|
I reached out to the Brown owner in my league and he said Jarvis Landry and Karlos Williams for Brown, this is an insta accept right? I also have Brown in 3 other leagues, so i'm already all in on him.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 00:24 |
|
|
VietCampo posted:I reached out to the Brown owner in my league and he said Jarvis Landry and Karlos Williams for Brown, this is an insta accept right? I also have Brown in 3 other leagues, so i'm already all in on him. lol yes. Best advice in this thread yet: LmaoTheKid posted:The window is open to buy lowish on AB84 after this weekend.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
Pain of Mind posted:We are manually voting on it, so I could just email the guy with a counter trade and see if that can go through instead. You don't veto a trade just because you don't like it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
dat one portagee posted:Peep this trade: I'd do it
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:52
|
|
), Fitz, Keenan Allen, Stevie Johnson, and Marvin Jones.
|
VietCampo posted:I reached out to the Brown owner in my league and he said Jarvis Landry and Karlos Williams for Brown, this is an insta accept right? I also have Brown in 3 other leagues, so i'm already all in on him. loving awesome, mash!
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
that sounds like an awful league to be in
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
dy. posted:That's not fair. The other guy got there first and took advantage. You should have made the deal first. Alright, I did not know offering a side-trade? was as unethical as it apparently is! I did not make any trade offers because I did not realize the most valuable player was on the trading block without having to give up any top talent, my loss.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:55
|
|
You are receiving this broadcast as a dream...We are transmitting from the year one nine... nine nine ...You are receiving this broadcast in order t
|
dat one portagee posted:Peep this trade: Also, I didn't think you were actually asking advice on this. This is a clear win, especially because Jordan Reed was available for free. Miller should rebound some (I hope), but he's not going to be better than a bottom end RB1 at the very best, and more likely to be somewhere in the mid to low RB2 range, I think. Pain of Mind posted:Alright, I did not know offering a side-trade? was as unethical as it apparently is! I did not make any trade offers because I did not realize the most valuable player was on the trading block without having to give up any top talent, my loss. If you have some weird trade system where one of the sides can back out of an already pseudo-official trade and negotiate a different trade, I don't think there's anything unethical about offering another trade. The other side in the original trade will likely call foul, but if a trade isn't locked in once it's accepted by the two sides, then you'd be dumb not to try to one up the guy and grab Rodgers for under value.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
Pain of Mind posted:Alright, I did not know offering a side-trade? was as unethical as it apparently is! I did not make any trade offers because I did not realize the most valuable player was on the trading block without having to give up any top talent, my loss.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
dy. posted:The other trade has been accepted, right? Which means it's too late for the parties to back out - the only way out is a veto vote. Which means you are essentially voting down the trade so your trade can go through. Which yes, is unethical. Ahh ok, yeah, vetoing the trade is awful in this case. Don't do that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
LmaoTheKid posted:loving awesome, mash! If the trade goes through i would be looking at a roster of QB: T-Mobile/Tannehill WR: R. Cobb, A. Brown, K. Allen, A. Robinson, T. Lockett RB: L. Bell, A. Foster, L. Miller, L. Dunbar TE: E. Ebron, Z. Ertz Klol: M. Bryant DEF: STL .5 PPR, people might ask why i'm holding 2 QB's and 2 TE's. I'm not really hurting for depth at this moment and i just hopped on the T-Mobile train. The guy with Antonio isn't happy with his RB2 choices between Woodhead/Blount/Cj2k, so maybe he's banking on Karlos paying out for the rest of the season? Also scared off by Mike Vick last night probably.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
There's a trade happy dude in my league who was offering me a succession of terrible deals, but he finally put one up that I might consider. Give: Martavis Bryant Forsett Get: Matt Ryan Lamar Miller Now normally I would say no, but I'm in desperate need of a QB for the rest of the season, as Stafford has been garbage and the WW is bare. I already have AB, am I right in thinking that Bryant has less value now with Big Ben sidelined? The other trade he offered me is Carr and Lamar Miller for Forsett alone, but obv Id rather have Ryan. Thoughts?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:09
|
|
|
You want zero parts of lamar miller. Duck dive dodge
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:10
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Can someone who has actually watched Dolphins games this year tell me how Parker is looking? He didn't actually get any significant playing time until deep into garbage time last week so it's hard to say. They did throw 2 fades in a row to him in the end zone at the very end of the game, but they weren't very well thrown by Tannehill. I'd expect Parker to start seeing more playing time after their week 5 bye.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:13
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:You want zero parts of lamar miller. Duck dive dodge Yeah I figured as much. I tried offering him Forsett for Ryan straight up but he didn't take it. And Ryan's his backup besides.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
shitbutt cockfag posted:Yeah I figured as much. I tried offering him Forsett for Ryan straight up but he didn't take it. And Ryan's his backup besides. if you don't go QB QB in the draft how can you win on the QB's bye week?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:18
|
|
|
shitbutt cockfag posted:There's a trade happy dude in my league who was offering me a succession of terrible deals, but he finally put one up that I might consider. I'd actually probably take this. I'm not at all high on Bryant, Ryan is a massive upgrade on Stafford, and the drop from Forsett to Miller likely won't be that massive. I think both should be usable RB2s, though Forsett at the high end and Miller at the low. Maybe see if he'd do Stafford and Forsett for Ryan and Miller? "Hey, you need a backup QB since you're trading away Ryan!"
