|
Chilichimp posted:Did he lose control of the ball going to the ground? I'm assuming so, as it's the only reason anyone would cut that extremely important part of the catch out of the gif. Not that I could tell, but FOX's stellar camerawork and ticker placement makes it difficult. 
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 12:45 |
|
|
Philip J Fry posted:Not that I could tell, but FOX's stellar camerawork and ticker placement makes it difficult. I'm guessing that jarring movement of the ball after the initial impact with the ground was interpreted as losing control by the ref.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
The side judge waves the out of bounds signal though, not incomplete catch. http://gfycat.com/PeriodicPinkDalmatian Philip J Fry fucked around with this message at 08:29 on Dec 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
Philip J Fry posted:The side judge waves the out of bounds signal though, not incomplete catch. Was it not reviewed?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 13:06
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Was it not reviewed? Even if it was it wouldn't have been a catch considering the ball movement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
That's extremely my poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:Even if it was it wouldn't have been a catch considering the ball movement. That's what I'm saying, any review would have called it an incomplete pass, because he didn't control it through the process of going to the ground. The real question is, why are people failing about it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Keisel 
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:That's what I'm saying, any review would have called it an incomplete pass, because he didn't control it through the process of going to the ground. Because catch / no catch is the new deflate-gate (hot button topic wise)
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 19:51
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:That's what I'm saying, any review would have called it an incomplete pass, because he didn't control it through the process of going to the ground. Oh, yeah, I was just saying it doesn't matter if it was reviewed since it's pretty clearly not a catch and that's what they called on the field. Calling it no catch because he went out of bounds isn't great though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
You're reading the movement wrong. He's got the ball secure in his right hand. The ball/right hand combo jerk up when he hits the ground and his LEFT hand brushes by but he didn't actually lose control of the ball.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 06:05
|
|
|
DancingMachine posted:You're reading the movement wrong. He's got the ball secure in his right hand. The ball/right hand combo jerk up when he hits the ground and his LEFT hand brushes by but he didn't actually lose control of the ball. That's debatable, and you're trying to guess what an NFL official is going to call it with millions of fans also watching the replay... He'd have called it incomplete.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 13:28
|
|
|
Marshmallow Blue posted:Because catch / no catch is the new deflate-gate (hot button topic wise) i promise the catch/no catch argument has been going on a lot longer than deflategate has been around.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:24
|
|
|
Cole posted:i promise the catch/no catch argument has been going on a lot longer than deflategate has been around. The Immaculate Reception. Any Raiders fan care to comment on that?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:30
|
|
|
Cole posted:i promise the catch/no catch argument has been going on a lot longer than deflategate has been around. Oh i know that, but the whole ref's making questionable/ wrong calls is the fall back for when there isn't a Ray Rice or PSI issue etc.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:36
|
|
|
People hated the scab refs, but really... I couldn't tell the difference. People just blew up every little thing because "gently caress these scabs" or w/e.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:People hated the scab refs, but really... I couldn't tell the difference. People just blew up every little thing because "gently caress these scabs" or w/e. I still think it's funny that the defining image of replacement ref incompetence, the call that basically got them kicked out, was a completely correct call.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:People hated the scab refs, but really... I couldn't tell the difference. People just blew up every little thing because "gently caress these scabs" or w/e. sirtommygunn posted:I still think it's funny that the defining image of replacement ref incompetence, the call that basically got them kicked out, was a completely correct call. What the poo poo?  Do you not remember the refs loving up numbers of timeouts/downs and being easily bullied by HCs into changing their calls on the field? As an unabashed Seahawks fan, Fail Mary was 100% an interception (and OPI to boot).
