|
This thread made me rewatch the prequels and I do, indeed, now enjoy them. Thanks thread! I Like Star Wars. I still found the dialogue horrible, some of the all CGI shots are flat and gently caress ugly, and the action sequences all go on too long- but I enjoyed them.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:10 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 20:07 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:Yoda picks up an entire army and brings them with him on a rescue mission for three people. The fact that they start the movie saying they can't fight a war and then end the movie fighting a war is significant. What do you think this fact means? Why are you attributing so much more thought to the consequences of this bowel movement than the guy who wrote it and made it into a movie? Are you aware that your "basically competent stoner-undergrad insight" into the breaches of logic in this movie will not net you any money? If not, I'm sorry. If so, I'm sorry. This Is Tragedy
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:16 |
|
Tezzor posted:Why are you attributing so much more thought to the consequences of this bowel movement than the guy who wrote it and made it into a movie? Are you aware that your "basically competent stoner-undergrad insight" into the breaches of logic in this movie will not net you any money? If not, I'm sorry. If so, I'm sorry. This Is Tragedy Actually, it's philistinism of the highest order to suggest that the producer, director, and writer of a movie put less effort into producing, writing, and directing it than an internet man puts into an internet post. Like, I wrote those words on the shitter. This is not even my job.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:18 |
|
Fuligin posted:This thread made me rewatch the prequels and I do, indeed, now enjoy them. Maybe then you'll fade away and not have to face the facts
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:18 |
|
Fuligin posted:This thread made me rewatch the prequels and I do, indeed, now enjoy them. Thanks thread! I Like Star Wars. I still found the dialogue horrible, some of the all CGI shots are flat and gently caress ugly, and the action sequences all go on too long- but I enjoyed them. Congrats on escaping the Star Wars fandom!
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:19 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:Actually, it's philistinism of the highest order to suggest that the producer, director, and writer of a movie put less effort into producing, writing, and directing it than an internet man puts into an internet post. Like, I wrote those words on the shitter. This is not even my job. It is not philistinism to assert that a manchild on the spectrum failed to create art without the help of others, unless you believe that The Legend of the 10 Elemental Masters by Ulilllia was the singular appreciated masterwork of our times
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:22 |
|
The thing that disappoints me more than anything else about the prequels (and the one episode of The Clone Wars I've seen) is that they were overinterested in regularizing Yoda's speech. More poetic and interesting phrasing like "Luminous beings are we!" would get chopped up into "Luminous beings, we are" in Episodes I through III. Everything he says becomes "Rest of sentence, subject verb." I don't know why they bothered, since they gave unusual speech to Jar Jar too.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:23 |
|
Tezzor posted:It is not philistinism to assert that a manchild on the spectrum failed to create art without the help of others, unless you believe that The Legend of the 10 Elemental Masters by Ulilllia was the singular appreciated masterwork of our times I am talking about the "you put more thought into this than George Lucas" meme. I promise you, I did not. Least of all in that post, which contains very basic factual observations. It takes a lot of thinking to direct a series of films, quite independently of the fact that it is a collaborative process. You seem to be unaware of this.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:26 |
|
homullus posted:The thing that disappoints me more than anything else about the prequels (and the one episode of The Clone Wars I've seen) is that they were overinterested in regularizing Yoda's speech. More poetic and interesting phrasing like "Luminous beings are we!" would get chopped up into "Luminous beings, we are" in Episodes I through III. Everything he says becomes "Rest of sentence, subject verb." I don't know why they bothered, since they gave unusual speech to Jar Jar too. Yoda gets better at
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:27 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:The dialog throughout the prequels lacks texture. To the extent that characters (excepting those with contrived affectations like Yoda) have distinctive voices, it clearly originates in the acting rather than the script. Far less characterization than could have been is delivered by this vector; many lines add little more than plot context to the emotional situation that is already plainly evident. Although the phrasing is strong and clear, it's largely graceless statements of fact. Scenes of types that are traditionally carried by dialog lack tension as a result. For example, the scene on Kamino where Obi-Wan confronts Jango badly wants to be filled with verbal sparring, double entendres, a show of wit; but instead some characters who are clearly not fooling each other tell a few perfunctory lies. You might say that the dialog reveals too much about what the characters think and feel. This is a big deal to people though. If the dialogue is real stiff and unconvincing it completely undercuts the emotional pull the films have. You care less about the characters and you're left with a movie that relies more on action sequences for enjoyment.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:28 |
|
Y Kant Ozma Diet posted:This is a big deal to people though. If the dialogue is real stiff and unconvincing it completely undercuts the emotional pull the films have. You care less about the characters and you're left with a movie that relies more on action sequences for enjoyment. Yeah, I fully understand why people don't like 'em, and the script is the biggest part of the reason why. They don't give as much to the viewer. It is more difficult to like the prequels, but it is worth it. Bongo Bill fucked around with this message at 06:32 on Jan 23, 2016 |
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:30 |
|
The Clone Wars TV show gets into the whole morality dimension and pretty much every other kind of dimension in a far more satisfying way than the movies so you can effectively skip the first two movies, watch the show, then I suppose watch ROTS though the conclusion is explained in ANH anyway. At least ROTS is a shot of Ian McDiarmid's SUPREME CHANCELLEMPEROR PALPATINE straight up your nose which is a lot better than it sounds.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:30 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:I am talking about the "you put more thought into this than George Lucas" meme. I promise you, I did not. Least of all in that post, which contains very basic factual observations. I promise you, you did. What "meme" are you referring to? Do you realize there is, in usual connotation, a difference between "a common argument, substantiated by logic and the available evidence" and a "meme," right? Why or why not?
