|
Doctor Spaceman posted:New Day by Day, not remotely work-safe. What a twist!
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 03:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 07:06 |
|
|
gently caress, Muir is so bad at everything he does. I dug up his Roosevelt arc because it's important to remember when Muir mattered.      
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
overdesigned posted:Zed dies, comic ends, we all finally can be free. I'd personally love to see his vision of heaven. Is Muir religious? My assumption is he hedges his spiritual bets
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
I'm betting he's the kind that goes out of his way to call himself 'culturally Christian.'
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:05
|
|
|
Pussy Cartel posted:I'm betting he's the kind that goes out of his way to call himself 'culturally Christian.' He's actually stated that in the comic a few times.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:13
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:New Day by Day, not remotely work-safe. So the past couple months have just been an occurance at owl creek? I actually kind of love this lovely twist and I want to see how far Muir takes it. Maybe the whole comic was just a turtles dream.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
MinionOfCthulhu posted:It's more like the Epic Mickey concept art before we got...what we got. Oh man, I remember when the details about this project were first coming out and there was massive excitement for what looked like Disney mixed with The Thing   Then Disney did a couple of focus groups and decided to tone it down. I can't really blame them for it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:29
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Oh man, I remember when the details about this project were first coming out and there was massive excitement for what looked like Disney mixed with The Thing  Now I know what Disney silent hill looks like.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
can you guys who like muir please get your own loving thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
Or at least make it a rule that a given day by day comic has to have a political reference in it... smh
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:can you guys who like muir please get your own loving thread KNOCKOUT MAH ROOSEVELTS?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:08
|
|
|
If we're getting rid of comics from the thread, can we also get rid of jarlsberg and kirschen?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
 Spooky scary politoons cause shitposts all the time Shrieking pols will wound your soul No good toons tonight Spooky scary politoons Worse than any ghost You'll curse and mutter in disgust when you read these cartoon posts We're so sorry, politoons You're sad and always tense You only want to educate But we're willfully dense 'Cause spooky scary politoons start whiny, shrilly rants The only thing more agitating is an rear end without pants Labels, so superfluous are bad, it must be said. We have to let the whole world know with a long-running thread. Spooky scary politoons are stupid and inane They're vapid and lovely ev'ry day I think they hurt my brain Stick and stones may break your bones But art's a special curse Spooky scary politoons and always getting worse
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:22
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:can you guys who like muir please get your own loving thread Quit getting mad about dumb political cartoons.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
DONE ESTA EL PATO BORRACHO!?!?!?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 05:44
|
|
|
Xander77 posted:Its a repeating plot point that you can go around assaulting people and there's literally nothing anyone can or will do about it. It's a point from one of the earliest issues, before it went to Vertigo from DC's short-lived Helix imprint, that Spider has "journalism insurance" that insulates him from the worst consequences of his acting like a violent moron.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Tom Guycot posted:If we're getting rid of comics from the thread, can we also get rid of Seriously this guy is more hateful than Ramirez and the McCoys.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 06:26
|
|
|
Bwee posted:Or at least make it a rule that a given day by day comic has to have a political reference in it... smh There's a parallel between the guy who uses a veneer of politics to justify creating his porn webcomic, and people who use the veneer of politics to justify following the porn webcomic, I think.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 06:42
|
|
|
Bwee posted:There is no politics in that comic You didn't even have to scroll past Day by Day this time! All you had to do was not click a link. It's super no big deal.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
at the very least take it to ADTRW
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
My main input is that if we ban Day By Day as officially too lovely to even be posted here, we must touch the poop (I will do it myself) and tell the author he's too godawful for us to even consider anymore, as Muir is utterly devoid of talent, insight, or ability and frankly should kill himself posthaste.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 07:01
