Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
zoux
Apr 28, 2006


I don't see how anyone could read that article and not be wholly convinced that guns and suicide deaths are intrinsically linked and that means restriction is a must but I bet someone is about to prove me wrong.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Push El Burrito
May 9, 2006

Soiled Meat

zoux posted:

I don't see how anyone could read that article and not be wholly convinced that guns and suicide deaths are intrinsically linked and that means restriction is a must but I bet someone is about to prove me wrong.

Read the comments.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July
Your evening news roundup:

Rupert Murdoch thinks it's time America elect a REAL black president.

Looks like these shootings are good news... For gun dealers!

And the Senate is moving to fast track a bill which would punish sanctuary cities by terminating all federal funding to such cities.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Jagchosis posted:

What even are you arguing, that they shouldn't talk to Toyota at all for uh, reasons, even though Toyota has produced the Hilux for decades well aware that it is a tool of insurgency and war? There's even a war called the Toyota War for fucks sake. Is an inquiry such a horrific burden they should just get hosed or what in God's name is your point

It's a waste of time and basically security theater conducted by a bunch of old shitters desperate to look like they're doing something important.

E: about the only thing productive about it would be the precedent that manufacturers can be called to account for the propensity of their wares to be involved in misdeeds, such as gun makers.

FAUXTON fucked around with this message at 03:57 on Oct 8, 2015

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

So is TPP passage a done deal due to fast track? Or is it doomed due to Obama!

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Trabisnikof posted:

So is TPP passage a done deal due to fast track? Or is it doomed due to Obama!

I suspect we won't know how this shakes out until the text of the agreement is in congress's hands.

FAUXTON posted:

It's a waste of time and basically security theater conducted by a bunch of old shitters desperate to look like they're doing something important.

E: about the only thing productive about it would be the precedent that manufacturers can be called to account for the propensity of their wares to be involved in misdeeds, such as gun makers.

A cursory "these aren't USDM models right?" is warranted I'd think.

Even if the response is a quick "No those are manufactured in Pakistan and Thailand"

hobbesmaster fucked around with this message at 04:06 on Oct 8, 2015

Sir Tonk
Apr 18, 2006
Young Orc

Trabisnikof posted:

So is TPP passage a done deal due to fast track? Or is it doomed due to Obama!

Yes.

Yudo
May 15, 2003

zoux posted:

I don't see how anyone could read that article and not be wholly convinced that guns and suicide deaths are intrinsically linked and that means restriction is a must but I bet someone is about to prove me wrong.

Means prevention could be an important component of suicide prevention, though there are a lot of assumptions in that statement. There is no reason, however, that it should require an overarching gun control scheme to implement.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

hobbesmaster posted:

A cursory "these aren't USDM models right?" is warranted I'd think.

Even if the response is a quick "No those are manufactured in Pakistan and Thailand"

Also in "reasons why it's pure bluster"

Also hiluxes have never been sold in the US and their plentiful (in overseas markets), resilient (in the same way you could utterly thrash a '93 civic hatch and have it back running in a day) nature has made them pretty big with people who drive them around in rough environments such as war zones.

FAUXTON fucked around with this message at 04:20 on Oct 8, 2015

Martin Random
Jul 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

FAUXTON posted:

Also in "reasons why it's pure bluster"

Also hiluxes have never been sold in the US and their plentiful, resilient nature has made them pretty big with people who drive them around in rough environments such as war zones.

I own a hilux that was sold in the US. 86.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Martin Random posted:

I own a hilux that was sold in the US. 86.

Did someone ship this 1986 hilux in or something, or are you making a "I bought a 6000 but I'm calling it a cutlass out of spite" thing?

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

FAUXTON posted:

Also in "reasons why it's pure bluster"

Also hiluxes have never been sold in the US and their plentiful, resilient nature has made them pretty big with people who drive them around in rough environments such as war zones.

The Hilux was sold in America as the Hilux from 1969 to 1975 model years. It was then rebadged "Toyota Truck" and later "Toyota Pickup" for 1975 until discontinued in America in 1995 in favor of the Toyota Tacoma.

On top of that the early US market 4Runners were also built from Hilux trucks.

So no, there were plenty of Hiluxes in the US, and there still are. Most just have a separate nameplate.

FAUXTON posted:

Did someone ship this 1986 hilux in or something, or are you making a "I bought a 6000 but I'm calling it a cutlass out of spite" thing?

There were 6 straight years of American Hiluxes with the Hilux badge and everything, and then another 20 years of the same truck, different name. Some of those years even included Hilux production on American soil.

Nintendo Kid fucked around with this message at 04:33 on Oct 8, 2015

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

FAUXTON posted:

Did someone ship this 1986 hilux in or something, or are you making a "I bought a 6000 but I'm calling it a cutlass out of spite" thing?

