|
Megera posted:Public page. I guess SPANX are like Jell-o and kleenex now where the brand name has become the product description?  Also holy poo poo that first post was prime STDH bullshit, but then the second post really takes the cake. I will not repeat this story! (Because I already transcribed it line-by-line in another post)
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 11:07 |
|
|
Non Serviam posted:stdh :I don't even own a Television being a funny podcast. You're always complaining about other people finding things racist or sexist or what have you. Why is that?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Khazar-khum posted:GIGA 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Indolent Bastard posted:
this pleases me
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 22:52
|
|
|
Megera posted:Public page. Spanx are like wearing underwear or a bra or a slip: they're so that the fabric that, for example, this dress is made of, doesn't drape weird on your human shape. If you do not want to wear Spanx with a formal dress, you should wear fabric that has more structure and won't bunch on you. If she'd tried it on with the proper undergarments, she might not have thought that the dress looked "old."
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Eponine posted:Spanx are like wearing underwear or a bra or a slip: they're so that the fabric that, for example, this dress is made of, doesn't drape weird on your human shape. If you do not want to wear Spanx with a formal dress, you should wear fabric that has more structure and won't bunch on you. If she'd tried it on with the proper undergarments, she might not have thought that the dress looked "old." Nah, that's a mother of the bride dress, not a prom dress. It would look better with Spanx, for the reasons you say, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
Megera posted:Public page. Dear Megan Naramore Harris, I'd gently caress your daughter. I hope this comment makes both of you happy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
RabbitWizard posted:Dear Megan Naramore Harris, Hey next time you're thinking about posting something creepy like this, how about you don't?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
RabbitWizard posted:Dear Megan Naramore Harris, Pic of your chub or it didn't happen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
Eponine posted:Spanx are like wearing underwear or a bra or a slip: they're so that the fabric that, for example, this dress is made of, doesn't drape weird on your human shape. If you do not want to wear Spanx with a formal dress, you should wear fabric that has more structure and won't bunch on you. If she'd tried it on with the proper undergarments, she might not have thought that the dress looked "old." Yeah agreed. It looks like a velvety sort of fabric, which without spanx will just accentuate all the wrong areas. It does look like something that a middle aged woman would wear. But then again most cheaper formal dresses look pretty frumpy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. Thank you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 03:43
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. This is beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 08:43
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. This is art.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:11
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. Ayy lmao, excellent work
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:54
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. So loving good
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:58
|
|
|
Zelder posted:You're always complaining about other people finding things racist or sexist or what have you. Why is that? I think clasping pearls at some falsely perceived racism, calling things "gross", and literally adding trigger warnings is dumb as gently caress. As for the books they review, they never reviewed something I've read, and most of the books sound legitimately terrible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 14:59
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:I think clasping pearls at some falsely perceived racism, calling things "gross", and literally adding trigger warnings is dumb as gently caress. I've seen this term being used a lot lately by the absolute worst people. Where did it start? It's like it's the new "I'm not racist, but.." of things bigots say to make themselves feel better.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:15
|
|
|
So wait. It's dumb as gently caress to say, "I find that racist." "I find that gross." "If you've been in active combat and have PTSD, don't watch this First Person Video of combat."
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:20
|
|
|
Your Computer posted:I've seen this term being used a lot lately by the absolute worst people. Where did it start? It's like it's the new "I'm not racist, but.." of things bigots say to make themselves feel better. And anyway, I think you're supposed to clutch pearls, not clasp them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
Turtlicious posted:So wait. It's a podcast about bad books, not a loving documentary about life on the Frontline. Sorry for this derail though. You can all direct your complaints, insults and accusations of racism as private messages.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
Your Computer posted:I've seen this term being used a lot lately by the absolute worst people. I was just about to say this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
GOTTA STAY FAI posted:I was just about to say this. I too use figures of speech, devoid of context, to determine the personal qualities of people. It just means that people are exaggerating their shock at something by pretending it's scandalous. It's just that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:51
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:It's a podcast about bad books, not a loving documentary about life on the Frontline. No wait where are you going, when are you going to take your set to the Apollo? you said both "triggered" and "pearl clasping", that's comedy gold!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:52
|
|
|
Alaois posted:No wait where are you going, when are you going to take your set to the Apollo? you said both "triggered" and "pearl clasping", that's comedy gold! Dude, I'm no trying to be funny. He quite literally uses trigger warnings before talking about bargain-bin novels and rockstar autobiographies. I'm sorry that I offended your affection for infantilizing behavior 
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:Dude, I'm no trying to be funny. He quite literally uses trigger warnings before talking about bargain-bin novels and rockstar autobiographies. I'm sorry that I offended your affection for infantilizing behavior sounds like I triggered you pretty hard xD
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:56
|
|
|
Alaois posted:sounds like I triggered you pretty hard xD This is precisely why his bullshit is a problem. They basically turn a coping mechanism for victims of PTSD as a punchline. Good going!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:This is precisely why his bullshit is a problem. They basically turn a coping mechanism for victims of PTSD as a punchline. Good going! do you think rape and child abuse victims don't deserve trigger warnings? Because those are the only times he's actually five those
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
Alaois posted:do you think rape and child abuse victims don't deserve trigger warnings? Because those are the only times he's actually five those I sincerely do not think literature analysis should have trigger warnings, no.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
I don't know what you are arguing about, but I hate it, and also people who hate it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:06
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:I sincerely do not think literature analysis should have trigger warnings, no. Yes because books can never be about sensitive topics like rape, child abuse, racism or whatever. I love how you get so mad about him warning people that he's going to talk about topics that are upsetting I the episode and about him expressing his distaste for stuff that happens in the terrible books he's reading. Non Serviam posted:most of the books sound legitimately terrible.  that's the whole point though?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:54
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. This deserves an Emmy
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Non Serviam posted:This is precisely why his bullshit is a problem. They basically turn a coping mechanism for victims of PTSD as a punchline. Good going! Do you think PTSD is only for combat veterans? That's not what it means. Abuse, violence, survivor's guilt, lots of things can lead to PTSD. It means you have poo poo inside that you haven't fully dealt with and certain unrelated experiences can "trigger" the same anxiety, fight or flight response you felt originally. A bad car accident can cause PTSD. Edit: Tindeck doesn't work right on my tablet so I'm missing out on the Troper Tale performance.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:24
|
|
|
Aleph Null posted:Do you think PTSD is only for combat veterans? That's not what it means. Abuse, violence, survivor's guilt, lots of things can lead to PTSD. It means you have poo poo inside that you haven't fully dealt with and certain unrelated experiences can "trigger" the same anxiety, fight or flight response you felt originally. Do you think any mention of a c** a******t should come with a content warning?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
STDH: A conversation about trigger warnings was productive Here, have some content: quote:Jan 7, 9:38pm E: There's a store called "Scheels" in St. Cloud, Minnesota, a city where a lot of Somali immigrants live. Pththya-lyi has a new favorite as of 17:33 on Jan 29, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:30
|
|
|
People who say "trigger warning" or get butt mad about "trigger warning" should be forced to read this thread over and over imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:45
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:STDH: A conversation about trigger warnings was productive
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
Pththya-lyi posted:STDH: A conversation about trigger warnings was productive they didn't even remove the >> from the chain mail this came from?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 18:18
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:loving hell. You are the best.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 11:07 |
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:
I got this directly from Snopes, which says that this story spread through email. Snopes actually contacted Scheels' manager about the alleged incident, and the manager confirmed that it didn't happen. Around the holidays the story was attached to a St. Cloud Wal-Mart, but the action shifted to "Shield's" after The St. Cloud Times debunked it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 19:01
|
|