|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:If you beat up a girl you look like an rear end in a top hat, and if you refuse to fight them over your own threats you're a pussy. There's just no way to win with moderntarded fragile masculinity. So you lose the fuckin' fight. That's the only non-bad way out.
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 15:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 17:45 |
|
|
Somfin posted:So you lose the fuckin' fight. That's the only non-bad way out. To be fair that's probably the outcome that would have happened even if he hadn't chickened out or taken an intentional loss.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:If you beat up a girl you look like an rear end in a top hat, and if you refuse to fight them over your own threats you're a pussy. There's just no way to win with moderntarded fragile masculinity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 16:23
|
|
|
Somfin posted:So you lose the fuckin' fight. That's the only non-bad way out. "Non-bad". I'm pretty sure that getting beaten up by a woman would be grounds for seppuku for these people.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
The only non-bad way out involves a time machine and teaching your younger self to be less of a tool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
Terrible Opinions posted:The only non-bad way out involves a time machine and teaching your younger self to be less of a tool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2015 18:15
|
|
|
DStecks posted:"Non-bad". I'm pretty sure that getting beaten up by a woman would be grounds for seppuku for these people. He was right, though. We saw who was fragile.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 04:33
|
|
|
coyo7e posted:I'm pretty sure after glancing through Pia Glenn's page, that she would destroy him. She's pretty buff, and posts updates like "Some Random Mansplainer At the Gym Admonished Me Against Looking 'Too Muscle-y'". As if I'd think some anime dweeb could actually fight and win against an adult.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
coyo7e posted:I'm pretty sure after glancing through Pia Glenn's page, that she would destroy him. She's pretty buff, and posts updates like "Some Random Mansplainer At the Gym Admonished Me Against Looking 'Too Muscle-y'". People who post and say that sort of poo poo should be forced to cage match with Rhonda Rousey. She doesn't plan on fighting men, but I'm sure she'd make an exception for manchildren. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Klaus88 posted:People who post and say that sort of poo poo should be forced to cage match with Rhonda Rousey.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
So does anyone remember the time a bunch of Dark Enlightenment folks got really angry at Roosh for being insufficiently racist?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:So does anyone remember the time a bunch of Dark Enlightenment folks got really angry at Roosh for being insufficiently racist? That, and he's slightly swarthier than they'd prefer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 02:41
|
|
|
Asgerd posted:That, and he's slightly swarthier than they'd prefer. But Iranians and Armenians are part of the Aryan race, are they not?  In fact Farsi is on the branch of the Indo-European tree that is most properly called "Aryan" (i.e. not the side Germanic languages are on).
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Woolie Wool posted:But Iranians and Armenians are part of the Aryan race, are they not? This is technically true but if you ask a nazi they believe those aren't real Aryans, the real ones were 8-foot tall supermen who came out of the Baltic region and lost their powers when they intermingled with the rest of humanity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Jim is reviewing "female-oriented" porn. AUGH MY EYES and that's for a text-only postfoolish commenter posted:How did you identify porn for females? Is it an actual genre now? James A. Donald, gushing broken sewer pipe of wisdom on all subjects posted:Went to xhamster. Has a pile of taste categories. Clicked on female. I don’t know how accurate their identifier algorithms are, but the results agreed with my intuition. Oh well, he used his intuition about women, that couldn't possibly lead to problems. What he's actually watching is cuckold porn, under the impression that it's for women, rather than for people like himself. divabot has a new favorite as of 11:02 on Oct 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 11:00
|
|
|
divabot posted:Jim is reviewing "female-oriented" porn. AUGH MY EYES and that's for a text-only post So how is this guy considered a DE guru again? At least Nick Land and Moldbug are able to give the vague impression of being savvy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
 at the entire south park thread in TVIV being Insufferable Libertarian Nerd Corner
BornAPoorBlkChild has a new favorite as of 14:31 on Oct 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
divabot posted:What he's actually watching is cuckold porn, under the impression that it's for women, rather than for people like himself. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
divabot posted:Jim is reviewing "female-oriented" porn. AUGH MY EYES and that's for a text-only post There's a much easier way to find out what porn ~SJW's~ are watching. Just saying Probably goes without saying, that link is not work safe
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
Race Realists posted:
It seems like the show finally embraced what it was long destined to be and is now the covert SA Gamergate thread
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
Political correctness being dumb is not a particularly GG position to take.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Political correctness being dumb is not a particularly GG position to take. Given that 'political correctness gone mad' tends to translate as 'why are all these women and brown folks here, and why are we supposed to pretend they're people?', the overlaps with Gamergate and its crusade against any game not exclusively marketed to straight white men seem obvious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:seem
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
You realise that one of the key boards co-ordinating GG was /pol/, right? Full name, /politicallyincorrect/? This seems like a strange hill to die on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Darth Walrus posted:You realise that one of the key boards co-ordinating GG was /pol/, right? Full name, /politicallyincorrect/? This seems like a strange hill to die on. Is this the AGG equivalent of those GG crazy person charts? How does this translate to South Park thread being a GG hangout? It may "seem" like they're GG sympathizers or whatever, but that's just dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Is this the AGG equivalent of those GG crazy person charts? How does this translate to South Park thread being a GG hangout? It may "seem" like they're GG sympathizers or whatever, but that's just dumb. It's just that they're a right-slanted show and have gotten more banally right-slanted as time goes on. And they were just making a "it shows" kinda summary post. There's no smoking gun to show you, no conspiracy to unravel. Just a "this show is more lovely than it used to be and lol at its fan base."
