Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Cartoon
Jun 20, 2008

poop

Yorkshire Tea posted:

I found the Sealion talk on the previous page super interesting. Did the Germans ever really have a plausible win point for the war? Could they have conquered all of mainland Europe, not invaded Russian during Winter, won in Northern Africa and then just peaced out of there until they got their nukes working for Britain?
We really need another thread to discuss this in but:

What if the Nazi's had accepted Chamberlain's ultimatum and retreated out of Poland? The Russians would have done the heavy lifting invasion wise and then apportioned the spoils to the Nazis under the non-aggression pact agreement.

Sealion.

On paper the French should never have been defeated in 1940. The final deciding factor in warfare is the enemy's will to fight. Who can say whether England wouldn't have capitulated in the face of an airborne invasion? The message that the two sides took away from Crete was radically different. The Allies were in awe of the power of an airborne attack and the German's were horrified by the size of the casualties sustained. In alternate history you can only rely on figures and probabilities. Actual history is usually more astonishing.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

lenoon
Jan 7, 2010

I read a great piece somewhere about Britain in ww2 being the ultimate in fan fiction, and Churchill being a massive Mary Sue author self insert. At the time I thought it was pretty good, and only later realised that lots of the history we have of the Second World War is pretty much fan fiction already - it's a rare book that says "history is all about chance events, so hosed If I know!"

SIGSEGV
Nov 4, 2010


TildeATH posted:

See, that's what happens when you model fingers and toes like people ask. With grogs, it's always a slippery slope to dongs.

Dongs are very important to troop morale. Just ask Wagner.

Ikasuhito
Sep 29, 2013

Haram as Fuck.

TildeATH posted:

See, that's what happens when you model fingers and toes like people ask. With grogs, it's always a slippery slope to dongs.

You know speaking of dongs, I've noticed a distinct lack of venereal disease tracking lists. What kind of grog game is this where I can't even check to see if my privates have syphilis?

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
Every frost-bitten dong causes a delay in your ship building due to the drop in morale back home.

Comrade Koba
Jul 2, 2007

Ikasuhito posted:

You know speaking of dongs, I've noticed a distinct lack of venereal disease tracking lists. What kind of grog game is this where I can't even check to see if my privates have syphilis?

War in the Pacific - Surgeon General's Edition

SIGSEGV
Nov 4, 2010


Comrade Koba posted:

War in the Pacific - Surgeon General's Edition

I heard the surgeon's bureau had a massively disproportionate influence in ship design following some politics happening after ww2 actually. I couldn't back up any of this to save my life of course but the thought alone is entertaining.

Loggie
Apr 29, 2009

Jobbo_Fett posted:

Can't give you a ship that's already taken.


Can I have the Amagi instead?

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry

Loggie posted:

Can I have the Amagi instead?

As long as it hasn't been taking, you can have anything. (This is more for people still on the fence about picking a ship)

Lucky ships are updated, aside from maybe last day seen/location.

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea

Cartoon posted:

On paper the French should never have been defeated in 1940.

Then that piece of paper should say "They were organisationally, doctrinally and politically hosed from the get-go" on it.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

SIGSEGV posted:

If you can't invade empty alaskan islands and have your soldiers freeze their dongs off after staying in landing craft for three hours while battleships shell a penguin colony then I'm not sure anyone would want to play this game.

See, the thing is, in order to prevent heavy disruption and loss of life during amphibious landings, you need to set a base hex as a "Preparation Target", and then wait roughly 100 days for the Preparation stat to climb to 100, then execute your landing.

But if it's a lovely Alaskan island in the middle of nowhere and you don't expect resistance, would really wait for full preparation? Can you wait for full preparation if you have to repeat the process a dozen times over?

It then becomes tempting to land without full prep, which then causes casualties and disruption when you land, which simulates real life gently caress ups during these misadventures!

Belisarius6
Jan 9, 2016

by Shine

sullat posted:

Also, the "Russia attacks Germany" scenario comes to us from... the Nazis themselves, so it is a little suspect. Considering Stalin had achieved most of his territorial goals through the MR pact and was subsidizing the Germans through cheap oil and grain, he probably felt relatively secure from the Germans.

I was (and still am) a serious student of military history, with a special interest in the Eastern Front in WWII. There's lots of corroborating evidence supporting the German claim that their attack on the Soviet Union was a necessary preemptive strike. The best, most complete, argument defending this possibility, in my opinion, is presented in a very readable book titled "Icebreaker" by a Russian historian who calls himself 'Suvorov. You can download the PDF copy of the book at http://justice4germans.com/2012/11/11/who-started-world-war-ii-the-answer-is-not-as-simple-as-we-have-been-led-to-believe/

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak
let me be the first to say I saw "justice for germans dot come" and :yikes: Not clicking that link

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.
Also, "a historian who calls himself 'Suvorov'" does not inspire confidence.

