|
Tujague posted:This thread has taken a sharp turn for 100% retarded fatass idiots pulling profoundly philosophical knowledge clean out of their greasy belly-buttons, totally trumping Mr. Misspelled Username McSmartguy's efforts a dozen pages ago, but this right here takes the taco. Especially given the devastating certainty in which it was delivered and the raging, pseudo-intellectual autism and obvious complete ignorance of the terms in which it was couched. I mean his comment was dumb but the rants you go on are probably equally as dumb.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:50 |
|
Tujague posted:Yeah. Many rich young people, who for some strongly relevant reason were born in a certain time and not before, exist in a tiny little post-scarcity society. We know this because we are loving dumbass goons who seem to think that actual smart people just sort of look out the window before ginning up ringing socio-economic truths and just sort of ream them through the poo poo-covered tube of our vague, hilariously unsupportable impressions. Yeah. Top marks from the old critical thinking department. But, its not exactly wrong. Gourmet food shows up anywhere they are with a tap on their phone aka computer. Same for an electric car to shuttle them around driven by someone that is just a few years away from being a talking robot. Same for music, everything recorded is available at a few taps. Literature as well, not that they read it. Powerful computer AI plots and plans their wardrobe for the season, and then sends it to them, automatically, based on their opinion of the last shipment and should spandex jumpsuits ever start to trend they'll be first to be wearing them. They can traverse the ends of the earth without getting wet in the rain, ferried in an 380-sized starship, with beds, showers and more gourmet food, all arranged, by voice command to their computer if they choose via a single tap at their shirt pocket. Never once handling crude cash for any of it. A rich kid of instagram is living what may be the closet thing our civilization may ever get to Roddenberry's vision.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:38 |
|
Tujague posted:I mean I don't hang around with dumb fat high school kids with a burning need to be the smartest guy on the planet a lot, are you just supposed to tune it out? Well you probably only ever hang out with yourself, so I'd say you spend 100% of your time with someone like that in the room.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:39 |
|
TEAYCHES posted:what does god need with a starship Star Trek 5 is cool and good no really, in spite of it's many flaws man's gods and religions are tiny and dumb compared to the vastness and grandeur of what little of the actual universe we have been fortunate to come to understand in just the last two centuries
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:39 |
|
Tujague posted:Yeah there's a level of stupidity at which I just white out. Some people think it's weird. But, on the other hand, You are by far the worst poster in this thread and your periodic poo poo fits aren't amusing.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:39 |
|
It's sort of funny and sad how stirred up you guys get when I say that desperately straining and grunting to seem smart by earnestposting wildly unexamined, kid-who-read-cliff's-notes philosophy bullshit in the context of a TV spaceship show is real stupid It's like poking a nest of obese hornets. Like, you all leap with uncharacteristic vigor and wheezing noises to make it stop and try to hurt my feelings via projection. Reminds me of that lowtax thread about changing the shitposting rules.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 19:48 |
|
There's a very clear pattern to your little temper tantrums: 1) You start calling the people who you're on the Forums with fat, greasy, throw in a line about cheetos or doritos, etc. 2) You talk about how you're so much more clever than whoever you're mad at 3) Then you act like you're some kind of calculating puppet master when people call you out, then you go back to childish name calling. Rinse and repeat every few pages.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NU338bxB5Lo Jean-Luc continues indulging his tea fetish...
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:10 |
|
Tujague posted:It's sort of funny and sad how stirred up you guys get when I say that desperately straining and grunting to seem smart by earnestposting wildly unexamined, kid-who-read-cliff's-notes philosophy bullshit in the context of a TV spaceship show is real stupid Holy poo poo guys, he was a puppetmaster all along, and we totally fell for it! Rekt!