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:People hated the scab refs, but really... I couldn't tell the difference. People just blew up every little thing because "gently caress these scabs" or w/e. Well if you couldn't tell they must not have existed at all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:What the poo poo? It's not a catch until the player has both feet or another body part down. By the time the "intercepting" defender had that, the receiver had equal control of the ball. Simultaneous catch goes to the offense. They absolutely missed the OPI but the actual refs miss that poo poo all the time. The replacement refs were awful overall but by the time of the "Fail Mary" they had settled in enough that they were keeping big, game delaying mistakes to a minimum.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Well if you couldn't tell they must not have existed at all. Refs are poo poo. Calls are unexplainably bad every game. Hope this helps.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Refs are poo poo. Calls are unexplainably bad every game. Hope this helps. It makes me all the more impressed with the NHL refs. You don't hear as much about them loving up and they have to be able to skate and get the gently caress out of the way yet they manage to do it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
sirtommygunn posted:It's not a catch until the player has both feet or another body part down. By the time the "intercepting" defender had that, the receiver had equal control of the ball. Simultaneous catch goes to the offense. Lol so you just don't remember it, that is fine. It happens. I am pretty sure the league itself has said it was the wrong call so all this is just lol.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:Refs are poo poo. Calls are unexplainably bad every game. Hope this helps. the regular refs don't extend a game's length for an hour by not knowing the yard/down and deliberating for 15 minutes over every holding call
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Lol so you just don't remember it, that is fine. It happens. The league itself said the exact opposite of that. They agreed with the interpretation of the replacement refs even as they were throwing them out the door. It's fine if you don't remember it but please don't come in here all smug when you're objectively wrong. I agree that this is "just lol", but for entirely different reasons. sirtommygunn fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Dec 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:42
|
|
|
It was the wrong call an no amount of rule stretching is going to change that. Also since you agree it was the play that got them out the door the league obviously did not agree. Hell The announcers were basically in full revolt after that game which is impressive. Considering how much dick they are willing to suck.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 20:57
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:It was the wrong call an no amount of rule stretching is going to change that. Also since you agree it was the play that got them out the door the league obviously did not agree. Hell The announcers were basically in full revolt after that game which is impressive. Considering how much dick they are willing to suck. It's the play that got them kicked out because it created a massive amount of outside pressure to resolve the situation with the officials, not because it was a bad call in and of itself. People are upset literally every time a simultaneous catch is called because its a lovely rule, it just usually doesn't happen on the last play in a game-deciding manner while there are heavily scrutinized replacement officials. Anyway this is the gif thread so I'm gonna take the cowards way out of this argument and stop making GBS threads it up with Fail Mary chat. sirtommygunn fucked around with this message at 21:12 on Dec 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
I have seen a couple of simultaneous catches, which this play was not one, and no one gave a poo poo. Mainly because the rule is fine and one of the easiest to spot usually.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:11
|
|
|
Gif thread 2015: lets talk about 2012
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:What the poo poo? In an era of 49ers football defined by great Jim Harbaugh moments, him calling timeouts and challenging plays when he had no challenges or timeouts remaining, then being granted challenges and timeouts by replacement refs, was the best.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Shut the gently caress up about refs and post more gifs please.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 13:18
|
|
|
 Rando redskins the other night. Crowd shot.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 13:39
|
|
|
You don't get a high five, you don't get a high five, you don't get a high five, you don't get a high five. https://gfycat.com/MatureSolidAustrianpinscher Edit: Winston is angry https://gfycat.com/EasyBigheartedGalapagospenguin Spermy Smurf fucked around with this message at 13:54 on Dec 18, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
Hahahahaha, gently caress Jameis Winston.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:
Can you blame him? His team is complete poo poo, except Doug Martin, he's cool and good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:Edit: Winston is angry I'm a little rusty when it comes to reading lips, but I'm pretty sure he's yelling "gently caress HER RIGHT IN THE PUSSY!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
On another note, someone on the team has a last name "Lemon"
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
Must throw great parties.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 12:45 |
|
|
Spermy Smurf posted:
If you listen to the worst fans, this means he's an excellent leader and will force his will on the team causing them to win. Or maybe he's a stupid baby. I don't know. I wish we hadn't drafted a rapist, but right now I wish Lovie Smith was able to instill some discipline in the team more. And teach them how to tackle. And also be a better play caller. And not draft rapists. gently caress Lovie.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2015 08:33
|
|
