|
looks really cool super customizable and controllable.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 01:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:19 |
|
I am impressed by this ui. Awesome! Height zoning and setbacks builtin in an intuitive manner! Woo! Is the setback going to be the only thing specifying that parking is required, or will businesses spontaneously generate their own optional parking lots even if no setback was specified of land values allow?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 02:28 |
|
That's so awesome and well done! It gives a lot of freedom and some potential to some really cool options. I could imagine having an area where the stores are pulled back far from the road with a little park or walking area in front or the height thing coming into play when planning airports. It'd be cool if you could alter both of those along a zone, but I'm sure that'll come in a future update.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 02:36 |
|
It'd be really loving cool if you could alter the setback space after buildings were already in without loving up the buildings. One that that always SUPER annoyed me in city sims was that changing anything meant losing all your old buildings. There was no sense of permanence/history. Like it'd be sweet if you could add a lane to the road, add parking, add a park, sidewalks, etc. Move the road in and put a park in the middle of the lanes, or a railway in the middle, all that kind of stuff. As long as it wasn't so wide that it hit the building, the buildings would stay and "adjust" to the new setback space. I would love you forever.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 02:42 |
|
I think you've finally designed a city sim with all the ui and depth of features us spergy mayors love. I'll admit, I thought my enthusiasm for this project would die down as I scratched my city sim itch with Cities: Skylines, but these development videos continue to impress me.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 04:24 |
|
Holy gently caress those setback and height controls.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:52 |
|
Poizen Jam posted:I'll admit, I thought my enthusiasm for this project would die down as I scratched my city sim itch with Cities: Skylines, but these development videos continue to impress me. I thought the same, but this latest video has me more excited about Citybound than any of the previous ones. I think it's because Skylines does traffic and roads relatively well (certainly in a very pretty way), so the roads in Citybound don't hold as much excitement for me as they used to. But when citybound touches on anything else, it looks amazing. That zone control is absolutely superb. I look forward to videos about the economy. Anselm: maybe it's just me, but the bright pastel green background makes it really difficult to see anything in your videos, especially planned roads. Any chance of darkening it? crabrock posted:It'd be really loving cool if you could alter the setback space after buildings were already in without loving up the buildings. One that that always SUPER annoyed me in city sims was that changing anything meant losing all your old buildings. There was no sense of permanence/history. I imagine that's largely the point of the setback, for widening roads, but odd that Anselm didn't mention it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 08:31 |
|
Holy poo poo in city planning.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 10:18 |
|
That is an amazing set of tools. Extremely powerful and adaptable, but also very intuitive. Well done.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 14:08 |
|
One suggestion: You should be able to drag the height restriction down to the ground (0 stories) to say "I don't care - make the Burj Khalifa." Otherwise, you'll be scrolling for a long time to get huge skyscrapers. Edit: I wonder if there's an elegant way to implement a sky exposure plane without making it over-complicated to use. Then we could have stuff like this be dynamically created, rather than random. KillHour fucked around with this message at 14:37 on Jun 20, 2015 |
# ? Jun 20, 2015 14:24 |
|
Thanks for the enthusiasm everyone KillHour posted:Holy fuckballs. FYI, my wife and me adopted "holy fuckballs" into our daily language. Thanks for that.
|
# ? Jun 27, 2015 21:30 |
|
Finally a new update! Written and posted from my entirely inadequate phone! August 2015 Update - A week with Michael
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 10:00 |
|
Good of you to move out of that place. Also loving MULTITHREADING!
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 11:02 |
|
Congrats on getting out of Russia!
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 20:01 |
|
I missed the last update, so let me just say . Not gonna lie, I got a huge loving UI boner watching that. I literally snorted incredulously watching the zones adapt on the fly while you were dragging roads around, and all of the zone painting/config stuff looks phenomenal. poo poo, however Citybound itself works out, I'm just glad you're doing this work and that other people/companies are smart enough to steal it from you for future generations of citybuilders. Obviously I hope Citybound works out fantastically and you earn piles of money, but seriously, at least at first glance this looks like the kind of genre-defining advancement that citybuilders have been in need of for decades. Skylines has made some important advances, especially with roads and agents, but they're still stuck in a zoning paradigm that's straight out of SimCity 2000.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2015 22:20 |
This looks amazing so far. Good luck!
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2015 18:24 |
|
New Update! The Road to Alpha, Week 89 - Theory and Practice
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 02:44 |
|
He's back! Enjoy Italy.
|
# ? Sep 23, 2015 03:59 |
|
After the third time hearing it: Oh, thick geometry!