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:34 |
|
Tezzor posted:-Not militant, actively resisting having to fight a war, actively uncomfortable fighting a war, not very good at fighting a war, by their own admission incapable of fighting a war without the army whose creation they were unaware of and not involved in, forced into the war by circumstances beyond their control The Empire Strikes Back posted:LUKE: But how am I to know the good side from the bad? Attack of the Clones posted:CLONE COMMANDER: Master Yoda, all forward positions are advancing. Revenge of the Sith posted:YODA: Into exile I must go. Failed, I have. Tezzor posted:It is not philistinism to assert that a manchild on the spectrum failed to create art without the help of others, unless you believe that The Legend of the 10 Elemental Masters by Ulilllia was the singular appreciated masterwork of our times Some pretty nice ableism there, Tezzor. Problematic as all hell, IMO. Cnut the Great fucked around with this message at 06:41 on Jan 23, 2016 |
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:36 |
|
So loving bad.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:36 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:Yeah, I fully understand why people don't like 'em, and the script is the biggest part of the reason why. They don't give as much to the viewer. It is more difficult to like the prequels, but it is worth it. It's just so frustrating to me. I like 'em but if Lucas would've had someone polish up the dialogue and characterization they'd be regarded as much better films. Also, by his own admission, Lucas isn't a the best at getting good performances out of his actors and that shows up in the prequels.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:37 |
|
Jack Gladney posted:Carrie Fisher seemed so normal in Star Wars and Blues Brothers. What happened to her after? Carrie Fisher is a cool woman with a cool dog.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:40 |
|
turtlecrunch posted:The Clone Wars TV show gets into the whole morality dimension and pretty much every other kind of dimension in a far more satisfying way than the movies so you can effectively skip the first two movies, watch the show, then I suppose watch ROTS though the conclusion is explained in ANH anyway. At least ROTS is a shot of Ian McDiarmid's SUPREME CHANCELLEMPEROR PALPATINE straight up your nose which is a lot better than it sounds. Jabba The Hutt's Previously Unknown Vaguely Gay Goofy Southern Purple Cousin With a Ridiculous Accent and An Inextinguishable Number of Owed Favors
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:41 |
|
Correct, Lucas is a poo poo writer.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:43 |
|
"I am a poo poo writer" - George Lucas
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:44 |
|
Tezzor posted:Jabba The Hutt's Previously Unknown Vaguely Gay Goofy Southern Purple Cousin With a Ridiculous Accent and An Inextinguishable Number of Owed Favors You can always use a guide to skip the rando content.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:44 |
|
Tezzor posted:"I am a poo poo writer" - George Lucas
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:49 |
|
Cnut the Great posted:The prophecy was about destroying the Sith as the cause of the imbalance. By the time of Episode III, the imbalance was already self-sustaining. It didn't need the Sith anymore. The Sith were no longer the cause. Evil was everywhere. The transformation of the Republic into the Empire was greeted with thunderous applause. A while back, but I was just going off of what Lucas said about it. Unless I was confusing what someone else said about it instead.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:51 |
|
https://web.archive.org/web/20100304190426/http:/secrethistoryofstarwars.com/marcialucas.html Lucas had re-configured much of The Star Wars for his second draft, completed in January of 1975. He had finally come up with the basic backbone of the film--the heroic journey of farmboy Luke Starkiller--but his characterisation and dialogue were arguably even worse than his first draft. Lucas, however, acknowledged that he was a poor writer, and sought the guidance of others. "I'm not a good writer," he says in 1974. "It's very, very hard for me. I don't feel I have a natural talent for it...When I sit down I bleed on the page, and it's just awful." [xlix] He had attempted to hire writers for every one of