|
Top City Homo posted:i wonder if there is a correlation between cuck porn and fat white rage I think it started after 2008 but yes. Being cucked, esp. by a black bull seems to always be swimming around the minds of neoreactionaries.
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 13:34 |
|
|
William Bear posted:I'm pretty sure this makes him more "Look at how fat my wife is " -donald trump
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 01:45
|
|
than angry.
|
looks like a tampon ad and putting jeb bush on it only furthers that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 07:19
|
|
|
Microwaves Mom posted:looks like a tampon ad and putting jeb bush on it only furthers that. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 08:57
|
|
|
Trump eat the pork
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Trump's skin
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Trump's skin lick the meat sweat off his brow and gain his powers
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
Admiral_eX_laX posted:Trump eat the pork 
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
Poor marla
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 04:14
|
|
|
Give me thump/sanders independent run.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
i look forward to watching trumps inauguration and finally being proud to call myself an american. i pray for the day for my legionaries is required reading.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 06:51
|
|
|
Admiral_eX_laX posted:Trump eat the pork trump doesnt sweat he glistens
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 07:12
|
|
|
I'm currently reading through quote:One thing I've learned about the press is that they're always hungry for a good story, and the more sensational the better...The point is that if you are a little different, or a little outrageous, or if you do things that are bold or controversial, the press is going to write about you...I'm not saying they necessarily like me. Sometimes they write positively, and sometimes they write negatively. But from a pure business point of view, the benefits of being written about far outweighed the drawbacks. It's really quite simple. If I take a full-page ad in the New York Times to publicize a project, it might cost $40,000, and in any case, people tend to be sceptical about advertising. But if the New York Times writes even a moderately positive story about one of my deals, it doesn't cost me anything, and it's worth a lot more than $40,000. quote:The final key to the way I promote is bravado. I play to people's fantasies. People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That's why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular. Bonus lol: quote:11:00 A.M.: I meet with a top New York banker at my office. He's come to try to solicit business, and we have a general talk about deals I'm considering. It's funny what's happened: bankers now come to me, to ask if I might be interested in borrowing their money. They know a safe bet. Edit: quote:All this was inspired by the principle -- which is quite true in itself -- that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. The Real Paddy has issued a correction as of 08:37 on Jan 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 08:04
|
|
|
The Real Paddy posted:All this was inspired by the principle -- which is quite true in itself -- that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. Tish! That's Strauss!
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
Do you think Trump will unleash on Hillary during one of his rallys? Like point to her tumbling in the polls as a character flaw that she'll take personally?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Do you think Trump will unleash on Hillary during one of his rallys? Like point to her tumbling in the polls as a character flaw that she'll take personally? Probably whenever his opponents have any sort of setback he loves to crow about their failure. Will probably say that Hillary is running a low energy ineffective campaign, can't keep strong numbers against Bernie despite Hillary having so many advantages.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" - Trump and Bernie, friends forever
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
The Real Paddy posted:I'm currently reading through It's been really funny watching people slowly realize this because they didn't read between the lines.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
The Real Paddy posted:I'm currently reading through It's really obvious that Trump plans out almost everything he says and carefully tests and refines his messaging as he goes along. Part of his plan is tossing out lines and seeing which ones work better and leaning on those points. He's putting on a master class on persuading and influencing people in this election.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
The most interesting thing about Trump is no one knows his actual policies or positions. Yea he wants to deport 13 million people. But that is actually impossible. So if he can't do that, what will he do instead?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
SoTU so far feels almost like an anti-trump "wake up america" screed
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:The most interesting thing about Trump is no one knows his actual policies or positions. enrich himself and his family
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
by bankrupting the nation
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
Is the Trump 2020 re-election campaign slogan going to be "Make America Great Again Again"
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 05:23