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:19
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:I'd actually probably take this. I'm not at all high on Bryant, Ryan is a massive upgrade on Stafford, and the drop from Forsett to Miller likely won't be that massive. I think both should be usable RB2s, though Forsett at the high end and Miller at the low. Maybe see if he'd do Stafford and Forsett for Ryan and Miller? "Hey, you need a backup QB since you're trading away Ryan!" Before last night I'd say yes. Now I'm not so sure.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
Which version of my team do you like more, .5 ppr: WR2: Evans TE: Ebron or Cameron or WR2: Kendall Wright or Allen Robinson TE: Kelce Suave Fedora fucked around with this message at 18:39 on Oct 2, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Which version of my team do you like more: The second one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
LmaoTheKid posted:Before last night I'd say yes. Now I'm not so sure. Well, I don't think Forsett or Miller are as bad as they have looked so far in terms of fantasy production. Miller is still a 3 down back and has kept catching passes, Miami can't possibly keep running as little as they have been (right?  ), he's gone up against Washington and Buffalo run defenses, and in a presumably nice match up against Jax, Miami trailed for 2.5 quarters. He's not going to be threatening to be a high end RB1 by any means, but I think he should be producing better than he has been within the next few weeks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Which version of my team do you like more: PPR? I like the 2nd option more because of Kelce. Both WRs are very serviceable, especially in PPR.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:32
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:Well, I don't think Forsett or Miller are as bad as they have looked so far in terms of fantasy production. Miller is still a 3 down back and has kept catching passes, Miami can't possibly keep running as little as they have been (right? Lazor is a dolt and Philbin is a moron. As much as I want Philbin fired, nothing's going to change if Lazor takes over. I'm never drafting Miller again but at this point it doesn't really help me to trade him for pennies on the dollar.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:34
|
|
|
I rostered Brian Quick the other day. Is he ever going to play ever? Is he even a real person?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:34
|
|
|
On the topic of collusion, a buddy of mine mentioned this trade got vetoed in his league and its pretty bad. Eric Decker and Karlos WIliams for Marshawn Lynch. The Decker/Williams owner is 3-0 and the Lynch owner is 0-3. I am generally of the opinion that you don't veto trades but this seems like it could be collusion given their records. What are your thoughts?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
SeannieDarko posted:PPR? I like the 2nd option more because of Kelce. Both WRs are very serviceable, especially in PPR. Sorry, yes it's half ppr. I don't have any shares of Wright or ARob this season. Preference?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
MrSargent posted:On the topic of collusion, a buddy of mine mentioned this trade got vetoed in his league and its pretty bad. Not vetoable. It's not that unbalanced if you are of the very strong opinion that Karlos could end up being lead dog in BUF, which is entirely possible and wouldn't surprise me at all because 1) Rex plays the best guy (see Tyrod) and 2) McCoy's skillset is NOT the best fit for their rushing style. He's a dodger best suited for zone blocking, and BUF power blocks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
MrSargent posted:On the topic of collusion, a buddy of mine mentioned this trade got vetoed in his league and its pretty bad. K Williams has a mid-good chance of outscoring Lynch from game to game from here on out, so, no, it's just a speculative trade.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
Why do so many of you have horribly stupid opinions on other peoples' perfectly valid trades? Like there are tons of bad trades in the keeper league I run (somebody just swapped Larry Fitzgerald for CJ Anderson and a 5th round pick, lmbo), but I don't run in here every time and complain about it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:49
|
|
|
MrSargent posted:On the topic of collusion, a buddy of mine mentioned this trade got vetoed in his league and its pretty bad. That's a perfectly fine trade.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
It's almost as if these owners are trading based on their opinions on the future performance of a player rather than past value. Whoa!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:55
|
|
|
I'm of the opinion that consenting adults can trade whatever they want. Like, in the goon 20 man league, I traded off Ben and Matt Jones for Carson Palmer. He got more long term value via a playoff qb and a flex RB, I got an instant quality replacement. Trades is trades.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
Rotoworld posted:LeSean McCoy (hamstring), who has been ruled out for Week 4, made it clear Friday that he won't return until he's 100 percent healthy. "All of the Karlos Williams" indeed! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
I'm on the Special K train so hard.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Suave Fedora posted:Sorry, yes it's half ppr. Wright. I like how he and Mariota have a rapport.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
Thanks for all of the thoughts on the trade guys. This is only my second year doing fantasy football so I haven't seen a lot of trades (total of 2 so far) so I really don't know where the line is between collusion and bad trade. In my league, I don't allow vetoes but there have only been two trades, so nothing for me to really evaluate.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
Also, I would like to take this time to say that if I lose to my opponent who is starting this team this week, I will just snap. Seriously, though. Losing to this would be humiliating.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
I think collusion is something like a 3-0 team trades a kicker to the 0-3 team for Lynch. Everything else is basically fair game and vetos are dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
LmaoTheKid posted:I'm on the Special K train so hard. T-Mobile looks down the field, *insert cool Watkins nickname here* is covered, dodges the rush and dumps off to Special K for a 30 yard gain!
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 00:24 |
|
|
MrSargent posted:On the topic of collusion, a buddy of mine mentioned this trade got vetoed in his league and its pretty bad. So when Decker and Williams go off and Lynch remains a bum does the league apologize for ruining that guys chance to compete this year?
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2015 19:21
|
|
