
Chris Christie went on Meet The Press and told people to stop reading the papers in response to a question about Bridgegate. That doesn't fill me with confidence about his innocence.

CloFan
Nov 6, 2004

I had a dream that Trump didn't have a campaign website yet, and that for some reason he was an alum from my school so I ended up being his IT director. :psyduck: time to step away from politics for a while, see you guys wednesday.

Bob Ojeda
Apr 15, 2008

I AM A WHINY LITTLE EMOTIONAL BITCH BABY WITH NO SENSE OF HUMOR

IF YOU SEE ME POSTING REMIND ME TO SHUT THE FUCK UP

skaboomizzy posted:

Chris Christie went on Meet The Press and told people to stop reading the papers in response to a question about Bridgegate. That doesn't fill me with confidence about his innocence.

That's a top 5 answer to a question so far this cycle

(Number one is still Walker's "no such thing as a hypothetical")

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Jewel Repetition posted:

How many presidents have we had who didn't like shaking hands?

Interestingly enough, George Washington himself intensely disliked shaking hands as he felt it was too informal and beneath the dignity of the chief executive. He preferred the older gentlemanly greeting of the bowing and doffing your hat.

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW

Doctor Candiru posted:


Not being at least OK with shaking hands at a rope line (like Trump) would be a pretty new thing in modern American politics. Rope lines are very good politics, too -- people fondly remember shaking a candidate's hand forever, let alone a president's hand, regardless of the candidate/president. This is a non-issue, though, either way, because Trump isn't actually trying to be president, and his supporters have already proven themselves to be accepting of pretty much anything he does or says.

Trump is absolutely trying to be president get your head out of your rear end.

docbeard
Jul 19, 2011

Hahahaha, I suppose it was inevitable, really.

Jesse Ventura talks about running with Donald Trump or on his own.

quote:

In recent weeks, Ventura has said that he is open to running for vice president on Donald Trump’s ticket. Politico carried the report, though there’s no invitation from Trump’s people.

quote:

He shrugs off the disbelief about an alliance with Trump, even though he has denounced Trump’s immigration policy on his Internet show, and, unlike Trump, strongly opposes U.S. military intervention in the Middle East.

Asked if it would be a problem to run with a man he disagrees with, even if Trump is a friend, Ventura said, “I’d be there to fight him over that and show him why it’s an idiotic policy to begin with.”

(Apologies in advance for my local newspaper's terrible website insisting on showing you an interstitial photograph before going to the story. And for its dumb paywall.)

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

Bob Ojeda posted:

That's a top 5 answer to a question so far this cycle

(Number one is still Walker's "no such thing as a hypothetical")

Does he keep saying it over and over? I've avoided him, well so has the press.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



Zwabu posted:

I don't really understand how Carson came to be #2. It doesn't seem like he's done anything much at all except be a bad speaker. Sure maybe he's getting the largest share of the "not Trump" vote right now, but why him as opposed to other fire breathing religious wingnuts like Santorum, Perry (RIP) or the Huck?

Because they get to have their own black guy then.

It's actually kind of smart from an electoral point of view.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Interestingly enough, George Washington himself intensely disliked shaking hands as he felt it was too informal and beneath the dignity of the chief executive. He preferred the older gentlemanly greeting of the bowing and doffing your hat.

"M'Legislator"

AllanGordon
Jan 26, 2010

by Shine
How many weeks has trump led the polls by now?

crazy cloud
Nov 7, 2012

by Cyrano4747
Lipstick Apathy
even though i'm panglossing hard af right now I still don't think we live in a just enough universe for us to have the next 16 years be

Trump / Ventura
Trump / Ventura
Ventura / West
Ventura / West

but it's lovely that it's even a potential future :buddy:

Anal Papist
Jun 2, 2011

Patter Song posted:

Also worth considering that within right wing activist circles Ben Carson has been famous for a long time. Arguably since Gifted Hands (the Ben Carson biopic starring Cuba Gooding Jr. as Ben Carson) came out in 2009, but especially since he criticized Obama to his face at the 2013 Prayer Breakfast and suddenly became a regular commentator on all the right wing media. Ben Carson has been in their sights for quite some time.

I didn't believe you but we exist in a post trump world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoAiTkkl-zo

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

nachos
Jun 27, 2004

Wario Chalmers! WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
That Carson answer about probably not shooting Mike Brown is so amateur hour. That's a gift wrapped softball where you just talk about how you couldn't know one way or another without seeing the video or possibly "I'm not going to disrespect the officer by putting myself, a civilian with no context, into the shoes of someone who risks his life everyday"

  • Locked thread