The historical consensus, since the actual military history thread on SA has done this subject to death a couple of times, is that the only way you can call Barbarossa a necessary preemptive strike is if you assume war between the Nazis and Soviet Union was inevitable (it probably was, the Nazis were xenophobic dicks like that), then the Nazis struck while the Soviet Union was still relatively weak and vulnerable before it could consolidate and improve.

Belisarius6
Jan 9, 2016

by Shine

Belisarius6 posted:

I was (and still am) a serious student of military history, with a special interest in the Eastern Front in WWII. There's lots of corroborating evidence supporting the German claim that their attack on the Soviet Union was a necessary preemptive strike. The best, most complete, argument defending this possibility, in my opinion, is presented in a very readable book titled "Icebreaker" by a Russian historian who calls himself 'Suvorov. You can download the PDF copy of the book at http://justice4germans.com/2012/11/11/who-started-world-war-ii-the-answer-is-not-as-simple-as-we-have-been-led-to-believe/

And lest readers take issue with my use of "preemptive strike" - yea, war between Germany and the Soviet Union was inevitable after Hitler openly declared his intentions to expand Germany eastwards in Mein Kampf, while the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) was equally frank in their unapologetic trumpeting to the world that the Red Army's mission was to export the Revolution abroad. War between the two was inevitable.

team overhead smash
Sep 2, 2006

Team-Forest-Tree-Dog:
Smashing your way into our hearts one skylight at a time

Splode posted:

let me be the first to say I saw "justice for germans dot come" and :yikes: Not clicking that link

Let me click it for you.

The article on their front page is titled: "The Real Holocaust Victims Were the Victims of British Firebombing in World War II"

The book Icebreaker that Belisarius6 linked to doesn't just put forward the idea that Hitler's strike was pre-emptive, but that the Soviets started WW2 and Stalin cannily tricked Hitler into all those invasions.

The tagline for the website at the top is "Exploring the little known, but true history of National Socialism, Hitler and WWII, what was really behind it, and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German people"

Here's an example of one of their articles:

Adolf Hitler: An Overlooked Candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize posted:

If anyone deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, it was Adolf Hitler. Hitler did not want war. World War II was forced on Germany. Poland was encouraged to attack Germany by the promises of British Ambassador Sir Howard William Kennard and French Ambassador Leon Noel. They promised unconditionally that England and France would come to Poland’s immediate aid should she need it in case of war with Germany; therefore, no matter what Poland did to provoke Germany’s attack, Poland had an assurance from England and France. With this guarantee, Poland began acting ruthlessly. In addition, Kennard and Noel flattered Poland into thinking she was a great power. As the Chinese proverb says, “You can flatter a man to jump off the roof.” They sabotaged the efforts of those Polish leaders who wanted a policy of friendship with Germany.1

Poland delivered the first blow, and Hitler announced,

“Since dawn today, we are shooting back,”


when he spoke to the Reichstag on September 1, 1939. “Shooting back” is not the statement of an aggressor.2 When Hitler attacked, Donald Day said, Poland got exactly what she deserved. None of Poland’s immediate neighbors felt sorry for her. Poland had conducted a policy of terror. Ethnic Germans living on German soil that had been given to Poland at the end of World War I by the Versailles Peace Treaty had been so mistreated that 2 million left the area for Germany and elsewhere.3 They were driven from what had been their homeland long before World War I.

Leon Degrelle, a young Belgian political leader in the 1930s, and who later joined Hitler’s hardest fighting unit, the Waffen SS, with over 400,000 other non-German European volunteers, says,

“Of all the crimes of World War II, one never hears about the wholesale massacres that occurred in Poland just before the war. Thousands of German men, women and children were massacred in the most horrendous fashion by press-enraged mobs. Hitler decided to halt the slaughter and he rushed to the rescue.”4 Young German boys, when captured by the Poles, were castrated.5

William Joyce, nicknamed Lord Haw Haw by British propaganda, became a German citizen and took up for the German cause. He described the conditions of the Germans who were living in Poland because of the Versailles Treaty:

German men and women were hunted like wild beasts through the streets of Bromberg. When they were caught, they were mutilated and torn to pieces by the Polish mob. . . . Every day the butchery increased. . . . [T]housands of Germans fled from their homes in Poland with nothing more than the clothes that they wore. Moreover, there was no doubt that the Polish army was making plans for the massacre of Danzig. . . . On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property. These incidents took place either on the border or inside German territory. On the night of [August 31], a band of Polish desperadoes actually occupied the German Broad casting Station at Gleiwitz. Now it was clear that unless German troops marched at once, not a man, woman or child of German blood within the Polish territory could reasonably expect to avoid persecution and slaughter.6

Due to Poland’s atrocious acts against the German people, Hitler declared to British Ambassador Sir Nevile Henderson on August 25, 1939:

“Poland’s provocations have become intolerable.”7

So Poland delivered the first blow, not Germany. The first blow was important to the United States in its war with Japan. It gave the United States the right and justification to do whatever was necessary to defeat the Japanese. But Germany did not have this right with Poland even after Poland had delivered the first blow.

