Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe

TheKingofSprings posted:

When does Mace do it?

Think about what the dark side really means.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

Tezzor posted:

The evil lizard man who is the supreme military commander of the enemy forces who thinks Jedi are scum for no delineated reason, and an evil red and black Sith with horns and dark magic who wants revenge against the Jedi for some unclear slight, probably destroying their evil cult many centuries previously: The Common Man, With Motivations For Hating The Jedi We Can Understand

It took you at least two tries to write a post where you do a half-assed job of dodging someone contradicting you. That's pitiful and you should make aaliyah to GBS instead of posting further in this thread.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

TheKingofSprings posted:

When does Mace do it?

He intends to kill Palpatine, which is Star Wars parlance for "dark side". "I can feel your anger. I am defenseless. Take your weapon, strike me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the Dark Side will be complete" etc etc.

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



Effectronica posted:

Going back to sci-fi from the pulps, if you look at, say, Galactic Patrol and contrast how it treats the Boskonians to how the prequels treat the droid army, you can see a world of difference. The Star Wars movies as a whole have a lot more focus on the villains as people than genre cinema, or genre fiction more generally, does. You can trace this to the whole Apollo/Dionysus notion, which requires accepting both the rational and emotional. So in The Force Awakens, what we see is that the Rebels failed to acknowledge and incorporate the Empire, and that Luke failed to acknowledge and incorporate the dark. So this produces yet another Star War, but at the same time, the movie appears to endorse the idea of permanently annihilating the pesky, untidy parts of the personality. This is probably not what will actually be what is endorsed in the end, but the fanbase is taking away the idea that the goal is to slaughter the First Order rather than reintegrate them.

I agree with all of this. It makes me think - If Kylo does get a redemption arc, and there's a team up (against Snoke, presumably), is the answer to destroy him? He's presented in TFA as a persuasive liar. If the final integration (Republic/Resistance/First Order) happens is the answer to leave him alive, but everyone just stops listening to him? That would be pretty cool. If he has to die you could do it like Saruman in LotR, and have an abused Hux turn on him.

Tezzor posted:

The people Donald Trump and Hitler convinced people are bad are people there was pre-existing resentment and hatred towards. I do not see any evidence in these movies that the common man hates the Jedi, or should have any particular reason to hate the Jedi, who I am told for over a thousand generations were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Even with these pre-existing bigotries, Donald Trump does not advocate the army killing summarily executing all Mexicans in America no matter where they are or what they are doing, including the children. If he did this as President and told everybody that he had to because the Mexicans were all planning to overthrow the government and also they were the ones who died his skin red and screwed horns into his head, everybody would not believe him.

The Jedi took on the role of military command. Their power and influence was thereby increased. Palpatine says the military tried to depose him as the war ended, they were afraid of losing their newfound power. Military coups happen. You don't have to "hate the military" to believe that the leadership could revolt in such a way. In fact, the common soldiers would all tell the civilians the same story about how the Jedi turned on them! It's not particularly elegant or intricate storytelling, but it makes internal sense. The people who don't buy it (or know it's a lie) become the Rebellion.

Prolonged Panorama fucked around with this message at 05:35 on Feb 18, 2017

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Mechafunkzilla posted:

He intends to kill Palpatine, which is Star Wars parlance for "dark side". "I can feel your anger. I am defenseless. Take your weapon, strike me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the Dark Side will be complete" etc etc.

That's reasonable, seems like there aren't too many other options available when a guy can shoot lightning from his hands though, that's a little hard to disarm...without, y'know, actually disarming him.

Actually, what was Luke's gameplan if Vader didn't throw Palpatine down the reactor shaft when he confronted him?

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Prolonged Priapism posted:

As an aside, forcibly and immediately deporting ~11 million people from the US would indeed be a death sentence to a substantial fraction of them, even if they're not being shot on sight.

Not that the US doesn't already fund doing that in the country immediately south.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

TheKingofSprings posted:

That's reasonable, seems like there aren't too many other options available when a guy can shoot lightning from his hands though, that's a little hard to disarm...without, y'know, actually disarming him.

