|
Jake was fine (as far as child actors went), he just had stupid lines. Yippee!
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 17:42 |
|
AndyElusive posted:I'm one of the few people who doesn't mind little Jake Lloyd in Phantom Menace. Of all the bad acting in that film his wasn't the most offensive. He was just a cute little kid given bad lines in a children's movie marketed towards adults. Kids are really lovely people.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:19 |
|
He did a better job than Liam Neeson.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:19 |
|
Neurolimal posted:Jake was fine (as far as child actors went), he just had stupid lines. But what's stupid about that? Have you ever met a child? They do, in fact, shout yippee.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:21 |
|
Kids today are all about Yogscast and in app purchases and living a well adjusted vegan lifestyle.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
Sometimes when he is allowed to speak more than four words he starts to sound like a human being, but one of those times is also when he asks about midichlorians so idk.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:25 |
|
greatn posted:But what's stupid about that? Have you ever met a child? They do, in fact, shout yippee. I'm not sure "mimesis" is a very strong defense when talking about Star Wars.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:45 |
|
Cnut the Great posted:Bu then a couple years later he posted this on his Facebook: AndyElusive posted:I'm one of the few people who doesn't mind little Jake Lloyd in Phantom Menace. Of all the bad acting in that film his wasn't the most offensive. He was just a cute little kid given bad lines in a children's movie marketed towards adults.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:49 |
|
AndyElusive posted:I'm one of the few people who doesn't mind little Jake Lloyd in Phantom Menace. Of all the bad acting in that film his wasn't the most offensive. He was just a cute little kid given bad lines in a children's movie marketed towards adults. I have a really hard time blaming him for the bad lines, as dialogue is not his job. Like with Hayden Christiansen, I feel most of the blame lies with whoever wrote it in the first place.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:55 |
|
greatn posted:But what's stupid about that? Have you ever met a child? They do, in fact, shout yippee. no they don't
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:55 |
|
Neurolimal posted:Jake was fine (as far as child actors went), he just had stupid lines. This. He actually is just right as the little kid in Jingle All the Way.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:55 |
|
greatn posted:But what's stupid about that? Have you ever met a child? They do, in fact, shout yippee. Have you? They really don't, but maybe they used to back in the day. Its the type of thing a 60 year old man writes because he's forgotten what childish glee feels like.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 20:59 |
|
porfiria posted:I'm not sure "mimesis" is a very strong defense when talking about Star Wars. And yet, that's exactly the case. Time and again, we're shown that people expected movie-logic - like the 'good guys' rewarding Shmii with a new house - and became frustrated when characters instead behaved as everyday idiots.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:04 |
|
Filthy Casual posted:Have you? They really don't, but maybe they used to back in the day. Its the type of thing a 60 year old man writes because he's forgotten what childish glee feels like. Why don't you go lurk in a McDonald's ballpit for a few hours, and tell us what you hear? I'm probably less picky about what kids do/don't sound like, and just want dialogue that makes sense and feels like it came naturally from a character. Do we really need to discuss earth kids of 1999 versus Tatooine kids of a long, long time ago, far, far away?
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:07 |
RBA Starblade posted:I really can't imagine making GBS threads on a little kid for doing a bad job in a bad movie. Like, I hate the prequels but jeez. A lot of it sounds like it was from people he went to school with too so that's even worse.
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:08 |
|
Red posted:Why don't you go lurk in a McDonald's ballpit for a few hours, and tell us what you hear? Screams, crying and hatred, mostly.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:09 |
|
With the experience of a little sister, multiple young cousins and nephews, and friends' twerps, I feel like I can most definitely say that kid's dont say "yipee!", today or in the 90's. I guess lurking in a ball pit gives a far different experience, I don't think i'm prepared to do that.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:15 |
|
Neurolimal posted:With the experience of a little sister, multiple young cousins and nephews, and friends' twerps, I feel like I can most definitely say that kid's dont say "yipee!", today or in the 90's. It was a long time ago in a galaxy far far away so comparisons to present day or the 90's are irrelevant.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:19 |
|
Neurolimal posted:With the experience of a little sister, multiple young cousins and nephews, and friends' twerps, I feel like I can most definitely say that kid's dont say "yipee!", today or in the 90's. I feel like I can most definitely say that 19-year-olds don't say things like "Blast it!", either today or in the 70's. Good thing Star Wars doesn't take place today, or in the 70's, or in the 90's. edit: Seriously, I'm really mad this line from Attack of the Clones got cut down: quote:ANAKIN I would have loved to have seen people flip out over Anakin's use of the word "gonzo." Cnut the Great fucked around with this message at 21:25 on Jan 13, 2016 |
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:20 |
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:26 |
|
It doesn't matter if kids say it or not, it matters if it feels like that kid would say it. Anakin in TPM sucked the tension out of scenes through a combination of bad directing, editing, acting, and writing, not just one alone. The Rey line of never imagining there being so much green I feel like could have been a I hate sand moment if the directing, editing, and acting wasn't there -- but it was so it fits in, unlike hating sand.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:28 |
piratepilates posted:It doesn't matter if kids say it or not, it matters if it feels like that kid would say it. Anakin in TPM sucked the tension out of scenes through a combination of bad directing, editing, acting, and writing, not just one alone.
