Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Who will win the debate?
Former Hedge Fund Manager and Corporate Raider, Bernard Sanders
Inexperienced Hippie and Lifelong Pacifist, Hillary Rodham
The Ghost of Martin O'Malley
View Results
 
  • Locked thread
C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Tatum Girlparts posted:

When their first example is one of Lawrence Lessig's disciples I'm not sure how solid a case this is, but yea, awesome, let's see if Sanders can actually cultivate this because a lot of his revolution talk is hands off and that worries me.

I hope Bernie keeps up his funding even after he's elected president and turns it into a "fund progressives I endorse" fund

People love throwing money at him, hell I threw Benjamin Franklin at him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FourLeaf
Dec 2, 2011

Yoshifan823 posted:

lol if you think the big companies wouldn't just take that fine

the only way fines work is if they are scaled to the size of the company, so the biggest ones have to pay a massive amount.

mormonpartyboat
Jan 14, 2015

by Reene

Bass Bottles posted:

Yeah I don't really get people thinking this debate was bad.

really, i could have listened to a second hour of bickering about the definition of 'progressive'

maybe we could have watched bernie look up the definition on his phone

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

HiHo ChiRho posted:

This, coupled with with the analysis that millennials are more liberal is where things get interesting. So we may get a political revolution after all.

Once all the olds die off at least. So maybe not for a few election cycles. We need to freeze Warren's brain so we can build SOCIALISTBOT9000 to run in 2024

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Neurolimal posted:

The gently caress do you think Bernie is?

This is literally what Bernie is doing or has done; he started from the bottom, worked his way through the system while maintaining his ideals, became the highest position in his state, and is now running for presidency to push them further, show how appealing leftist policies are, and encourage more leftist politicians.

It's almost as if this line of thought is retarded cavemanspeak for "woah woah woah, let the grown-up moderates handle things".

Yeah Bernie remember a year ago to this day polled 7% in Iowa. He split the delegates basically there and most likely won the popular vote by a good margin.

Mitt Romney
Nov 9, 2005
dumb and bad

Bad Caller posted:

Nah he's mentioned it a few times in a few of his stumps, "I can't do it without you" is pretty much saying "loving VOTE ME SOME PROGRESSIVES IN"

Clinton raised $5m for down-ticket races in January alone. Sanders raised $0.

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Neurolimal posted:

The gently caress do you think Bernie is?

This is literally what Bernie is doing or has done; he started from the bottom, worked his way through the system while maintaining his ideals, became the highest position in his state, and is now running for presidency to push them further, show how appealing leftist policies are, and encourage more leftist politicians.

It's almost as if this line of thought is retarded cavemanspeak for "woah woah woah, let the grown-up moderates handle things".

One person can't do that alone though. Bernie's path to success is exactly the one that should be taken, but you can't have one person do that and expect the entire country to coalesce around it. Bernie is not the political revolution, he's the beginning of one. John the Baptist, not Jesus, if I'm gonna make a real bad analogy.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Neurolimal posted:

The gently caress do you think Bernie is?

This is literally what Bernie is doing or has done; he started from the bottom, worked his way through the system while maintaining his ideals, became the highest position in his state, and is now running for presidency to push them further, show how appealing leftist policies are, and encourage more leftist politicians.

It's almost as if this line of thought is retarded cavemanspeak for "woah woah woah, let the grown-up moderates handle things".

It's not about what he's done you idiot it's about how well he can support others.


Bad Caller posted:

I hope Bernie keeps up his funding even after he's elected president and turns it into a "fund progressives I endorse" fund

People love throwing money at him, hell I threw Benjamin Franklin at him.

Yea pretty much.

Yudo
May 15, 2003

Not a Step posted:

Once all the olds die off at least. So maybe not for a few election cycles. We need to freeze Warren's brain so we can build SOCIALISTBOT9000 to run in 2024

I will run in 2024 and my forums post history will ruin my career. Book it.

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Not a Step posted:

Once all the olds die off at least. So maybe not for a few election cycles. We need to freeze Warren's brain so we can build SOCIALISTBOT9000 to run in 2024

I goddamn hate when people think we're all going to get "more conservative" as we get older. Like come on, when stuff is still bad for our generation we aren't magically going to turn on ourselves. Millenials despite the tumblr and other hug boxes are far better informed youth generation than any before it.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Bad Caller posted:

I hope Bernie keeps up his funding even after he's elected president and turns it into a "fund progressives I endorse" fund

People love throwing money at him, hell I threw Benjamin Franklin at him.

