|
ahmeni posted:Apple
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 14:07 |
|
|
fart simpson posted:im the guy who feels bad for companies that cant use child labor
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
cremnob posted:nah cause everyone wants to make poo poo for apple stuff so they'll do it congratulations you just got fired because you made your company lose the multi-million dollar apple contract to another company who are also using those unethically sourced materials but was able to bullshit their way through apple
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
apple has stopped doing business with suppliers they find to not be complying
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:17
|
|
|
cremnob posted:apple has stopped doing business with suppliers they find to not be complying
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:22
|
|
|
cremnob posted:apple has stopped doing business with suppliers they find to not be complying what happens in the end is those places like the illegal tin mines just sell their materials to other suppliers who can obfuscate their source well enough or you've just killed all those jobs for those poor people with nothing else to do besides mining in those mines congratulation you've resulted in more suffering instead of everyone having a job, but at least you can feel good about it right??
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:or you've just killed all those jobs for those poor people with nothing else to do besides mining in those mines Just gonna quarantine this here line
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 06:44
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:congratulation you've resulted in more suffering instead of children having a job, but at least you can feel good about it right??
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 08:05
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:yeah instead of actually caring and supplying aides directly to those places just so, you know, improve their actual lives lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 13:12
|
|
|
Facing allegations of child labor in their supply lines, [multinational corporation] released a statement regarding supplier labor practices. The company states "this is actually a good thing", explaining that children fired from factories and mines must often find worse-paying and more dangerous jobs when they cannot be hired, many times turning to prostitution. "However," the company elaborates, "we had those kids fired so that you white people are happy and to keep bad headlines away. We hope you sleep better tonight."
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
The Management posted:Facing allegations of child labor in their supply lines, [multinational corporation] released a statement regarding supplier labor practices. The company states "this is actually a good thing", explaining that children fired from factories and mines must often find worse-paying and more dangerous jobs when they cannot be hired, many times turning to prostitution. "However," the company elaborates, "we had those kids fired so that you white people are happy and to keep bad headlines away. We hope you sleep better tonight." https://twitter.com/crushingbort/status/463132110006784000
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 17:28
|
|
|
craisins posted:do they still have suicide nets at Foxconn? when they were putting up the suicide nets, foxconn employees had lower suicide rates than the general population in mainland china. but employees typically live on site. so they were committing suicide on site. and foxconn took action. good on foxconn.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
nah child labor is bad and they do check for it the problem is that they wont be able to catch the child labor if the worker themselves provide falsified id or documentation just so they can earn some money and send it back to their village and whatnot
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
MARKET CAP
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 08:20
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:MARKET CRAP
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
how come if you make a usb type-c cable it doesn't have to follow any standards it's so bad there are people who review nothing but type-c cables, and then destroy their own computers and diagnostic equipment
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 07:32
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:how come if you make a usb type-c cable it doesn't have to follow any standards that guy's a google engineer and he's probably doing it as his 20% work or something. anyway, they're bad because oneplus (a bad company) was the first to market with a usb-c-equipped phone, and everyone copied their cables, which weren't designed to spec.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:how come if you make a usb type-c cable it doesn't have to follow any standards who gets paid to enforce the standards?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
who gets paid to enforce the standards on the enforcers??
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
the only punishment for making a non-compliant usb device is that you don't get to put the USBIF logo on it. can any of you recall what that logo even looks like?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:how come if you make a usb type-c cable it doesn't have to follow any standards There's one Google engineer that goes and reviews cables on amazon. There are special anroid apps to check the cable and charger quality.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 17:32
|
|
|
Millstone posted:There's one Google engineer that goes and reviews cables on amazon. There are special anroid apps to check the cable and charger quality. Apps such as the oscilloscope
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
Hi Developers at Rocketship Apps, I reviewed Adblock Fast, com.rocketshipapps.adblockfast, and found that it violates section 4.4 of the Developer Distribution Agreement. This particular app has been disabled as a policy strike. Just as a reminder, you’ve agreed to follow the Google Play Developer Program Policies and additional enforcement could occur if there are further policy issues with your apps. If you’ve reviewed the policies and feel this rejection may have been in error, please reach out to our policy support team. One of my colleagues will get back to you within 2 business days. I appreciate your support of Google Play!
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 21:58
|
|
|
does the developer agreement forbid ad blockers?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
the gouges posted:4.4 Prohibited Actions. You agree that you will not engage in any activity with the Store, including the development or distribution of Products, that interferes with, disrupts, damages or accesses in an unauthorised manner the devices, servers, networks or other properties or services of any third party including, but not limited to, Android users, Google or any mobile network operator. You may not use customer information obtained from the Store to sell or distribute Products outside of the Store. it's p vague
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
that's some bullshit language right there
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
 lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 11:58
|
|
|
What does his salary have to do with anything?
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 12:44
|
|
|
they were trying to prove a point and he proved it better than if he had just told them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 12:52
|
|
|
Stux posted:they were trying to prove a point and he proved it better than if he had just told them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 12:56
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:that's some good context, way to explain a thing that happened google is being questioned by uk govt over their tax arrangements
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 12:58
|
|
|
Stux posted:
it must be a completely different world where you "don't know" what you get paid
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:05
|
|
|
St Evan Echoes posted:google is being questioned by uk govt over their tax arrangements
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:08
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:what does that have to do with the president of google europe's income, he's already european Stux posted:they were trying to prove a point and he proved it better than if he had just told them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:12
|
|
|
you can just say you don't know
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:16
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:you can just say you don't know the first question in that image is "Do you understand the anger?" and the second is "What do you get paid?". this seems pretty straightforward
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
its not his fault that no-one briefed him that 'six and a half figgies' was a good enough answer
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:what does that have to do with the president of google europe's income, he's already european The embarrassing moment came as Ms Hillier asked if he understood the public anger at revelations Google only paid tax at the equivalent rate of 3%. This followed a deal with HMRC to pay back £130million in corporation tax, an arrangement derided by all sides of the political spectrum. prefect posted:the first question in that image is "Do you understand the anger?" and the second is "What do you get paid?". this seems pretty straightforward
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:22
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:The embarrassing moment came as Ms Hillier asked if he understood the public anger at revelations Google only paid tax at the equivalent rate of 3%.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 14:07 |
|
|
prefect posted:it must be a completely different world where you "don't know" what you get paid when you get paid enough, it doesn't really matter. although not knowing the ballpark figure is pretty weird.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2016 13:37
|
|
