Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
homeowner | 39 | 22.41% | |
renter | 69 | 39.66% | |
stupid peace of poo poo | 66 | 37.93% | |
Total: | 174 votes |
|
Exclamation Marx posted:Wellington owns
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 20:46 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 05:19 |
|
Jacobin posted:For some reason computer posted twice. Ask if he can come over here, we haven't had a proper left-wing government since the Reagan years.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:19 |
|
Exclamation Marx posted:Wellington owns After signing the tppa it'll only be renting though.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 21:37 |
|
WarpedNaba posted:Ask if he can come over here, we haven't had a proper left-wing government since the Reagan years. I don't think anyone in the Anglo-Saxon political realm has.
|
# ? Jan 23, 2016 22:34 |
|
I doubt I'll convince anyone, but Christchurch is an exciting place to live. With the whole city undergoing an, albeit way too slow, regeneration, there's always something new that just been finished. Better than that though is the lingering feeling of actual community that formed during the quakes. I've lived in NZ all my life, small and big centres, but I'd never experienced anything like what followed 2011. The residing effect is obviously more muted than it was directly following the quakes, but it manifests in people who are just so much more engaged and interested in the city in general. If the rebuild wasn't such a shambles I would genuinely recommend people come and get involved.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 00:10 |
|
Looks like we're in for 5 more years of National at leastquote:Prime Minister John Key says he will lead New Zealand for "as long as the party and the public want me", after confirming he plans to run for a fourth term. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/76203309/John-Key-I-ll-stay-Prime-Minister-as-long-as-New-Zealand-wants-me?cid=app-android
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 06:55 |
|
Lancelot posted:Wellington is city built for people rather than cars. Auckland is really underdeveloped in the CBD, to the extent that any road that isn't one of the main streets (Queen, High, Karangahape) is really dreary and horrible to walk along. The University is right next to a four-lane highway that you have to cross to get the bus. In Wellington the whole city, from Cuba across to the Beehive, is full of interesting cafes and stores even when you turn down side-streets you haven't seen before. You're right, Waterloo Quay is in no way just a wind tunnel of road and buildings. And the streets of Wellington certainly weren't massive and wide enough to hold a V8 Supercar race in the CBD, something that Auckland never managed.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 07:00 |
|
fong posted:Looks like we're in for 5 more years of National at least Cut my god drat face off with a hatchet
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 07:13 |
|
I mean, this is hardly a surprise
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 07:35 |
|
John Key to New Zealand: I will leave my dick in for as long as you're sucking it.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 07:40 |
|
Butt Wizard posted:You're right, Waterloo Quay is in no way just a wind tunnel of road and buildings. And the streets of Wellington certainly weren't massive and wide enough to hold a V8 Supercar race in the CBD, something that Auckland never managed. Can't beat Waterloo Quay on a good day.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 08:55 |
|
Butt Wizard posted:You're right, Waterloo Quay is in no way just a wind tunnel of road and buildings. And the streets of Wellington certainly weren't massive and wide enough to hold a V8 Supercar race in the CBD, something that Auckland never managed. Don't walk along Waterloo quay you dumb berk, the waterfront is just over there and is a beautiful pedestrian-highway
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:13 |
|
lol just lol at all you idiots who don't understand why a channel would be targeted to men and get all up in arms about sexism about it
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:18 |
|
puchu posted:lol just lol at all you idiots who don't understand why a channel would be targeted to men and get all up in arms about sexism about it man = bad
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:19 |
|
puchu posted:lol just lol at all you idiots who don't understand why a channel would be targeted to men and get all up in arms about sexism about it The free market is a beautiful thing, I agree.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:22 |
|
BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:man = bad Hmm but this is true El Pollo Blanco posted:The free market is a beautiful thing, I agree. Are you loving retarded
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:23 |
|
'Guhhh I hate how TVNZ tries to make more money by targetting the higher margin audience and I definitely don't want that money going back to the Government' - you, a big idiot who does not sign their posts
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:25 |
|
puchu posted:'Guhhh I hate how TVNZ tries to make more money by targetting the higher margin audience and I definitely don't want that money going back to the Government' - you, a big idiot who does not sign their posts Oh my god you mean they're trying to make money from it? I really thought they just hated women. I'm glad you've enlightened me
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:32 |
|
targeting a TV channel at one group means you hate the other
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:35 |
|
fong posted:Oh my god you mean they're trying to make money from it? I really thought they just hated women. I'm glad you've enlightened me http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3694733&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=179 please see page of people unironically saying that or perhaps they are doing it ironically and just being unfunny