Yeah, this poo poo's way bigger than Bernie himself. He's at the forefront of it, but it's so important that this momentum keeps up even after November.

Jacobin
Feb 1, 2013

by exmarx

Tatum Girlparts posted:

It's not about what he's done you idiot it's about how well he can support others.

Serious suggestion- read up on how Bernie fared as mayor of Burlington.

He initially faced a lack of 'team support' after his 'upset victory' but soon enough public pressure either voter in supportive people or they had to turn around and support him.

Because its what people supported.

Dead Cosmonaut
Nov 14, 2015

by FactsAreUseless
This debate was a lot clearer than I thought. I'm glad Sanders and Hillary don't fight as much as their supporters do.

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Mitt Romney posted:

Clinton raised $5m for down-ticket races in January alone. Sanders raised $0.

Sanders also doesn't have big super pac money, and his pac money is from unions that are pennies compared to what Hillary rakes in to fund his campaign, and needs his donors money currently to compete against the Clinton political machine, which is incredibly well-oiled. 5 million is nothing to Hillary's purse.

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

Yoshifan823 posted:

One person can't do that alone though. Bernie's path to success is exactly the one that should be taken, but you can't have one person do that and expect the entire country to coalesce around it. Bernie is not the political revolution, he's the beginning of one. John the Baptist, not Jesus, if I'm gonna make a real bad analogy.

Then support Bernie to see how far he can get and inspire other leftists that they have national support if they'd just rise up?

Then primary Hillary from the left in 2020 if he loses :bernin:

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Bad Caller posted:

I goddamn hate when people think we're all going to get "more conservative" as we get older. Like come on, when stuff is still bad for our generation we aren't magically going to turn on ourselves. Millenials despite the tumblr and other hug boxes are far better informed youth generation than any before it.

Yeah, the whole "if you're not liberal when you're young you have no heart, if you're not conservative when you're old you have no brain" thing is something that needs to die. At my caucus, there was a guy who graduated from the same high school as I did about 65 years ago with a Bernie sticker on his shirt. He's awesome, and if you turn conservative when you get older, you can get hosed.

Salt Fish
Sep 11, 2003

Cybernetic Crumb

Rexicon1 posted:

China wants a word with you.

*for socially desirable definitions of socialism

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



If Bernie was a woman or a minority other than jewish and younger Hillary would have no chance at this point. Honestly it's amazing such an unappealing candidate has gotten this far, but hey at least he got me to care about local politics to try and get involved in my local rural town.

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Not a Step posted:

Then support Bernie to see how far he can get and inspire other leftists that they have national support if they'd just rise up?

Then primary Hillary from the left in 2020 if he loses :bernin:

This is where I point out that I"m a Sanders supporter and was elected as a Sanders delegate for my Caucus. That's basically the tact that I'm taking, but with a healthy dose of "don't turn yourself off of Hillary because if she is the nominee you drat sure better vote for her lest we end up with President Trump or worse".

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Yoshifan823 posted:

Yeah, the whole "if you're not liberal when you're young you have no heart, if you're not conservative when you're old you have no brain" thing is something that needs to die. At my caucus, there was a guy who graduated from the same high school as I did about 65 years ago with a Bernie sticker on his shirt. He's awesome, and if you turn conservative when you get older, you can get hosed.

People are more aware and connected with poverty than they once were, because of the internet. You can't just easily ignore it with a white picket fence and staying in suburbia now.

Even in 2008 poverty was not talked about as much as it is this debate. There are steps forward.

Still kind of wish Liz Warren could be the first female president, but oh well if Hillary gets that "historic first".

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Tatum Girlparts posted:

It's not about what he's done you idiot it's about how well he can support others.


Yea pretty much.

And he's apparently inspiring others to run for local positions, going off the recently linked articles. Do you expect him to just dump all his campaign funds into other races while Hillary wins?

Bass Bottles
Jan 14, 2006

BOSS BATTLES DID NOTHING WRONG

mormonpartyboat posted:

really, i could have listened to a second hour of bickering about the definition of 'progressive'

maybe we could have watched bernie look up the definition on his phone

Bernie gave a lot of bad answers, yeah.

