|
MeruFM posted:i don't get react my take on it is this: 1) A really good way to make it easy to reason about your user interface is to build a stateless UI that gets re-rendered entirely with each update. 2) This is also a really good way to make your UI super slow. 3) React lets you pretend you're writing a stateless UI but then it uses shadowdom diffing to make your application really fast. In addition to that, the API is very well designed and very small. And the react components you build are ridiculously, well, composable (possibly due to the small/well designed api). It has a few confusing gotchas but once you're past those it's really really good. The HTML in your javascript is JSX and not at all necessary. You can write everything in JS if you want, but JSX is also really good and worth using. DONT THREAD ON ME fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Oct 28, 2015 |
# ? Oct 28, 2015 03:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 00:00 |
|
pepito sanchez posted:never that's just w/r/t writing react native apps for ios/android on windows. I want to write react native apps FOR windows. (well idgaf about windows, but linux/osx).
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 03:31 |
|
http://elixir-lang.org/docs/v1.0/elixir/Inspect.Algebra.html finally, an algebraic approach to pretty printing.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 04:05 |
|
also since the alternative to html in your logic is putting login your html like every other web framework which is also gross
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 04:05 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:http://elixir-lang.org/docs/v1.0/elixir/Inspect.Algebra.html oh yeah and congrats on getting this far with elixir. it's sure not being newbie friendly for me... i need something to do with it. i think i'm gonna give up on it and focus a bit more on python. i have a summer project with a friend coming and i really want it to be good. oddly though, because haskell is such a weird different language it's the first time ever i can say i'm having fun with just a repl
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 04:12 |
yeah haskell is a blast
|
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 05:11 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:i copied and pasted some code from stack over flow to connect the nodes and it sucks i'd just literally copy luigi's d3 thing if i were you, assuming you arent getting some kind of sick pleasure out of janitoring js
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 05:17 |
|
bobbilljim posted:decent, i only waste about 15 seconds of their time nice it was akwward coz the script was for clarithromycin 250 and i was liek "we only have 500s" and it was like 5:25 im amazed the dr was still there i sent the rx back and got doc to annoate and sign 500mgs (this took 10 minutes to get it back) and then get to shelf and realise i had misread, we had NO clarithromycin, only clindamycin! what a ning nong. but I owned up, said to the lady "sorry, i misread, we dont have any of it", but did the rest of the rx. what a ballsup
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 08:11 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:also you know you're a lovely web developer when you use HTML/JS for your UI for non web applications. My dream
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 09:10 |
|
You can do this in Java by setting up a basic Grizzly HTTP server (3 or 4 lines of code) to serve up your static content, then open a websocket and pump encoded JSON strings to and fro'. And it all runs from a single JAR, resources included. No loving around.
Valeyard fucked around with this message at 09:19 on Oct 28, 2015 |
# ? Oct 28, 2015 09:16 |
|
Valeyard posted:You can do this in Java by setting up a basic Grizzly HTTP server (3 or 4 lines of code) to serve up your static content, then open a websocket and pump encoded JSON strings to and fro'. And it all runs from a single JAR, resources included. No loving around. yeah this is basically how i'm doing things in my elixir task thing
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 09:49 |
|
same
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 10:04 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:also you know you're a lovely web developer when you use HTML/JS for your UI for non web applications. Our modern client (that we're replacing vb6 with) uses html and JS on the actual endpoint device (because we eventually want our client to be able to run 100% in-browser so our customers can stop loving about with Citrix), but a lot of the heavy lifting is done in C# on an intermediary server, so at least there's that I guess? The HTML/JS is truly a dumb display free of business logic and anything more than "show this stuff" gets done by the server.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 14:19 |
|
got turned down after phone screen again. fourth different company in a row! idk what im doing wrong, the only vaguely contentious thing I do is refuse to give salary expectations but that's pretty standard, right?
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 14:29 |
|
yeah they should give you the salary information.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 14:30 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:got turned down after phone screen again. fourth different company in a row! does your name sound weird? tell them ur name is james
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 18:27 |
|
are you taking the calls on a cell phone? try taking the next one on a copper wire
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 18:40 |
|
so there's a lot of discussion that Go is a pretty fantastic language in terms of viability, but the design is so hosed it's like some ratchet rear end car that looks rigged to explode but drives like a rocket. what are people's thoughts on the code design?
