|
witz posted:(unless it was girls, then probably U14 or 15). ugh, mods?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 15:28 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 21:37 |
|
chaoslord posted:
Don't players try to do this now when the ball is in the box? If there isn't a good cross available, just ping the ball off the defender. Worst case: turnover. Middle case: corner kick. Best case: a free goal from a penalty kick.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 15:33 |
|
Aggro posted:Don't players try to do this now when the ball is in the box? If there isn't a good cross available, just ping the ball off the defender. Worst case: turnover. Middle case: corner kick. Best case: a free goal from a penalty kick. Some do, yes, but from what I've seen it's mostly limited to when they're in the corner and they don't see a good cross anymore because there is a middle case. I don't see many players do it in the middle of the field. I'm saying making all contact with arms a free kick (DFK or IFK depending on if you think it's intentional or not) will cause it to start occurring more often and in the middle of the field because you've replaced "Worst case: Turnover" with "Worst case: Indirect free kick" for most professional players. I can't imagine there are too many pros that play in attacking positions that couldn't hit the arm of a defender marking them with the ball.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 15:49 |
|
witz posted:I agree with all of this. I would have called this a PK in U12 and up, actually (unless it was girls, then probably U14 or 15). The issue is 'making yourself bigger' even though it may not have been intentional, the arm being in an unnatural position is indeed 'deliberate'. This situation is a cut and dry PK at most levels (and a caution). I'd call it a penalty U12 and down, hell, I'd even take it myself to let those little bitchmade babies know what's up
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 18:42 |
|
Here's my new rule: no more bullshit!
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 18:51 |
|
Just do as La Liga did a few seasons ago, any hand ball was a yellow card offence unless you had your arms close to your body
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 19:10 |
|
jyrka posted:Jesus. Sorry that my example is related to Manchester United. It's not personal. It's a penalty. I'd be hard pressed to disagree even if it were the scummy scouse awarded said pen.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 20:05 |
|
Make the sport a lot less boring to watch
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 20:19 |
|
Carpet bomb Stanford Bridge
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 03:30 |
|
Just regular football only with two balls. All the other rules stay the same. Two refs to watch each ball. If a foul is committed near one ball, the ref watching that ball calls it but you can keep playing with the other ball while you set up the free kick or whatever. Goalkeepers will have to really be on their toes because while you're watching a free kick or penalty, someone else could be trying to score with the second ball.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 03:32 |
|
For real though bring back old school NASL shootouts
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 03:40 |
|
The games are often a bore! Make them better. Change it up.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 08:18 |
|
Ban the lone striker
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 09:34 |
|
African AIDS cum posted:The games are often a bore! Make them better. Change it up. If nobody has scored a goal in the past ten minutes, one player from each team is removed to where the fourth official stands. The rest of the game continues as normal while these two players engage in a fierce battle of keepy-uppy (they may attempt to kick, trip, or otherwise interfere with each other). A goal is awarded to the team of whichever player wins.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 11:04 |
|
Compulsory 4-4-2
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 11:52 |
|
African AIDS cum posted:The games are often a bore! Make them better. Change it up. not sure i agree
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 12:42 |
|
An extra point when you score three goals in a game.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 18:12 |
|
lmaoboy1998 posted:An extra point when you score three goals in a game. This. Reward playing with panache. This negative poo poo is for the birds!
