|
Alright I'm changing my vote from B to C because clearly nobody trusts my friend John Edgar.
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 02:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 13:34 |
|
|
Sheng-ji Yang posted:you dont just "get rid" of hoover I was going to suggest using Jumbo on him but the fat little turd might like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
C.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
D
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
So basically going with the mess that was the historical warren commission or letting rfk getting to the bottom of it but hand him a huge amount of political capital to gently caress with us later? gently caress it go with D and see what he does
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:50
|
|
|
No man, you coopt RFK and bring him into the fold. Shutting him out directly led him to challenging for the 68 nomination.
Paper With Lines has issued a correction as of 22:21 on Dec 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:52
|
|
Typo posted:So basically going with the mess that was the historical warren commission or letting rfk getting to the bottom of it but hand him a huge amount of political capital to gently caress with us later? Or let J Edgar dress up like a lady and try to seduce the truth out of an imprisoned Jack Ruby...
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:08
|
|
|
Typo posted:So basically going with the mess that was the historical warren commission or letting rfk getting to the bottom of it but hand him a huge amount of political capital to gently caress with us later? Yeah but the Warren Commission reached the correct conclusion (  ) and I think there's no possible investigation of an event of this magnitude that's going to be any cleaner. We're not going to be resigning for the '68 election, because we're not going to gently caress up Vietnam, so we've got this.E: also, RFK's not going to be a factor
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Personally I want Bobby on the case because I hope he's going to find the Greys were involved and catapult this into a new direction, wherein Jumbo slays the Reticulan menace and frees Earth.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:47
|
|
Dogstoyevsky posted:E: also, RFK's not going to be a factor Ah but who says the Six-Day War will go off in such cases a way that RFK expresses support for Israel and gets Sirhan Sirhan angry enough to kill? Even if it did the butterflies have been set in motion four years earlier and assassinations tend to rely on a fair amount of random chance.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
E We settle this matter PERSONALLY. ... But actually D, because hey, why not?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
D, because gently caress it, why not.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
Have we come upon the option where we sit on the toilet and take a huge poo poo for two hours while dictating war plans to our cabinet who stands around the stall?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 01:15
|
|
|
D
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
why do you guys want to end this lp early with an election loss it's not like sirhan b sirhan has to be written into this; maybe rfk is too busy doing the poo poo we're gonna let him do to piss that guy off, who knows
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
Then we'll just have to do it ourselves
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
Gonna go with D, will probably regret it
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:why do you guys want to end this lp early with an election loss Yeah, RFK isn't the threat, Goldwater is.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
The X-man cometh posted:Yeah, RFK isn't the threat, Goldwater is. Nah, he isn't. If there is one thing we can learn from Ike is that the people will only ever vote for a moderate Republican. The conservatives in the party will never make a comeback, much less rule the country.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 13:17
|
|
|
D
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 15:17
|
|
|
D. friends close, enemies closer. plus if we started an independent commission we'd need someone actually independent. I'd rather not stress Earl Warren out and wind up weakening the Supreme Court by having him depart.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
I'm gonna go with Yell at Lady Bird again
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
A.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Why wouldn't we trust our home state to handle things? A
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
C. Letting a rival be the man that informs the nation who is culpable for the loss of a beloved leader is not a wise idea moving forward into 68.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 21:03
|
|
|
The next election is 64, we don't know if we can win that either. Unless the GOP nominates some insane radical who can't be trusted with The Bomb.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
Don't give one of our rivals a stick to bludgeon us with. RFK is a rival, don't forget that. EDIT: I should also point out that RFK considered JFK's assassination to be partly LBJ's fault for encouraging his brother to go on that trip to begin with. Changing vote to C since it has the best chance of beating the suicide pill that is D. Vernii has issued a correction as of 04:43 on Dec 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 04:33
|
|
|
D is at +2 now over C I think; Sherlock Holmes still without much support
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 11:34
|
|
|
Vernii posted:
As a member of the D voting base I am standing fast. I am certain RFK will see us handing him free reign to investigate as our way of making up for both urging JFK to his doom and also for that funeral date fuckery. Our honest admission that he is the best man for the job will most certainly cause him to view us as exonerated and incompetent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 15:53
|
|
|
D, just for the campiness of "he must investigate the assassination of the president...his own brother."
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 16:16
|
|
|
If he realizes we did it though, we're going to have to have him killed I think
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 17:37
|
|
|
Vernii posted:
A full endorsement for C as outlined by Vernii. However, I advocate for a discreet meeting with Hoover to keep tabs on the DOJ and watch for possible interference from its leadership. (I also want to note that the Sherlock Holmes' proposal has a resounding runner-up endorsement, even if it is not practical.) Valinon has issued a correction as of 01:03 on Dec 16, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
memy posted:If he realizes we did it though, we're going to have to have him killed I think This brings me to the thought: If we are going to extra-judicially assassinate anybody there is an un-charismatic toad named Nixon that hasn't ever done anything to convince me not to kill him. Just a penny for our collective thoughts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
John Dough posted:Sherlock Holmes still without much support Criminal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
C
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
reignofevil posted:As a member of the D voting base I am standing fast. Hm yes, the guy that's hated us for three years and taken just about every opportunity possible to politically isolate us, who's blood pressure spikes every time he sees us in the Oval Office, and holds us partly responsible for his brother's death, is definitely just going to call it even because we let him do his job.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
Carrasco posted:D, just for the campiness of "he must investigate the assassination of the president...his own brother." Also D because presidential politics should be as soap opera like as possible imo
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
Abner Cadaver II posted:Also D because presidential politics should be as soap opera like as possible imo Exactly this. D
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
You fools are going to give RFK the nomination for '64 at this rate
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 13:34 |
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:You fools are going to give RFK the nomination for '64 at this rate That just sets the stage for a
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 20:38
|
|
