|
Ah sorry my bad, guess I'm an idiot
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 09:48 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 08:48 |
|
I don't think it's abnormal to experience a similar feeling of dread from tales about giant invisible squid as from a book about Italian family life. I seriously mean it, not only because Ferrante's characters are Italian. Very different books can give you a similar type of feeling, and it's cool and interesting. But ppl in this thread might get triggered the word 'lovecraftian', even though it describes your own feelings.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 10:05 |
|
Smoking Crow posted:How does everyone in the thread acquire their books I mostly get them through my city library's Overdrive system. Usually I don't have to wait for anything because everyone's got 100 holds on YA Book That Came Out This Month, but I've been waiting on that Ferrante book for like three weeks now.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 14:28 |
|
the_homemaster posted:Ah sorry my bad, guess I'm an idiot Nah its cool I appreciate you being willing to join into the conversation I just paused for a second and was like "wait what?"
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 17:15 |
|
I'm reading Moby Dick now for the first time since undergrad and it's really good, though I'm skimming those chapters where he talks about Who Draws a Whale the Best
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 19:11 |
|
I want a Queequig prequel
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 19:12 |
|
Chamberk posted:I'm reading Moby Dick now for the first time since undergrad and it's really good, though I'm skimming those chapters where he talks about Who Draws a Whale the Best I have never read Moby Dick but I hear it's one of those books with very long tangents on minor subjects; I think at one point there is a long discussion on how whale fat is conserved or something on that note.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 19:38 |
The tangents are some of the best parts, though.
|
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 20:11 |
|
Oh, some of the tangents are great. But some are just Melville telling you everything that was known about whales circa 1850, which can be amusing ("I tell you, the whale is a FISH, not a mammal!") but can get dull pretty quickly. However, the characters like Queequeg, Ahab, and Starbuck are great. Just don't expect too much from Ishmael after the first 100 pages.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 20:14 |
|
I'm glad I read all the tangents, even though some were better than others. Like how would you know which ones were skippable if you didn't actually read them? Plus I appreciated the contrast between the pseudo-scientific view of the whales(s) and the treatment of them as almost supernatural.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 20:24 |
|
i like the parts where they kiss the whales, then each other, and then go back to kissing the whales again.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 20:29 |
|
Knowing exactly what a whale is and isn't is important when reading Moby Dick, the "tangent" chapters are quite important to the book.Chamberk posted:However, the characters like Queequeg, Ahab, and Starbuck are great. Just don't expect too much from Ishmael after the first 100 pages. Stubb's #1.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 21:37 |
|
Stubb is the best, a goddamn adorable laugh riot. Anyone who dislikes Stubb is no friend of mine.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2016 23:49 |
|
Chamberk posted:Oh, some of the tangents are great. But some are just Melville telling you everything that was known about whales circa 1850, which can be amusing ("I tell you, the whale is a FISH, not a mammal!") but can get dull pretty quickly. Early science stuff is really cool and those chapters aren't boring at all.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 00:27 |
|
Tree Goat posted:i like the parts where they kiss the whales, then each other, and then go back to kissing the whales again. Squeeze! Squeeze! Squeeze! all the morning long; I squeezed that sperm till I myself almost melted into it; I squeezed that sperm till a strange sort of insanity came over me, and I found myself unwittingly squeezing my co-labourers' hands in it, mistaking their hands for the gentle globules. Such an abounding, affectionate, friendly, loving feeling did this avocation beget; that at last I was continually squeezing their hands, and looking up into their eyes sentimentally, as much as to say,—Oh! my dear fellow beings, why should we longer cherish any social acerbities, or know the slightest ill humour or envy! Come; let us squeeze hands all round; nay, let us all squeeze ourselves into each other; let us squeeze ourselves universally into the very milk and sperm of kindness.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 01:55 |
|
The whaling parts are essential to understanding Ishmael's construction of the entire narrative after the fact and his deliberate paralleling of Moby Dick and Ahab, though I could probably have done with a lot less of that chapter where he talks for 20 pages about why the color white is scary. Even if you're just skimming those chapters it's important to get a sense of what each chapter is about and why he's going on that particular digression. And yes Stubb is clearly the best of the mates. EDIT: I don't know if this is too meta-narrative for a novel from 1851 or whatever but try to dissociate the Ishmael-as-newbie-whaler who does basically nothing on the voyage and Ishmael-as-cetology-expert who is the actual narrator. The whaling digressions are not things that Ishmael-the-sailor wove into his story of the Pequod's voyage, they're things that Ishmael-the-narrator puts there on purpose to punctuate the events of the story and explain a lot of things. The same is true of the segments where Ishmael-the-sailor couldn't possibly have been observing the events in question and the narrative slides into a Shakespearean play style. There are an awful lot of symbols that he introduces in his moments as narrator that are mirrored by events that happen; compare the very first paragraph of the book with events that happen in the last 5-10 chapters. Nakar fucked around with this message at 03:40 on Jan 18, 2016 |
# ? Jan 18, 2016 03:34 |
|
The Whiteness of the Whale is one of my favorite chapters
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 05:29 |
|
BTW I'm taking a world lit class next semester, and I am gonna gently caress ya'll up so bad on book chat.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 05:35 |
|
blue squares posted:BTW I'm taking a world lit class next semester, and I am gonna gently caress ya'll up so bad on book chat. Show us the book list!