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:36 |
|
puchu posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3694733&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=179 please see page of people unironically saying that or perhaps they are doing it ironically and just being unfunny So if something is done for profit it can't be sexist?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:39 |
|
pooshoes please push my "no loving reality shows" channel to your higher ups
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:39 |
|
fong posted:So if something is done for profit it can't be sexist? It's not sexist, it's putting dumb poo poo that males skew more towards on to a single channel much like how sky made a sci fi channel for virgin nerds. That way people who watch tv feel that they have more choice even though it's still the same poo poo shovelled at them, and tv networks can jack prices up. If you look at the current FTA channels it's % wise more viewed by females compared to males. Why put out another channel for females? BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:pooshoes please push my "no loving reality shows" channel to your higher ups I don't work in the industry any more :coolshark:
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:46 |
|
Where the hell did :coolshark: go
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 11:47 |
|
puchu posted:It's not sexist, it's putting dumb poo poo that males skew more towards on to a single channel much like how sky made a sci fi channel for virgin nerds. That way people who watch tv feel that they have more choice even though it's still the same poo poo shovelled at them, and tv networks can jack prices up. If you look at the current FTA channels it's % wise more viewed by females compared to males. Why put out another channel for females? You're still just saying "it will probably work". Like, no poo poo, this is basically a moot point. The problem is that TV is already very male dominated despite % viewers so another channel just for men is lovely. That's why people were eye rolling at the idea.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 12:02 |
|
puchu posted:'Guhhh I hate how TVNZ tries to make more money by targetting the higher margin audience and I definitely don't want that money going back to the Government' - you, a big idiot who does not sign their posts Isn't the annual payment TVNZ makes to the government considerably less than the ~$16 million of MCH funding TVNZ gets each year? I am probably wrong but I am a big dumb idiot so whatever.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 12:31 |
|
Yes, but that's kind of expected from a publicly funded channel. The real issue is that their mandate to produce television has been reduced to "make a profit" instead of producing culturally important television that won't be privately funded, and then they siphon as much of that profit off in the form of bonuses and kickbacks before handing a withered cheque back to the government with a wink.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 13:08 |
Reminder that Puchu was wrong and dumb about all the tv3 stuff as well.
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 20:28 |
|
All I can think about a TVNZ man channel is "But Sky Sport already exists" It isn't as if they are now going to be able to outbid Sky for the popular men's sports. Instead we will be left with whatever some exec at TVNZ thinks blokey blokey kiwi men want to watch that isn't sport. It is going to be cringe worthy terrible.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 20:45 |
|
I don't even have a tv
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 20:48 |
|
no one cared when that car-show based channel popped up on sky
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 20:54 |
|
There's a car-show channel on Sky?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 21:24 |
|
Vagabundo posted:There's a car-show channel on Sky? Yeah. It's called "Revved" or "Amped" or something equally obvious and dumb.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 21:28 |
|
Is it just wall to wall Top Gear reruns?
|
# ? Jan 24, 2016 21:38 |
|
I just don't see what the Mannel has to offer that isn't available elsewhere. It kind of seems like a desperate grasp for TV to stay relevant in the internet age. EDIT: Maybe they're planning on hiring Clarkson to be the face of the Mannel.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 06:16 |
|
puchu posted:lol just lol at all you idiots who don't understand why a channel would be targeted to men and get all up in arms about sexism about it I'm mad because we can already stream porn 24/7, this seems like very poor market research was put into it.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 06:58 |
|
The Rabbi T. White posted:Yeah. It's called "Revved" or "Amped" or something equally obvious and dumb. It's called Turbo. And there are about three shows worth watching and the rest are all American Chopper rip offs.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 07:03 |
|
Laverna posted:Hey, Dunedin's where I'm at too! Dunedin actually owns, it's like being in Scotland only not loving horrible
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 09:21 |
|
WarpedNaba posted:I'm mad because we can already stream porn 24/7, this seems like very poor market research was put into it. Lord knows when I turn on the teevee my first thought is 'dammit if only there was some channel that was exclusively targeted at some sort of parody stereotype of my gender, but without any of the stuff I actually want to watch'
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 10:44 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 05:19 |
|
I hate the man channel because it reminds me that the kinds of people that channel is trying to appeal to exist
|
# ? Jan 25, 2016 10:50 |