|
larchesdanrew posted:Here I go Good luck , you're going to nail it. We're just going to sit here and  furiously.
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 16:19 |
|
|
I ace every drug test, I take drugs like a champ.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Here I go 
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
gently caress my gay rear end life. The "interview" was just me pissing all over a cup and then verifying that, yes, I know what a network switch is. The real interview with the hospital itself isn't until later.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:gently caress my gay rear end life. The "interview" was just me pissing all over a cup and then verifying that, yes, I know what a network switch is. The real interview with the hospital itself isn't until later. So you're complaining the screening interview was too easy ?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:pissing all over a cup I don't think you read the instructions
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
The instructions are on the bottom of the cup, turn it around after its full
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:gently caress my gay rear end life. The "interview" was just me pissing all over a cup and then verifying that, yes, I know what a network switch is. The real interview with the hospital itself isn't until later. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
Usually you go through the interviews then last you take a drug test. Weird that was the first piece.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
So did you piss on your interview pants?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Land, for real though how did you not get that part clarified before you showed up?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:So did you piss on your interview pants? Do you not?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
Just Offscreen posted:Do you not? I was always told that they could taste if you had done drugs and to aim for the mouth.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
pr0digal posted:Tickets won't be coming in April 22nd through 24th! Nice! We should goon up some places around then! I don't need a pass to go to PAX 
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:Land, for real though how did you not get that part clarified before you showed up? Her email literally said "Let's set up an appointment for tomorrow at 2:00 for some basic paperwork, a urinalysis drug screen and an interview." I've never gone through a recruiter before, so I don't know what the hell to expect.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:Her email literally said "Let's set up an appointment for tomorrow at 2:00 for some basic paperwork, a urinalysis drug screen and an interview." From experience recruiters have loose definitions of certain words like "salary", "interview" and "experience" When is the real interview?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:16
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:I've never gone through a recruiter before, so I don't know what the hell to expect. Expect the recruiter to be both incompetent and a liar.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
Bring the cup with you to the interview. Piss in it while you answer the questions.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Why the hell would you waste money on a drug test for someone before even interviewing them?
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Isn't it a hospital? It's not like they're paying to send you to a hospital.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:39
|
|
|
jre posted:So you're complaining the screening interview was too easy ? It was the interview for the interview for the interview.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:39
|
|
|
Erwin posted:Isn't it a hospital? It's not like they're paying to send you to a hospital. Kind of ironic that the IT guy has to be drug-free and yet the doctors are all hopped up on free samples from Big Pharma and the surgeons are alcoholics.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
Viagra and Ambien speedballs for everyone! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
If your IT guy fucks up you lose precious money making time. If your doctors gently caress up they can still finish the surgery and your malpractice insurance will cover it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 18, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
GreenBuckanneer posted:It was the interview for the interview for the interview. Don't joke, I've gone through a chain of 7 interviews before.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
J posted:Why the hell would you waste money on a drug test for someone before even interviewing them? Hospital execs being bad with money? Why I never E: I too had to pee in a cup before filling out papers. I was called and asked to start like the very next day, though, so 
Malachite_Dragon fucked around with this message at 00:40 on Nov 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Wrath of the Bitch King posted:Don't joke, I've gone through a chain of 7 interviews before. Jesus. I had 4 plus a preliminary for my current job. Took 8 months to get hired. I thought mine was bad...
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
One upon a time, I was asked by a colleague who works at a cloud reseller to look over the architecture diagram for a (small, non-enterprise support) customer as a favor. The architectural diagram was literally five EC2 instances surrounded by a subnet surrounded by a VPC with a simple gateway. No, high-availability, no scalability. The customer was literally using this VPC like a server closet in the cloud. After looking at this diagram, my response was, "Hoping that your single instance doesn't fail is not a valid fault tolerance strategy." And then forgot all about it. (gently caress doing "a solid" for colleagues, by the way.) So today, months later I get a ping from the same colleague:  Guess who lost an instance today? Uh, God? No. Remember that customer whose architectural diagram I asked you to take a look at? Vaguely. They lost an instance? So what are they doing about it? They're pulling out of the cloud back to five servers on-prem. Wait, so they're taking their collection of single instances and replacing it with a collection of single servers in a closet? Yeah. So their literal solution to losing an instance is to replace a bunch of single instance VMs with single instance physical servers? Yup.There is no :facepalm: big enough. Edit: woah! Sorry about the pump-fake Larch. But make sure you kick rear end on the interview and you'll laugh about this later. Agrikk fucked around with this message at 01:36 on Nov 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
Erwin posted:Isn't it a hospital? It's not like they're paying to send you to a hospital. They don't usually do them in house, they send them out to labs to be done. At least, the 2 hospitals I've worked at have done this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:gently caress my gay rear end life. The "interview" was just me pissing all over a cup and then verifying that, yes, I know what a network switch is. The real interview with the hospital itself isn't until later. Don't sweat it, I would guess that they've had a lot of problems with abyssmal candidates if they screen this way. You're cream of the crop!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
Holy poo poo, this guy ain't on meth. Hire him now hurry!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Don't sweat it, I would guess that they've had a lot of problems with abyssmal candidates if they screen this way. There was one guy ahead of me when I arrived. Decked out in the finest urban street wear, he was filling out an application that was nothing but pictures he had to circle. Then he got to watch a safety video on muscular injuries before hiring him. I was totally outclassed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
TWBalls posted:They don't usually do them in house, they send them out to labs to be done. At least, the 2 hospitals I've worked at have done this. Usually these screening tests is they put a test strip in the cup and if it changes colour then it is positive. These usually cost a buck or two each and are fairly unreliable. But simple enough for large scale pre-employment checks and cheaper than actually doing a full interview for someone who might fail.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
It was done in office. It was one of those magic cups where you peel the label off and it tells you if the person is a meth addict. I'm not surprised by anything anymore.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:It was done in office. It was one of those magic cups where you peel the label off and it tells you if the person is a meth addict. I'm not surprised by anything anymore. Meth, I knew it. loving south.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
GreenNight posted:Meth, I knew it. loving south. For the first few years at my radio job every other week we had a meth bust news story. Rural TN/KY have loads of meth makers as well as methheads  E: This has went down drastically after the implementation of a tracking system to watch people that run around trying to get sudofed etc from multiple stores in quick succession. And also stores working together to tell cops if they've seen people buying several boxes and idiots who get pulled over telling the cops "yeah I was buying all this to make money from a meth dealer" because nobody here knows "don't talk to cops" 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
larchesdanrew posted:It was done in office. It was one of those magic cups where you peel the label off and it tells you if the person is a meth addict. I'm not surprised by anything anymore. Remember, your name to put on the resume is Walter White. Meanwhile, as mentioned - how long down the road before you see offers?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 04:11
|
|
|
GreenBuckanneer posted:It was the interview for the interview for the interview.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 04:35
|
|
|
J posted:Why the hell would you waste money on a drug test for someone before even interviewing them? I don't know how much a drug test costs but perhaps it's worth less then the the man hours it takes to invite in and interview someone who they would never hire in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 16:19 |
|
|
KoRMaK posted:Interview interview interview Interview, interview interview Interview. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 04:45
|
|
