|
I'm sure the American voting public will be able to make a nuanced distinction between ffffffff hahahahahahah
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
fade5 posted:I have discovered something amazing, I have discovered that Wikipedia has a picture of Donald Trump's comb-over from behind: whoa, if true!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:19
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:I don't get why the pro-life movement dies on this hill. I can understand abortion(dead babies etc) but people like terrie arnt even living really. stuff like zombaby or those kids who are born so profoundly mentally disabled that all they can do is be vegetables and are in constant pain isnt living. keeping that corpes girl alive because "she might get better because some scumfuck righ wing lawyer told me." isnt rational. idk. i mean gently caress they are still at it. https://www.facebook.com/keepJahiMcmathonlifesupport/ Hey this is sad! Don't post said poo poo in this fun thread.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:20
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:John Connally spent 11 million in 1980 (~32 million in 2015 dollars) to get a single delegate~ Interesting that it should be John Connally who proves that there are no magic bullets, not even money.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:23
|
|
|
fade5 posted:I have discovered something amazing, I have discovered that Wikipedia has a picture of Donald Trump's comb-over from behind: When Trump sees this there will be hell toupee
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:27
|
|
|
memy posted:When Trump sees this there will be hell toupee this is great even greater though was the comical ali/gaseous clay pun earlier tbh vv im just said i didnt quote it sorry to wrap you up in my failure oystertoadfish fucked around with this message at 06:31 on Nov 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:28
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:even greater though was the comical ali/gaseous clay pun earlier tbh That's true
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
America is becoming more conservative. Future policies will probably be more conservative and less experimental. Proactive conservative policy implementation is the name of the new politics. Politicians' actions are predictable. Government intervention to merely influence ideas is unacceptable to the American public because it does not go far enough. Republican policies will be determined on the basis of how the government will change and influence communities. Anything that influences how individuals interact with their community or government will be rejected as being a "government intervention". As a politician, Trump understands this and has been staying away from promoting policies which have direct impacts on individuals. Americans hate anything that involves telling them what to do. Prove me wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
points 5 and 8 are contradictory qed
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:32
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:points 5 and 8 are contradictory qed Are you a Republican?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:35
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:Are you a Republican? not in the present past, yes. future?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:35
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:points 5 and 8 are contradictory qed How are they contradictory? You can influence ideas while meeting a larger goal, like, say, making some gently caress'n money, putting millions to work, and cutting the national deficit. oystertoadfish posted:not in the present I just don't know how you're going to win a primary with that attitude.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:36
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:How are they contradictory? You can influence ideas while meeting a larger goal, like, say, making some gently caress'n money, putting millions to work, and cutting the national deficit. 1. you want to yank the levers of american federal policy to achieve predetermined goals just like any good policy wonk, but you want some of your lever-yanks to be labeled as 'influencing' - but not 'not far enough' - and others to be labeled as 'telling americans what to do'. i don't see the essential difference between 'not not far enough' influence and 'telling americans what to do' - i see only a rhetorical difference. does the opposing party violate the constitution? do you? are you both not playing by the same rules? is this answer up to us to litigate through rhetoric? if that's all we're doing, it's in the eye of the beholder and it's just a difference of labeling edit: is it just that the policy changes republicans like are 'not not far enough influence' and the policy changes democrats like are 'telling americans what to do?' i see the 'community' language in your post but i don't buy the distinction. 'anything that influences how individuals interact with their community or government'? republicans don't propose anything that impacts anything about how individuals interact with their community or government? i don't buy the distinction 2. its true that im not standing for election in any primaries this cycle oystertoadfish fucked around with this message at 07:23 on Nov 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 06:55
|
|
|
This making the rounds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYOFyYMegFU Dana Bash calling Ted Cruz out on being the hypocritical son of a Cuban refugee.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:06
|
|
|
Montasque posted:This making the rounds: Good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:America is becoming more conservative. Are you talking about "American" as in American people or government? Because thinking the average American citizen is becoming more conservative is laughable.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Montasque posted:This making the rounds: He kind of evaded the question. Just redirected it to "defining what we're fighting". His plan to defeat ISIS is great. It's like what Obama's doing now, but he will say "Radical Islam". He says it a few times in the interview. "Radical Islam". "Radical Islam". "Radical Islam". 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:22
|
|
|
Joementum posted:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2015/11/18/fox-news-poll-trump-sanders-lead-respective-primaries-in-new-hampshire/ Carson is really losing steam now, so it looks like the media barrage is having some effect after all. Trump, Rubio, Cruz could be the top three going into the primaries.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:37
