|
panic! at the dslam
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 11:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
sorry i cant hear you over the low latency of my cmts 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:its exactly that, mixed in with some overconfidence and poverty plz see a doctor about your very obvious brain problems just let go of the raid array. jfc what moron runs a raid array in their desktop anymore. 3x1TB goddamn you know you can get like 6TB hard drives now right?? also hitachi drives are very good so your embarrassment further proves your idiocy build a new pc that isn't a gross hosed up space heater, buy a separate NAS appliance and stuff it in a closet
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
Panty Saluter posted:sorry i cant hear you over the low latency of my cmts same
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 14:58
|
|
|
none of my closets have cat6 utp
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 15:54
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:none of my closets have cat6 utp Just buy a dryer with integrated network storage, jesus. Although it might be difficult to access the drive when the dryer is going...
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 16:09
|
|
|
plug a USB hdd into your router m8
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:some pedestrians fall through screaming, Grand Shag Shaggar working as intended
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
SO DEMANDING posted:also hitachi drives are very good huh, who knew. they were the cheapest by a margin at the time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
i have a linux. the linux has a bunch of php. I want the php to execute a node script using exec(). it gives error 126, permission denied. node got installed to root user bc node. how do i tell php (www-data) it is allowed to execute node without making the server into a pile of garbage dumpster trash? chown www-data:www-data /path/to/node and chmod 777 /path/to/node doesnt give it permissions. i just want to run node script from php the correct way on a linux
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
obstipator posted:i have a linux. the linux has a bunch of php. I want the php to execute a node script using exec(). it gives error 126, permission denied. node got installed to root user bc node. what's the over/under on whatever you end up with allowing shell command injection? 'cause you're probably gonna have command injection problems lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
i did shell escaping right. I'm the only guy that knows web security thats worked here and have been braindumping to all the guys. i dont know linux poo poo at all tho i solved it btw by copying the node binary to a local directory and told someone else to do it right obstipator fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Nov 4, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
update to my crappy machine: new gfx card fixed everything, getting sick framez now and no texture pop in. cpu usage p much pegged tho so when there's a sale on ill upgrade that poo poo maybe worth getting a ddr4 mobo with the new intel socket? 6600 should be ok right no need to get k?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:update to my crappy machine: new gfx card fixed everything, getting sick framez now and no texture pop in. cpu usage p much pegged tho so when there's a sale on ill upgrade that poo poo maybe honestly you're probably better off without the k version tbh. i mean who really manually overclocks these days
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
obstipator posted:i have a linux. the linux has a bunch of php. I want the php to execute a node script using exec(). it gives error 126, permission denied. node got installed to root user bc node.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:'chmod 777 file' gives read permissions but if file is a script you'll need to add execute permissions with 'chmod a+x file' but you're being way too vague for meaningful advice this is wrong as 7 gives execute as well
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:update to my crappy machine: new gfx card fixed everything, getting sick framez now and no texture pop in. cpu usage p much pegged tho so when there's a sale on ill upgrade that poo poo maybe when you get a new mobo, get one with at least one m.2 drive slot, they're ~5x faster than ssds and are awesome for your primary os drive
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
also seconding vague as hell and probably insecure af
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:this is wrong as 7 gives execute as well
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:when you get a new mobo, get one with at least one m.2 drive slot, they're ~5x faster than ssds and are awesome for your primary os drive
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:35
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:lol just make sure you get an sata m.2 slot instead of a pcie m.2 slot because the latter aren't really made or supported well ???? maybe a few months ago, but Asus and others have robust pcie m.2s that support the full 4 lanes; the nvme drives are just a touch better performance. still leading edge but they work fine, installing the os can be a pain but with an updated bios you're fine
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:update to my crappy machine: new gfx card fixed everything, getting sick framez now and no texture pop in. cpu usage p much pegged tho so when there's a sale on ill upgrade that poo poo maybe  which gfx card did you wind up getting?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:???? maybe a few months ago, but Asus and others have robust pcie m.2s that support the full 4 lanes; the nvme drives are just a touch better performance. still leading edge but they work fine, installing the os can be a pain but with an updated bios you're fine for example, here is a pcie ssd in an m.2 form factor, which is not the same as this drive, which is a sata ssd in an m.2 form factor
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:i'm not talking about nvme drives, i'm talking about m.2 sockets which are designed for sata or pcie cards. yeah the slot is the same; samsung actually _just_ released the retail nvme version of that and it's pcie x4 here