his previous films, but experience taught him a different technique--he would listen to the suggestions others had, but write the words himself. Marcia [his wife-Tezzor], along with many of George's friends, critiqued which characters worked, which ones didn't, which scenes were good, and Lucas composed the script in this way. Marcia was always critical of Star Wars, but she was one of the few people Lucas listened to carefully, knowing she had a skill for carving out strong characters. Often, she was a voice of reason, giving him the bad news he secretly suspected--"I'm real hard," she says, "but I only tell him what he already knows." [l] Pollock notes, "Marcia's faith never waivered--she was at once George's most severe critic and most ardent supporter. She wasn't afraid to say she didn't understand something in Star Wars or to point out the sections that bored her." [li] She kept her husband down to earth and reminded him of the need to have an emotional through-line in the film. Mark Hamill remembers: "She was really the warmth and heart of those films, a good person he could talk to, bounce ideas off of." [lii]
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:53 |
|
Okay.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:54 |
|
That directly contradicts the idea that Lucas is the type of person who doesn't put any thought or effort into his work.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 06:57 |
|
http://www.markhamill.com/archive/kpla.htmquote:Mark: ‘The thing is, what is amazing about Harrison is like I was over there for a couple-three weeks. And then Harrison comes along and, up until then, I’m the only American there. My first movie, all these things going on. And then, finally, you have somebody that comes in that you can bounce ideas off of. I mean, not me... he had total.... He came in with amazing things in his own mind about the film. And I was just- I was literally doing every comma, every period, every semi-colon. And in comes Harrison, he’s got big speeches crossed out in the script with arrows. With lines written out.’
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:00 |
|
No-one ever provides specific examples of bad writing.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:04 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:The dialog throughout the prequels lacks texture. To the extent that characters (excepting those with contrived affectations like Yoda) have distinctive voices, it clearly originates in the acting rather than the script. Far less characterization than could have been is delivered by this vector; many lines add little more than plot context to the emotional situation that is already plainly evident. Although the phrasing is strong and clear, it's largely graceless statements of fact. Scenes of types that are traditionally carried by dialog lack tension as a result. For example, the scene on Kamino where Obi-Wan confronts Jango badly wants to be filled with verbal sparring, double entendres, a show of wit; but instead some characters who are clearly not fooling each other tell a few perfunctory lies. You might say that the dialog reveals too much about what the characters think and feel. One of the things that bugged me the most about the prequels' writing, even in my recent rewatch where I found way more to enjoy about them than I ever had before, was the jokes. Not that there were jokes and comic relief in the first place, since that's always been part of Star Wars ("Trouble with your droid?") and it seems especially important in the prequels (the various conflicts Palpatine is phantom menacing having farcical elements seems very appropriate), but that most of the jokes just didn't land. TFA had a lot of pretty funny lines delivered with wit and charisma; the prequels had deathsticks and a space horse farting in Jar Jar's face.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:06 |
|
quote:Harrison: ‘But George would often not notice that there was any changes made...’ Yikes
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:08 |
|
The deathsticks joke is amazing and I will fight you if you say otherwise It's also hilariously on-point with the interpretation of the Jedi Order as incompetent and overly attached to the Republic. Rather than doing anything about the environment that led to Sleazebaggano trying to sell 'deathsticks' to Obi-Wan, he just tells him to go home and not do drugs. It's so '90s it hurts. ("Winners don't do drugs!")