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:Seriously this guy is more hateful than Ramirez and the McCoys. Oh good, another pointless argument over who's the worst ever and who we should ban. This has certainly never been discussed before and always leads to productive results. Because we can always agree on who's the most hateful and can always agree that means we don't want to see it. Now, banning DbD is a different conversation. It's always seemed more like a lovely webcomic that gets political often than an actual "political cartoon." Isn't there a thread for lovely webcomics? If we do want to draw any lines in the sand, it should be because something isn't really a "political cartoon" and not because it's the most hateful. There's a reason we never miss posting a McCoy or lester, because if you're coming here you hate yourself and want to see terrible and hateful opinions in the form of political cartoons. Not sure DbD is that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 07:15
|
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:Isn't there a thread for lovely webcomics? Don't bring that poo poo to Ghost of Webcomics Past. We have a higher standard for fetish comics in our thread. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
chairface posted:My main input is that if we ban Day By Day as officially too lovely to even be posted here, we must touch the poop (I will do it myself) and tell the author he's too godawful for us to even consider anymore, as Muir is utterly devoid of talent, insight, or ability and frankly should kill himself posthaste.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
My biggest problem with DBD is that I have a fear that my wife will catch me peeping one of the NSFW panels. No. Not because of the nudity. Or cartoon porn. That's not a big deal. But because she might think I'm into it and be okay with it. She'll be open enough to accept my weird fetish that I don't even have, and when I try to defend myself she'll just think I'm too embarrassed to admit it. She'll tell me she loves me anyway and I'll try everything to convince her it's not like that. Having to defend yourself from being accused of liking DBD porn. I just want to die thinking about it. Fake edit: please archive this post as evidence.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:05
|
|
|
Every discussion of whether DbD should be posted or not is honestly more tedious and circular then any actual Day by Day comic itself can ever try.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:06
|
|
|
FutureFriend posted:Every discussion of whether DbD should be posted or not is honestly more tedious and circular then any actual Day by Day comic itself can ever try. It also goes on for far more posts (more to scroll past if you're uninterested) than the actual discussion of most DbD strips ever does
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:14
|
|
|
To be fair, there's not usually a lot to discuss about a DbD strip. Half a dozen posts about how sad Muir is. One or two posters pointing out how it's A Good Cartoon. Maybe some light discussion on how stupid the resolution of the current plot will be, all of which will be completely overshadowed by how stupid the plot actually turns out to be.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:21
|
|
|
The Roosevelts arc was clearly the peak, can't we retcon it so Zed died back then and everything since has been a dream he's been having while bleeding out? That way we get closure and we can stop posting it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:28
|
|
|
DbD's really gone downhill in terms of hilarious awful political commentary. It's pretty much just titillation now, which is terribly boring. After all noone is questioning posting Tinsley even though that's just a cartoon that sometimes gets political. only thing that's kept it even half worth it is the edits
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 08:38
|
|
|
DbD is terrible and probably shouldn't be posted, but the only thing more unbearable than terrible cartoons is lengthy arguments about which cartoons are terrible. So let's maybe not do that.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 09:24
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:I've seen this exact picture done by a hundred different artists in the last 3-4 years. It started out pretty trite and played out and hasn't gotten better with age. Shaun of the Dead's opening credits used that gag over a decade ago (pre-smartphone, but effectively the same).
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 09:38
|
|
|
Every time I look at this my brain sees the "nazi propaganda" as a giant duck-man with a tall, bald head
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 09:46
|
|
|
It's easy to skip DbD discussion if it bothers you that much. I do that the majority of the time until I see it generate a lot of responses. The fuckbarn, for example.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 09:49
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:Every time I look at this my brain sees the "nazi propaganda" as a giant duck-man with a tall, bald head 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 09:57
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:New Day by Day, not remotely work-safe. Can't not think of this Oglaf strip.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 10:30
|
|
|
Cpt.Americant posted:Oh good, another pointless argument over who's the worst ever and who we should ban. This has certainly never been discussed before and always leads to productive results. Because we can always agree on who's the most hateful and can always agree that means we don't want to see it. I think what we learned from these is that goons are the worst.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 11:01
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 11:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 07:06 |
|
|
So if it was a dream, was fuckbarn destroyed or not? It's Schrodinger's cathouse until we find out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2015 11:28
|
|
