|
SeANMcBAY posted:The best Really, for Ramirez it just goes downhill from here.
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 10:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
WarpedNaba posted:President on the left cut some wicked beef. President on the left.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:02
|
|
|
Dr Christmas posted:Fewer comics about Benghazi? I'm sure they'll find some way to turn it into Bernghazi.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:06
|
|
|
They already got it this far with absolutely no factual basis, what's a little more?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:08
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:President on the left. In his defence, this is Ramirez so that could be pretty much anyone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:14
|
|
|
Living. That's why we prohibit abortion after the foetus is developed enough to survive outside the mother, only making exceptions for foetuses that are incompatible with life or if the pregnancy will kill the mother. E: that Ramirez - I would love it if some cartoonist did consistently adopt a caricature of Sanders as a child's crayon drawing. Double points if regardless of circumstance he has "GRANDAD" written below or above him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:26
|
|
|
I apologize in advance.Nckdictator posted:Can someone post that old (Brett Noel?) cartoon of Hilary describing her upcoming presidency? I remember it had a hammer and sickle somwhere.  Jurgan posted:I remember one that was probably Noel where short, fat Hillary screams about how morons don't like her, and Ann Coulter explains it's because "you're a bitch." 
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 11:51
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:President on the left. It's a Ramirez, I'm lucky I'm able to identify him as a President of the USA.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 12:16
|
|
|
Cloud Potato posted:Mac on... MPs' pay rises A good Mac. That's a rare thing. So the "special place in Hell" for women who don't help women is not the same special place as the one for women who don't vote Hillary, making the whole quote not about elections in the first place. Rorus Raz posted:
"Didn't I use", lurn 2 gramer Rorus Raz posted:
Me too, but with... Rorus Raz posted:
... the ice cream and sickle logo. MrUnderbridge posted:So Rove's "Accuse them of what we're doing " strikes again. Wasn't it Stalin's before Rove took it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 12:28
|
|
4
2
5
11
|
FronzelNeekburm posted:I apologize in advance. Brett Noel was a thread treasure. I can't get enough of the guy, and it's a shame it all had to end with a smack and a whimper.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:A good Mac. That's a rare thing. I remember somebody in one of the threads describing Mac as hating anyone who makes more or less money than he does, looking at it like that you can see how he sometimes comes upon a decent opinion by accident every now and then.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 12:50
|
|
|
FronzelNeekburm posted:I apologize in advance. Like coherence, knowing anything about what you're talking about, and a clean criminal record, being a Republican cartoonist doesn't require or value subtlety. So anyone who ever has a D by their name will be depicted messily making out with Marx and Satan while laughing as terrorists deprive veterans of apple pie. The difference is whether that person is called a c word, an n word, a k word, or an s word, just as another reason they are awful.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 13:09
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Living. That's why we prohibit abortion after the foetus is developed enough to survive outside the mother, only making exceptions for foetuses that are incompatible with life or if the pregnancy will kill the mother. Why the gently caress does Adam4d think killing non-innocent people is okay? Seriously, that's what he's arguing here. He could have said 'human life' but he's gotta point out that foetuses are 'innocent' until born. He allows for the idea that non-innocent lives can be terminated without remorse. Jesus said, "13love thy enemy, unless you can figure out a way to define 'em as non-innocent, in which case terminate their asses."