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:18 |
|
You can actually witness a bit of the Harrison process at work here, though this was by the time of the third film. It's practically like Ford was directing the scene, down to the specifics of how to make jokes land.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:18 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:The Jedi live in a spacious palace just down the street from the Senate and towering over the slums of a densely-packed city. The robes they wear, ostensibly symbols of voluntary poverty, are made of noticeably finer materials than the coarse-spun ones that actual farmers wear. They openly plot a coup d'etat to preemptively protect the Jedi Order from the political repercussions if they should move against the Chancellor. The war begins with Jedi-led clones invading the droids' homeworld. The villains' goal is to secede from the Republic, which even you can see has problems. The north had problems; the answer to those problems was not to allow slaveowners sovereignty. We were right to go to war in reality, and the movie peoples were right to go to war over the decadent and unproductive tradesmen who's most notable quality is the mass exploitation of a "sub-race" for all labor needs. The fact that their lincoln happened to be Evil Space Lincoln is a strike against Abraham Von Dracula, not the war. Clones are heroes my friend.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:22 |
|
Neurolimal posted:The north had problems; the answer to those problems was not to allow slaveowners sovereignty. We were right to go to war in reality, and the movie peoples were right to go to war over the decadent and unproductive tradesmen who's most notable quality is the mass exploitation of a "sub-race" for all labor needs. The fact that their lincoln happened to be Evil Space Lincoln is a strike against Abraham Von Dracula, not the war. I was merely pointing out the factual errors in the quoted post (specifically, that the antagonists had no clear motivation). Bongo Bill fucked around with this message at 07:29 on Jan 23, 2016 |
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:24 |
|
Empress Theonora posted:One of the things that bugged me the most about the prequels' writing, even in my recent rewatch where I found way more to enjoy about them than I ever had before, was the jokes. Not that there were jokes and comic relief in the first place, since that's always been part of Star Wars ("Trouble with your droid?") and it seems especially important in the prequels (the various conflicts Palpatine is phantom menacing having farcical elements seems very appropriate), but that most of the jokes just didn't land. TFA had a lot of pretty funny lines delivered with wit and charisma; the prequels had deathsticks and a space horse farting in Jar Jar's face. That's one of those situations like "I thought Anakin is supposed to be really cool and likeable, so why does he commit genocide?" The answer is that the presumption is wrong. The death-sticks scene isn't 'supposed to be' funny because it's not a funny scene. It's a rather uncomfortable scene where Obiwan just casually ruins the life of a lowly drug dealer. It's a counterpart of the scene in A New Hope where he just unthinkingly dismembers the alien guy in the cantina. "You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy." Really, Obiwan? Nearly all the 'lighthearted comedy' in Episode 2 is tinged with this darkness, while actual the comedy is in the 'serious' combat and romance scenes. I recall, earlier in one of these threads, someone complaining that Yoda's swordfight is so goofy that it's almost like it's supposed to be funny(!). In fact, he was horrified that the audience in his theatre was laughing at what was 'obviously supposed to be' a very serious and dramatic fight scene. SuperMechagodzilla fucked around with this message at 07:33 on Jan 23, 2016 |
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:30 |
|
Its pretty interesting how their wildly different approaches to their scripts helped sculpt their characters; Harrison's penchant for brevity helped sell Han as rogueish and street-smart, while Hamill's respect for the scriptwriter resulted in Luke's longer and more descriptive dialogue helping to sell him as a hopeful and idealistic farmboy constantly impressed by the world around him. Harrison's naturalist approach made the character feel perfect in the lived-in world of Star Wars, while Hamill's inclusion of lengthy script muck helped fulfill his role as the out-of-his-depth viewer insert. I wonder if and when Harrison stopped doing this, since there's a very noticable point where he seems to just stop giving a poo poo and playing awkward roles (with TFA being a return-to-norm)
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:32 |
|
Empress Theonora posted:One of the things that bugged me the most about the prequels' writing, even in my recent rewatch where I found way more to enjoy about them than I ever had before, was the jokes. Not that there were jokes and comic relief in the first place, since that's always been part of Star Wars ("Trouble with your droid?") and it seems especially important in the prequels (the various conflicts Palpatine is phantom menacing having farcical elements seems very appropriate), but that most of the jokes just didn't land. TFA had a lot of pretty funny lines delivered with wit and charisma; the prequels had deathsticks and a space horse farting in Jar Jar's face. To be fair, Obi's "go home and be a family man" bit with the drug pusher was amusing and managed some comedic timing. Which is probably why it was one of the more parodied bits during AOTC's prominence. Other than that the jokes were...eyerollworthy at best.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:35 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:
One of my favorite little visual things in the prequels is how Obi-wan and Yoda wear outfits that are superficially similar to the robes they wear in the OT, but they're finely tailored and layered and made of fancier fabrics. I'd wear a dress made out of whatever Yoda's prequel robes are made of (well, beyond 'computer magic'. But by Episode III the CGI fabric was looking quite nice.) Some prequel criticisms I've seen (RLM, maybe? I certainly don't feel like sitting through those things again) completely miss that and complain about how just because Obi-wan wore robes similar to everyone else on Tatooine doesn't mean the Jedi in the prequels should all wear the same robes like they're a uniform. They aren't the same robes at all.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:36 |
|
Or maybe they are the same robes, and the rough experience of living in solitude and contemplating self-reflection is reflected on the transition from magic silky cgi robes to ragged old robes of the OT It's still pretty silly that all the jedi wear the same robes and weapons. Life must be hell for the legless alien dudes who have to drag around three feet of heavy robes and balance on one hand while swinging an oversized death stick at peoples' ankles.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:41 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 20:07 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:It's a counterpart of the scene in A New Hope where he just unthinkingly dismembers the alien guy in the cantina. "You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy." Really, Obiwan? The people in the Catina were haters. Obi-Wan was almost instantly proven right when that pig face and his homie got in Lukes grill and started poo poo. Obi-Wan stepped up and saved his homeboys skin.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 07:47 |