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 05:48 |
|
Great to see an update! As I have been traveling around the absolute disaster of urban planning that is Kiev I was thinking of this game and all the very different sort of cities we can hopefully make. \/ Yeah those barely even really count as cities. So many american "cities" are just a huge mess of roads and highways dotted with houses and strip malls and a core of office towers but no where does a real city form. A city in the form of gas, no substance, expanding to fill all available space. The core of Kiev is ok (although way too many huge over-wide soviet style roads that would probably perform better after a road diet) but outside of the city centre is just an endless sprawl of awful apartment blocks along jammed highways and stroads. It's an extremely car-centric city that's only getting worse since their urban planning theory hasn't adapted since soviet times and development is "planned" based enitrely on corruption/political connections so you get massive 20 story apartment towers in the middle of a farm field because the land-owner knows someone in the local authority and got their project approved. The infastructure is horrible, the driving culture is really bad (those slavic dash cam vids are an accurate depiction of daily driving), and it leads to massive commute times and traffic jams. Baronjutter fucked around with this message at 09:49 on Sep 28, 2015 |
# ? Sep 28, 2015 09:29 |
|
I enjoy Kiev ten times more than cities in the American South.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 09:38 |
|
Vahakyla posted:I enjoy Kiev ten times more than cities in the American South. Name ten American cities in the south. Oh wait you can't because we've all merged into one souless expanse of swamp and subdivisions broken up by strip malls and Dollar General's. (I do like Dollar General though, they always have canning supplies)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:24 |
|
Suspect Bucket posted:Name ten American cities in the south. Oh wait you can't because we've all merged into one souless expanse of swamp and subdivisions broken up by strip malls and Dollar General's. Excuse me? The official Houston city limits contain only 600 square miles (not counting water), a mere ten times as much area as Washington, DC. It's metropolitan area is only 10,000 square miles, barely more land than the entire state of Maryland—it's not even as big as West Virginia. Stop exaggerating. If you want a terrible city that's eating half an entire state, you're thinking of Southern California.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:40 |
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Excuse me? The official Houston city limits contain only 600 square miles (not counting water), a mere ten times as much area as Washington, DC. It's metropolitan area is only 10,000 square miles, barely more land than the entire state of Maryland—it's not even as big as West Virginia. Stop exaggerating. If you want a terrible city that's eating half an entire state, you're thinking of Southern California. Well gee when you put it like that it's not so bad.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:46 |
|
I hope in citybound we can make hellscapes like this
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:53 |
|
Well, north Texas continues the trend really. Edmonton has a 3700 sq mile metro and is actually slightly less dense than even Houston.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 15:59 |
|
Anyone who thinks they want to make games because it would be so cool and fun and easy should be forced to watch these dev diary videos.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 16:40 |
|
Baronjutter posted:I hope in citybound we can make hellscapes like this Not nearly enough of that is parking lot and abandoned strip mall for my hellscape tastes. Also, not beige enough.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 20:11 |
|
StealthArcher posted:Well, north Texas continues the trend really. Edmonton has a 3700 sq mile metro and is actually slightly less dense than even Houston. By slightly less you mean half the density right? I was going to mention how St. John's, NL is an utter failure of a city due to a pathological fear of density: Terrible parking availability, a large sprawl of copy pasted suburbs, a decaying urban core, and terrible public transporation. It's comparable to Houston's density, but with about 200k people... Then I checked the 'Edmonton Capital Region' after your post and felt really sad for you. Oh well, at least you have a city that's less cruddy at the center of that Metro.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 01:53 |
A PDF on American sprawl. Houston number one for large metros. A lot of places in the south as well, like Tennessee. http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/measuring-sprawl-2014.pdf
|
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 02:13 |
|
Goodpancakes posted:A PDF on American sprawl. Houston number one for large metros. A lot of places in the south as well, like Tennessee. Houston isn't the worst, Atlanta is. Nashville, where I live, is second worst. I can't wait to move...
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 17:29 |
|
Goodpancakes posted:A PDF on American sprawl. Houston number one for large metros. A lot of places in the south as well, like Tennessee. This isn't loading for me, got a different link? Also, all hail Atlanta: King of Building Out!
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 18:18 |
|
Poizen Jam posted:By slightly less you mean half the density right? A fair bit of it comes from the city of Edmonton itself pulling rear end covers for places like Sherwood Park. SP: "Hey, we wanna not pay taxes! Wah." E: "Fine, here's a deal, we'll asspull some numbers to claim large swaths of your population and let you stay a Hamlet." SP: "Really? Deal!" Now it's: E: "Hey, time to pay up, we're gonna amalgamate you now." SP: "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 19:17 |
Opals25 posted:Houston isn't the worst, Atlanta is. Nashville, where I live, is second worst. I can't wait to move... Ooh, you're right. I was reading the table wrong. Atlanta the worst of large metros. Morgantown NC worst regardless of size.
|
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 19:24 |
|
Baronjutter posted:I hope in citybound we can make hellscapes like this Hellscape? Please report to your local Ministry of Internal Affairs office, citizen.
|
# ? Sep 30, 2015 20:00 |
|
Supraluminal posted:Anyone who thinks they want to make games because it would be so cool and fun and easy should be forced to watch these dev diary videos. And frankly, Anselm is doing a dramatically better job than I think I would if I were in his place.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2015 03:06 |
|
New Update! The Road to Alpha, Week 96 - Committing to ...
|
# ? Nov 12, 2015 01:19 |
|
Neat. You're aware that this kind of thing already exists, and is generally used to support TC style mods? Having extreme customizability for your game can be a pretty neat thing.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2015 06:55 |
|
I'm curious... other developers would be terrified to open source any part of their work, for fear of losing their primary means of making money and paying the bills. Are you confident that the core, non-open source engine going to be sufficient for you to make a living off the game? Thinking of Tarn Adams here, and his aversion to open source. But then again, he's not a fan of collaborations at all, while you clearly are.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2015 14:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 12:19 |
|
Thanks for the update, Anselm! Good luck with this new initiative. I hope it helps you develop the game faster/better.
|
# ? Nov 12, 2015 16:22 |