|
computer parts posted:he got his leftist creds for mocking christianity as a lifelong atheist, it's amazing how many atheists people are total myopic dicks about religion
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
durr, religious is stupid! ~ignores the role of religion as a means of community organization as well as how western tradition is fundamentally shaped by christianity such that even atheists should acknowledge the influence on their own thinking and morality~ magic sky wizard hurr!
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
farts out he own mouth
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
Captive female coyote mating with a male dog, then nursing the resulting hybrids. A Quilmes 355ml can in North Korea.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
Due to the somewhat confused nature of Chad's appointment and the continued references to 'chads' – small pieces of ballot papers punched out by voters using voting machines – in the 2000 US Presidential Election it has been jocularly suggested that Chad is the patron saint of botched elections. In fact there is no official patron saint of elections
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:farts out he own mouth Prlrbbrlt "moderate" religious are worse than fundamentalists because *tiny poo slips out, badly staining Hawaiian shirt with car motif*
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
i know you childish christians don't believe in evolution, but every scientifically-minded atheist knows that vaccines are deadly autism juice that poisons my precious bodily fluids
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:i know you childish christians don't believe in evolution, but every scientifically-minded atheist knows that vaccines are deadly autism juice that poisons my precious bodily fluids this goon knows what's up brb gonna buy some razer cartridges from noted korean manufacturer dorco
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Mansfield's breasts fluctuated in size, it was said, from her pregnancies and nursing her five children. Her smallest bust measurement was 40D (102 cm), which was constant throughout the 1950s, and her largest was 46DD (117 cm), measured by the press in 1967.[268] According to Playboy, her vital statistics were 40D-21-36 (102-53-91 cm) on her 5'6" (1.68 m) frame.[44] According to her autopsy report, she was 5'8" (1.73 m).[citation needed]
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 07:05
|
|
|
boobes
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 13:17
|
|
|
erhm how is that worthless 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:16
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:erhm how is that worthless i wouldn't call it worthless, but it's got a little bit of a creepy feel to it
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:21
|
|
|
prefect posted:i wouldn't call it worthless, but it's got a little bit of a creepy feel to it
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:26
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:Mansfield's breasts fluctuated in size, it was said, from her pregnancies and nursing her five children. Her smallest bust measurement was 40D (102 cm), which was constant throughout the 1950s, and her largest was 46DD (117 cm), measured by the press in 1967.[268] According to Playboy, her vital statistics were 40D-21-36 (102-53-91 cm) on her 5'6" (1.68 m) frame.[44] According to her autopsy report, she was 5'8" (1.73 m).[citation needed] sir mix a lot approved
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:28
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:Mansfield's breasts fluctuated in size, it was said, from her pregnancies and nursing her five children. Her smallest bust measurement was 40D (102 cm), which was constant throughout the 1950s, and her largest was 46DD (117 cm), measured by the press in 1967.[268] According to Playboy, her vital statistics were 40D-21-36 (102-53-91 cm) on her 5'6" (1.68 m) frame.[44] According to her autopsy report, she was 5'8" (1.73 m).[citation needed] there should be a name for when a wiki article has meticulous citations for questionable information and [citation needed] for something basic. wikiscoffing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:29
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:why do you think i used that smiley i felt the need to explain  
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 14:32
|
|
|
prefect posted:i wouldn't call it worthless, but it's got a little bit of a creepy feel to it Playboy started showing wisps of pubic hair about nine months after Penthouse (June 1970).[2] As competition between the two magazines escalated, their photo shoots became increasingly explicit.[1] Playboy, however, had actually first showed a very slight glimpse of any pubic hair on Melodye Prentiss' centerfold (Miss July 1968), some 15 years after the magazine's introduction. With Playmates it was usually the case that the pubic area would be obscured by an item of clothing, a leg, or a piece of furniture. The first appearance of real pubic hair in Playboy actually occurred in August 1969 in a pictorial featuring dancer/actress Paula Kelly. A few more glimpses of pubic hair appeared in some later pictorials and centerfolds, but it was not until January 1971 when Liv Lindeland showed clearly visible pubic hair in her pictorial. The first Playmate to clearly have the first full frontal nude centerfold was Miss January 1972, Marilyn Cole. Both went on to become Playmate of the Year, respectively 1972 and 1973. When Hustler was launched in 1974, it outdid both Playboy and Penthouse in explicitness by showing more graphic photos of the female sex organs.[1] A recent visit to Playboy Plus featured a photo of October 1959 Playmate of the Month, Elaine Reynolds. One of the outtake photos clearly shows pubic hair as she exits a swimming pool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 15:37
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:Playboy started showing wisps of pubic hair about nine months after Penthouse (June 1970).[2] As competition between the two magazines escalated, their photo shoots became increasingly explicit.[1] Playboy, however, had actually first showed a very slight glimpse of any pubic hair on Melodye Prentiss' centerfold (Miss July 1968), some 15 years after the magazine's introduction. With Playmates it was usually the case that the pubic area would be obscured by an item of clothing, a leg, or a piece of furniture.  this is written by one of those japanese people who are obsessed with pubic hair, isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 15:42
|
|
|
prefect posted:
it's a piece of all-american history, probably.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 16:09
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:it's a piece of all-american history, probably. drat. when it's in context, it's actually humorous and interesting maybe i'm the weirdo 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 16:11
|
|
|
prefect posted:drat. when it's in context, it's actually humorous and interesting no, i'm still pretty sure that's still the guys carefully going through decades of playboy archives for traces of pubic hair.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
i kinda like how playboy decided to go non nude
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:there should be a name for when a wiki article has meticulous citations for questionable information and [citation needed] for something basic. wikiscoffing? scaffolding?