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:14 |
|
Tujague posted:It's sort of funny and sad how stirred up you guys get when I say that desperately straining and grunting to seem smart by earnestposting wildly unexamined, kid-who-read-cliff's-notes philosophy bullshit in the context of a TV spaceship show is real stupid
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:21 |
|
Premeditated Toast posted:There's a very clear pattern to your little temper tantrums: 1) You start calling the people who you're on the Forums with fat, greasy, throw in a line about cheetos or doritos, etc. 2) You talk about how you're so much more clever than whoever you're mad at 3) Then you act like you're some kind of calculating puppet master when people call you out, then you go back to childish name calling. Rinse and repeat every few pages. In fairness though I am fat and greasy, have three flavours of Doritos within arms length and am infact a puppet. But I don't think his rant was actually direct at me. Pity.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:24 |
|
shadow puppet of a posted:In fairness though I am fat and greasy, have three flavours of Doritos within arms length and am infact a puppet. But I don't think his rant was actually direct at me. Pity. Don't leave us hanging. Which flavors?
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:29 |
|
Orange Sunshine posted:Don't leave us hanging. Which flavors? Cool Ranch, Lokar Bean and JAMBALAYA
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:31 |
|
JAMBALAYAAAAA
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:44 |
Tujague posted:This thread has taken a sharp turn for 100% retarded fatass idiots pulling profoundly philosophical knowledge clean out of their greasy belly-buttons, totally trumping Mr. Misspelled Username McSmartguy's efforts a dozen pages ago, but this right here takes the taco. Especially given the devastating certainty in which it was delivered and the raging, pseudo-intellectual autism and obvious complete ignorance of the terms in which it was couched. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4em8_iu-Tw
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 20:53 |
|
Can some one link me to a Jambalaya clip.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 21:04 |
|
Tujague posted:It's sort of funny and sad how stirred up you guys get when I say that desperately straining and grunting to seem smart by earnestposting wildly unexamined, kid-who-read-cliff's-notes philosophy bullshit in the context of a TV spaceship show is real stupid I think you're projecting there a bit buddy.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 21:32 |
|
Let's stop bickering and get back on track here folks. http://i.imgur.com/dEQCbUK.gifv
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 21:50 |
|
Star Trek is actually really cool until people start taking it serious.
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 22:32 |
|
Rattus Amicus posted:Let's stop bickering and get back on track here folks. Would
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 22:37 |
|
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 22:52 |
|
It's pretty cool that all the frizzling sexual chemistry Janeway and Seven had in their scenes together was pretty much fueled entirely out of Kate Mulgrew's hatred for Jeri Ryan. It's not like the writing in anyway supported a sapphic subtext, Berman forbid! That, and they are both good actors
|
# ? Oct 24, 2015 23:21 |
|
I'm watching TNG and just got to the very first Holodeck Malfunction episode, and Wesley is saying they can't just cut the power because if they do everyone on the holodeck will just disappear. So I guess early holodeck technology converted organic life into holograms while the holodeck was running?
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 00:01 |
|
Well, she was basically a blow-up doll. Acting aside, you'd have to stick her in a burqa to keep her from having sexy chemistry with everything else on set.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 00:03 |
|
Tujague posted:It's sort of funny and sad how stirred up you guys get when I say that desperately straining and grunting to seem smart by earnestposting wildly unexamined, kid-who-read-cliff's-notes philosophy bullshit in the context of a TV spaceship show is real stupid This is how everyone describes you as well. Just FYI.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 00:04 |
|
The Bible posted:I'm watching TNG and just got to the very first Holodeck Malfunction episode, and Wesley is saying they can't just cut the power because if they do everyone on the holodeck will just disappear. I just assume if you cut the power nothing will exist anymore so like if someone's on the third floor of a building they will fall to the ground
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 00:05 |
|
Holodecks fall apart because they support multiple people. The technology would be more believable if it was a one person at a time rule. A bunch of suites instead of a deck. Interlinked of course for multi participant.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 00:36 |
|
The General posted:Holodecks fall apart because they support multiple people. The technology would be more believable if it was a one person at a time rule. A bunch of suites instead of a deck. Interlinked of course for multi participant. Or if there could be multiple people but only in the same location. Having 10 people in that bar that Tom Paris created is believable.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 01:05 |
|
The General posted:Holodecks fall apart because they support multiple people. The technology would be more believable if it was a one person at a time rule. A bunch of suites instead of a deck. Interlinked of course for multi participant. They ed this away in an early TNG holodeck episode, I think the first Shelock one? The holodeck basically puts you on a holo treadmill and fakes your field of view in front of you. Or something. Figaro posted:It's pretty cool that all the frizzling sexual chemistry Janeway and Seven had in their scenes together was pretty much fueled entirely out of Kate Mulgrew's hatred for Jeri Ryan. It's not like the writing in anyway supported a sapphic subtext, Berman forbid! I've never heard this. What caused the animosity?