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 19:44 |
|
Not sure if these have been submitted but here goes: - turn based encounters using dice rolls to decide who gets to keep possession. Each season a new rule book costing $90 will be published. - former players as guest referees - the outlawing of Liverpool football clubs and those in the greater merseyside area
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:32 |
|
Have I mentioned my serious idea of Europe-wide football pyramid here yet?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:05 |
|
FIFA tried out anyone on the opposition team touching the ball once its gone out of play getting a yellow card at an under 19 tournament or something and it was really effective at speeding up matches
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:34 |
|
There should be a shot clock for goal kicks. Once a goal kick is awarded, you have to kick it within 15 seconds or its a corner. This would speed up the game immensely.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:38 |
|
Suqit posted:There should be a shot clock for goal kicks. Once a goal kick is awarded, you have to kick it within 15 seconds or its a corner. This would speed up the game immensely.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:49 |
|
witz posted:There already is an 'unofficial' clock for all restarts (and a slightly more official one for keeper kicks). Slightly delaying is gamesmanship, yes, but you can get cautioned for it. I think a United player got a yellow for it against Wolfsburg the other day. It just isn't enforced enough. This happens more in Europe than in domestic leagues, and it's almost always worth it for the keeper to stall and gain a minute instead of putting the ball back in play, even if it means a yellow. It's the most obvious form of time wasting, which is why you see it cautioned more than faking an injury or arguing a call. Suqit posted:There should be a shot clock for goal kicks. Once a goal kick is awarded, you have to kick it within 15 seconds or its a corner. This would speed up the game immensely. I like this idea.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:53 |
|
African AIDS cum posted:This. Reward playing with panache. This negative poo poo is for the birds! It's piss poor to watch rn and only stuffy fags think otherwise. I spend most of each match paying bills on my phone.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:01 |
|
Probably be better if it were 15 seconds from when the goalkeeper gets the ball from the ballboy or something.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:02 |
|
lmaoboy1998 posted:It's piss poor to watch rn and only stuffy fags think otherwise. I spend most of each match paying bills on my phone. Yeah the sport is in serious decline from an entertainment standpoint. I used to wake up early to watch games.. The light has gone out of my life.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:11 |
|
African AIDS cum posted:Yeah the sport is in serious decline from an entertainment standpoint. I used to wake up early to watch games.. The light has gone out of my life. I disagree. Football is an entertaining, powerful experience.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:15 |
|
African AIDS cum posted:Yeah the sport is in serious decline from an entertainment standpoint. I used to wake up early to watch games.. The light has gone out of my life. Whoever first realised that you can scab points easier by flooding the central midfield with cloggers is responsible
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:15 |
|
jyrka posted:Probably be better if it were 15 seconds from when the goalkeeper gets the ball from the ballboy or something. Then the ballboy would just hold it until he gets kicked by hazard
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 03:45 |
|
Blue Star Error posted:Whoever first realised that you can scab points easier by flooding the central midfield with cloggers is responsible I blame The Makelele Role
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 12:55 |
|
guardiola ruined football
|
# ? Oct 3, 2015 12:59 |
|
Here's a change for football: stop allowing England have 4 teams out! It's ridiculous. One country, one team - that's what I always say. Maybe that's why they never do well in major tournaments. Because Gareth Bale plays for Wales not England.
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 03:41 |
|
Suqit posted:There should be a shot clock for goal kicks. Once a goal kick is awarded, you have to kick it within 15 seconds or its a corner. This would speed up the game immensely. You could even have the opposing team's captain just constantly scream the seconds at the referee's face with no negative repercussions
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 04:57 |
|
jyrka posted:Here's a change for football: stop allowing England have 4 teams out! It's ridiculous. One country, one team - that's what I always say. Maybe that's why they never do well in major tournaments. Because Gareth Bale plays for Wales not England. 6 teams
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 09:22 |
|
The Falklands should be in UEFA and teams should have to fly out for away matches
|
# ? Oct 9, 2015 18:28 |
|
lmaoboy1998 posted:An extra point when you score three goals in a game. We used to have this in the 80s. 1 point for a draw, 2 for a win and 3 for a win by 3 goals or more.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2015 11:16 |
|
mackintosh posted:We used to have this in the 80s. 1 point for a draw, 2 for a win and 3 for a win by 3 goals or more. If you were going to do this properly it should be a bonus point for scoring three goals whether you win, lose, or draw though, like in rugby. 0 for a loss, 1 for a draw, 3 for a win, 1 for a loss scoring 3 goals, 2 for a draw scoring 3 goals, 4 for a win scoring three goals. So if it's an exciting 4-3 both teams benefit more than a poo poo 1-0.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2015 13:11 |
|
vyelkin posted:If you were going to do this properly it should be a bonus point for scoring three goals whether you win, lose, or draw though, like in rugby. 0 for a loss, 1 for a draw, 3 for a win, 1 for a loss scoring 3 goals, 2 for a draw scoring 3 goals, 4 for a win scoring three goals. So if it's an exciting 4-3 both teams benefit more than a poo poo 1-0. Implement this and then be amazed when end of season Italian matches are suddenly goalfests
|
# ? Oct 10, 2015 13:31 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 21:37 |
|
Bigger goals maybe? Theyve been the same size since Victorian times when people were much shorter, goalkeeping was poo poo and goalies didnt wear massive gloves.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2015 13:49 |