What fair-minded man, if he knew the true facts involved in the Polish situation, could blame Hitler for his retaliatory attack on Poland? Poland, if any nation ever did, deserved exactly what Germany gave her in return. But Hitler did not even want to do what he had to do. No sooner than Hitler began protecting the German people inside Poland, he was ready to stop all hostilities and begin peace negotiations. Prince Sturdza narrates:

Only hours after the outbreak of hostilities between Germany and Poland, Mussolini, renewing his efforts for peace, proposed to all the interested powers an immediate suspension of hostilities and the immediate convocation of a conference between the great powers, in which Poland would also participate. Mussolini’s proposals were, without any delay, accepted by all governments concerned except Great Britain.8

Before war broke out Britain’s ambassador to Berlin, Sir Nevil Henderson, on August 30, 1939, said, in his final report of Germany’s proposed basis for negotiations,

“Those proposals are in general not too unreasonable.”

Even Pierre and Renee Gosset, in their rabid anti-German book Hitler, declare:

“It was a proposal of extreme moderation. It was in fact an offer that no Allied statesman could have rejected in good faith.”9

As early as January 1941, Hitler was making extraordinary efforts to come to peace terms with England. He offered England generous terms. He offered, if Britain would assume an attitude of neutrality, to withdraw from all of France, to leave Holland and Belgium . . . to evacuate Norway and Den mark, and to support British and French industries by buying their products. His proposal had many other favorable points for England and Western Europe. But England’s officials did not want peace. They wanted war. Had they not celebrated their declaration of war by laughing, joking and drinking beer?10

Yes, basically it is exactly as bad as you thought. Reading the about page it seems that his parents survived British bombing and gave the author a serious hate for the Allies because of it. A lot of the articles are about the allied bombing of civilians being war crimes (which I don't necessarily disagree with) but he seems to have decided that this therefore means Nazi Germany was the good guy and therefore faultless and perfect in every possible way.

lenoon
Jan 7, 2010

What the christ just happened

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak
Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to the Let's Play! subforum.

lenoon
Jan 7, 2010

I guess an occasional salutary reminder that the grog world is divided into two groups:

People like us who really enjoy ridiculously in depth games of strategy and planning.

and

Hitler apologists

Acebuckeye13
Nov 2, 2010
Ultra Carp
Hahaha it's a shame Ensign Expendable isn't here, he'd probably get a kick out of someone attempting to seriously cite that discredited hack Suvorov.

Grey Hunter
Oct 17, 2007

Hero of the soviet union.
Accidental destroyer of planets






That's a big ship, I want it still. Please stop shooting it.



We begin the attacks to take the Changsha fortifications – this is going to be a long and bloody job!







I'm doing well at picking off their larger troop transports.







We get a few hits in on Singapore, but most planes here are still on training mode to replace losses and repair damaged planes.



The Kido Butai jumps back into action hitting the President Coolaid hard. I know I said I was sending them back for repair, but that was a cunning plan to confuse the spies amongst you! In reality, I remembered I'd ordered a fresh wave of troops in – that's the transport up near Kota Barau – These guys are landing at Mersing and I need to provide support for them!



These guys have moved up as well! Its only taken them a month to march 40 miles!







The battle for Iba continues!







The Manchurian Garrison has been stripped down to near the bone! But that's a good thing.



That's a couple of great ships to sink.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

lenoon posted:

I guess an occasional salutary reminder that the grog world is divided into two groups:

People like us who really enjoy ridiculously in depth games of strategy and planning.

and

Hitler apologists


They're called wehraboos, and can typically be summoned by raising the fact that the Panther and Tiger tanks were at best mixed bags and didn't impress Allied and Soviet forces that encountered them.

Doloen
Dec 18, 2004

Belisarius6 posted:

I was (and still am) a serious student of military history, with a special interest in the Eastern Front in WWII. There's lots of corroborating evidence supporting the German claim that their attack on the Soviet Union was a necessary preemptive strike. The best, most complete, argument defending this possibility, in my opinion, is presented in a very readable book titled "Icebreaker" by a Russian historian who calls himself 'Suvorov. You can download the PDF copy of the book at http://justice4germans.com/2012/11/11/who-started-world-war-ii-the-answer-is-not-as-simple-as-we-have-been-led-to-believe/

What the gently caress.