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 02:34 |
|
isn't Kate Mulgrew just a raging prima donna that rubs off on people the wrong way I thought I heard that about her on OITNB
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 02:35 |
|
Excelzior posted:isn't Kate Mulgrew just a raging prima donna that rubs off on people the wrong way I heard Avery Brooks can be up his own rear end at times (he made everyone call him Mr. Brooks on set) but I don't know about Mulgrew
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 02:38 |
|
Reading Ryan's interview with Aisha Tyler it sounded like some degree of jealousy from Mulgrew. That being said from what I've read Jeri seems like an alright, down to earth person. She even likes to cook in restaurants.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 02:58 |
|
Clark Nova posted:I've never heard this. What caused the animosity? Jeri Ryan Speaks About Her ‘Intentionally Unpleasant’ Experiences on the “Star Trek: Voyager” Sets http://trekcore.com/blog/2014/11/ryan-mulgrew-feud/ JERI RYAN: The addition of this character… Voyager was the flagship show of the network -- UPN -- and Paramount saw this as this character as their chance to break Star Trek into the mainstream media, and not just the sci-fi mags and things like that. So the Paramount publicity machine went into overdrive with the addition of this character. AISHA TYLER: What season was this? RYAN: This was the beginning of Season Four. Everything was top secret about the character. The costume people didn't see what the makeup people were doing, everything was secret, secret, secret. They didn't want anybody to know anything about it until the day I walked on to set to shoot this -- which is a bunch of other stories! [Laughs] It was crazy. They were very successful in getting the mainstream media to pay attention to it with the addition of the character. TYLER: What were the other stories? It's so far in the past... RYAN: It is so far in the past. Oh, god. [Laughs] TYLER: Pick the one that you feel comfortable sharing. RYAN: It was understandably tough for an existing cast that had been together for three years already. Star Trek, traditionally -- because this was like the fourth incarnation of Star Trek at the time -- was always the Captain, or the Captain and First Officer. Typically, it's the Captain that gets the attention of the press, and the shows revolve around that. So all of a sudden, all of that shifted drastically in Season Four and now the writers, who have been writing for the same seven characters for three years, are salivating for something new to write with. They've got this character that's so rich, because she's not even human when they start out... TYLER: And the whole point of it is what it means to be human, it's a huge storyline. RYAN: Right, there's no better way to do that. Consequently, all the scripts revolved around Seven of Nine and her relationship with the other characters, of course -- which actually ended up leading to some really rich storylines for the other characters. TYLER: There was probably more diversity in terms of storyline for everybody. RYAN: Exactly -- but that's hard, when the new kid comes in and suddenly it's all about them. That was tough, and it was particularly tough for some more than others, which was not real fun. It really made it an unpleasant work experience. TYLER: Did that continue, or did evolve? RYAN: It continued, for quite a while. I mean, for the most part, everybody was phenomenal and absolutely great -- and the guys, my God, I loved my boys on that show. [Laughs] They were hilarious to the point that if I had a two-shot with and then it's my close-up, I had to look off-camera because if I looked at them I'd just break and crack up. But yeah, it was unnecessarily unpleasant for a couple of years -- basically, until I started dating [Brannon Braga]. Once I was dating the boss, funny how things suddenly cleaned up! [Laughs] But it was really, really tough the first couple of years. and there were many days when I was nauseous before going into work because it was that miserable. Just unnecessarily, intentionally unpleasant. TYLER: And such a waste of energy. RYAN: Waste of energy. TYLER: I always feel like there's a strange intimacy on a set that makes difficult sets much more difficult that working at a difficult office -- because you can usually avoid the other person... RYAN: Right. There's no avoidance on a set, and most of my scenes were with this person. TYLER: Oh, god. RYAN: I mean, there was NO avoidance, because it was the richest relationship. They really wanted to capitalize