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
the slot isn't always the same, the one in my motherboard will only use pcie, will not use sata, and won't even let you boot off of it. the sata m.2 sticks are also waaay cheaper and not oem parts
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:lol just make sure you get an sata m.2 slot instead of a pcie m.2 slot because the latter aren't really made or supported well
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
the situation with mini-pcie/msata/m.2/nvme/fartpisspoop is a goddamn clusterfuck. multiple standards sharing the same physical interface aaaaaaagggggg is win7 able to boot off that poo poo natively or are we back to the good ol' days of loading extra drivers at install? bobbilljim posted:update to my crappy machine: new gfx card fixed everything, getting sick framez now and no texture pop in. cpu usage p much pegged tho so when there's a sale on ill upgrade that poo poo maybe consult the tech report's system guide for parts recommendations, and consult the shsc part picking thread (ewww grey forum bluh fuh fuh shutup and deal with it) if u need extra spergy advice cuz the people in there live for this poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:the slot isn't always the same, the one in my motherboard will only use pcie, will not use sata, and won't even let you boot off of it. the sata m.2 sticks are also waaay cheaper and not oem parts sorry for your loss, did you see the non-oem retail drive I just linked it works fine you can boot off it if you're getting a nice shiny new mobo that supports it
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
SO DEMANDING posted:the situation with mini-pcie/msata/m.2/nvme/fartpisspoop is a goddamn clusterfuck. multiple standards sharing the same physical interface aaaaaaagggggg win 7 will boot off it without issue, you probably will have to do a fresh install and obviously a mobo that supports it. I followed a guide and had zero problems, even if it takes some finagling the end result is so worth it
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:sorry for your loss, did you see the non-oem retail drive I just linked it works fine you can boot off it if you're getting a nice shiny new mobo that supports it
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
why care, your computer still boots in 10 seconds even on sata 6
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:???? maybe a few months ago, but Asus and others have robust pcie m.2s that support the full 4 lanes; the nvme drives are just a touch better performance. still leading edge but they work fine, installing the os can be a pain but with an updated bios you're fine this sounds liek teh kind of pain im into, too bad i have a nice ssd already but good for future i suppose. SO DEMANDING posted:consult the tech report's system guide for parts recommendations SO DEMANDING posted:and consult the shsc part picking thread (ewww grey forum bluh fuh fuh shutup and deal with it) if u need extra spergy advice cuz the people in there live for this poo poo i like that thread, sucks that the op was updated in january and no mention of the socket 1511 poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:52
|
|
|
Panty Saluter posted:
an asus gtx970 lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 00:52
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:an asus gtx970 lol a pro choice you should be set for at least a few years. unless you go for a crazy hi-res/hi-refresh monitor i guess
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Forums Terrorist posted:why care, your computer still boots in 10 seconds even on sata 6 pcie has less latency which can be important if you are running a database and you want to write it all to disk
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:'chmod 777 file' gives read permissions but if file is a script you'll need to add execute permissions with 'chmod a+x file' but you're being way too vague for meaningful advice spankmeister posted:also seconding vague as hell and probably insecure af i dont get linux, so idk which parts are vague. nginx is running and php is running. the php code is some other dudes thing that he wrote a bunch of cron-esque scripts in. I built a node script (utilizing commander; this isn't some random express poo poo) for some data fetching stuff and related and he wants it to be runnable from his server by just hitting some php url. node was installed via nvm and as the root user. it exists at like /root/.nvm/poopy/butt/bin/node root has access to it, but www-data does not. when I try php's exec() on the sanatized node command exec('/root/.nvm/poopy/butt/bin/node gay.js', $out, $err); i get a error code of 126, which means permission denied. so, i tried to make the node binary 777 just to get it to work and I'd least permissions it out later. chmod'd /root/.nvm/poopy/butt/bin/node to 777 and chown'd it to www-data:www-data still permission denied. at this point i gave up and just cp'd it to the directory i had that php file in that runs the exec(). i modified the exec() node binary path to that and it worked and a big "ACCESS GRANTED" showed up on my screen in big green letters. so I'm like "here's the working thing but i linuxed it wrong, so you fix it"
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
because I'm a masochist or something I'm considering scanning a bunch of family photo albums for christmas, probably myself because putting them all in a a cardboard box that gets sent to india doesn't sound like a great plan what scanner should I use (basically all colour prints, no negatives), and how awful will this be?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
obstipator posted:i dont get linux, so idk which parts are vague. it was probably selinux or something
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:an asus gtx970 lol nvidia lol 
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
echi i built my brother a real nice pc not long ago not a disaster liek my pc. cost him like 1300 all up with screen (free case though that I had had) i5 4670, decent mobo, gtx760 the thign runs mint as. 760s rule and they arent too expensive
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2015 02:38
|
|