|
I can't wait for the colored version, where Ramirez gives the loving Pope yellow demon eyes.
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 08:10 |
|
|
Ramirez's depiction of Francis is rapidly decaying into a mass of wrinkles.  
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
The Vatican does not pick and choose it's scientists based on beliefs that are irrelevant to their area of study. A good cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
  Guardian:  "Steve Bell on Lib Dems' call for Labour defectors – Tim Farron says election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader could lead to disgruntled Labour MPs turning to his party" Telegraph:  Lord Ashcroft 'not settling scores' with David Cameron book Yesterday's Independent:  Jeremy Corbyn had 'fling' with Diane Abbott in the 1970s Independent: walgreenslatino posted:IT HAS BEGUN Times: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Ok Latuff now do one of Goku loving a pig 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
 My favorite part of the latest debate was that most of the candidates believed in anthropogenic climate change but there was nothing we can or should do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
  Very impressive.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
Hash tags should be aware of the anatomical context therefore it should be #PigGape. They're large animals! And your draw drops when you hear of it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:15
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:The fact I've had to wait so long for UKPol Pig Issue cartoons may be a bigger scandal than the event itself I know it's obvious, but I can't help myself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrF37TUaOIg QuoProQuid posted:Ramirez's depiction of Francis is rapidly decaying into a mass of wrinkles. Also, the current pope pretty much never wears the elaborate miter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:I know it's obvious, but I can't help myself: Like you'd pass up a chance to draw a hat that :swag:
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:I know it's obvious, but I can't help myself: Glad someone noticed. I think Ramirez hasn't seen a picture of Francis or is just drawing Benedict anyway. How the gently caress do you decide that to caricature somebody you're going to draw the thing that distinguishes them by it's absence super loving big? Two Pulitzers.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Soooo this guy is a furry artist. I can't tell if he's condemning or supporting Cameron. escapegoat posted:100 hours in photoshop. NO! Goddamnit Mason, when we said we wanted Cameron eaten by pigs, this isn't what we meant! Oolong will go to any lengths to get more screen time in the new series.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Glad someone noticed. I think Ramirez hasn't seen a picture of Francis or is just drawing Benedict anyway. On the other hand, he has somehow avoided labeling the pope hat "DEBT". So far. Baby steps and all that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:On the other hand, he has somehow avoided labeling the pope hat "DEBT". Eh, he's labeled it "politics," which to me is even worse because it has no content. At least a debt label conveys the message "debt bad," but "politics" doesn't mean anything as a generic concept.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
I am almost positive a majority of scientists are religious, but when have we ever let facts stay in the way of a Ramirez cartoon?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
Somehow the question has never occurred to me before today, but these guys are political cartoonists, right? A thing happens, they make cartoons about the thing...that totally counts, right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Also, the current pope pretty much never wears the elaborate miter. And most scientists don't wear labcoats, but it's a perfectly reasonable way to draw them in a cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
  Kulkasha posted:I can't wait for the colored version, where Ramirez gives the loving Pope yellow demon eyes. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
This is what Ramirez thinks Pope Francis looks like. This is what Pope Francis actually looks like. Seriously, how is Ramirez so goddamn bad at this?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
How is it possible to produce writing this bad?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Maybe its me imagining it, but I think Sack included Walker's uneven eye level.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:How is it possible to produce writing this bad? By being Muir.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Heh, yeah, when has the Catholic church EVER tried to influence what people and governments do before this pope amirite?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
But... Social issues ARE political. Helping the poor, standing up for the disadvantaged - basic tenets of the Catholic faith - anything that doesn't maintain the status quo is, inherently, a political act. That doesn't mean it's bad. Does he just want a Pope who says "yep everything is A-OK as-is, let's not change our behavior at all"? Who am I kidding, I know he does.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:How is it possible to produce writing this bad? I actually got a little angry at that it was so lovely. As Pauline Kael might have said, it looks like it was written by trolls. e: Although Kael's quote was, "You can't get angry at something this stupefying; it seems to have been made by trolls. " so I guess she wouldn't have said it at all! 
Starshark fucked around with this message at 02:29 on Sep 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
PUGGERNAUT posted:But... Social issues ARE political. Helping the poor, standing up for the disadvantaged - basic tenets of the Catholic faith - anything that doesn't maintain the status quo is, inherently, a political act. That doesn't mean it's bad. Ah, but don't you see, when it's admonishing gay folks for being the worst (unless they're also pedophiles in robes), that's morals. When it's about things like emissions that actually affect other people and nations, it's shallow self-serving politics.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:27
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:And most scientists don't wear labcoats, but it's a perfectly reasonable way to draw them in a cartoon. I think there is a difference between using a symbol to represent a specific profession and drawing a caricature of a particular person with the details completely wrong. I don't think I have ever even seen a picture of Frances where he is not wearing a zucchetto. Not bothering with that kind of detail shows laziness and a lack of basic craft. But it's Ramirez, so we knew that already.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
I'll never get over the hammers and sickles in the Political Pope Rameriez  EDIT: Someone please post the Branco of the Pope hugging Marx tia
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
fade5 posted:This is what Ramirez thinks Pope Francis looks like. Seriously, Pope Francis has never worn the big hat. It's one of his visual trademarks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
Cabinet posted:EDIT: Someone please post the Branco of the Pope hugging Marx tia 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
Poo poo pee pee he is a bad pope.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:I am almost positive a majority of scientists are religious, but when have we ever let facts stay in the way of a Ramirez cartoon? Even if 100% of all scientists were atheists, how would this discredit global warming science, OR imply that the Pope should automatically disagree with it?  If an atheist says, "I believe that air is necessary for life, AND that there is no God  ", is the Pope duty-bound to stop breathing in Ramirez-world?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Even if 100% of all scientists were atheists, how would this discredit global warming science, OR imply that the Pope should automatically disagree with it? There are no facts. There is only the culture war.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
I'm sure Karl Marx had a lot too say about global warming.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
PUGGERNAUT posted:But... Social issues ARE political. Helping the poor, standing up for the disadvantaged - basic tenets of the Catholic faith - anything that doesn't maintain the status quo is, inherently, a political act. That doesn't mean it's bad.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Cabinet posted:I'll never get over the hammers and sickles in the Political Pope Rameriez Where are the hammers or sickles? The way he modified the P is to be emblematic of ancient Rome: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
I know it's been said but I really can't see this as anything but 'the vatican accepts scientific studies with overwhelming proof regardless of the personal beliefs the scientists, as any reasonable adult would'.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 08:10 |
|
|
Post 9-11 User posted:Where are the hammers or sickles? The way he modified the P is to be emblematic of ancient Rome: It's a Christian chi-rho symbol, it's not a roman eagle or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:49
|
|