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:Is the Trump 2020 re-election campaign slogan going to be "Make America Great Again Again" Death to the Enemies of the Trumperium!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:Do you think Trump will unleash on Hillary during one of his rallys? Like point to her tumbling in the polls as a character flaw that she'll take personally? No this is what Hillary is going to do to Bernie "3 men raping her simultaneously" twice-married child-out-of-wedlock Trotsky-worshipping Sanders the week before Iowa.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
Top Bunk Wanker posted:It's really obvious that Trump plans out almost everything he says and carefully tests and refines his messaging as he goes along. Part of his plan is tossing out lines and seeing which ones work better and leaning on those points. He's putting on a master class on persuading and influencing people in this election. The rolling stones article was pretty good about this. Trump sits in a plane, reading cards, interrupting him self saying he needs to focus or do this. But he keeps bouncing cards off of people asking how they feel about a statement. If he likes it, it shows up in the next rally, and if it does well there it stays in. IIRC the author said something to him on that plane that showed up at the next rally.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 06:17
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:Trump is so, so close to eclipsing Rubio in nom likelihood: http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-republican-nomination/
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
Third World Reggin posted:The rolling stones article was pretty good about this. Trump sits in a plane, reading cards, interrupting him self saying he needs to focus or do this. But he keeps bouncing cards off of people asking how they feel about a statement. If he likes it, it shows up in the next rally, and if it does well there it stays in. IIRC the author said something to him on that plane that showed up at the next rally. I like how his speeches include digs for surreal current events like when he made fun of MOM for getting only one voter at his Iowa event and the voter stayed undecided after talking with him.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" - Trump and Bernie, friends forever FRIENDSHIP ENDED WITH CHAPO NOW BERNIE IS MY BEST FRIEND
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 09:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Touched by a Trump
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
For years everyone thought that kissing a baby was the quintessential political photo op. In 2016 Donald Trump turns this paradigm on it's head by passionately kissing the troops.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
Does this count as an attack on trump by the media to trump fans? There's a bunch of replies trying to argue around it (why it doesn't matter, why it's actually a good thing etc) like it was somebody's negative opinion of trump instead of just a fact.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
the people who want to strip non-white americans of their citizenship are raising money off of trump and spending it trying to get people to vote for trump http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/01/12/donald-trump-is-a-fundraising-engine-for-white/207927 quote:Two leading white nationalist media websites have used Donald Trump in their recent fundraising drives. The solicitations hail Trump for spurring "unprecedented interest in" white nationalism and putting their ideas "firmly in the mainstream." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...acist-movement/ quote:Rachel Pendergraft — the national organizer for the Knights Party, a standard-bearer for the Ku Klux Klan — told The Washington Post that the KKK, for one, has a new conversation starter at its disposal. i'm curious, thread, if the growing connection between trump and white racism makes your support of trump more ironic, or less
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
i support trump so he destroys the republican party forever and then loses the election in a landslide
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
oystertoadfish posted:i'm curious, thread, if the growing connection between trump and white racism makes your support of trump more ironic, or less if i were to base myself by the company i keep id be living on a glacier eating penguin
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:i support trump so he destroys the republican party forever I support anybody who destroys any party forever. There are over 300,000,000 of us in this country. Being represented by two parties is an abstraction that should not be.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 13:34 |
|
|
a system where all the interest groups work out their allegiances and form two and exactly two coalitions before the election is probably the best way to negotiate a first-past-the-post system. just look at the silliness that goes on in canada and the uk, a decade of conservative minority government in the former, the tories in the uk (or labour in past decades) winning >50% of the seats with <40% of the votes for the latter there are much better ways than first-past-the-post to do house of representatives/house of commons type elections though. top-two runoffs as already exist in a few states, larger multimember districts, a mixed system where non-geographical representatives are added to correct for the discrepancy between winners in the districts and the voting average at a larger level like in germany or new zealand, these are a few options but just having twenty parties wouldn't help all that much, the whining would just be about how that one party that gets 20% in half the districts won a majority of the seats oystertoadfish has issued a correction as of 04:13 on Jan 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 04:11
|
|