|
CommonShore posted:Last one is probably ironic, rest are p.bad. I'm pretty sure its supposed to say "Live the life you love, love the life you live." Not that that is much more meaningful.
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 19:16 |
|
|
Dienes posted:I'm pretty sure its supposed to say "Live the life you love, love the life you live." Not that that is much more meaningful. Oh yeah that's obvious. It's the link between the sentiment and seemingly random imagery that confuses me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
mrpwase posted:What the gently caress does this even say Lizard Combatant posted:(e)A4 IJiSNEp ... Have you guys never seen the Disney logo?  Hers is pretty spot on vvv you never know with this thread Psychobabble! has a new favorite as of 00:37 on Feb 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
Psychobabble! posted:... Have you guys never seen the Disney logo? Pretty sure they were just being facetious.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
The D is famously difficult to read as a D instead of a G
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:40
|
|
|
But G faces the other way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 04:48
|
|
|
It's "Disnep" guys.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Wao Gisnep
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
SynthOrange posted:But G faces the other way. My D faces the wrong way 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:13
|
|
|
Inzombiac posted:My D faces the wrong way That's called "a vagina"
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
It looks like South America, but I guarantee it was supposed to be some sort of Texas/Longhorn skull design. It's like they hosed up resizing the picture or something.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 09:27
|
|
|
Nope, that's Africa and a buffalo skull.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 09:33
|
|
|
GreatSquidKite posted:It looks like South America, but I guarantee it was supposed to be some sort of Texas/Longhorn skull design. It's like they hosed up resizing the picture or something. "Who needs Geography anyway? It's a pointless subject mom!" dpack_1 has a new favorite as of 18:13 on Feb 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 15:09
|
|
|
GreatSquidKite posted:It looks like South America 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 15:13
|
|
|
Saw this in the AUG thread... I would think it has been posted in here, but I don't remember seeing it before.   http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/18/ian-watkins-transcript
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
GreatSquidKite posted:It looks like South America, but I guarantee it was supposed to be some sort of Texas/Longhorn skull design. It's like they hosed up resizing the picture or something. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
I'm an idiot, here are some terrible tattoos:       I'm not sure if the last one belongs here, but getting gag tattoos is never a good idea.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
GreatSquidKite posted:
Unironically love it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Unicornally 
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
From the tattoo thread: http://theinkgallery.com/blog/category/shawn-rome-shawn2k-gallery/  Philp 4:13 One of the artists that's suing 2k games or whoever for 1.4M because LeBron's tattoos are in the game and on the cover of NBA'14.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Frazzbo posted:Unicornally Ok you win.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
SaNChEzZ posted:From the tattoo thread: To be fair, it is short for Philipians and is probably the abbreviation used in hymnals or other handouts at a church.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
SaNChEzZ posted:One of the artists that's suing 2k games or whoever for 1.4M because LeBron's tattoos are in the game and on the cover of NBA'14. They'll probably get a settlement too. It's well established that you can't use other's artwork for commercial purposes without compensation, even tattoos and makeup jobs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
Mulva posted:They'll probably get a settlement too. It's well established that you can't use other's artwork for commercial purposes without compensation, even tattoos and makeup jobs. Never thought about it like this. Who owns the art? Does the canvas have any rights?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
It came from Reddit. Today's theme is: bears   Tribal Pokemon! Sweet. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
The last time this happened, it was settled out of court, but at least a couple of law profs believe that in the absence of something explicit to the contrary, the artist should be seen to have granted an implied license for public display and so forth. http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-raustiala-tattoo-copyright-20131006-story.html
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
I can't imagine that that would hold up in court. How is that different from him appearing on the cover of a magazine for instance.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
This rocks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
nostrata posted:I can't imagine that that would hold up in court. How is that different from him appearing on the cover of a magazine for instance. Totally a guess here, but a photograph is an actual image of the work in question, whereas a video game would involve someone recreating the work, unless you actually texture-mapped a picture of him onto the 3D model...  I dunno man, now I'm confused.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
nostrata posted:I can't imagine that that would hold up in court. How is that different from him appearing on the cover of a magazine for instance. There's no money in print media  Boat posted:Totally a guess here, but a photograph is an actual image of the work in question, whereas a video game would involve someone recreating the work, unless you actually texture-mapped a picture of him onto the 3D model... No it's the same since the issue is public display for commercial purposes. Gynocentric Regime has a new favorite as of 03:14 on Feb 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
Mulva posted:No it's the same since the issue is public display for commercial purposes. Is that what the suit alleges? Do you have a link to a copy? I expected that it would turn on the rights to reproduce or make derivative works. E: I don't think copyright law differs between public display for commercial or non-commercial purposes (except in the context of a fair use claim -- I doubt that would fly here). Subjunctive has a new favorite as of 03:27 on Feb 3, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Chakan posted:This rocks. Is that what it is? Rocks? because I honestly can't tell
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
Nitrox posted:Is that what it is? Rocks? because I honestly can't tell I get that, but it worked for me at a glance.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
Nitrox posted:Is that what it is? Rocks? because I honestly can't tell I think that's on you, because it's obviously a bear. Or is  ?
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 04:55
|
|
|
Thin Privilege posted:The last 3 posts most aren't bad/poorly done. You all aren't even trying, I see the smoothskin is jealous.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
 This belongs to a guy in his late thirties. He subsequently started unfriending people on Facebook that made fun of it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 15:56
|
|
|
Dienes posted:I'm pretty sure its supposed to say "Live the life you love, love the life you live." Not that that is much more meaningful. It's a Die Antwoord lyric, but I don't know if that's what they were going for. Might make slightly more sense that way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 16:41
|
|
|
Apprentice Dick posted:
As someone with a TMNT tattoo, I am offended.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 17:01
|
|
|
Warpaint posted:It's a Die Antwoord lyric, but I don't know if that's what they were going for. Might make slightly more sense that way. That's a terrible choice for a lyric if it is. "I fink u freeky and I like you a lot" is much better.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 19:16 |
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:I think that's on you, because it's obviously a bear. quote:ob·vi·ous·ly
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 18:43
|
|