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Living. That's why we prohibit abortion after the foetus is developed enough to survive outside the mother, only making exceptions for foetuses that are incompatible with life or if the pregnancy will kill the mother. As medical science advances, and fetuses could survive outside the womb at earlier and earlier times during development, should the cutoff for abortions be changed?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
Dr Cheeto posted:As medical science advances, and fetuses could survive outside the womb at earlier and earlier times during development, should the cutoff for abortions be changed? No, it should be taken out of the womb and then a fundie should be given the responsibility of caring for it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:00
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:
The used+to construction is quite unique and atypical so it could be prone to becoming a frozen form (and I see "didn't used to" fairly often) so I had to check out what linguists say about its negation Huddleston & Pullum: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language posted:(after discussing the variants "usedn't to" and "didn't used to") It's a preterite form that can act grammatically like either an auxiliary or a lexical verb depending on the speaker and its use is restricted to one particular context; "didn't I used to" could easily become accepted in prescriptive grammars in the future were it not for the fact that English language pedants are pretty uptight and even make up nonsense rules all by themselves just to feel smart and relevant.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:01
|
|
|
Dr Cheeto posted:As medical science advances, and fetuses could survive outside the womb at earlier and earlier times during development, should the cutoff for abortions be changed? Maybe that's the solution to abortion in the future - if a woman don't want to carry the child to term, transplant it out and let it develop in an artificial womb. I'm sure all the Christians that hate abortion will be completely fine with paying for all this and adopting all the unwanted babies, after all they already advocate adoption for current unwanted children.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
 Guardian:  "Martin Rowson on the Syrian ceasefire – Bashar al-Assad has dealt a blow to international efforts to secure a ceasefire, deliver aid and promote a negotiated solution to the war in Syria, vowing to regain control of the entire country" Also Einstein's gravitational waves 'seen' from black holes Telegraph:  Independent:   After Giovanni Lanfranco. Times:  Stephen Collins: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
I really hope that Ramirez continues with this as his caricature of Sanders. Obama has the eyes-closed wormbama, Sanders is just consistently a crayon stick figure surrounded by detailed other characters and backgrounds.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:20
|
|
|
How many times has Ramirez done a "dignified picture of Lincoln next to lovely caricature of person I don't like, to imply that they are v bad by comparison" cartoon, and does he really think a Trump or Cruz presidency would stand up next to Abraham Lincoln any loving better? e: SgtScruffy posted:I really hope that Ramirez continues with this as his caricature of Sanders. Obama has the eyes-closed wormbama, Sanders is just consistently a crayon stick figure surrounded by detailed other characters and backgrounds. Nah, that'd be clever, he'd never go for it
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:23
|
|
|
loquacius posted:How many times has Ramirez done a "dignified picture of Lincoln next to lovely caricature of person I don't like, to imply that they are v bad by comparison" cartoon, and does he really think a Trump or Cruz presidency would stand up next to Abraham Lincoln any loving better? I'm sure he'd fall in line and praise them even as they created Muslim concentration camps if they managed, through some evil miracle, to take power. He's a shill first and foremost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 15:33
|
|
|
SgtScruffy posted:I really hope that Ramirez continues with this as his caricature of Sanders. Obama has the eyes-closed wormbama, Sanders is just consistently a crayon stick figure surrounded by detailed other characters and backgrounds. loquacius posted:Nah, that'd be clever, he'd never go for it Also, it's been done. Jim Borgman (of ''Zits'' fame) used to draw Dan Quayle as crayon stick-figure.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
nobodyssweetheart posted:I know Pro-Life Christians are sheltered but this comic makes no sense. Has Adam4by4 ever met a pro-life person? Reminder that this is the same dude who thought it was slick claim that adhering to strictly patriarchal relationship structures was the new cool countercultural thing to do, and then put that argument into a woman's mouth. Dr Christmas posted:Fewer comics about Benghazi? Nonsense, this is an election year.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
 :2016socialism:  By the way, does anyone know what the actual smilie limitations are now? The old limits were 90x25 and under 10kb but I know there are bigger ones now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
 The TN Legislature has a bill floating about that would allow counselors and therapists to deny treatment to someone if it clashes with their religious beliefs  Idiots, everyone knows you give fuzzy handcuffs for Valentine's day...
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 17:34
|
|
wins.
