|
Mulva posted:There's no money in print media Pretty sure ESPN is worth billions, but also pretty sure its a different issue because a photograph of the subject of an article is almost always going to be fair use. Subjunctive posted:Is that what the suit alleges? Do you have a link to a copy? Here's a link, but Mulva is basically right about the substance of the suit. Lawsuit posted:Defendants have infringed Plaintiff's copyrights in their works by publicly displaying the Plaintiff’s copyrighted works without authorization and in violation of 17 U.S.C. §§106(5) and 501. Section 106(5) addresses the copyright holder's exclusive right to publicly display graphic works. Technically, I don't think it's an element of infringement that the use was commercial, only that it was a non-permitted public display, but the commercial use does factor into the fair use defense and likely factors into damages for infringement.
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 10:55 |
|
|
 From a local shop here. Any of the shops here demonstrate this level of prowess when it comes to basic shapes and anatomy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Pre-K Bikini Carwash posted:
Against all odds, crosseyed woman successfully pilots melting boat to safety.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
GreatSquidKite posted:I'm not sure if the last one belongs here, but getting gag tattoos is never a good idea. Well, this is just incorrect. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
Apprentice Dick posted:
Why are they standing on eachother's shoulders and then extending one of them to reach out to grab the pizza ... that's at ground level with them already??? Or am I somehow misinterpreting that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
bummer dude posted:Against all odds, crosseyed woman successfully pilots melting boat to safety. ..finally proof that she'd overcome the hardship of being born with a titty growing out of her collarbone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 21:12
|
|
|
fullroundaction posted:Why are they standing on eachother's shoulders and then extending one of them to reach out to grab the pizza ... that's at ground level with them already??? My guess is that he thought it would be wacky. I still don't understand how a guy his age would get this poo poo on himself.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
fullroundaction posted:Why are they standing on eachother's shoulders and then extending one of them to reach out to grab the pizza ... that's at ground level with them already??? Should be a butt tattoo with the Teenage Minion Ninja Turtles trying to bridge the crack.
|
|
#
?
Feb 3, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
Pre-K Bikini Carwash posted:
I'm looking forward to seeing it after all that fur grows back.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2016 00:05
|
|
|
Wait, how did the tattoo artist have any rights to their work after they sell it to someone? I would assume that the person buying the tattoo also gets the rights to it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
Look toward deviantart/furry art $15 commissions for your answer. Just like tattoos, when you go to an artist and say "draw this for me" and they say "ok", the only thing you're actually paying for is the finished chunk of ink/pixels itself. In the absence of something like a signed work for hire agreement, the actual copyright of the design itself (even if you tell the artist what to do in exacting detail) still belongs to the artist. You can sell the painting itself, or you can slice off your arm to sell the finished tattoo, but you don't automatically own the artwork's copyright in order to sell newly made copies of the piece
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 03:20
|
|
|
PaleInkedBoy posted:#kittytattoos leaves something dead on your front step: Here ya go 
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 10:05
|
|
|
Not My Leg posted:Here's a link, but Mulva is basically right about the substance of the suit. Very interesting, thank you. Does the person on whose body the tattoo appears have a license/right to public display? Could the tattoo artist prevent them from wearing short sleeves in public? From appearing in a movie with short sleeves? Neither of those seem like likely outcomes of a suit, to me. It's interesting that the wearer wasn't named in the suit, since that would seem to be the origin of the infringement.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 10:13
|
|
|
The lawsuit is against publisher and creator of a video game, who replicated the design. The wearer did nothing wrong.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 14:12
|
|
|
Nitrox posted:The lawsuit is against publisher and creator of a video game, who replicated the design. The wearer did nothing wrong. The wearer entered into a contract permitting 2K to reproduce their likeness in that video game. Seems like contributory infringement if nothing else. Would it be different if the design were replicated through a video recording, rather than as a texture? Seems like the difference between photocopying a book and retyping its text, which is to say immaterial.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 14:47
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:The wearer entered into a contract permitting 2K to reproduce their likeness in that video game. Seems like contributory infringement if nothing else. The real truth are there are colorable arguments to be made on both side, so we'll never really know how the courts would have decided it, as the parties will inevitably settle. This may not hold true if one of the parties (or their attorneys) are greedy, but I'd assume there is too much risk on both sides for either party to push for a final ruling.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 08:29
|
|
|
The Mark of the Beast
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 08:40
|
|
|
he looks just as upset as i do about it. (and wow, those teeth)
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 08:46
|
|
|
Tedoca?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
MrSmokes posted:Tedoca? Feboca, obviously.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Is that "Brony shirt at his friend's wedding" guy?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
PCOS Bill posted:Is that "Brony shirt at his friend's wedding" guy?  This rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Yes. Is that the same person.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 19:39
|
|
|
Now you can never take it off.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/pE4hEMBYbTI
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
So does that tattoo officially make this guy the most insufferable human on the planet?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Pretty sure he held that title before this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
 I've been trying hard to figure out what that before is supposed to be.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 02:52
|
|
|
A map to my butthole.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
I want to see the after when that hair grows back in. Fuzzy lion
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Well thats easy to fix, just get some laser hair removal. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
A woman looking to the left, she has a shawl over her head.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
McPhearson posted:
Just buy a picture and frame it. What a stupid tattoo. Hey check out my photo-realistic lion upper arm.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
McPhearson posted:
A Prokaryotic Cell?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
A snarling papillon with an eye patch over its right eye and a bandage over the left
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
artsy fartsy posted:A snarling papillon with an eye patch over its right eye and a bandage over the left Snake Papillon, star of "Escape from New York 3"
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 06:59
|
|
|
Pigsfeet on Rye posted:Snake Papillon, star of "Escape from New York 3" Snake Papillon, star of "Escape from New Yorkie" more like.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 07:43
|
|
|
McPhearson posted:
I'm guessing it's a scorpion. A hairy scorpion. But the "after" looks pretty terrible too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 07:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 10:55 |
|
|
It's like a cloud in that you can see countless images in it. Also it might actually be a cloud. Or a flea beaming up a rock in its UFO tractor beam. I thought the lion had an afro at first. Basically, I like the before a lot more because it is hypnotizing me and I want it tattooed on myself so that I can hypnotize others.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 07:50
|
|