Actually, what was Luke's gameplan if Vader didn't throw Palpatine down the reactor shaft when he confronted him?

Luke was ready to die. Him killing the Emperor had no bearing on the fleet blowing up the Death Star II.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

TheKingofSprings posted:



Actually, what was Luke's gameplan if Vader didn't throw Palpatine down the reactor shaft when he confronted him?

Die.

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Mechafunkzilla posted:

He intends to kill Palpatine, which is Star Wars parlance for "dark side". "I can feel your anger. I am defenseless. Take your weapon, strike me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the Dark Side will be complete" etc etc.

Actually wait, now that I'm thinking about this again, Yoda and Obi-Wan were encouraging him to kill Vader. Were they on the dark side when they did that?


Mechafunkzilla posted:

Luke was ready to die. Him killing the Emperor had no bearing on the fleet blowing up the Death Star II.

Does that mean any of the people in the fleet about to blow up the Death Star II and kill thousands of people were also headed to the Dark Side then? Or is it the mindset you have when you kill that defines whether or not you're on the Dark Side then?

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib
I think that Luke's initial belief was that he could provoke the Emperor into attacking him.

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Yaws posted:

Eh, I dunno about some of these.


Realistically, what are they supposed to do about slavery? Start a slave insurrection?

They're supposed to be a force for justice in the galaxy, right? Why the Hell not? At least TRY to do something instead of saying "welp, that's not our jurisdiction."

Of course it's also not so much what they're supposed to do now as the fact that they let it get to this state in the first place. Slaves in the Outer Rim territories, merchant princes with their own private armies, droid abuse everywhere, clearly the Republic has let a lot of problems go unaddressed.

This is traditionally how tragedy works. The good guys are brought down by their own flaws, not just because other people are bastards.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

TheKingofSprings posted:

Actually wait, now that I'm thinking about this again, Yoda and Obi-Wan were encouraging him to kill Vader. Were they on the dark side when they did that?


Does that mean any of the people in the fleet about to blow up the Death Star II and kill thousands of people were also headed to the Dark Side then? Or is it the mindset you have when you kill that defines whether or not you're on the Dark Side then?

Yoda and Obi-Wan's philosophy is that it's okay to kill as long as you do so without emotion. Which is kind of messed up.

But basically, there's a lot in the films -- even the OT -- that suggests the "dark side" distinction is kind of bullshit.

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe

TheKingofSprings posted:

Actually wait, now that I'm thinking about this again, Yoda and Obi-Wan were encouraging him to kill Vader. Were they on the dark side when they did that?


Does that mean any of the people in the fleet about to blow up the Death Star II and kill thousands of people were also headed to the Dark Side then? Or is it the mindset you have when you kill that defines whether or not you're on the Dark Side then?

No offense but you seem to be trying to think about this in the way the game kotor determines your side of the force.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

SHISHKABOB posted:

No offense but you seem to be trying to think about this in the way the game kotor determines your side of the force.

Speaking of which I tried playing KOTOR II recently because it was recommended to me. Early on I got "Dark Side points" for using sarcastic dialogue options, which gave me a good laugh.

Shortly thereafter I uninstalled it because it was super boring.

No Dignity
Oct 15, 2007

TheKingofSprings posted:


Does that mean any of the people in the fleet about to blow up the Death Star II and kill thousands of people were also headed to the Dark Side then? Or is it the mindset you have when you kill that defines whether or not you're on the Dark Side then?

I'd say it's the mindset. If Luke were the real hero who transcended the division of the light/dark side he'd have struck down Palpatine without malice out of compassion and solidarity with the rebels. As it is he's a simple lad and can't take that ethical leap and it's left to Vader to do the dirty work with a clean conscience

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

A Steampunk Gent posted:

I'd say it's the mindset. If Luke were the real hero who transcended the division of the light/dark side he'd have struck down Palpatine without malice out of compassion and solidarity with the rebels. As it is he's a simple lad and can't take that ethical leap and it's left to Vader to do the dirty work with a clean conscience

People may also be forgetting that Luke does grab his lightsaber and try to kill the Emperor (in anger!) once his sister is mentioned, Vader just blocks him.