|
|
|
Phlegmish posted:Carson is really losing steam now, so it looks like the media barrage is having some effect after all. Trump, Rubio, Cruz could be the top three going into the primaries. That makes sense, since each one is the strongest representative of a segment of the field.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:55
|
|
|
Montasque posted:So far two protestor disruptions. Cops just lead a very large man out. this country is piss
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:59
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:America is becoming more conservative. hey remember when your quote-unquote natural choice for the next president of the united states, rahm emmanuel, had to spend more money on his campaign than both contenders for the LA mayorship combined to beat a total nobody
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 07:59
|
|
|
migf you got the political acumen of a toaster strudel
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
fade5 posted:I have discovered something amazing, I have discovered that Wikipedia has a picture of Donald Trump's comb-over from behind: what am i looking at
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 08:05
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:what am i looking at the next president of the united states
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 08:12
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:the next president of the united states yikes
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 08:21
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:what am i looking at Donald Trump at Wrestlemania.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 08:23
|
|
|
quote:On Bush, VanderSloot wrote, "it has become increasingly clear that Jeb simply does not have the leadership skills necessary to unite the people behind him. He has become one of the weaker candidates among a very capable field." so do they actually believe this or does everyone just have to keep saying it to keep the whole thing from falling apart
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 09:22
|
|
|
baw posted:so do they actually believe this or does everyone just have to keep saying it to keep the whole thing from falling apart Probably a combination of both.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 09:25
|
|
|
baw posted:so do they actually believe this or does everyone just have to keep saying it to keep the whole thing from falling apart there have been a bunch of polls showing gop voters are far more satisfied/enthusiastic with their choices this year than in 2012, like 70%+ in this race
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 09:46
|
|
|
thethreeman posted:there have been a bunch of polls showing gop voters are far more satisfied/enthusiastic with their choices this year than in 2012, like 70%+ in this race I cannot express just how satisfied/enthusiastic I am about JEB!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 09:52
|
|
|
thethreeman posted:there have been a bunch of polls showing gop voters are far more satisfied/enthusiastic with their choices this year than in 2012, like 70%+ in this race Compared to equal dates? I'm sure that that rate will go down significantly once the GOP settles on Rubio or Bush.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 09:55
|
|
|
Mitt Romney posted:once the GOP settles on Bush.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:09
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:1. you want to yank the levers of american federal policy to achieve predetermined goals just like any good policy wonk, but you want some of your lever-yanks to be labeled as 'influencing' - but not 'not far enough' - and others to be labeled as 'telling americans what to do'. i don't see the essential difference between 'not not far enough' influence and 'telling americans what to do' - i see only a rhetorical difference. does the opposing party violate the constitution? do you? are you both not playing by the same rules? is this answer up to us to litigate through rhetoric? if that's all we're doing, it's in the eye of the beholder and it's just a difference of labeling So long as you're an upstanding American, Republicans want to abolish government micromanagement of your life; Democrats like Bernie Sanders want to micromanage it more.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:10
|
|
|
What are the chances of a high-ranking member of Bush's campaign staff ever putting out a tell-all book? I really want to read the dirty of what's happening behind the scenes right now as reality sets in.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:13
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:What are the chances of a high-ranking member of Bush's campaign staff ever putting out a tell-all book? I really want to read the dirty of what's happening behind the scenes right now as reality sets in. Imagine if there was a documentary crew following him around like Romney.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:16
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:So long as you're an
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:28
|
|
|
And what do you get when you click the link in that picture?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:49
|
|
|
AllanGordon posted:That's kind of hosed up that you're implying that all slaves were criminals. "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Ergo, slavery can exist after 1865, but only after found guilty in a court of law. For some reason, all sorts of new laws were put in place after 1865, fees and fines locking convicts in place for years or decades, etc etc. When Jim Crow ended, we kicked off the Drug War, and the convict slavery programs continue. Source: Slavery by Another Name, The New Jim Crow. edit: Look up pictures or information on Angola Prison sometime, you'll get a kick out of how we still have literal plantations.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 10:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 17:57 |
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:What are the chances of a high-ranking member of Bush's campaign staff ever putting out a tell-all book? I really want to read the dirty of what's happening behind the scenes right now as reality sets in. Pretty good. Once the old man is gone they wont have to worry about the cia murdering them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2015 11:00
|
|