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 07:30 |
|
Lol Im gonna go to UNIVERSITY to get SMART
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 13:01 |
|
blue squares posted:BTW I'm taking a world lit class next semester, and I am gonna gently caress ya'll up so bad on book chat. Son, I have only shown you a fraction of my true power *hair turns yellow*
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 16:52 |
|
Chamberk posted:Oh, some of the tangents are great. But some are just Melville telling you everything that was known about whales circa 1850, which can be amusing ("I tell you, the whale is a FISH, not a mammal!") but can get dull pretty quickly. Actually, the cetological tangents are awfully important to Moby-Dick, in that they are Ishmael's retrospective attempt to reduce the white whale to human terms. By defining the whale, he diminishes it. He spends forty-two-odd chapters of whalelore trying to pigeonhole a murderous freak of nature as just another ornery sperm whale. Succeeding would strip away its soul and rob it of its mythic power. Scientific inquiry is just as much a weapon against the white whale as a literal harpoon, since in Ishmael's mind the whale's terrifying invincibility assumes both physical and spiritual dimensions.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 17:20 |
|
ACTUALLY, i understand that they're important but it can be frustrating when the narrative and characters are put aside for 30 pages to talk about different parts of the whale. i'm not saying Melville did a bad job, it's just that reading this book requires a bit more work and some adjustment from my usual expectations for a story.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 17:47 |
|
Chamberk posted:ACTUALLY, i understand that they're important but it can be frustrating when the narrative and characters are put aside for 30 pages to talk about different parts of the whale. i'm not saying Melville did a bad job, it's just that reading this book requires a bit more work and some adjustment from my usual expectations for a story. Quit Being a loving Child e: in the middle of The Blind Assassin rn and feel the same way about the eponymous embedded sci-fi story always getting interrupted by old lady problems, but you're not supposed to say these things in the Literahchah thread. Eugene V. Dubstep fucked around with this message at 18:19 on Jan 18, 2016 |
# ? Jan 18, 2016 18:04 |
|
at the date posted:Quit Being a loving Child Honestly I have up on that book for the same reason. Not because she was an old lady but I was tired of hearing the morose nostalgia of the wealthy and being expected to sympathize
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 18:38 |
|
Isn't Atwood some sub New Yorker level housewife trash
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 18:41 |
|
Ras Het posted:Isn't Atwood some sub New Yorker level housewife trash No.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 18:56 |
|
What a bizarre accusation. Atwood is a Canadian novelist who writes literary sci-fi and doesn't like the sci-fi label.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 19:01 |
|
Ras Het posted:Isn't Atwood some sub New Yorker level housewife trash sounds pretty sexist to mee
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 19:02 |
|
at the date posted:Actually, the cetological tangents are awfully important to Moby-Dick, in that they are Ishmael's retrospective attempt to reduce the white whale to human terms. By defining the whale, he diminishes it. He spends forty-two-odd chapters of whalelore trying to pigeonhole a murderous freak of nature as just another ornery sperm whale. Succeeding would strip away its soul and rob it of its mythic power. Scientific inquiry is just as much a weapon against the white whale as a literal harpoon, since in Ishmael's mind the whale's terrifying invincibility assumes both physical and spiritual dimensions. Moreover I don't think it's Moby Dick that older-narrator-Ishmael cares so much about anymore. Moby Dick himself barely appears at all, and the pursuit of him is Ahab's goal and not the Pequod's crew's until close to the end. The fact that Ishmael is reflecting on (and possibly making up stuff about) the crew and Ahab suggests that, as his partial encyclopedia on whales is his unfinished and unfinishable attempt to understand the whale on a physical and spiritual level, his story of the ill-fated voyage is his unfinished and unfinishable attempt to understand man in the same way. Or if not man then definitely Ahab, because just about everything Ishmael says about the inability to get into the whale's head or soul and understand it in spite of everything one can see on the surface applies just as much to the captain. What Moby Dick is to Ahab and what Ahab wants seem so simple, but in scenes like Ahab's final conversation with Starbuck there's always hints of more to it: Chapter 132, 'The Symphony' posted:But Ahab’s glance was averted; like a blighted fruit-tree he shook, and cast his last, cindered apple to the soil.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 19:22 |
|
Ras Het posted:Isn't Atwood some sub New Yorker level housewife trash
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 19:24 |
|
Ras Het posted:Isn't Atwood some sub New Yorker level housewife trash wtf
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 20:36 |
|
I guess I was confused
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 20:39 |
|
You're thinking of John Updike
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 21:30 |
|
Ras Het posted:I guess I was confused a bit
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 21:42 |
|
I thought that the Handmaid's Tale was bad. The only interesting part were Offred's efforts to sustain herself mentally ("In the desert there is no sign that says Thou shalt not eat stones")
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 21:45 |
|
BravestOfTheLamps posted:I thought that the Handmaid's Tale was bad.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 22:24 |
|
mallamp posted:You must be WHITE MALE without A VAGINA who just MALEGAZED it through and didn't get it. You probably vote for Donald Trump too and your grandfather is secretly Hitler. Thank you for pre-emptive shouting down of radical feminists not reading this thread.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 22:35 |
|
mallamp posted:You must be WHITE MALE without A VAGINA who just MALEGAZED it through and didn't get it. You probably vote for Donald Trump too and your grandfather is secretly Hitler. That's a funny one, hombre
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 22:37 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 08:48 |
|
It does break my heart that this internet discussion forum Something Awful is so patriarchal. That registration fee for staters. Should be 7,5-8$ for women. We are all radical feminists in our hearts bro.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2016 22:42 |