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



TheKingofSprings posted:

Actually wait, now that I'm thinking about this again, Yoda and Obi-Wan were encouraging him to kill Vader. Were they on the dark side when they did that?

There's two ideas - that Yoda and Obi-Wan are advocating this, and are wrong to do so, and Luke finds the third/middle way in defiance of them. Or, since they never explicitly say he needs to kill him, that they were disappointed in Luke's jump to that conclusion, but could not tell him that the answer was compassion - he had to find out for himself, or fail.

TheKingofSprings posted:

Does that mean any of the people in the fleet about to blow up the Death Star II and kill thousands of people were also headed to the Dark Side then? Or is it the mindset you have when you kill that defines whether or not you're on the Dark Side then?

This is true. It's like in Bushido, you can kill an enemy, but only as an avatar of the state, or of justice. If your enemy spits on you, making you angry at him, killing him would be immoral - you've let it become personal. But yes, sometimes doing battle is the right thing to do.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Mechafunkzilla posted:

People may also be forgetting that Luke does grab his lightsaber and try to kill the Emperor (in anger!) once his sister is mentioned, Vader just blocks him.

No he goes crazy on vader. Vader mentions Leia.

Or Im not remembering.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

euphronius posted:

No he goes crazy on vader. Vader mentions Leia.

Or Im not remembering.

Oh, yeah, you're right about who mentions Leia -- but Luke still does try to kill the Emperor when he's being taunted. He does exactly what the Emperor tells him to do up until the point where he spares Vader.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIJFDGCg_sc

Mechafunkzilla fucked around with this message at 02:41 on Jan 24, 2016

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

Prolonged Priapism posted:

There's two ideas - that Yoda and Obi-Wan are advocating this, and are wrong to do so, and Luke finds the third/middle way in defiance of them. Or, since they never explicitly say he needs to kill him, that they were disappointed in Luke's jump to that conclusion, but could not tell him that the answer was compassion - he had to find out for himself, or fail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8uDQuWlnww&t=120s

Obi-Wan flat out says it's over if Luke can't kill Vader so he at least is advocating it.

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



You're right. Luke initially tried to kill Palpatine after Palps reveals that the whole setup was a trap, that the fleet is doomed, and that the shield generator is too well defended to be taken out. All his friends will die, and it was always the plan to have him here to watch it, impotently. It's at this moment that Luke turns away in mock stoic acceptance, then whirls around, Force grabs his saber, and tried to chop him in half. It was clearly done in anger.

He hides from Vader midway through their fight, and freaks out on him when he senses the truth about Leia and suggests turning her instead. It's after disarming Vader that he pulls back and decides he's done fighting once and for all.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

:v:

homullus
Mar 27, 2009

Yaws posted:

What do you mean when you call people OP?

Tezzor resorts to claims of argument imbalance -- that Cnut the Great is Over-Powered (OP) -- when his arguments are repeatedly destroyed.

Tezzor
Jul 29, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
If The Force Awakens was a prequel movie whether or not Finn and Rey involve themselves in the plot makes no difference because a character behind the scenes is directing everything, so if they had just stayed home there would be no difference in the major events of the story

Tezzor fucked around with this message at 02:50 on Jan 24, 2016

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



TheKingofSprings posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8uDQuWlnww&t=120s

Obi-Wan flat out says it's over if Luke can't kill Vader so he at least is advocating it.

The alternate interpretation would be that Obi-Wan is saying that the Emperor has already won if that's all Luke can think to do. He's disappointed that Luke instinctively frames "face Darth Vader" as "kill your father." Luke thinks the question is: "are you ready to kill your father, yes/no?" but the answer is to reject the form of the question: "mu." The guru (Obi-Wan) can't reveal that, though. Luke has to learn it himself.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

Prolonged Priapism posted:

The alternate interpretation would be that Obi-Wan is saying that the Emperor has already won if that's all Luke can think to do. He's disappointed that Luke instinctively frames "face Darth Vader" as "kill your father." Luke thinks the question is: "are you ready to kill your father, yes/no?" but the answer is to reject the form of the question: "mu." The guru (Obi-Wan) can't reveal that, though. Luke has to learn it himself.