on that. TYLER: I'm not going to ask you... I'm sure people can deduce [who it is] if they spend some time Google-ing. RYAN: Right, yeah. TYLER: I have had friends who have been in situations... where they had a very close co-star, sometimes their love interest, and they really did not like each other off-camera. I know someone who went through this, and they were just not even on speaking terms, and they had to kiss on camera. How was that for you -- did you develop mental tricks? Like, what did you do? RYAN: There was nothing I COULD do -- literally I would be nauseous when I knew these scenes were coming up. When there were a lot of scenes with this person the next day, I was sick to my stomach all night, just miserable. It was so unnecessary and just so petty; things like, oh my God...[Laughs] We'd have scenes -- because a lot of my scenes took place in this set they built for my character called the Astrometrics Lab. It was a really impressive-looking set with this huge, massive, curved green-screen and this giant window. So there's only one entrance to the set, because all the cameras were built up on platforms and stuff to shoot the window -- there was just one set of doors. I remember this one time in particular, I had this once scene with this person, just the two of us. We do their coverage first, and shoot their side of this really dramatic scene, and then it was time for my coverage. Before every close-up, the hair and makeup and wardrobe teams come in and do touch-ups and everything to make sure everything's right... [Laughs wildly] [The co-star] shut the door to the set, and said, "She's fine. LET'S GO." Wouldn't let them in. Just stupid, stupid stuff like that .TYLER: And by the way, out of their job description. RYAN: Exactly. Let people do their jobs. TYLER: Not your call! RYAN: Right, things like that. Another time, I don't even think it was the same day, but a different scene with that person on the same set -- we do their side first, and then it's my coverage on close-up for this really intense scene. The literally sat off-camera picking their nails, thumbing through a book, and just haphazardly saying their lines off camera without even making eye contact. TYLER: It would have been better to just not have them there. RYAN: Yeah, could the [assistant director] just read it off camera? I'm good. TYLER: Anyone? A production assistant? A C-Stand and a tennis ball? It would be better. RYAN: Exactly! It would have been better. It was intentional, purely intentional and unnecessary.p
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 02:59 |
|
I can see why Mulgrew would have been pissed. She was the female lead of the show, that's not terribly common type of role for a 40+ actress and by all accounts she was really jazzed about the opportunity to play a trek captain. Then the show is poo poo, the production is lifeless, the writing is godawful, the ratings drop, and the next thing you know they're refocusing the show around a big titted blonde ten years younger than you. It's still totally unprofessional behavior on her part but whatever, when you look at how Beltran behaved and got away with it I'm not surprised the rest of the cast just behaved like a bunch of fuckheads.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 03:16 |
|
You guys think Garrett Wang hot boxed the Delta Flyer? I bet he did
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 04:16 |
|
Boy, it's a good thing that the gently caress toy started banging the boss man or she never would have earned the respect of her peers!
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 07:53 |
|
Clark Nova posted:They ed this away in an early TNG holodeck episode, I think the first Shelock one? The holodeck basically puts you on a holo treadmill and fakes your field of view in front of you. Or something. Yeah, so it makes even more sense to just have a bunch of little single-man-sized holopods.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 08:03 |
|
That wouldn't make for as good a show though.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 08:06 |
|
Tujague posted:Boy, it's a good thing that the gently caress toy started banging the boss man or she never would have earned the respect of her peers! You should smoke a joint or something man.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 08:06 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:50 |
|
Tujague posted:Boy, it's a good thing that the gently caress toy started banging the boss man or she never would have earned the respect of her peers! Tell me about your porn collection.
|
# ? Oct 25, 2015 08:06 |