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:31 |
|
George Lucas writes really stilted, artificial dialogue most of the time. That is not to say that it can't be delivered in a way that sounds believable. Just look at Harrison Ford or Ewan McGregor. Both were able to adapt and either deliver the written dialogue with enough charm to sell it, or just plain ignore the script and say something that gets the idea across, but flows more easily. But to deliver those lines well requires either a very self-starting actor or a very hands-on director. George Lucas is notoriously not a hands-on director, and so actors who would rely more on direction are left struggling.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:35 |
|
Nessus posted:To be frank, hearing people talk, it wouldn't matter what he said - literally anything, including direct quotes from the Communist Manifesto to exhaustively realistic childlike dialogue apt for his grade and age level, would have been unrealistic poo poo tainted by the combination of bad this, bad that, and bad the other thing. Because the character in that film was a 9 year old child instead of a totally awesome badass, he was doomed. Fortunately, I am sure that going forward there need be no fear of such things occurring again. I think it could have worked out (well I'm sure weirdos would have hated it regardless of the execution) if it was better executed and the movie wasn't so drat goofy. He shouldn't have been played as a comic relief character. And that drat scene with the yipee should have been played as serious instead of the mishmash they had in the final cut. The OT movies were goofy and lighthearted but they knew when it was time to get serious and hold tension (I.e. almost every action scene).
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:36 |
|
If y'all keep this up, Lucas is gonna make Vader yell "yippee" when he throws the emperor down the pit in the 4K release of ROTJ
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:41 |
|
"George, you can type this poo poo, but you can't say it!" -Harrison Ford
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:50 |
|
piratepilates posted:I think it could have worked out (well I'm sure weirdos would have hated it regardless of the execution) if it was better executed and the movie wasn't so drat goofy. He shouldn't have been played as a comic relief character. And that drat scene with the yipee should have been played as serious instead of the mishmash they had in the final cut. The OT movies were goofy and lighthearted but they knew when it was time to get serious and hold tension (I.e. almost every action scene). So it wasn't any sort of technical problem; you just wanted an entirely different movie.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:53 |
|
Vintersorg posted:"George, you can type this poo poo, but you can't say it!" I guess Ford doesn't realize his own value, such a huge part of what makes the dialogue in ANH work is that it was being said by the likes of Peter Cushing, James Earl Jones, Alec Guinness, and Ford. The casting of Cushing is such a stroke of genius. His line delivery is right out of a Hammer Frankenstein film.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:53 |
|
Sir Lemming posted:If y'all keep this up, Lucas is gonna make Vader yell "yippee" when he throws the emperor down the ball pit in the 4K release of ROTJ
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:54 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:And yet, that's exactly the case. Time and again, we're shown that people expected movie-logic - like the 'good guys' rewarding Shmii with a new house - and became frustrated when characters instead behaved as everyday idiots. The thing is, the actions people seem to think Padme or the Jedi should have taken for Shmi are actually advised against in the real world as doing more harm than good. From a 2008 humantrafficking.org fact sheet: quote:Buying slaves to set them free From a 2001 New York Times article about slaves in Sudan: quote:Sudan's 18-year civil war between an Arab-dominated government in the north and the long-subjugated black African south has claimed two million lives and forced more than four million southern Sudanese from their homes. It has also perversely transformed many international efforts to provide humanitarian assistance into fuel for further fighting. The latest example is a global campaign to curtail one of the most pernicious symptoms of this intractable war -- slavery. The efforts of well-meaning foreigners to buy the freedom of captive southern Sudanese -- a practice known as slave redemption -- may be expanding the very market it seeks to eliminate. Another article from The Atlantic about the same thing: The False Promise of Slave Redemption Furthermore, Human Rights Watch and UNICEF both caution against the practice of buying slaves in order to set them free, due to possible unintended negative consequences. I believe there's room for nuance in the discussion, but this is not at all the clear cut issue people are unthinkingly making it out to be. Freeing Shmi necessarily means participating in Tatooine's slave market, and giving money to slavers so that they can purchase more slaves. You're probably not a bad person if you do it anyway, but I'd also have a hard time saying you're a bad person if you don't do it. I don't think most people objecting to the "plot hole" have actually thought about this very hard at all. But goes to show that the Star Wars prequels remain really good for encouraging discussions about complex moral issues, doesn't it?