But is there really any big difference?

Nostalgia4Infinity
Feb 27, 2007

10,000 YEARS WASN'T ENOUGH LURKING
There's a huge difference between a Hilux and a Tacoma. I wish I could buy a Hilux in the states.

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012

Tr*ckin' and F*ckin' all the way to tha
T O P

Hollismason posted:

Wait so there may be a situation where no one get's elected speaker because of the Freedom Caucus or has the extreme right viewed this as their way to seize more power?

To add onto what has already been said, the House vote is scheduled a day before Boehner's resignation. If the GOP somehow fails to elect a candidate, Boehner would remain Speaker until a majority is reached.

Might explain why Boehner is pushing so hard for Republicans to line up behind a single candidate. I can't imagine he wants to stick around any longer than he needs to.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

I'd like to reiterate my hope for Toyota to be like "because their fords and chevys fell apart :parrot:"

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

Trabisnikof posted:

So is TPP passage a done deal due to fast track? Or is it doomed due to Obama!

It's probably happening at this point, if not this year than in next year's lame duck session.

Cabbit
Jul 19, 2001

Is that everything you have?

FAUXTON posted:

I'd like to reiterate my hope for Toyota to be like "because their fords and chevys fell apart :parrot:"

Man, old Fords are fine. I've got a old rusty Ford from way back in the year 1990 and it runs great.

I mean, sure, it basically has a new engine, and AC, and wiring, and brakes, and.. everything, but the body is holding up fine!

Mostly!

SalTheBard
Jan 26, 2005

I forgot to post my food for USPOL Thanksgiving but that's okay too!

Fallen Rib

zoux posted:

In fact, that's exactly what happened to my 18 year old cousin last year, who got into a fight with his girlfriend and suddenly in the middle of it went and got his dad's, my uncle's, .22 pistol and killed himself with it. We don't know why he did it, but if there wasn't a gun in the house that day he'd still be alive.

So to answer your question, I don't have to explain why cultural mores towards suicide wouldn't actully reduce suicide deaths, because suicide rates in America could remain unchanged. Every person that reached for a gun that wasn't there, and came to their senses later, or tried to hang themselves an failed, or whatever the scenario, they'll have a chance to go get therapy, to go get the help they need.

My cousin, who was like a brother to me killed himself with a shotgun to the head. He had been involved in a fairly traumatic accident that had left a very athletic person with about 80% of the strength he had. He was never the same after his fall, he got depressed, got drunk and shot himself. I have no doubt that had my cousin not had a gun he would still be here today. His death was 13 years ago and I have never stopped being sad about his choice. My cousin was one of the "responsible" gun owners that kept his weapons in one safe and ammo in another. He taught pretty much all of our cousins how to be safe and responsible with a weapon. gently caress I'm sorry to rant I just loving hate guns so loving much.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Cabbit posted:

Man, old Fords are fine. I've got a old rusty Ford from way back in the year 1990 and it runs great.

I mean, sure, it basically has a new engine, and AC, and wiring, and brakes, and.. everything, but the body is holding up fine!

Mostly!

The Top Gear segments about Clarkson turning his abuse on a hilux are pretty great, even if they're not exactly real.

Peztopiary
Mar 16, 2009

by exmarx

Crain posted:

That too.

But American media taught them that "guns" are the solution to their small penises.

I think that they actually taught the media that. Gun fetishists have existed before America, and certainly before American media. You're blaming the media for reflecting back what society tells it.

Evil Fluffy
Jul 13, 2009

Scholars are some of the most pompous and pedantic people I've ever had the joy of meeting.
Top Gear's segment on them is pretty great though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnWKz7Cthkk

These things are tough as gently caress and it's a shame they aren't made and sold in the US.

Martin Random
Jul 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

FAUXTON posted:

Did someone ship this 1986 hilux in or something, or are you making a "I bought a 6000 but I'm calling it a cutlass out of spite" thing?

It's not a rare thing. Are you people in an alternate dimension or are you all only pretending that one of the most successful greatest most reliable pickup trucks of all time have never been sold in the states

The 22re engine. Come on.

Mr Interweb
Aug 25, 2004

I saw Chris Hayes covering the story about Jeb getting help for his campaign from Dubya, and he played that "he kept us safe" clip and (not to be a broken record), it occurred to me that I literally have not seen a single loving reporter question Jeb about that since the time he said it. Is it cause the media still afraid of asking/criticizing anything regarding 9/11? It's so aggravating.