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Political correctness being dumb is not a particularly GG position to take. Much like SJW, it started life as a way for leftists to criticize other leftists who were acting silly, but then turned into "Why don't these drat minorities let me say the N word?". DarklyDreaming posted:There's a much easier way to find out what porn ~SJW's~ are watching. Just saying But porn about a beautiful white woman being sexually ravaged by a big strong black man while an impotent white man looks on doesn't make me as hard. Angry. I mean angry. Not hard. Why would it make me hard? The only thing that makes me hard is good blonde aryan women having sex with alpha aryan men.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:23
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Much like SJW, it started life as a way for leftists to criticize other leftists who were acting silly, but then turned into "Why don't these drat minorities let me say the N word?". No, actually, the term legitimately came out of soviet academic politics. You couldn't say things that offended the party leadership and still publish. So you could be "scientifically correct but politically incorrect". This term was "borrowed" by republicans to suggest that saying "hey maybe you shouldn't be a racist rear end" was overt censorship. That happened decades ago.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
ikanreed posted:No, actually, the term legitimately came out of soviet academic politics. You couldn't say things that offended the party leadership and still publish. So you could be "scientifically correct but politically incorrect". This term was "borrowed" by republicans to suggest that saying "hey maybe you shouldn't be a racist rear end" was overt censorship. That happened decades ago. Oh so it's like the nrx misuse of "purging" to mean "criticize"?
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Oh so it's like the nrx misuse of "purging" to mean "criticize"? The whole "criticism is a violation of free speech" thing is so completely baffling and infuriating.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:35
|
|
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:Is this the AGG equivalent of those GG crazy person charts? How does this translate to South Park thread being a GG hangout? It may "seem" like they're GG sympathizers or whatever, but that's just dumb. I mean, if you really want I can amend my statement so instead of "Gamergate hangout thread" it reads "group of people whose political and philosophical outlook is identical to Gamergate hangout thread". Calico Heart has a new favorite as of 19:40 on Oct 22, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Pope Guilty posted:The whole "criticism is a violation of free speech" thing is so completely baffling and infuriating. Randall Munroe author of XKCD is an evil thought police abuser Incidentally here's the same person who wrote the above article, several months earlier, talking about how social justice warriors will probably soon purge Randall Munroe. https://twitter.com/sarahdoingthing/status/462476654191734785
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
Probably the best video ever recorded on the "political correctness gone mad" phenomenon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmsV1TuESrc
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 19:40
|
|
|
This whole article is a wonderful expression of confused thinking, but Someone who considers boycotts less justifiable than beheadings posted:During the Restoration, for example, the English monarchs imposed the 39 Articles and the Second Book of Homilies ...as the core of the sacred official belief system. The content of the mandatory sacred beliefs did not change from year to year, decade to decade. These items touched on social and religious matters, but mostly left personal matters, as well as those of science, alone. (Both science and pagan rituals flourished during this time.) A king is endowed with absolute power not so that he may use it, but so that he may keep anyone else from exercising it. How do these people understand so little about the time periods they lionize?
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 20:59
|
|
|
Patrick Spens posted:This whole article is a wonderful expression of confused thinking, but If they really understood them they wouldn't be able to lionize them. It's the historical equivalent of 'never meet your heroes'.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
Patrick Spens posted:This whole article is a wonderful expression of confused thinking, but Oh, man, as much as I've read this thread, I never realized how little window dressing they put on the "I would forbid opinions that differ from my own" core belief. I always thought that was something they danced around, and tacitly ignored, rather than declaring outright.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
Patrick Spens posted:During the Restoration, for example, the English monarchs imposed the 39 Articles and the Second Book of Homilies ...as the core of the sacred official belief system. The content of the mandatory sacred beliefs did not change from year to year, decade to decade. These items touched on social and religious matters, but mostly left personal matters, as well as those of science, alone. (Both science and pagan rituals flourished during this time.) A king is endowed with absolute power not so that he may use it, but so that he may keep anyone else from exercising it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:44
|
|
|
This has been my favourite thing since I saw it posted on SA ~19 years ago.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:44
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:So just to make the obvious explicit: this is trying to retroactively paint Monarchy as a Libertarian paradise.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 17:45 |
|
|
Cingulate posted:So just to make the obvious explicit: this is trying to retroactively paint Monarchy as a Libertarian paradise. Feudalism is what libertarians actually want.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2015 21:58
|
|