I also like that Obi-Wan's advice is for Luke to "bury his feelings deep down." Sounds healthy!

Of course, Luke rejects this, and it's his emotions that allow him to overcome and eventually redeem Vader.

Mechafunkzilla fucked around with this message at 02:51 on Jan 24, 2016

turtlecrunch
May 14, 2013

Hesitation is defeat.

TheKingofSprings posted:

And Darth Maul's back and cool in it.

Actually he's still not cool sorry.
However his homeworld is ooper dooper spooky. :gonk:

edit: Savage Oppress :smug:

turtlecrunch fucked around with this message at 02:54 on Jan 24, 2016

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Tezzor posted:

If The Force Awakens was a prequel movie the whether or not Finn and Rey involve themselves in the plot makes no difference because a character behind the scenes is directing everything, so if they had just stayed home there would be no difference in the major events of the story

How precisely is Palpatine supposed to engineer his ascension to the throne, hm? You think he just strolls into the Senate and says "nah, this ain't doin' it for me"?

Are you now literally arguing against the archetype of the villain with a grand master plan?

Tezzor
Jul 29, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
I think it is probably a good idea to bury your feelings deep down, for the duration of your confrontation with two dark wizards who can and do access sensitive information by reading your emotions

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



Mechafunkzilla posted:

I also like that Obi-Wan's advice is for Luke to "bury his feelings deep down." Sounds healthy!

Yeah personally I think Obi-Wan is advocating killing. He wants Luke to become the emotionless avatar of justice (killing Vader and the Emperor), unlike him and his failure in his fight with Anakin, where he won but was too emotional to finish the job. He doesn't consider that he could have nursed Anakin back to health, and maybe redeemed him.

"[Your feelings] do you credit, but they could be made to serve the Emperor." Or, what Obi-Wan doesn't consider, Luke could master his feelings and use them for good, which is what he does.

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe

Tezzor posted:

I think it is probably a good idea to bury your feelings deep down, for the duration of your confrontation with two dark wizards who can and do access sensitive information by reading your emotions

Luke should have done this, then things wouldn't have ended so horribly for everyone. Hmm wait.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

Tezzor posted:

I think it is probably a good idea to bury your feelings deep down, for the duration of your confrontation with two dark wizards who can and do access sensitive information by reading your emotions

Can't say I'm surprised that this is what you took away from that. The two posters above me get it.

Remember, Obi-Wan is the guy who basically tries to radicalize Luke by purposefully getting killed by Vader right in front of him.

Mechafunkzilla fucked around with this message at 03:02 on Jan 24, 2016

TheKingofSprings
Oct 9, 2012

turtlecrunch posted:

Actually he's still not cool sorry.
However his homeworld is ooper dooper spooky. :gonk:

edit: Savage Oppress :smug:

I'm sorry dude he gets a really cool lightsaber, you're wrong

Tezzor
Jul 29, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
I think the reason I hate the prequel movies so much is that if you assume the events in them actually happened it makes the actions of characters in the OT sillier and less comprehensible. Vader is obvious, but Obi-Wan is a big one, too. Obi-Wan talking wistfully about how "Annie was a good friend" ceases to make any sense. I would not look back on my relationship with Anakin Skywalker with any fondness. I would think about him more like the fictional roommate I had in college who I had some fun times with but was always kind of an rear end in a top hat who lied to me all the time, who later became a Neo-Nazi, caved in his girlfriend's head with a blender, and is doing life upstate. If I thought about him at all 20 years later I would think "what a piece of poo poo that guy was" and not "Mikey was a good friend."

turtlecrunch
May 14, 2013

Hesitation is defeat.

TheKingofSprings posted:

I'm sorry dude he gets a really cool lightsaber, you're wrong

Hmmm you make a convincing argument

ungulateman
Apr 18, 2012

pretentious fuckwit who isn't half as literate or insightful or clever as he thinks he is
Obi-Wan has two friends. One of them owns a diner and they like to have conversations about how stupid droids are, in front of the droid staff. The other is Anakin.

Obi-Wan does not have good friends.

