|
A person just owning a gun doesn't suddenly turn them into a crazed Republican gun nut either. poo poo, wasn't there pictures of Obama going to the range in the past?
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 05:26 |
|
|
Kit Walker posted:http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/United-Kingdom/United-States/Crime
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
ErIog posted:gently caress off. Nobody gives a poo poo about mentally ill people and further still a lot of people have active scorn for them and view their illness as a personal failure of character. Like honestly if elementary school children being killed didn't do anything then nothing is going to. Depressed people killing themselves isn't even going to register. Try again next generation. Mantis42 posted:A person just owning a gun doesn't suddenly turn them into a crazed Republican gun nut either. poo poo, wasn't there pictures of Obama going to the range in the past? He did some really transparent photo ops firing a gun, yes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
It wasn't enough for Republicans that that skeet shooting pic was staged. They said it was a photoshop. They believed that it was impossible that Obama could even pick up a gun.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:40
|
|
|
Trilas posted:Title of the article: Actor Kelsey Grammar Stuns Internet By Wearing Shirt That Makes Liberals Explode  http://www.starwipe.com/article/kelsey-grammer-wears-anti-abortion-shirt-which-fin-714
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:46
|
|
|
Why does the chalkboard say "lunatic killers will be shot on sight," and why did they tape the constitution on it instead of putting it on a wall where it won't cover up a writing surface? This is someone's honest ideal scenario. It's like they're making their own reductio ad absurdum for us. Oh and here's another 
Stinky_Pete fucked around with this message at 07:51 on Oct 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 07:45
|
|
|
When does this take effect? I'm already sad about the dead kid/s.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 07:55
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete posted:Why does the chalkboard say "lunatic killers will be shot on sight," and why did they tape the constitution on it instead of putting it on a wall where it won't cover up a writing surface? This is someone's honest ideal scenario. It's like they're making their own reductio ad absurdum for us. Why is Ellen Burstyn teaching in Missouri?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 07:57
|
|
|
Nevvy Z posted:When does this take effect? I'm already sad about the dead kid/s. Actually I can't find anything about it. I think it's just plain made up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 08:02
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete posted:Why does the chalkboard say "lunatic killers will be shot on sight," and why did they tape the constitution on it instead of putting it on a wall where it won't cover up a writing surface? This is someone's honest ideal scenario. It's like they're making their own reductio ad absurdum for us. Do right wingers think "Red Dawn" was a documentary?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 08:05
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:Do right wingers think "Red Dawn" was a documentary? More or less
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 08:07
|
|
|
ErIog posted:gently caress off. Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 10:26
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. #feeltheburn
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 10:39
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 11:57
|
|
|
 I think someone posted this a few pages back, but it's making the rounds on my Facebook feed. This pisses me off, because what from what I understand, fertilizer sales and such became regulated afterwards for obvious reasons... But my mother is an RN, and we were living in Norman at the time (about 15-20 minutes South of OKC). It was her day off, but she grabbed all of her equipment and rushed to ground zero to help. The only thing she'll say is that it was "horrific" and she doesn't want to talk about it, and she's the type that will talk to me about anything. Basically, gently caress this meme! and gently caress anyone who posts it!
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 12:11
|
|
Damonic posted:This pisses me off, because what from what I understand, fertilizer sales and such became regulated afterwards for obvious reasons... It's pretty much impossible to get that type of fertilizer anymore in any sort of large quantity.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:00
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:44
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
Stinky_Pete posted:Why does the chalkboard say "lunatic killers will be shot on sight," and why did they tape the constitution on it instead of putting it on a wall where it won't cover up a writing surface? This is someone's honest ideal scenario. It's like they're making their own reductio ad absurdum for us. Is that Kathy Bates from that Stephen King Misery movie?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. Go gently caress yourself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
Good news everyone, I figured out what a III%er is. It's like an Oathkeeper, and the reference is thatquote:During the American Revolution, the active forces in the field against the King’s tyranny never amounted to more than III% of the colonists. Three percenters today, for the most part, identify with this 3% because they were true patriots fighting for the freedoms the nation we love and honor was founded on. http://tacticalshit.com/iii-three-percent-mean/ Not a lot of macros, but some real winners in the comments, including a man posting his wife's glock with a line scripture engraved on it about not being far from me when you're in trouble   
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 18:13
|
|
|
     
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
Are all these long winded pseudo intellectual rants from the same person? They sound like a libertarian that thinks they're way smarter than all the sheeple around them but is stuck working at Walmart.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
Rick_Hunter posted:Are all these long winded pseudo intellectual rants from the same person? They sound like a libertarian that thinks they're way smarter than all the sheeple around them but is stuck working at Walmart. Almost every contribution I've made to this thread has come from the same person. It's sort of a game to me to post the shortest possible comment and see how long of a diatribe I can elicit and how "what? what?!" it can get.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Almost every contribution I've made to this thread has come from the same person. It's sort of a game to me to post the shortest possible comment and see how long of a diatribe I can elicit and how "what? what?!" it can get. My brother-in-law is a gun-dealer Libertarian who rarely posts himself but he comments on nearly every political post with an undecipherable-yet-still-condescending remark and a winky smiley face. I finally gave up and blocked him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
A representative system would be ideal, we should change ours to be less lovely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI His other videos on voting systems are all solid entries too, great primers on how our system of voting is really bad at representing the people.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Defenestration posted:Good news everyone, I figured out what a III%er is. It's like an Oathkeeper, and the reference is that Well known propagator of liberal bias, Wikipedia attests that the US had 40,000 soldiers and a population of 2.4 million. If my math works out, that's actually a little over 1.5%. So got me where they got 3% from. 