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i kinda like how playboy decided to go non nude it's an interesting move. th real challenge is going to be how they continue to differentiate themselves from the piles of PG lad mags
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
is the removal of nudity total? that is, would they still be capable of printing nudity if it's in the context of a feature article or whatever? because i can definitely see a space for "we'll prin tnudity, but not lasciviously"
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:is the removal of nudity total? that is, would they still be capable of printing nudity if it's in the context of a feature article or whatever? because i can definitely see a space for "we'll prin tnudity, but not lasciviously"
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:it's an interesting move. th real challenge is going to be how they continue to differentiate themselves from the piles of PG lad mags playboy sometimes has some actual articles; I've been linked to some good ones on their website over the past few years. lad mags will be cosmo-level inanity until the heat death of the magazine industry if they go full non-nudity, i wonder if minors will be able to buy it then. it would be weird if kids could buy the flagship product of a porn company just because that particular publication doesn't have nudity
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
The witch house visual aesthetic includes occult, witchcraft, shamanismand horror-inspired artworks, collages and photographs as well as significant use of typographic elements such as Unicode symbols.[1][2]Many works by witch house visual artists incorporate themes from horror films such as The Blair Witch Project,[3] the television series Twin Peaks,[4]and mainstream pop culture celebrities. Common typographic elements in artist and track names include triangles, crosses, and other Unicode symbols, which are seen by some as a method of keeping the scene underground and harder to search for on the Internet as well as references to the television series Twin Peaks and Charmed.[5][6]
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i wonder if minors will be able to buy it then
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:playboy sometimes has some actual articles; I've been linked to some good ones on their website over the past few years. lad mags will be cosmo-level inanity until the heat death of the magazine industry yeah, there's a real literary legacy with playboy. i do have to wonder how they'll handle the branding. kalstrams posted:they're making the mag pg-13 welp
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
whole generation of teen fathers taking their kids to barnes & noble on the eve of their 13th birthday to buy them a playboy
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
if they had shifted to occasionally doing both male and female r-rated fashion photography but otherwise not focus on the nudity thing and then double-down on the articles it could have renewed their status as an actually transgressive publication
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
but what do i, a single american salaried male in the 25-34 age bracket that has bought a tree-meat national geographic within the past month know about how to leverage branding to sell a few magazines
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:both male and female r-rated fashion photography speaking of male nudity, did they say whether playgirl was going pg13?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Fart.Bleed.Repeat. posted:whole generation of teen fathers taking their kids to barnes & noble on the eve of their 13th birthday to buy them a playboy i bought my first porn mag circa that age. i put on a raiders cap and sunglasses, my mc hammer pants that i never wore anywhere. girl at the counter was like "it'll be so and so money" and i was a robot silently handing her sweaty coins, then pretty much ran home and didnt look at it for 2 weeks. later i figured out to steal porn mags from a used bookstore in a different city while pretending to look at comics. pretty gross now that i think about it, it being a used bookstore & all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:i bought my first porn mag circa that age. i put on a raiders cap and sunglasses, my mc hammer pants that i never wore anywhere. girl at the counter was like "it'll be so and so money" and i was a robot silently handing her sweaty coins, then pretty much ran home and didnt look at it for 2 weeks. i bought my first playboy at that age and it had ronald reagan's daughter in it then i bought anne rice's sleeping beauty book from the same shop and the clerk gave me the evil eye and told me she wished she could call my mother and tell her what a sicko i was in retrospect she was right
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
we are similarly aged apparently guy at the bookstore didnt give a gently caress, he looked like william m. gaines of mad magazine fame and basically just sat there wheezing while i casually wandered the aisles.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
i think my first porn mag was the issue of hustler right after the supreme court ruled in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. maybe that's why i like reading about the supreme court so much
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
i found my porn in the woods, as god intended
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 10:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
last time i found porn it was in this weird closet/floor buffer storage space at work. it was over night and i was stocking shelfs and unloading a truck, and we had this crew of 3 generic slavs that were strictly maintenance/floors. they would disappear for hours at a time and it turns out they had this secret closet area stocked with sleeping bags and food and a black garbage bag full of porn mags and VHS tapes and they got fired shortly after that and one of the other overnight guys lugged the black garbage bag full of porn home with him one morning
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2015 14:22
|
|