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:07 |
|
go is idiot garbage for morons
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:11 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:got turned down after phone screen again. fourth different company in a row! What kind of questions are you being asked in the phone screen? Can you provide examples of technical questions etc?
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:14 |
|
Bloody posted:go is idiot garbage for morons yep. true as a value judgement and a design goal.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:42 |
|
Nitrocat posted:so there's a lot of discussion that Go is a pretty fantastic language in terms of viability, but the design is so hosed it's like some ratchet rear end car that looks rigged to explode but drives like a rocket. Nitrocat posted:so there's a lot of discussion that Go is a pretty fantastic language in terms of viability, but the design is so hosed it's like some ratchet rear end car that looks rigged to explode but drives like a rocket. ohhhhh pram aaaaaaam
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:46 |
|
Barnyard Protein posted:are you taking the calls on a cell phone? try taking the next one on a copper wire i work remote so everybody i interview is via phone (or skype or google hangouts) and ive had plenty of candidates where my writeup includes 'didnt do great on the coding problem but we had a terrible connection so they might not have properly understood it', maine internet infrastructure is pretty shoddy
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:49 |
|
jony neuemonic posted:yep. true as a value judgement and a design goal. oh snap, just what i was looking for. ty.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 19:58 |
|
Nitrocat posted:oh snap, just what i was looking for. ty. this one too http://blog.gopheracademy.com/advent-2014/case-against-3pl/ more koolaid consumer in this blog then an extra thirsty branch of some cult
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 20:06 |
|
ryde posted:What kind of questions are you being asked in the phone screen? Can you provide examples of technical questions etc? i say 4 turned me down, 3 of those were "weve withdrawn the position, can we keep your details on file please" so they were maybe all just resume fishing exercises
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 20:16 |
|
St Evan Echoes posted:they aren't technical questions at all, just the bog standard stuff about my experience, why do i want to work for $company, what are my salary expectations etc yeah sounds like you just got unlucky. try not to take it personally quote:One unexpected side effect to versionless package management is that I now need to know and trust the developers who write the libraries I use. Because of that, I’ve become much more involved in the Go community than I was in any other language community.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 20:20 |
|
drat, OTOH i just found out elm's package manager enforces semantic versioning by type checking your package when you submit an update
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 20:35 |
|
Flat Daddy posted:drat, OTOH i just found out elm's package manager enforces semantic versioning by type checking your package when you submit an update
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:19 |
|
Nitrocat posted:so there's a lot of discussion that Go is a pretty fantastic language in terms of viability, but the design is so hosed it's like some ratchet rear end car that looks rigged to explode but drives like a rocket. Bloody posted:go is idiot garbage for morons
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:42 |
|
go is great if you're devops. sucks for everyone else. it's a shame about channels being so great.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:52 |
|
I would not use go for anything ever cause its destined to be abandonware and theres no real reason for you to use it over c#/java in the first place.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:53 |
|
the reason they called it go is because people take one look at it go use java or c#
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:55 |
|
devops is full of people who couldn't make it as real developers and a big part of that is them not understanding why they should use c#/java
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 21:57 |
|
Barnyard Protein posted:the reason they called it go is because people take one look at it go use java or c# they called the language go and they hyped the concept of 'go being finished' just because what they really wanted was to name a language goto. go is really lovely with a few nice ideas because the whole point is goto.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:00 |
|
i used c# properly today for the first time and i have only one thing to say S H A G G A R W A S R I G H T
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:04 |
|
yeah c# is great. finishing up some ado.net learning and then it's on to web services.
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:05 |
|
Soricidus posted:i used c# properly today for the first time and i have only one thing to say the more you learn the more you realise shaggar is correct in all things
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:12 |
|
im using c#/asp.net/mvc and i <3 everything about it
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 00:00 |
|
Awia posted:im using c#/asp.net/mvc and i <3 everything about it the holy trinity
|
# ? Oct 28, 2015 22:17 |