Keeshhound fucked around with this message at 20:37 on Oct 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
Occupy introduced the whole ___%er so those dumbasses copied it without thinking out the details.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 20:44
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. I'm pretty sure this is how LeJackal pictures all gun control advocates. Also, that's an incredibly dickish thing to say.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
Keeshhound posted:Well known propagator of liberal bias, Wikipedia attests that the US had 40,000 soldiers and a population of 2.4 million. If my math works out, that's actually a little over 1.5%. So got me where they got 3% from. I'm on my phone so I only skimmed the wiki article but maybe the 40k counts the Continental Regulars and not the militias.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:05
|
|
|
PhazonLink posted:Occupy introduced the whole ___%er so those dumbasses copied it without thinking out the details. One percenters were the original %ers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlaw_motorcycle_club#One_percenter
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
Defenestration posted:Good news everyone, I figured out what a III%er is. It's like an Oathkeeper, and the reference is that  I feel like the "TAKE OUR GUNS" crowd is starting to outweight the "OUR TROOPS" crowd. I'm moderately curious of what might result.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Want to make a wild wild west meets ghostbusters movie about how America was saved from an Injun Ghost Army Wait, was it ghosts, or the dead rising? Because poo poo, I think I figured out what started the zombies in The Walking Dead.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
Klaus88 posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
Goatman Sacks posted:Mere ownership of a firearm is evidence of reactionary cancer of the mind. Excising it with a bullet is the proper treatment. sucides by firearm should be celebrated, not mourned. when someone is suicidal, they are willing to do harm to themselves. sometime they threaten to harm themselves with a gun. this makes you a bad guy with a gun, right? but when you shoot that person, you are eliminating a threat, therefore also being at the same time a good guy with a gun. since the highest and best use of a gun is to exercise your right to self defense, being a good guy with a gun trumps the simultaneous aspect of being a bad guy with a gun, so you die a hero and a stoic defender of the second amendment of the united states constitution. it then follows that there are far more successful uses of the firearm in self defense every year than homicides, proving yet again that firearms are necessary to protect yourself from mortal threat. boner confessor fucked around with this message at 21:43 on Oct 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:sucides by firearm should be celebrated, not mourned. when someone is suicidal, they are willing to do harm to themselves. sometime they threaten to harm themselves with a gun. this makes you a bad guy with a gun, right? but when you shoot that person, you are eliminating a threat, therefore also being at the same time a good guy with a gun. since the highest and best use of a gun is to exercise your right to self defense, being a good guy with a gun trumps the simultaneous aspect of being a bad guy with a gun, so you die a hero and a stoic defender of the second amendment of the united states constitution. Hrm... Given that many of the recent mass shooters have killed themselves by being shot, have they turned into good guys with guns, stopping a bad guy with a gun?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Damonic posted:
That was me. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
e_angst posted:Hrm... Given that many of the recent mass shooters have killed themselves by being shot, have they turned into good guys with guns, stopping a bad guy with a gun? yes. the least successful mass shooters are the ones who are taken into police custody. when a mass shooter shoots themselves as the final death, their murders are washed away because in the end they use the firearm for its proper use, the elimination of murderers and criminals. so technically they're also good guys with guns
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
They're losers with no life
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
Is it just me or is $25000 an incredibly small amount of money for such a big corporation?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 05:26 |
|
|
Flaskraven posted:Is it just me or is $25000 an incredibly small amount of money for such a big corporation? I think this individual singled out a specific congressman for god knows what reason. The total investment on GD's part was probably orders of magnitude higher than that and spread across every possible congressional ally.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 22:31
|
|