I feel like he's really good at explaining things college liberals are passionate about, and are thrilled to hear mentioned on television. But his answers never make me feel like he has serious, attainable, thought-out plans for how to get there. Hillary actually gets more in depth about actual action she has taken in the past, and seems like she has specific ideas for going forward.

A Sanders presidency would be like Obama pushback x 100. He's not going to be able to accomplish any of this and people will cry about it for years.

Edit: I mean, I like him and I'll happily vote for him if he wins. But I think I like Hillary more.

Bass Bottles has issued a correction as of 05:32 on Feb 5, 2016

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Yoshifan823 posted:

This is where I point out that I"m a Sanders supporter and was elected as a Sanders delegate for my Caucus. That's basically the tact that I'm taking, but with a healthy dose of "don't turn yourself off of Hillary because if she is the nominee you drat sure better vote for her lest we end up with President Trump or worse".

Rubio is the only one remotely not super damaging compared to Trump or Cruz, and even then it'd be bad/uncomfortable for a lot of people.

HiHo ChiRho
Oct 23, 2010

Bad Caller posted:

People love throwing money at him, hell I threw Benjamin Franklin at him.

Yeah I keep on throwing him a bone every so often. Hillary doesn't need it, and I like idea of her scrambling for more fundraisers to keep up with the Sanderstorm.

He's the first campaign I've ever thrown money at. It's better than jpeg ships at least.

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Bad Caller posted:

People are more aware and connected with poverty than they once were, because of the internet. You can't just easily ignore it with a white picket fence and staying in suburbia now.

Even in 2008 poverty was not talked about as much as it is this debate. There are steps forward.

Still kind of wish Liz Warren could be the first female president, but oh well if Hillary gets that "historic first".

Yeah, I just imagine what we would know about this whole issue in Flint if it happened 30 years ago. I guess the settlements in Baltimore would be something to look at, but on a much worse scale.

The internet is p cool.

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

Yoshifan823 posted:

This is where I point out that I"m a Sanders supporter and was elected as a Sanders delegate for my Caucus. That's basically the tact that I'm taking, but with a healthy dose of "don't turn yourself off of Hillary because if she is the nominee you drat sure better vote for her lest we end up with President Trump or worse".

As a deep red state resident the electoral college allows me to waste my vote however I want without fear of affecting anything at all, so I can waste my national vote on showing my irritation in the meaningless popular vote. Also my dumb state hates third parties so I can't even go that direction.

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Bass Bottles posted:

Bernie gave a lot of bad answers, yeah.

I feel like he's really good at explaining things college liberals are passionate about, and are thrilled to hear mentioned on television. But his answers never make me feel like he has serious, attainable, thought-out plans for how to get there. Hillary actually gets more in depth about actual action she has taken in the past, and seems like she has specific ideas for going forward.

A Sanders presidency would be like Obama pushback x 100. He's not going to be able to accomplish any of this and people will cry about it for years.

Issue I have with Hillary is she flat out lied about her campaign site having any policies on healthcare written out, because it seriously doesn't or didn't at the time. Bernie's website does go into pretty good depth without becoming bill lingo that the average american can't understand.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Joementum posted:

I agree with Bernie on basically every domestic issue... except campaign finance reform.

Bernie Sanders wants to force you to rely upon the public sector, yet refuses to take public funding for his campaign.

HiHo ChiRho
Oct 23, 2010

Bass Bottles posted:

A Sanders presidency would be like Obama pushback x 100. He's not going to be able to accomplish any of this and people will cry about it for years.

See this is what I don't get. You've seen how the republicans attack Hillary constantly, what makes you thing she is going to get more done than Obama or Sanders or even her husband with a tight senate and locked red House?

Yoshifan823
Feb 19, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Not a Step posted:

As a deep red state resident the electoral college allows me to waste my vote however I want without fear of affecting anything at all, so I can waste my national vote on showing my irritation in the meaningless popular vote. Also my dumb state hates third parties so I can't even go that direction.

I live in Iowa, which is one of those states that the Republicans would have to win to get the white house, so I get to be the guy throwing water on the "well I"m gonna vote for Jill Stein" parade by threatening President Ted Cruz and Secretary of Homeland Security Sarah Palin.