Peztopiary
Mar 16, 2009

by exmarx
They're as flabbergasted as the rest of us at the blatant replacement of reality with fiction. They've been confronted by the fact that a man they are contractually obligated to pretend is sane and responsible is neither and they have no idea how to communicate that to their audience. The Republicans are deep in the woods, the media is there with them, and the Republicans have just started speaking in tongues.

Lessail
Apr 1, 2011

:cry::cry:
tell me how vgk aren't playing like shit again
:cry::cry:
p.s. help my grapes are so sour!

Gravel Gravy posted:

Nah i meant the other poster. For some reason they took the meaning a tad different.

basically the post was about painting Bernie as an unthinking ideologue as they expanded on later

The Iron Rose posted:

I don't see what I could elaborate upon. I appreciate that Hillary weighed this issue based on information available and came to a considered decision after an appropriate period of time. I prefer politicians do this rather than oppose an issue because it wins points with their base or does so based upon ideology.

It's bad when the Republicans do that, and it's also bad when Democrats (and independents!) do so as well. To believe otherwise is hypocrisy.

Which is fine in many cases, I don't necessarily have a problem with hypocrisy or weighing pragmatism over principle, but at least I own up to it. Now, I appreciate Sanders for long supporting something like gay marriage as it speaks well to his principles. And that is valuable as well, I'm not discounting that, but when it comes to who I'll vote for? I'll go for someone who weighs issues on their content and merit and comes to a considered decision rather than someone whose ideology blinds them to potential solutions. Even if I share similar values (which I don't), of if I agree with the policy, or some of the policies produced by adhering to that ideology (which I do).

So, tl;dr: I'd rather a politician who weighs each individual issue on their merits, rather than on blind ideological opposition to free trade and capitalism.

BirdOfPlay
Feb 19, 2012

THUNDERDOME LOSER

Mr Interweb posted:

I saw Chris Hayes covering the story about Jeb getting help for his campaign from Dubya, and he played that "he kept us safe" clip and (not to be a broken record), it occurred to me that I literally have not seen a single loving reporter question Jeb about that since the time he said it. Is it cause the media still afraid of asking/criticizing anything regarding 9/11? It's so aggravating.

It's simple. The narrative is that after 9/11 Bush beat back the terrorist horde and prevented them from ever attacking America. See: the War on Terror, shoe-bomber, those anarchists in Cleveland, etc.

The problem you're running into is assuming that the media would loving blame Bush for 9/11. If they don't blame him for 9/11, using 9/11 as a counter-point to "Kept us safe" is a non-starter.

Goatman Sacks
Apr 4, 2011

by FactsAreUseless

BUBBA GAY DUDLEY posted:

Read the comments.

So let them kill themselves. Less reactionary voters.

Dalael
Oct 14, 2014
Hello. Yep, I still think Atlantis is Bolivia, yep, I'm still a giant idiot, yep, I'm still a huge racist. Some things never change!

SalTheBard posted:

My cousin, who was like a brother to me killed himself with a shotgun to the head. He had been involved in a fairly traumatic accident that had left a very athletic person with about 80% of the strength he had. He was never the same after his fall, he got depressed, got drunk and shot himself. I have no doubt that had my cousin not had a gun he would still be here today. His death was 13 years ago and I have never stopped being sad about his choice. My cousin was one of the "responsible" gun owners that kept his weapons in one safe and ammo in another. He taught pretty much all of our cousins how to be safe and responsible with a weapon. gently caress I'm sorry to rant I just loving hate guns so loving much.

:sympathy:

I am sorry for your loss.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July
Now that Walker is back in Wisconsin for good, Republicans there are looking to make sure he and other Republicans don't get recalled again by dismantling the non-partisan board responsible for calling the recall elections and investigating possible coordination between Walker's campaign and outside groups.

Ravenfood
Nov 4, 2011

Goatman Sacks posted:

So let them kill themselves. Less reactionary voters.
Yeah, that'd be okay if they didn't have any kids, friends, or families who also had access.

Serrath
Mar 17, 2005

I have nothing of value to contribute
Ham Wrangler
I have a lot of familiarity with the research underlying the impact of banning the methods to suicide has on suicide rates, I can make an effort post aggregating that information but I can say that comparison rates, country to country, or even region to region within countries doesn't really allow you to make many meaningful conclusions so arguments about South Korea having a higher suicide rate isn't really relevant to a conversation about whether restrictions of firearms in the US would have much impact on successful suicide attempts. Confusing the data as well are differences (again, not just country by country but region by region) regarding what qualifies as a "suicide" for the purpose of data collection and how to even begin to report incidence of parasuicidal behaviour. Something overlooked is the fact that a lot of people actually act recklessly, not in ways where they mean to kill themselves, but in ways where death may be an expected reaction. A lot of people who attempt suicide are not rational actors and, when you speak to survivors of suicide attempts, you find (surprisingly often) that they didn't have a specific intent to die but wanted to either cause harm to themselves, call or help, or just be reckless... it's really complex but when the method of self harm gets lethal enough, you get enough proportion of deaths that the completed deaths masks any research attempt to clarify motivations. It's not uncommon to hear from people who have survived self-inflicted gunshot wounds that they were simply staring at their gun and contemplating or simply handling it; if they'd died from that same attempt, these would have been aggregated within the suicide statistics. I've known at least two people who survived an act where they loaded their gun with an insufficient number of bullets and tried to shoot themselves; in one instance, the goal was a thrill, in the other, there wasn't a specific intent to die but there was an ambiguity about the act.