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 21:58 |
|
Sir Lemming posted:If y'all keep this up, Lucas is gonna make Vader yell "yippee" when he throws the emperor down the pit in the 4K release of ROTJ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_H3_g9PhnM
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:03 |
|
Nessus posted:To be frank, hearing people talk, it wouldn't matter what he said - literally anything, including direct quotes from the Communist Manifesto to exhaustively realistic childlike dialogue apt for his grade and age level, would have been unrealistic poo poo tainted by the combination of bad this, bad that, and bad the other thing. Because the character in that film was a 9 year old child instead of a totally awesome badass, he was doomed. This is a very fair post with significant respect and tolerance for alternate opinions and readings quote:Fortunately, I am sure that going forward there need be no fear of such things occurring again. Lol
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:12 |
|
Cnut the Great posted:The thing is, the actions people seem to think Padme or the Jedi should have taken for Shmi are actually advised against in the real world as doing more harm than good. It's not about real world slavery, and "First, Do More Harm Than Good" could be the motto of late Republic Jedi. The lazersword supermen have a really powerful lazersword superman trainee, but his emotional stability is in question the moment they meet him. Rather than address his emotions and mitigate a rather large and evident source of distress for him, these guardians of peace and justice try to get him to suppress his emotions the same way they did in superman brainwashing camp.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:15 |
|
They didn't necessarily have to buy her. They could have won her in a game of chance or slaughtered the slavers like animals.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:16 |
|
It's a bit disingenuous to compare unrealistic advice (nobody in a situation where their beloved family member is being kept in slavery will go "I shan't free her peacefully and be about my way, for this shall perpetuate an economy built upon slavery of which I has never affected my life before today") from a group focused on combatting an illegal trade, to commentary on a universe where slavery is legal, the person affected is a war hero, and the world he helped rescue is super rich. As an addendum, it's always felt like the jedi in TPM face an ultimatum WRT film readers; if they forcefully free the slaves then they are cemented as a theocratic strongarm police force that is left unsupervised and unregulated. If they dont free the slaves then they are uncaring monsters who tolerate awful measures to maintain their lifestyle. Thanks Obama.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:23 |
|
Sir Lemming posted:If y'all keep this up, Lucas is gonna make Vader yell "yippee" when he throws the emperor down the pit in the 4K release of ROTJ EDIT: never mind, beaten by PittTheElder
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:23 |
Neurolimal posted:It's a bit disingenuous to compare unrealistic advice (nobody in a situation where their beloved family member is being kept in slavery will go "I shan't free her peacefully and be about my way, for this shall perpetuate an economy built upon slavery of which I has never affected my life before today") from a group focused on combatting an illegal trade, to commentary on a universe where slavery is legal, the person affected is a war hero, and the world he helped rescue is super rich. Congratulations, you have identified a complex moral problem with no easy answers.
|
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:31 |
|
Basebf555 posted:I guess Ford doesn't realize his own value, such a huge part of what makes the dialogue in ANH work is that it was being said by the likes of Peter Cushing, James Earl Jones, Alec Guinness, and Ford. Darth Vader is played by the Frankenstein Monster from (I think?) Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed. Might have been Evil of Frankenstein. It's just cool that in that scene you have Frankenstein talking to his monster.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:31 |
|
Effectronica posted:Congratulations, you have identified a complex moral problem with no easy answers. This was in response to Cnut's assertion on the subject, and SMG's reading on the Jedi passiveness towards slavery.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:34 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 17:42 |
|
On a really basic level, both Anakin and Padme are frustrated that- despite their apparent strength and resources- their respective organizations are so unable to save people, at least the people that matter to them. Padme makes her deal with the devil in Episode 1 to save Naboo (following Palpatine's advice to lead the revolt against Valorum), Anakin makes his deal with the devil in Episode 3 to save Padme. Episdoe 2 is where Padme begins to recognize the cost of her prior decision, while it sets the stage for Anakin to do what he does in the RoTS.
|
# ? Jan 13, 2016 22:52 |