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Not a Step posted:

As a deep red state resident the electoral college allows me to waste my vote however I want without fear of affecting anything at all, so I can waste my national vote on showing my irritation in the meaningless popular vote. Also my dumb state hates third parties so I can't even go that direction.

Same here, I hope beyond Bernie's platform we look to more representative reforms so third parties could get thrown a bone. FPTP is garbage.

I also wouldn't be mad if we codified party procedures in the constitution but lol at constitutional reform ever happening when the ERA is still unable to pass because the wicked witch of the midwest got people long ago to agree with her bullshit

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



Yoshifan823 posted:

I live in Iowa, which is one of those states that the Republicans would have to win to get the white house, so I get to be the guy throwing water on the "well I"m gonna vote for Jill Stein" parade by threatening President Ted Cruz and Secretary of Homeland Security Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin would be better off in the Department of the Interior making North Dakota drinking water even more flammable

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012

Bass Bottles posted:

Bernie gave a lot of bad answers, yeah.

I feel like he's really good at explaining things college liberals are passionate about, and are thrilled to hear mentioned on television. But his answers never make me feel like he has serious, attainable, thought-out plans for how to get there. Hillary actually gets more in depth about actual action she has taken in the past, and seems like she has specific ideas for going forward.

A Sanders presidency would be like Obama pushback x 100. He's not going to be able to accomplish any of this and people will cry about it for years.

Sanders and Hillary's plans have an equal chance of making it through congress. As for actual legislation he's made clear what he wants to do (and if you're the kind of dude who screams DEBT!!!! You're a dullard who doesn't understand how government finance works), and has a history of dealing with hostile parties from the bleachers.

At the very least, a vote for Sanders is a vote opposing TPP and more war involvement, as well as a reminder that the Left belongs to the Leftists, not the center-rights.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

HiHo ChiRho posted:

See this is what I don't get. You've seen how the republicans attack Hillary constantly, what makes you thing she is going to get more done than Obama or Sanders or even her husband with a tight senate and locked red House?

Because she is a moderate with experience on working through the system in Washington.

Sanders would be like throwing a croc into a river of hippos.

Nix Panicus
Feb 25, 2007

They just played that soundclip of "Senator Sanders is the only person who would describe me, a woman, as part of the Establishment." Thats still absolutely hilarious.

I, Hillary Clinton, wife of President Bill Clinton, senator from New York, Secretary of State, professional speaker on the Wall Street circuit, can't possibly be part of the Establishment because I'm a *woman*!

Truly the most progressive candidate.

Jacobin
Feb 1, 2013

by exmarx

Bad Caller posted:

Same here, I hope beyond Bernie's platform we look to more representative reforms so third parties could get thrown a bone. FPTP is garbage.

I also wouldn't be mad if we codified party procedures in the constitution but lol at constitutional reform ever happening when the ERA is still unable to pass because the wicked witch of the midwest got people long ago to agree with her bullshit

The fact that Canada is moving to reform FPTP is huge. At bare minimum it means the issue will get on the news and hundreds of thousands of Americans will actually learn for the first time that other voting systems exist and that they can change.

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



My Imaginary GF posted:

Because she is a moderate with experience on working through the system in Washington.

Sanders would be like throwing a croc into a river of hippos.

Sanders has a history of getting amendments that were good things* onto bills though and he even mentioned on VA stuff how he crossed the line and worked with Republicans. He also doesn't go around slinging mud at them like the easy target he could. He could arguably do just as well as Hillary.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Bad Caller posted:

Same here, I hope beyond Bernie's platform we look to more representative reforms so third parties could get thrown a bone. FPTP is garbage.

I also wouldn't be mad if we codified party procedures in the constitution but lol at constitutional reform ever happening when the ERA is still unable to pass because the wicked witch of the midwest got people long ago to agree with her bullshit

FPTP is absolutely loving awesome. Look at Venezuela to see what happens when you get rid of representative government.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

My Imaginary GF posted:

FPTP is absolutely loving awesome. Look at Venezuela to see what happens when you get rid of representative government.

what

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

C-SPAN Caller
Apr 21, 2010



My Imaginary GF posted:

FPTP is absolutely loving awesome. Look at Venezuela to see what happens when you get rid of representative government.

I honestly don't get this post, because FPTP would be replaced hopefully with Mixed-member proportional representation like in Germany or Sweden, where diverse parties do actually happen even if they have to make "coalitions".

  • Locked thread