The only available research that provide any reliable estimate about how suicide rates may be impacted by firearm restrictions is to look at individual countries or regions that enacted such bans and compare the rates before and after, this at least controls for confounding factors unique to that region. I can pull up exact stats but this is actually very well researched in areas like Australia which has shown rather profound and sudden drops in completed suicide attempts following gun control and gun buy-back programs; these effects have been found to occur both in the short term and in the long term (though the longer term stats become unreliable as the cultural and personal factors driving suicide change over time - I've been involved in research exploring the impact of access to mental health services on suicides in rural areas of Australia and we're finding that one of the biggest predictors of completed suicides within some regions is the presence of enduring periods of drought concurrent to failure of financial and social systems to support rural populations experiencing drought).

It's hideously complex, though, and you're never going to find a perfect model that accounts for all factors - the weight of evidence suggests that gun bans reduce completed suicides generally but the data is nebulous and complex enough that people arguing that's [/i]not[/i] the case wouldn't have to look very far to find individual studies and examples to support that claim. That's one of the problems with sociological research, reaching conclusions tends to be done based on weight of often contradictory evidence rather than concrete and irrefutable research studies...

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

Martin Random posted:

It's not a rare thing. Are you people in an alternate dimension or are you all only pretending that one of the most successful greatest most reliable pickup trucks of all time have never been sold in the states

The 22re engine. Come on.

Is it built on the same drivetrain? Same chassis? Same suspension? How about the cab and bed?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Martin Random posted:

It's not a rare thing. Are you people in an alternate dimension or are you all only pretending that one of the most successful greatest most reliable pickup trucks of all time have never been sold in the states

The 22re engine. Come on.

:colbert: Its not the diesel. Get out.


We can't have all that accountability running all willy nilly.

BI NOW GAY LATER
Jan 17, 2008

So people stop asking, the "Bi" in my username is a reference to my love for the two greatest collegiate sports programs in the world, the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Marshall Thundering Herd.
The Tacoma and the HiLux are mechanically different; the HiLux is way more rugged, while the Tacoma has much better ride quality.

There's a reason they don't sell the HiLux here, and it's because American truck buyers don't actually use their trucks.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

I think that if there's anyone who can speak to issues of authenticity in the African-American community, it's white octogenarian Australian billionaires.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Evil Fluffy posted:

Top Gear's segment on them is pretty great though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnWKz7Cthkk

These things are tough as gently caress and it's a shame they aren't made and sold in the US.

Good news: the TPP might eliminate the tariff that has kept them out

the paradigm shift
Jan 18, 2006

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Good news: the TPP might eliminate the tariff that has kept them out

Sure, but will the small diesel that makes them so desirable meet US emissions standards?

Sir Tonk
Apr 18, 2006
Young Orc
Yeah what we really needed was a *real* black man as president.

One like these guys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2tLyqfJd54

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

I dunno about real blackness but I do want a president that knows what a debt limit is.

quote:

Ryssdal: All right, so let's talk about debt then and the budget. As you know, Treasury Secretary Lew has come out in the last couple of days and said, "We're gonna run out of money, we're gonna run out of borrowing authority, on the fifth of November." Should the Congress then and the president not raise the debt limit? Should we default on our debt?

Carson: Let me put it this way: if I were the president, I would not sign an increased budget. Absolutely would not do it. They would have to find a place to cut.

Ryssdal: To be clear, it's increasing the debt limit, not the budget, but I want to make sure I understand you. You'd let the United States default rather than raise the debt limit.

Carson: No, I would provide the kind of leadership that says, "Get on the stick guys, and stop messing around, and cut where you need to cut, because we're not raising any spending limits, period."

Ryssdal: I'm gonna try one more time, sir. This is debt that's already obligated. Would you not favor increasing the debt limit to pay the debts already incurred?

Carson: What I'm saying is what we have to do is restructure the way that we create debt. I mean if we continue along this, where does it stop? It never stops. You're always gonna ask the same question every year. And we're just gonna keep going down that pathway. That's one of the things I think that the people are tired of.

  • Locked thread