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 17:49
|
|
|
nobodyssweetheart posted:I know Pro-Life Christians are sheltered but this comic makes no sense. Has Adam4by4 ever met a pro-life person? I'm not sure if I get your question since this comic and it's awesome logic are pretty standard arguments within pro-life circles. Adam is just parroting what he's heard and been duly impressed by because it just sounds so right and moral ya know? It's also a core part of pro-life ideology to ignore the person actually carrying the precious fetus in their bodies, supporting it with their own blood and organs. Abortion as a moral wrong only makes sense if you thing fetus >born human, since the inherent nature of pregnancy is a trespass on one person's body by another. So pregnant people/women seeking abortion are just sluts dodging responsibility (and/or god's plan if you're a real die-hard like Adam), or children being duped by big bad PP, or non-existent as the case is all those fetus in the void cartoons. Somfin posted:Why the gently caress does Adam4d think killing non-innocent people is okay? Seriously, that's what he's arguing here. He could have said 'human life' but he's gotta point out that foetuses are 'innocent' until born. He allows for the idea that non-innocent lives can be terminated without remorse. Because it gives him an out on having to care about all the people that die or get killed everyday. Fetuses are sinless blobs of possibility that it's easy to throw your unequivocal support behind, unlike born people who might have done bad things thus inviting moral complexity into the question of helping them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
World Famous W posted:
I think the ones that are bigger than the limitations are admin specials.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
There were so many good zingers Bernie could have used there. "Was she worried about thwarting the first black president? What kind of question is that?" or even "Is Hillary worried about thwarting the first Jewish president?" So many good things he could have said but didn't.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
there wolf posted:Abortion as a moral wrong only makes sense if you thing fetus >born human, since the inherent nature of pregnancy is a trespass on one person's body by another. That doesn't follow. Not everyone believes that trespass on one person's body by another justifies killing them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 18:50
|
|
|
56k warning 1 Death looooves Florida 2 3 A thing happened. 4 She's been struck by... she's been hit by a smooth criminal 5 6 #NewHampshireSoWhite
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
there wolf posted:I'm not sure if I get your question since this comic and it's awesome logic are pretty standard arguments within pro-life circles. Adam is just parroting what he's heard and been duly impressed by because it just sounds so right and moral ya know? It's also a core part of pro-life ideology to ignore the person actually carrying the precious fetus in their bodies, supporting it with their own blood and organs. Abortion as a moral wrong only makes sense if you thing fetus >born human, since the inherent nature of pregnancy is a trespass on one person's body by another. So pregnant people/women seeking abortion are just sluts dodging responsibility (and/or god's plan if you're a real die-hard like Adam), or children being duped by big bad PP, or non-existent as the case is all those fetus in the void cartoons. I'm pretty sure he meant to say "has he ever met a pro-choice person?"
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
AGC because finally a conservative admits that Clinton is not & never will be a socialist of any sort
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
Thump! posted:I think the ones that are bigger than the limitations are admin specials. Generally the admins are cool with adding oversized emotes though. Just buy a placeholder and pm them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
I thought Hillary is still very much in the lead? What's with all these cartoons suggesting Bernie has her on the ropes
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
Silver2195 posted:That doesn't follow. Not everyone believes that trespass on one person's body by another justifies killing them. It justifies ending the trespass if it's unwanted, death is just a side effect. But really this isn't about good faith moral discussion; it about hypocrisy. The common wisdom in the US is that organ donation must be voluntary to be ethical, but you don't see pro-lifers raising a hue and cry over all the lives lost to selfish people dodging a responsibility in that context. They don't care about preserving lives just like they don't care about what pregnancy really is and the burden it constitutes.They just want to feel like defenders of the innocent with as little work or moral comical ion as possible.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Raserys posted:I thought Hillary is still very much in the lead? What's with all these cartoons suggesting Bernie has her on the ropes He tied her in Iowa and won New Hampshire so he is sorta tied with her now even though he probably won't do anywhere near as well going forward.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:I'm pretty sure he meant to say "has he ever met a pro-choice person?" I did mean to write "pro-choice" and got quoted before I caught it/changed it. I don't think Adam has met any people though. and I'm a "she"
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 22:35 |
|
|
there wolf posted:It justifies ending the trespass if it's unwanted, death is just a side effect. I don't think that defence is gonna hold up in court. Well, maybe if the trespasser happens to be black. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2016 19:54
|
|