Yaws
Oct 23, 2013

Tezzor posted:

I think the reason I hate the prequel movies so much is that if you assume the events in them actually happened it makes the actions of characters in the OT sillier and less comprehensible. Vader is obvious, but Obi-Wan is a big one, too. Obi-Wan talking wistfully about how "Annie was a good friend" ceases to make any sense. I would not look back on my relationship with Anakin Skywalker with any fondness. I would think about him more like the fictional roommate I had in college who I had some fun times with but was always kind of an rear end in a top hat who lied to me all the time, who later became a Neo-Nazi, caved in his girlfriend's head with a blender, and is doing life upstate. If I thought about him at all 20 years later I would think "what a piece of poo poo that guy was" and not "Mikey was a good friend."

The PT also forces you to think of Hayden Christiansin in the Vader suit. And then the SE puts him RotJ as a painful reminder of the prequels.

That suit must help Anakin emote because James Earl Jones acts circles around Hayden.

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

Tezzor posted:

I think the reason I hate the prequel movies so much is that if you assume the events in them actually happened it makes the actions of characters in the OT sillier and less comprehensible. Vader is obvious, but Obi-Wan is a big one, too. Obi-Wan talking wistfully about how "Annie was a good friend" ceases to make any sense. I would not look back on my relationship with Anakin Skywalker with any fondness. I would think about him more like the fictional roommate I had in college who I had some fun times with but was always kind of an rear end in a top hat who lied to me all the time, who later became a Neo-Nazi, caved in his girlfriend's head with a blender, and is doing life upstate. If I thought about him at all 20 years later I would think "what a piece of poo poo that guy was" and not "Mikey was a good friend."

This is a much, much better post than you've been making so thanks for that. You're actually thinking about why you dislike the films rather than accusing people who enjoyed them of being insincere.

Personally, I found the subtext of Obi-Wan's guilt-borne delusion to be there even without the prequels. He is, after all, someone who "buries his feelings deep down", to the point that he can barely reconcile Vader and Anakin being the same person.

Prolonged Panorama
Dec 21, 2007
Holy hookrat Sally smoking crack in the alley!



I just figured something out, the cut between Obi-Wan saying "they could be made to serve the Emperor" and the majestic establishing shot of the Rebel Fleet (which we're seeing for the first time) always sort of bothered me. The music swells from ambivalent horns to pompous Rebel March. It's cool looking (and sounding), but I always felt some unease. It's because "they could be made to serve the Emperor" applies just as well to the fleet, which is in the process of executing the Emperor's plan and falling in to his trap! It's a neat cut.

Tezzor posted:

I think the reason I hate the prequel movies so much is that if you assume the events in them actually happened it makes the actions of characters in the OT sillier and less comprehensible. Vader is obvious, but Obi-Wan is a big one, too. Obi-Wan talking wistfully about how "Annie was a good friend" ceases to make any sense. I would not look back on my relationship with Anakin Skywalker with any fondness. I would think about him more like the fictional roommate I had in college who I had some fun times with but was always kind of an rear end in a top hat who lied to me all the time, who later became a Neo-Nazi, caved in his girlfriend's head with a blender, and is doing life upstate. If I thought about him at all 20 years later I would think "what a piece of poo poo that guy was" and not "Mikey was a good friend."

You're missing the context of their relationship. Obi-Wan basically adopted Anakin at age 9. He's his surrogate father for ten or twelve years. Anakin is rebellious, but mostly tries to live up to Obi-Wan's expectations. He is a very gifted student and in many ways is beyond his teacher. They save each other's lives multiple times.

Parents don't usually think of their wayward children as "pieces of poo poo." They say things like "I wish I could have helped him more. He was such a good kid, he could be so kind. I wish I could go back and do a better job, see the signs earlier, get him help. For his victims, and for him. I'm so sorry." They feel guilt and sorrow over what they feel was their responsibility, not hatred for a person they think they failed.

Prolonged Panorama fucked around with this message at 03:25 on Jan 24, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

piratepilates
Mar 28, 2004

So I will learn to live with it. Because I can live with it. I can live with it.



Mechafunkzilla posted:

that he can barely reconcile Vader and Anakin being the same person.

Can you blame him.

  • Locked thread