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak
I hope we all learnt a valuable lesson about what happens when you derail the thread.

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
Are those Vals bombing the liners with SAP or GP bombs?

StealthArcher
Jan 10, 2010




I'm appreciative of the buy avatar button.

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak

StealthArcher posted:

I'm appreciative of the buy avatar button.

It's spelt cum just fyi

StealthArcher
Jan 10, 2010




Splode posted:

It's spelt cum just fyi
SFW requirements on avatars.


I'm skirting it pretty hard.

team overhead smash
Sep 2, 2006

Team-Forest-Tree-Dog:
Smashing your way into our hearts one skylight at a time

Dude only joins today and after 2 posts gets red text of shame and accompanying avatar. A forum record?

Belisarius6
Jan 9, 2016

by Shine

Splode posted:

let me be the first to say I saw "justice for germans dot come" and :yikes: Not clicking that link

The biggest problem with the ignorant is that they don't realize that they're ignorant. The website is for "Justice" for "Germans" - not Nazis. My father was a Lancaster pilot in WWII and let's just say that he didn't think that there was much real difference in morals between the leadership of any of the warring nations. So rather than sticking your fingers into your ears and chanting out loud why not just go directly to the "Icebreaker" PDF link as suggested rather than browsing in a site which clearly challenges your deeply entrenched world-view paradigms.

P.S. For those who are interested in learning more about the whys and wherefores of World War II which is only now starting to come out as previously highly classified information is now slowly being released to historians you might be interested in reading Pat Buchanan's book "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War". I thought it was brilliant.

Splode
Jun 18, 2013

put some clothes on you little freak

team overhead smash posted:

Dude only joins today and after 2 posts gets red text of shame and accompanying avatar. A forum record?

Whoever posted this LP on the matrix forums deserves a stern talking to.

ANYWAY

Imagine my shame when I looked up my lucky ship, the I-8, and realised it was infamous for committing a bunch of war crimes. I only picked it because I thought a sub with a scout plane was dumb and cool :negative:

StealthArcher
Jan 10, 2010




Belisarius6 posted:

So rather than sticking your fingers into your ears and chanting out loud why not just go directly to the "Icebreaker" PDF link as suggested rather than browsing in a site which clearly challenges your deeply entrenched world-view paradigms.

loving lol.


loving.

LoL.

Hi Hitler.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.

StealthArcher posted:

loving lol.


loving.

LoL.

Hi Hitler.

Just a troll. Put him on ignore and move on.

Belisarius6
Jan 9, 2016

by Shine

Acebuckeye13 posted:

Hahaha it's a shame Ensign Expendable isn't here, he'd probably get a kick out of someone attempting to seriously cite that discredited hack Suvorov.

Please forward the paper which discredits Suvorov's thesis. I'd be interested in reading it.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Grey Hunter posted:

The Kido Butai jumps back into action hitting the President Coolaid hard. I know I said I was sending them back for repair, but that was a cunning plan to confuse the spies amongst you! In reality, I remembered I'd ordered a fresh wave of troops in – that's the transport up near Kota Barau – These guys are landing at Mersing and I need to provide support for them!

Misspelling aside, that's a 21 000 ton liner. Good on you, Grey!

Jobbo_Fett
Mar 7, 2014

Slava Ukrayini

Clapping Larry
Welp, lasted a little over a month.

Deptfordx
Dec 23, 2013

Hey people, I've just been reading an article by this Lyndon LaRouche guy. He has some really amazing things to say about World leaders and shape shifting Alien Lizards that conventional sources are to afraid to tell us

I'll do a 10,000 word effort post about it later, so you can all look forward to that!

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
It's a different kind of warcrimes chat, but it's not entirely unexpected.

Belisarius6
Jan 9, 2016

by Shine

Cythereal posted:

Just a troll. Put him on ignore and move on.

I'm stunned at the reaction I've received for my link to Suvorov's "Icebreaker". The only reason I used the "Justice4Germans" website was because my Google search showed it had the book available online. I never stated support for Nazism - in fact I immediately followed up my first comment with a statement that Hitler was going to attack the Soviet Union regardless of any provocation or threat. Yet forum participants are all over me for being a Nazi sympathizer. Someone changed my avatar, I'm assuming the moderator himself, to a cum covered Iron Cross. What the hell? This is why the U.S. is collapsing before our eyes - nobody's willing to make a serious effort at understanding any viewpoint that differs from their own - even when that viewpoint is, all in all, very much the same.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SIGSEGV
Nov 4, 2010


goatface posted:

It's a different kind of warcrimes chat, but it's not entirely unexpected.

Honestly it's a lot better than warcrimes chat, this time we've got schadenfreude and can all have a good laugh instead of warcrimes chat which just leaves us drained and unhappy.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply